Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:08:11.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Social Construction of Population Science: An Intellectual, Institutional, and Political History of Twentieth-Century Demography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Susan Greenhalgh
Susan Greenhalgh
Affiliation:
University of California at Irvine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Demographers have often lamented their field's reputation as one of “all methods and no theory.” Pushed by advances in computer technology and pulled by the appeal of being the “hardest,” most scientistic of the social sciences, the field has grown ever more sophisticated in mathematical technique. At the same time, theory has languished, becoming increasingly narrow and divorced from the realities of a rapidly changing post-Cold War world (McNicoll 1992). Leading members of the field routinely bemoan this state of affairs, though proposals for remaking the discipline are rarely offered (Preston 1993; Keyfitz 1993).

Type
Disciplinary Delimitations
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 26 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amin, Samir. 1989. Eurocentrism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter; and Bergman, Elihu. 1973. Power and Choice: The Formulation of American Population Policy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Becher, Tony. 1989. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Buckingham, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
Blaut, J. M. 1993. The Colonizer's Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bledsoe, Caroline H.; Hill, Allan G.; Umberto D'Allesandro; and Patricia Langeroc. 1994. “Constructing Natural Fertility: The Use of Western Contraceptive Technologies in Rural Gambia.” Population and Development Review, 20:1, 81–113.Google Scholar
Bogue, Donald J.. 1993. “How Demography Was Born.” Demography, 30:4, 519–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogue, Donald J.. 1964. “The Demographic Breakthrough: From Projection to Control.” Population Index, 30:4, 449–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, John C.. 1993. “Approaches to Anthropological Demography: An Overview,” in International Population Conference of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population Montreal, 1993, vol. 4:303–11.Google Scholar
Caldwell, John C.. 1988. “Micro-Approaches: Similarities and Differences, Strengths and Weaknesses,” in Caldwell, John C., Hill, Allan G., and Hull, Valerie J., eds., Micro-Approaches to Demographic Research, 458–70. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Caldwell, John C., eds., 1982. Theory of Fertility Decline. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, John C., and Caldwell, Pat. 1986. Limiting Population Growth and the Ford Foundation Contribution. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Caldwell, John C., Caldwell, Pat; and Caldwell, Bruce. 1987. “Anthropology and Demography: The Mutual Reinforcement of Speculation and Research.” Current Anthropology, 28:1, 25–43.Google Scholar
CD Editors., 1970a. “The PAA: A Time for Change.” Concerned Demography, 1:4, 1–3.Google Scholar
CD Editors., 1970b. “Reader Response—Pro and Con.” Concerned Demography, 1:4, 10.Google Scholar
CD Editors., 1970c. “The Population Studies Center, University of Michigan.” Concerned Demography, 2:2, 39–41.Google Scholar
CD Editors., 1969a. “Why a New Organization?” Concerned Demography, 1:1, 1,3,4,6.Google Scholar
CD Editors., 1969b. “Beginnings of Concerned Demographers.” Concerned Demography, 1:1,2,6.Google Scholar
CD Editors., 1969c. “Population—The Second Front.” Concerned Demography, 1:2, 1–3,7.Google Scholar
CD Editors., 1969d. “NIH, NSF: Up against the Wall?” Concerned Demography, 1:6 2, 6.Google Scholar
Carter, Anthony T. 1995. “Agency and Fertility: For an Ethnography of Practice,” in Greenhalgh, Susan, ed., Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry, 55–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, John; and Wilson, Christopher. 1987. “Demand Theories of the Fertility Transition: An Iconoclastic View.” Population Studies, 41:1, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Herman E. 1971. “A Marxian-Malthusian View of Poverty and Development.” Population Studies, 25:1, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, Kingsley. 1945. “The World Demographic Transition.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 237: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeny, Paul. 1988. “Social Science and Population Policy.” Population and Development Review, 14:3, 451–79.Google Scholar
Demeny, Paul. 1975. “Population Policy: The Role of National Governments.” Population and Development Review, 1:1, 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon-Mueller, Ruth. 1993. Population Policy and Women's Rights: Transforming Reproductive Choice. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Peter J.. 1990. Nature Against Us: The United States and the World Population Crisis, 1965–1980. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Finkle, Jason L.; and Crane, Barbara B.. 1985. “Ideology and Politics at Mexico City: The United States at the 1984 International Conference on Population.” Population and Development Review, 1:1, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkle, Jason L.; and Crane, Barbara B.. 1975. “The Politics of Bucharest: Population, Development, and the New International Economic Order.” Population and Development Review, 1:1, 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality, vol. I. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Freedman, Ronald; and Takeshita, John Y.. 1969. Family Planning in Taiwan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, Thomas. Forthcoming. “Culture Theory and Population Process: Toward a Thicker Demography,” in Kertzer, David I. and Fricke, Thomas, eds., Anthropological Demography: Toward a New Synthesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fricke, Thomas. 