Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:07:19.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“A Scramble for Freight”: The Politics of Collaboration along and across the Railway Tracks of Korea under Japanese Rule

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Jun Uchida
Jun Uchida
Affiliation:
Department of History, Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

New interpretations constantly grow around a familiar story, like life along colonial railways. From the vast plains of America to the subcontinent of India, scholars have noted, railroads played a pivotal role in inscribing power on uncharted terrain. They facilitated conquest, opened lands for settlement, and fueled the colonial extractive economy. And railroads were more than mere “tools of empire.” From missionaries and administrators in the field to interlocutors in the distant metropole, Europeans celebrated railroads and their locomotives as vehicles of their “civilizing mission” on the benighted colonial frontier. Not only did railroads reshape local lands into well-ordered spaces of production, they also remade their non-European dwellers by uplifting them from their alleged state of cultural decline. An instrument of progress, industry, and rationality, the railroad was the personification of the model colonizer: it captured lands as well as the minds of their inhabitants, not by brute force but by the sheer power of modernity (see figure 1).

Type
Research Article
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 117 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abe, Mitsuie. 1919. Letter to Saitō Makoto (undated). Chōsen tōchi iken. Saitō Makoto Bunsho, Kokuritsu Kokkai Toshokan Kensei Shiryōshitsu, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
Adas, Michael. 1989. Machines as the Measure of Men: Science, Technology, and Ideologies of Western Dominance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
An, Pyŏng-jik, ed. 2001. Han'guk kyŏngje sŏngjangsa: yebijŏk kochal. Seoul: Sŏul Taehakkyo Ch'ulp'anbu.Google Scholar
An, Pyŏng-jik et al. , eds. 1989. Kŭndae Chosŏn ŭi kyŏngje kujo. Seoul: Pibong Ch'ulp'ansa.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig, Cooper, Frederick, and Moore, Kevin W., eds. 2006. Lessons of Empire: Imperial Histories and American Power. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Chae-hŭp, ed. 1927. Chosŏnin hoesa taesangjŏm sajŏn. Kyŏngsŏng (Seoul): Puŏp Segyesa.Google Scholar
Ching, Leo T. S. 2001. Becoming “Japanese”: Colonial Taiwan and the Politics of Identity Formation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chŏng, Chae-jŏng. 1990. Singminjigi ŭi sounsongŏp kwa ilche ŭi tongje chŏngch'aek. Yŏksa Kyoyuk Yŏn'guhoe. Yŏksa Kyoyuk 48: 117–75.Google Scholar
Chŏng, Chae-jŏng. 1999. Ilche ch'imnyak kwa Han'guk ch'ŏlto: 1892–1945. Seoul: Sŏul Taehakkyo Ch'ulp'anbu.Google Scholar
Chōsen Asahi Shinbun [newspaper]. 12 June 1930.Google Scholar
Chōsen Kōron [magazine]. Sept. 1927, 45.Google Scholar
Chōsen Mainichi Shinbun [newspaper]. 29 Apr. 1930.Google Scholar
Chōsen oyobi Manshū [magazine, articles cited in text by issue date]. 1928–1930. Keijō (Seoul): Chōsen Zasshisha.Google Scholar
Chōsen Sōtokufu, Ca. 1919. Chōsen minzoku undō ni taisuru taisaku. Repr. in Saitō Makoto bunsho [a collection of government documents], vol. 9. Seoul: Koryŏ Sŏrim, 1990.Google Scholar
Chōsen Sōtokufu. Ca. 1921. Chōsen ni okeru shinshisei. Oct. Repr. in Kenichi, Kondō, ed., Saitō Sōtoku no bunka tōchi. Tokyo: Yūhō Kyōkai, 1970.Google Scholar
Chōsen Sōtokufu Tetsudōkyoku. 1940. Chōsen tetsudō 40-nen ryakushi. Keijō (Seoul): Chōsen Sōtokufu Tetsudōkyoku.Google Scholar
Chōsen Tetsudō Kyōkai. 1928. Chōsen Tetsudō Kyōkaishi. Jan. Keijō (Seoul): Chōsen Tetsudō Kyōkai.Google Scholar
Chosŏn Ilbo [newspaper, articles cited in text by date]. 1926–1931. Kyŏngsŏng (Seoul): Chosŏn Ilbosa.Google Scholar
Chōunkai. 1983–1989. Chōunkai dayori: Maruboshi nakama. Fukuoka, Japan: Chōunkai dayori Maruboshi nakama Henshūbu.Google Scholar
Cooper, Frederick. 2003. Modernizing Colonialism and the Limits of Empire. Items and Issues 4, 4: 1–9.Google Scholar
Cumings, Bruce. 1984. The Legacy of Japanese Colonialism in Korea. In, Myers, Ramon H. and Peattie, Mark R., eds., The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895–1945. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Clarence B. and Wilburn, Kenneth E. Jr., with Robinson, Ronald E., eds. 1991. Railway Imperialism. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Duus, Peter. 1995. The Abacus and the Sword: The Japanese Penetration of Korea, 1876–1910. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Carter. 1991. Offspring of Empire: The Kochang Kims and the Colonial Origins of Korean Capitalism, 1876–1945. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Ericson, Steven J. 1996. The Sound of the Whistle: Railroads and the State in Meiji Japan. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Niall. 2003. Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fuchino, Sakae, ed. 1940. Chōsen Unsō Kabushiki Kaisha jūnenshi (CUKKJ). Keijō (Seoul): Chōsen Unsō Kabushiki Kaisha.Google Scholar
Fuzan Nippō [newspaper, articles cited in text by date]. 1929, 1935. Pusan: Fuzan Nippōsha.Google Scholar
Go, Julian. 2007. The Provinciality of American Empire: ‘Liberal Exceptionalism’ and U.S. Colonial Rule, 1898–1912. Comparative Studies in Society and History 49, 1: 74–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, Manu. 2004. Producing India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, Simon. 2006. From Hegemony to Governmentality: Changing Conceptions of Power in Social History. Journal of Social History 39, 3: 705–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headrick, Daniel. 1981. The Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, Gregory. 1973. Japan's Chosen: Immigrants, Ruthlessness and Development Shock. In, Nahm, Andrew C., ed., Korea under Japanese Colonial Rule. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Ho, Samuel Pao-San. 1984. Colonialism and Development: Korea, Taiwan, and Kwantung. In, Peattie, Mark R. and Myers, Ramon H., eds., The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895–1945. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hori, Kazuo. 1995. Chōsen kōgyōka no shiteki bunseki. Tokyo: Yūhikaku.Google Scholar
Itō, Seikaku, ed. 1941. Keijō Shōkō Kaigisho nijūgonenshi. Keijō (Seoul): Keijō Shōkō Kaigisho.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Man-gil. 1975. Han'guk sangŏp ŭi yŏksa. Seoul: Sejong Taewang Kinyŏm Saŏphoe.Google Scholar
Katō, Sanjirō. 1930. Chōsen unsō gōdō shi. Keijō (Seoul): Chōsen Unsō.Google Scholar
Keijō Honmachi Keisatsu Shochō. 1930. Ungō hantai sanpa gōdō taikai ni kansuru ken. The Han'guk Yŏksa Chŏngbo Tonghap Sisŭtem, Kuksa P'yŏnch'an Wiwŏnhoe (Kyŏnggi-do Kwach'ŏnsi, South Korea).Google Scholar
Keijō Nippō [newspaper, articles cited in text by date]. 1922, 1928–1933. Keijō (Seoul): Keijō Nippōsha.Google Scholar
Keijō Shōkō Kaigisho. 1927–1928. Chōsen Keizai Zasshi. Keijō (Seoul): Keijō Shōkō Kaigisho.Google Scholar
Kerr, Ian J. 1995. Building the Railways of the Raj, 1850–1900. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, Ian J. 2003. Representation and Representations of the Railways of Colonial and Post-Colonial South Asia. Modern Asian Studies 37, 2: 298–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Yong-sŏp. 1971. Chosŏn hugi nongŏpsa yŏn'gu. II, Nongŏp pyŏndong, nonghak sajo. Seoul: Ilchogak.Google Scholar
Kimura, Kenji. 1989. Zaichō Nihonjin no shakaishi. Tokyo: Miraisha.Google Scholar
Kimura, Kenji. 2001. Kaidai. Shashi de miru Nihon keizaishi: shokuminchi-hen. Vol. 3. Tokyo: Yumani Shobō.Google Scholar
Kimura, Mitsuhiko. 1993. The Standards of Living in Colonial Korea. Journal of Economic History 53, 3: 629–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, Sŏng-bong. 2006. Shokuminchi no tetsudō. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Hyōronsha.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 1997 Japanese Colonialism and Korean Development: A Reply. World Development 25, 6: 883–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokumin Shinbun [newspaper]. 16 Dec. 1927.Google Scholar
Kublin, Hyman. 1959. The Evolution of Japanese Colonialism. Comparative Studies in Society and History 2, 1: 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, Ming-Cheng Miriam. 2002. Doctors within Borders: Profession, Ethnicity, and Modernity in Colonial Taiwan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Takenori. 2005. Chōsen nōson no ‘shokuminchi kindai’ taiken. Tokyo: Shakai Hyōronsha.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, Yoshihisa Tak. 2003. The Making of Japanese Manchuria, 1904–1932. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center.Google Scholar
McNamara, Dennis L. 1996. Trade and Transformation in Korea, 1876–1945. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 1988. Colonizing Egypt. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 1991. Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics. The American Political Science Review 85, 1: 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray Li, Tania. 2005. Beyond ‘the State’ and Failed Schemes. American Anthropologist 107, 3: 383–94.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Shiryō. 1925. Taishō 14-nen Chōsen ginkō kaisha yōroku. Keijō (Seoul): Tōa Keizai Jihōsha.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Tetsu and An, Pyŏng-jik. 1993. Kindai Chōsen kōgyōka no kenkyū. Tokyo: Nihon Hyōronsha.Google Scholar
Nihon Tsūun Kabushiki Kaisha. 1962. Shashi Nihon Tsūun Kabushiki Kaisha (SNTKK). Tokyo: Nihon Tsūun Kabushiki Kaisha.Google Scholar
Oguma, Eiji. 1998. “Nihonjin” no kyōkai. Tokyo: Shin'yōsha.Google Scholar
Osaka Mainichi Shinbun [newspaper, articles cited in text by date]. 1927 and 1930. Osaka: Osaka Mainichi Shinbunsha.Google Scholar
Park, Soon-Won. 1999. Colonial Industrialization and Labor in Korea: The Onoda Cement Factory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center.Google Scholar
Peattie, Mark R. 1984. Introduction. In, The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895–1945. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 3–51.Google Scholar
Richards, Jeffrey and MacKenzie, John M., eds. 1986. The Railway Station: A Social History. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Michael. 1988. Cultural Nationalism in Colonial Korea. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Ronald. 1972. Non-European Foundations of European Imperialism: Sketch for a Theory of Collaboration. In, Owen, Roger and Sutcliffe, Bob, eds., Studies in the Theory of Imperialism. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schmid, Andre. 2000. Colonialism and the ‘Korea Problem’ in the Historiography of Modern Japan: A Review Article. The Journal of Asian Studies 59, 4: 951–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1999. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shin, Gi-Wook and Do-hyun, Han. 1999. Colonial Corporatism: The Rural Revitalization Campaign, 1932–1940. In, Gi-Wook, Shin and Robinson, Michael, eds., Colonial Modernity in Korea. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shin, Gi-Wook and Robinson, Michael, eds. 1999. Colonial Modernity in Korea. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sin, Yong-ha. 1998. Ilche singminji kŭndaehwaron pip'an. Seoul: Munhak kwa Chisŏngsa.Google Scholar
Stoler, Ann Laura and Cooper, Frederick. 1997. Between Metropole and Colony: Rethinking a Research Agenda. In, Stoler, Ann Laura and Cooper, Frederick, eds., Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Suh, Sang-Chul. 1978. Growth and Structural Changes in the Korean Economy, 1910–1940. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taehan T'ongunsa P'yŏnch'an Wiwŏnhoe, ed. 1967. Taehan T'ongunsa. Seoul: Taehan T'ongun Chusik Hoesa.Google Scholar
Taikyū Nippō [newspaper]. 1 Feb. 1930.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Yasutaka. 1995. Nihon shokuminchi tetsudō shiron. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Hyōronsha.Google Scholar
Takasaki, Sōji. 2002. Shokuminchi Chōsen no Nihonjin. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Tokyo Asahi Shinbun [newspaper, articles cited in text by date]. 1936. Tokyo: Tokyo Asahi Shinbunsha.Google Scholar
Tonga Ilbo [newspaper, articles cited in text by date]. 1927–1928. Kyŏngsŏng (Seoul): Tonga Ilbosa.Google Scholar
Tosushi, Tadayasu. 1926. Shōunsō no kenkyū. Keijō (Seoul): Chōsen Tetsudō Kyōkai.Google Scholar
Uchida, Jun. 2003 Shokuminchiki Chōsen ni okeru dōka seisaku to zaichō Nihonjin. Chōsenshi Kenkyūkai Ronbunshū 41: 173–201.Google Scholar
Yamamura, Kōzō. 1995. Bridled Capitalism and Economic Development in Japan, 1880–1980. In, Myers, Ramon, ed., The Wealth of Nations in the Twentieth Century. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 54–79.Google Scholar
Young, Louise. 1988. Japan's Total Empire: Manchuria and the Culture of Wartime Imperialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar