Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:33:19.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residual intersections are Koszul–Fitting ideals

Part of: Special varieties Commutative algebra: Homological methods Local rings and semilocal rings Cycles and subschemes Theory of modules and ideals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2019

Vinicius Bouça  and
S. Hamid Hassanzadeh
Vinicius Bouça
Affiliation:
Instituto de Matemática, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil email [email protected], [email protected]
S. Hamid Hassanzadeh
Affiliation:
Instituto de Matemática, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil email [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe generators of disguised residual intersections in any commutative Noetherian ring. It is shown that, over Cohen–Macaulay rings, the disguised residual intersections and algebraic residual intersections are the same, for ideals with sliding depth. This coincidence provides structural results for algebraic residual intersections in a quite general setting. It is shown how the DG-algebra structure of Koszul homologies affects the determination of generators of residual intersections. It is shown that the Buchsbaum–Eisenbud family of complexes can be derived from the Koszul–Čech spectral sequence. This interpretation of Buchsbaum–Eisenbud families has a crucial rule to establish the above results.

Keywords

residual intersectionsFitting idealsKitt idealsresidual approximation complexessliding depthdisguised residual intersection

MSC classification

Primary: 13C40: Linkage, complete intersections and determinantal ideals 13D02: Syzygies, resolutions, complexes
Secondary: 13H10: Special types (Cohen-Macaulay, Gorenstein, Buchsbaum, etc.) 14C17: Intersection theory, characteristic classes, intersection multiplicities 14M06: Linkage
Type
Research Article
Information
Compositio Mathematica , Volume 155 , Issue 11 , November 2019 , pp. 2150 - 2179
Copyright
© The Authors 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The first author was partially supported by PhD scholarships from CAPES-Brazil and from FAPERJ-Brazil. The second author was partially supported by the grant ‘bolsa de produtividade 301407/2016-9’ from CNPq-Brazil.

References

Artin, M. and Nagata, M., Residual intersection in Cohen–Macaulay rings , J. Math. Kyoto Univ. (1972), 307–323.Google Scholar
Avramov, L. and Herzog, J., The Koszul algebra of a codimension 2 embedding , Math. Z. 175 (1980), 249–260.Google Scholar
Bouça, V., Generators of residual intersections, PhD thesis, Institute of Mathematics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (2019).Google Scholar
Bruns, W. and Herzog, J., Cohen–Macaulay rings, revised version (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).Google Scholar
Bruns, W., Kustin, A. and Miller, M., The resolution of the generic residual intersection of a complete intersection , J. Algebra 128 (1990), 214–239.Google Scholar
Chardin, M., Eisenbud, D. and Ulrich, B., Hilbert functions, residual intersections, and residually S 2 ideals , Compos. Math. 125 (2001), 193–219.Google Scholar
Chardin, M., Eisenbud, D. and Ulrich, B., Hilbert series of residual intersections , Compos. Math. 151 (2015), 1663–1687.Google Scholar
Chardin, M., Naeliton, J. and Tran, Q. H., Cohen–Macaulayness and canonical module of residual intersections , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 371 (2019), 1601–1630.Google Scholar
Chardin, M. and Ulrich, B., Liaison and Castelnuovo–Mumford regularity , Amer. J. Math. 124 (2002), 1103–1124.Google Scholar
Chasles, M., Construction des coniques qui satisfont a cinque conditions , C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 58 (1864), 297–308.Google Scholar
Corso, A., Huneke, C., Katz, D. and Vasconcelos, W., Integral closure of ideals and annihilators of homology , in Commutative algebra, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 244 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006), 33–48.Google Scholar
Deconcini, C. and Strickland, E., On the variety of complexes , Adv. Math. 41 (1981), 57–77.Google Scholar
Eisenbud, D., Commutative algebra with a view toward algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 150 (Springer, New York, NY, 1995).Google Scholar
Eisenbud, D., An unexpected property of some residual intersections, in New trends in syzygies, Banff International Research Station (2018), http://www.birs.ca/events/2018/5-day-workshops/18w5133/videos/watch/201806270902-Eisenbud.html.Google Scholar
Eisenbud, D. and Ulrich, B., Duality and socle generators of residual intersections , J. Reine Angew. Math. (2018), doi:10.1515/crelle-2017-0045.Google Scholar
Fulton, W., Intersection theory, second edition (Springer, 1998).Google Scholar
Hartshorne, R., Huneke, C. and Ulrich, B., Residual intersections of licci ideals are glicci , Michigan Math. J. 61 (2012), 675–701.Google Scholar
Hassanzadeh, S. H., Cohen–Macaulay residual intersections and their Castelnuovo–Mumford regularity , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 6371–6394.Google Scholar
Hassanzadeh, S. H. and Naeliton, J., Residual intersections and the annihilator of Koszul homologies , Algebra Number Theory 10 (2016), 737–770.Google Scholar
Herzog, J., Simis, A. and Vasconcelos, W., Koszul homology and blowing-up rings , in Commutative Algebra, Trento, 1981, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 84 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1983), 79–169.Google Scholar
Herzog, J., Vasconcelos, W. V. and Villarreal, R., Ideals with sliding depth , Nagoya Math. J. 99 (1985), 159–172.Google Scholar
Huneke, C., Strongly Cohen–Macaulay schemes and residual intersections , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 277 (1983), 739–763.Google Scholar
Huneke, C., The Koszul homology of an ideal , Adv. Math. 56 (1985), 295–318.Google Scholar
Huneke, C. and Ulrich, B., Residual intersection , J. Reine Angew. Math. 390 (1988), 1–20.Google Scholar
Kleiman, S., Chasles’s enumerative theory of conics: a historical introduction , in Studies in algebraic geometry, Studies in Mathematics, vol. 20 (Mathematical Association of America, 1980), 117–138.Google Scholar
Kustin, A., Miller, M. and Ulrich, B., Generating a residual intersection , J. Algebra 146 (1992), 335–384.Google Scholar
Kustin, A. and Ulrich, B., A family of complexes associated to an almost alternating map, with applications to residual intersections , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 95(461) (1992).Google Scholar
Peskine, C. and Szpiro, L., Liaison des variete algebriques , Invent. Math. (1974), 271–302.Google Scholar
Ulrich, B., Remarks on residual intersections , in Free resolutions in commutative algebra and algebraic geometry, Research Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2, eds Eisenbud, D. and Huneke, C. (Jones and Bartlett, 1992), 133–138.Google Scholar
Ulrich, B., Artin–Nagata properties and reduction of ideals , Contemp. Math. 159 (1994), 373–400.Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, W. V., Arithmetic of blowup algebras, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 195 (Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Wu, X., Residual intersections and some applications , Duke. Math. J. 75 (1994), 733–758.Google Scholar