1995. “History, Marriage Politics, and Demographic Events in the Central Himalaya,” in Greenhalgh, Susan, ed., Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry, 202–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Steve. 1993. Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: The Coming of Science and Technology Studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F.. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review, 48:6, 781–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillis, John R.; Tilly, Louise A.; and Levine, David; eds. 1992. The European Experience of Declining Fertility, 1850–1970: The Quiet Revolution. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Faye; and Rapp, Rayna, eds. 1995. Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, Susan, ed. 1995a. Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, Susan. 1995b. “Anthropology Theorizes Reproduction: Integrating Practice, Political Economic, and Feminist Perspectives,” in Greenhalgh, Susan, ed., Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry, 3–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, Susan. 1990. “Toward a Political Economy of Fertility: Anthropological Perspectives.” Population and Development Review, 16:1, 85–106.Google Scholar
Guest, Avery M.. 1994a. “Gatekeeping among the Demographers,” in Simon, Rita J. and Fyfe, James J., eds., Editors as Gatekeepers: Getting Published in the Social Sciences. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Guest, Avery M. 1994b. [Letter]. January 2.Google Scholar
Hall, M.-Francoise. 1973. “Population Growth: U.S. and Latin American Views—An Interpretation of the Response of the United States and Latin America to Latin American Population Growth.” Population Studies, 27:3, 415–29.Google Scholar
Hammel, E. A. 1990. “A Theory of Culture for Demography.” Population and Development Review, 16:3,455–85.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies, 14:3, 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra, ed. 1993. The “Racial” Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Philip M. 1964. “Demographic Dimensions of World Politics,” in Mudd, Stuart, ed., The Population Crisis and the Use of World Resources. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mudd, Stuart, ed. 1958a. Population and World Politics. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mudd, Stuart. 1958b. “Introduction,” in Hauser, Philip M., ed., Population and World Politics, 9–23. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Philip M., and Otis Duncan, Dudley, eds. 1959a. The Study of Population: An Inventory and Appraisal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Philip M., Duncan, Dudley. 1959b. “Overview and Conclusions,” in Houser, Philip M. and Otis Duncan, Dudley, eds., The Study of Population: An Inventory and Appraisal, 1–26. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Philip M., Duncan, Dudley. 1959c. “Demography as a Profession,” in Hauser, Philip M. and Otis Duncan, Dudley, eds., The Study of Population: An Inventory and Appraisal, 106–17. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary E. 1989. “Knowers, Knowing, Known: Feminist Theory and Claims of Truth.” Signs, 14:3, 533–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendershot, Gerry E. 1973. “Population Size, Military Power, and Antinatal Power.” Demography, 10:4, 517–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, Louis. 1976. Population: Analysis and Models. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Dennis. 1991. “The Ideological Origins of the Population Association of America.“ Population and Development Review, 17:1, 1ȁ34.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Dennis. 1988. “Orthodoxy and Revisionism in American Demography.” Population and Development Review, 14:4, 541–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Dennis. 1983. “Demography as Social Science and Policy Science.” Population and Development Review, 9:1, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, David G. 1994. Social Bodies: Science, Reproduction, and Italian Modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kantner, John F. 1982. “Population, Policy, and Political Atavism.” Demography, 19:4, 429–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kertzer, David I. 1995. “Political Economic and Cultural Explanations of Demographic Behavior,” in Greenhalgh, Susan, ed., Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry, 29–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kertzer, David I., 1993. Sacrificed for Honor: Italian Infant Abandonment and the Politics ofControl. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Keyfitz, Nathan. 1993. “Thirty Years of Demography and Demography.” Demography, 30:4, 533–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knodel, John; and Walle, Etienne van de. 1979. “Lessons from the Past: Policy Implications of Historical Fertility Studies.” Population and Development Review, 5:2, 217–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreager, Philip. 1993. “Anthropological Demography and the Limits of Diffusionism,” in International Population Conference of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, Montreal 1993, vol. 4: 313–26. Liège: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E.. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lunde, Anders S. 1981. “The Beginning of the Population Association of America.” Population Index, 47:3, 479–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaughey, Robert A. 1984. International Studies and Academic Enterprise: A Chapter in the Enclosure of American Learning. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Emily. 1987. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N.. 1994. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNicoll, Geoffrey. 1994. “Institutional Analysis of Fertility,” in Lindahl-Kiessing, Kerstin and Lundberg, Hans, eds., Population, Economic Development, and the Environment, 199–230. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lundberg, Hans. 1992. “The Agenda of Population Studies: A Commentary and Complaint.” Population and Development Review, 18:3, 399–420.Google Scholar
Lundberg, Hans. 1980. “Institutional Determinants of Fertility Change.” Population and Development Review, 6:3, 441–62.Google Scholar
Messer–Davidow, Ellen; Shumway, David R.; and Sylvan, David J., eds. 1993. Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Moran, William E., Jr. 1965. Population Growth—Threat to Peace? New York: P. J. Kennedy and Sons.Google Scholar
National Research Council (Working Group on Population Growth and Economic Development, Committee on Population).Google Scholar
Moran, William E. 1986. Population Growth and Economic Development: Policy Questions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Notestein, Frank W. 1951. “Policy of the Indian Government on Family Limitation.” Population Index, 17:4, 254–63.Google Scholar
Notestein, Frank W.. 1945. “Population—The Long View,” in Schultz, Theodore, ed.,Foodfor the World, 36–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oudshoorn, Nelly.. 1994. Beyond the Natural Body: An Archaeology of Sex Hormones. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
PDR. 1975. “Editor's Note.” Population and Development Review, 1:1, iii–iv.Google Scholar
Petchesky, Rosalind Pollack. 1984. Abortion and Woman's Choice: The State, Sexuality, and Reproductive Freedom. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew, ed. 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piotrow, Phyllis Tilson. 1973. World Population Crisis: The United States Response. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Prakash, Gyan. 1990. “Writing Post–Orientalist Histories of the Third World: Perspectives from Indian Historiography.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 32:2, 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Samuel H. 1993. “The Contours of Demography: Estimates and Projections.” Demography, 30:4, 593–606.Google Scholar
Preston, Samuel H..1987. “The Social Sciences and the Population Problem.” Sociological Forum, 2:4, 619–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, James. 1978. From Private Vice to Public Virtue: The Birth Control MovementAmerican Society Since 1830. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Reid T. 1971. “Introduction.” Concerned Demography, 3:1, 3–4.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. 1973. Communication Strategies for Family Planning. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy. 1991. The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy.. 1979. “The Development of the Social Sciences,” in Oleson, Alexandra and Voss, John, eds.; The Organization of Knowledge in Modern America, 1860–1920, 107–38. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Said, Edward S. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Schneider, Jane; and Schneider, Peter. 1996. Festival of the Poor: Fertility Decline and the Ideology of Class in Sicily, 1860–1980. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Peter. 1984. “Demographic Transitions in a Sicilian Rural Town.” Journal of Family History, 9:3, 245–73.Google Scholar
Schofield, Roger; and Coleman, David. 1986. “Introduction: The State of Population Theory,” in Coleman, David and Schofield, Roger, eds., The State of Population Theory: Forward from Malathus, 1–13. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shryock, Henry S.; and Siegel, Jacob S.. 1976. The Methods and Materials of Demography, condensed ed. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Shumway, David R.; and Messer–Davidow, Ellen. 1991. “Disciplinarity: An Introduction.” Poetics Today, 12:2, 201–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szreter, Simon. 1993. “The Idea of Demographic Transition and the Study of Fertility: A Critical Intellectual History.” Population and Development Review, 19:4, 659–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teachman, Jay D.; Paasch, Kathleen; and Carver, Karen Price. 1993. “Thirty Years of Demography.” Demography, 30:4, 523–32.Google Scholar
Thompson, Warren S. 1929. “Population.” American Journal of Sociology, 34:6, 959–75.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, ed. 1978. Historical Studies of Changing Fertility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tipps, Dean C. 1973. “Modernization Theory and the Comparative Study of Societies: A Critical Perspective.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15:2, 199–226.Google Scholar
Vance, Rupert B. 1959. “The Development and Status of American Demography,” in Hauser, Philip M. and Otis Duncan, Dudley, eds., The Study of Population: An Inventory and Appraisal, 286–313. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Philip M. and Otis Duncan, Dudley. ed., 1956 [1952]. “Is Theory for Demographers?,” in Spengler, Joseph J., and Otis Duncan, Dudley, eds., Population Theory and Policy: Selected Readings, 88–94. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Vining, Daniel R., Jr. 1995. “More on Demography.” P.A.A. Affairs, Summer, 2.Google Scholar
Watkins, Susan Cotts. 1991. From Provinces into Nations: Demographic IntegrationWestern Europe, 1870–1960. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, Susan Cotts. 1987. “The Fertility Transition: Europe and the Third World Compared.” Sociological Forum, 2:4, 645–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Susan Cotts. 1986. “Conclusion,” in Coale, Ansley J. and Watkins, Susan C., eds., The Decline of Fertility in Europe, 420–49. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar