Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 June 2009
1 Benjamin, Walter, “Some Motifs in Baudelaire,” in Charles Baudelaire: A Lyric Poet in the Era of High Capitalism (London:New Left Books, 1973), 107–54, at 113.Google Scholar
2 Bataidlle, Georges, “The Notion of Expenditure,” in Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927–1939, Stoekel, Alan, ed. (Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press, 1985), 116–29, at 118 (first published in La Critique Sociale 7, [01 1933]).Google Scholar
3 Bataille, Georges, The Accursed Share, vol. 1, Hurley, Robert, trans. (New York:Zone Books, 1988; first published; Paris, Les Editions de Minuit, 1967).Google Scholar
4 A more detailed description with requisite bibliographic information can be found in Taussig, M., The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America (Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina Press, 1980).Google Scholar
5 Benjamin, Walter, “Some Motifs in Baudelaire,” 141.Google Scholar
6 Benjamin, Walter, “Theoretics of Knowledge, Theory of Progress,” in The Philosophical Forum, XV (Fall-Winter, 1983–84), 1–40, at 6 (Konvolut N in Das Passagen-Werk, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1982, Band 2, 571–611).Google Scholar
7 Compare with Mehlman's, Jeffrey recent work, Walter Benjamin for Children: An Essay on His Radio Years (Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1993), 28–30, in which Mehlman draws attention to Benjamin's radio story for children concerning the 1755 earthquake of Lisbon-Benjamin's point being that he disputed the older theory that earthquakes are due to pressure from the earth's fiery core and favored the theory that the earth's surface is constantly shifting, the result of tension from the permanently unstable tectonic plates.Google Scholar
8 Benjamin, , “Theses On The Philosophy of History,” in Illuminations (New York:Schocken, 1968), 253–64, at 255.Google Scholar
9 Benjamin, , “Theses,” 262–3.Google Scholar
10 Bataille, G., Consumption, vol. 1 of The Accursed Share, 21.Google Scholar
11 A liter in 1992 there cost 5,000 pesos (around six United States dollars) and covered around one and a half acres in two days of labor costing around 6,000 pesos, whereas working the same land and area with a machete or pala could take 20 days of labor at cost of around 60,000 pesos-ten times as much!
12 Benjamin, Walter, “Some Motifs in Baudelaire,” 107–54, at 139–40.Google Scholar
13 Taussig, Michael, “Coming Home: Ritual and Labor Migration in a Colombian Town” (Working Paper Series Number 30, Centre for Developing Area Studies, McGill University, Montreal, 1982).Google Scholar
14 Taussig, Michael, “La magia del estado,: Maria Lionza y Simón Bolívar en la Venezuela contemporanea,” in Maniolo Guttiérez Éstévez etal, eds, De palabra y obra en el nuevo mundo, Vol 2:encuentros interetnicos (Madrid:Siglo XXI, 1992).Google Scholar
15 Taussig, Michael, Shamanism, Colonialism, and the Wild Man: A Study in Terror and Healing (Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Thanks to the hospitality of the Mfete family and Adam Ashforth.
17 See the unnumbered footnote at the beginning of this article.
18 Bataille, , Nietzsche and Communism, in Sovereignty, vol. 3, 365–71,Google Scholar at 367, of The Accursed Share. Nietzsche, Friederich, Twilight of the Idols (or How to Philosophise with a Hammer), Hollingdale, R. J., trans. (Middlesex:Penguin, 1990), 86.Google Scholar
19 Nietzsche, Friederich, The Gay Science, Kaufmann, Walter, trans. (New York:Vintage, 1974), 274.Google Scholar On the concept of “the eternal return,” Bataille wrote early on in his life, in 1937: “Of all the dramatic representations that have given Nietzsche's life the character of a laceration and of the breathless combat of human existence, the idea of the eternal return is certainly the most inaccessible.” This passage is in “Nietzsche and the Fascists,” in Visions of Excess, Stockel, Alan, ed. (Minnesota:University of Minnesota Press, 1985), 182–96, at 191.Google Scholar
20 Bataille, G., “The Notion of Expenditure,” 118.Google Scholar
21 Bataille, , in Consumption, vol. 1 of The Accursed Share, 106.Google Scholar
22 Bataille, , in Consumption, vol. 1 of The Accursed Share, 9.Google Scholar
23 When I write “economic,” I have, of course, in mind the way that with modern capitalism economic has come to stand not simply for goods and prices, production, distribution, and exchange but for a totalizing way of thinking reasonably, as Lionel Robbins put it, defining economics as the science of the logical apportioning of scarce means to alternate ends—hence a definition of reason, no less than of efficiency. Bataille is fascinating because he, too, creates a totalizing definition of economics as a logic, only in this case the logic—to employ the treacherous language of Lord Robbins et al.—is of ends, not means, and is therefore drastically opposed to the economic reason of capitalist schemata of means and ends. Here one sees, therefore, the radical possibilities opened up by a science of consumption that is true to consumption proper.
24 Bataille, , in Sovereignty, vol. 3 of The Accursed Share, 209.Google Scholar
25 First in this very journal! See Taussig, M., “The Genesis of Capitalism Amongst A South American Peasantry,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 19:2 (1977), 130–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also the wonderful essay by Edelman, Marc, “Landlords and the Devil: Class, Ethnic, and Gender Dimensions of Central American Peasant Narratives,” in Cultural Anthropology, 9:1 (1994), 58–93, and also M. Taussig, The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America. The terminology of use value and exchange value hearkens back to Aristotle's discussion of oeconomia in The Politics. In building on this, Marx couples it to the very basis of Hegel's philosophy, the logical and historical problem of how the concrete particular can be coordinated with the universal (as with money and the modern state).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Mauss, Marcel, The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies (New York:Norton, 1967; first published as Essai sur le don, forme archaique de l'échange, Paris, 1925).Google Scholar
27 Lévi-Strauss, Claude, The Elementary Structures of Kinship (Boston:Beacon, 1969).Google Scholar
28 Derrida has recently expounded on this with great verve and insight. See Denida, Jacques, Counterfeit Money (Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
29 Mauss, The Gift, 1.
30 Kojeve, Alexandre, Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit Assembled by Raymond Queneau (Ithaca:Cornell University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
31 Bataille, Sovereignty, vol. 3 of The Accursed Share, 347. Towards the end of his essay on the gift, Mauss makes two interesting moves in this respect. One is to point out that, except for the European middle ages, all his examples of the gift come from societies structured into symmetrical “segments” in which “individuals, even the most influential, were less serious, avaricious and selfish than we are; externally at least they were and are generous and more ready to give” (p. 79). The next move is to relate the “exaggerated generosity” to the fragility of peace in such societies, to see, in other words, the gift as that which is composed by a peace forever fragile in the shadow of imminent violence. From this Mauss draws the lesson for the naturalness, if not the need, for socialism in modern Europe: the socialism of a gift being “wealth amassed and redistributed in the mutual respect and reciprocal generosity that education can impart” (p. 81). Karl Polanyi's anthropologically informed distinction between reciprocity, redistribution, and markets as the three basic forms of economy comes to mind, especially since it regards Polanyi's equation of socialism with redistribution (the model for which are Trobriand chiefdoms!). See for example Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston:Beacon Press, 1957),Google Scholar ch. 4, and also Sahlins, Marshal on the gift and war in Stoneage Economics (Chicago:Aldine Atherton, 1972). Like Mauss and Polanyi, Bataille saw the solution to the crucial problems of the world economic order as requiring the capitalist states to consider “the gift in a rational manner” (in Sovereignty, vol. 3 of Accursed Share, 429).Google Scholar
32 The political repressions involved come across strongly in Bataille's articles in the late 1930s on Nietzsche reprinted in Visions of Excess (see note 19).
33 Bataille, Georges, The Impossible (1962, first published as The Hatred of Poetry).Google Scholar
34 “Too-muchness” is a term I take from Brown's, Norman O. essay, “Dionysus in 1990,” in his Apocalypse and/or Metamorphoses (Berkeley:University of California Press, 1990), 179–200, at 183.Google Scholar
35 Aristotle, The Politics.
36 Franklin, Benjamin, Advice to a Young Tradesman, cited in Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (New York:Scribner's, 1958), 49.Google Scholar
37 Financial Times Weekend, May 29/May 30, 1993.
38 Berman, Marshall, All That 1s Solid Melts into Air (New York:Simon and Schuster, 1982).Google Scholar
39 Bataille, , The History of Eroticism, vol. 2 of The Accursed Share, 94.Google Scholar
40 Hegel, G. W. F., The Phenomenology of Spirit.Google Scholar
41 Bataille, , The History of Eroticism, vol. 2 of Accursed Share, 101.Google Scholar
42 Nietzsche, , The Gay Science, no. 125, “The Madman,” 181.Google Scholar
43 Nietzsche, , The Gay Science, no. 342, “Incipit Tragoedia,” 275 (end of Book Four, introduction to the concept of “the eternal return”).Google Scholar
44 Caillois, Roger, “Mimicry and Legendary Psychaesthenia,” October, 31 (Winter 1984),Google Scholar 1732, at 30 (originally published in Paris as “Mimétisme et psychasthenie légendaire,” in Minotaure 7 [1935]). For a wide-ranging discussion of this, see Taussig, , Mimesis and Aletrity: A Particular History of the Senses (New York:Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
45 Nietzsche, , Twilight of the Idols, 84.Google Scholar
46 Nietzsche argues in Twilight of the Idols, 87, and throughout his works, that mimicry is no less the essential weapon of power throughout history than it is of thinking and the cultural construction of reality itself. Moreover, he sets up two kinds of mimicry: on the one hand, the Dionysian and, on the other, that of calculation, dissimulation, self-control, and lying. Thus is raised the fascinating problem: How do these two forms interrelate through history and what are the implications thereof for understanding the gift in relation to capitalism? This question can now be seen as what guides one of the most significant contributions to social theory in the twentieth century, namely Dialectic of Enlightenment by Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodore W. (New York:Continuum, 1987). As to the identity of the devil, Nietzsche had a swift response: that Christianity distilled the Evil One out of Dionysus—a point explored in The Anti-Christ, 123–99, at 129, in Twilight of the Idols and The Anti-Christ (Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin, 1990).Google Scholar
47 Nietzsche, , “The Madman,” in The Gay Science, 181–2.Google Scholar
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.