Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:32:25.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resource Politics and State-Society Relations: Why Are Certain States More Inclusive than Others?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2014

Jin Sato
Jin Sato*
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, The University of Tokyo
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why do some states resort to more exclusive top-down management of natural resources, while others tend to be more inclusive and solicit participation from civil society? By rejecting the simple characterization of the state within the narrow spectrum of “weak” and “strong,” this article investigates resource-mediated relations in the peripheral social groups that the state has sought to transform as part of the process of modernization. Focusing on Siam and Japan, I highlight alternative explanations based on ethnicity and labor, bureaucratic mindset, and agro-ecological conditions. I argue that the more embedded nature of the labor force in resources sectors made it necessary for the Japanese government to engage with marginal people, whereas the enclave nature of such sectors in Siam allowed elites to establish a distinctively exclusive system. While the Japanese state quickly learned to accommodate people at the fringes through its recognition and acceptance of existing customs in the management of resources, and even facilitated the creation of local organizations such as forest unions, the Siamese were consistently more exclusionary and even oppressed indigenous groups living at the state's territorial periphery. Resource interventions targeted at the fringes of land and society in Japan and Siam produced lasting effects on state-society relations that have extended far beyond their original intention of securing resource procurement. Understanding the historical roots of such relations offers a fresh perspective from which to explain why state inaction prevails in the present debate on state devolution in Thailand.

Type
Research Article
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 745 - 773
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agrawal, Arun. 2009. Environmentality: Technologies of Governance and State Making. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Shinbusha, Asahi. 1999. Meiji Taisho Ki Nihon Keizai Toukei Souran [General economic statistics of the Meiji and Taisho periods]. Tokyo: Namiki Shobo.Google Scholar
Baker, Charles and Pasuk, Pongpaichit. 2005. A History of Thailand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barton, Gregory and Bennett, Barett. 2010. Forestry as Foreign Policy: Anglo-Siamese Relations and the Origins of Britain's Informal Empire in the Teak Forests of Northern Siam. Itinerario 34, 2: 65–86.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert. 2001. Prosperity and Violence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bunnag, Tej. 1977. Provincial Administration of Siam, 1892–1915: The Ministry of the Interior under Prince Damrong Rajanubhab, Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cushman, Jennifer. 1991. Family and State: The Formation of a Sino-Thai Tin-Mining Dynasty, 1797–1932. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doi, Teppei. 2010. Kindai no Kogyō niokeru rōdōshijō to koyō [Characteristics of the labor market and employment in the mining industry in modern Japan: Research using the management material of Tomoko at Ashio and Osarizawa mines]. Shakaikeizaishigaku [Socio-economic history] 76, 1: 3–20.Google Scholar
Doner, Richard, Ritchie, Bryan, and Slater, Dan. 2005. Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States: Northeast and Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective. International Organization 50, 2: 327–61.Google Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2008. Crude Democracy: Natural Resource Wealth and Political Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter, ed. 1997. State-Society Synergy: Government and Social Capital in Development. IAS Research Series no. 94. Berkeley: Institute for International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Falcus, Malcolm. 1989. Early British Business in Thailand. In Devenport-Hines, R.P.T. and Jones, Geoffrey, eds., British Business in Asia since 1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feeny, David. 1989. Decline of Property Rights in Man in Thailand, 1800–1913. Journal of Economic History 49, 2: 285–96.Google Scholar
Fine, Ben. 2007. Social Capital. In Clark, David Alexander, ed., The Elgar Companion to Development Studies. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Fukushima, Masao. 1970. Chiso Kaisei no Kenkyu [A study of land-tax reform]. Expanded edition. Tokyo: Yūhikaku.Google Scholar
Garon, Sheldon. 1987. The State and Labor in Modern Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, James. 1971. Economic Change in Thailand, 1850–1970. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kikuma, Mitsuru. 1980. Kokuyū Rinya no Jimoto Riyō to Ikurin Rōdō Soshiki no Tenkai Kōzō: Itakurin seido no shiteki bunseki [Local use of national forest and the evolution of labor organization for reforestation: Historical analysis of commissioned forests]. Research Bulletin of the College of Experiment Forests, Hokkiado University 37, 2: 479–608.Google Scholar
Kitahara, Atsushi. 2010. Shinrin no Hozen to Riyō no Mujun to Funsō [Contradiction and conflicts over the conservation and utilization of forests]. In Ken, Pauline and Kitahara, Atushi, eds., Funsō Kaiketsu, Gurōbaruka, Chiiki, Bunka [Conflict resolution, globalization, local and cultural]. Tokyo: Minerva Shobo.Google Scholar
Koizumi, Junko. 1995. Tai niokeru Kokkakaikaku to Minshu, Rekishigaku Kenkyukai hen, Minzoku to Kokka-Jikaku to Teikō [Ethnicity and nation, self-awareness and resistance]. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Koizumi, Junko. 1999. Between Pre-Modern Corveé System and Modern Capitation Tax and Military Conscription System. Jochi Ajia Gaku 17: 119–45.Google Scholar
Tarani, Krom Sapayakorn. 1992. 100 pi krom sapayakorn tarani [One hundred years of the Department of Mineral Resources]. Bangkok: Chalongratrana Publishing.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus. 2009. The Social Foundations of Institutional Order: Reconsidering War and the ‘Resource Curse’ in Third World State Building. Politics and Society 37, 4: 479–520.Google Scholar
Larsson, Thomas. 2008. Western Imperialism and Defensive Underdevelopment of Property Rights Institutions in Siam. Journal of East Asian Studies 8, 1: 1–28.Google Scholar
Larsson, Thomas. 2012. Land and Loyalty: Security and the Development of Property Rights in Thailand. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Loos, Tamara. 1994. Critical Introduction to Five Years in Siam. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
Mabry, Bevars DuPre. 1979. The Development of Labor Institutions in Thailand. Ithaca: Cornell University Southeast Asia Program Data Paper 112.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R. H. 1934. History of the Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation, Ltd., 1864–1910. London: Spottiswoode, Ballantyne & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Malloch, D. E. 1852. Siam: Some General Remarks on Its Productions and Particularly on Its Imports and Exports, and the Mode of Transacting Business with the People. Calcutta: J. Thomas at the Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar
Matsunami, Hidemi. 1920, Meiji Ringyo Shiyou [Outline of forestry in the Meiji era]. Tokyo: Dainihon Sanrinkai.Google Scholar
Mekvichai, Banasopit. 1988. The Teak Industry in Northern Thailand: The Role of Natural Resource-Based Regional Economy. PhD diss., Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel. 1988. Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel. 1997. Studying the State. In Lichbach, Mark I. and Zuckerman, Alan S., eds., Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel. 2001. State-in-Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel, Kohli, Atul, and Shue, Vivienne, eds. 1994. State Power and Social Forces: Domination and Transformation in the Third Worlds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of the Interior. 1952. Anuson nuang naigaansong wanthiraluk sapapana Krasuwang Mahathai Krop Roop 60 pii boribun [Sixtieth anniversary commemoration volume of the Ministry of the Interior]. Microfilm at National Library of Thailand, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Ministry of Trade and Industry. 1966. Shōkō Seisakushi: Volume 22 Kōgyō [History of commercial and engineering policies: vol. 22, mining]. Tokyo: Ministry of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 2011. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Morita, Masaru. 2012. Chikasui wa Kataru: Mienai Shigen no Kiki [The story of underground water: The crisis of invisible resources]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shinsho.Google Scholar
Murakushi, Ninzaburō. 1998. Nihonno Dentōteki rōshikankei [Traditional industrial relations in Japan]. Tokyo: Sekaishoin.Google Scholar
Nimura, Kazuo. 1988. Ashio Bōdō no Shiteki Bunseki [Historical analysis of the Ashio riot]. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Nishio, Takashi. 1988. Nihon Shinrin Gyoseishi no Kenkyu [A study of Japanese forestry administration]. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Niwa, Kunio. 1989. Tochimondai no Kigen [The origin of land problems]. Tokyo: Heibonsha.Google Scholar
Ogino, Toshio. 1990. Nihon Kindairinsei no Hattatsu Katei [Development processes of Japanese modern forest policy]. Tokyo: Ringyō chōsakai.Google Scholar
Peluso, Nancy and Vandergeest, Peter. 2001. Genealogies of the Political Forest and Customary Rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Journal of Asian Studies 60, 3: 761–812.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. New York: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rajanubhab, Damrong. 1901. Letter to the King Rama V on the Mining Disputes in Phanga. National Archive of Thailand, Bangkok, file R5.Google Scholar
Ramsay, Ansil. 1979. Modernization and Reactionary Rebellions in Northern Siam. Journal of Asian Studies 38, 2: 283–97.Google Scholar
Resource Council on the History of Forestry Development, Ringyō Hattatsushi Chōsakai. 1960. Nihon Ringyō Hattatsushi (Jōkan) [History of the evolution of Japanese forestry]. Tokyo: Ringyō Hattatsushi Chosakai.Google Scholar
Ribot, Jesse and Larson, Anne, eds. 2005. Democratic Decentralization through a Natural Resource Lens. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael. 1999. The Political Economy of the Resource Curse. World Politics 51, 2: 297–322.Google Scholar
Sasaki, Ryō. 1971. Wagakunino shoki kōgyō rōdō hogorippōnitsuite-kōgyōjōreino Kōfuhogokitei nikansuru oboegaki [On early mining labor protection laws: A note on mining laws on the protection of workers]. Shakaikagakunenpō [Annual bulletin of social sciences] 5: 229–62.Google Scholar
Sato, Jin. 2003. Public Land for the People: The Institutional Basis of Community Forestry in Thailand. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 34, 2: 329–46.Google Scholar
Sato, Jin. 2011. Resource Policy and Domestic Origins of Foreign Aid. In Toyoda, Toshihisa, Sato, Hiroshi Kan, and Nishikawa, Jun, eds., Economic and Policy Lessons from Japan to Developing Countries. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sato, Jin. 2013. State Inaction in Resource Governance: Natural Resource Control and Bureaucratic Oversight in Thailand. In Sato, Jin, ed., Governance of Natural Resources: Uncovering the Social Purpose of Materials in Nature. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sethakul, Ratanaporn. 1989. Political, Social, and Economic Changes in the Northern States of Thailand Resulting from the Chiang Mai Treaties of 1874 and 1883. PhD diss., Department of History, Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Siriprachai, Somboon. 2012. Industrialization with a Weak State: Thailand's Development in Historical Perspective. Kyoto Center for Southeast Asian Studies Series on Asian Studies 6. National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, William. 1957. Chinese Society in Thailand: An Analytical History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Slade, Herbert. 1897. Report of the Forestry Department. National Archive of Thailand, Bangkok, file R5 M 16/9 (Ministry of the Interior).Google Scholar
Slade, Herbert. 1901. Report of the Forestry Department. National Archive of Thailand, Bangkok, file R5 M 16/2 (Ministry of the Interior).Google Scholar
Smyth, Warrington H. 1898. Five Years in Siam from 1891–1896. Vols. 1 and 2. Bangkok: White Lotus (also published the same year in London).Google Scholar
Somboon, Siriprachai. 2012. Industrialization with a Weak State: Thailand's Development in Historical Perspective. Sugihara, Kaoru, Phongpaichit, Pasuk, and Baker, Chris, eds. Kyoto: NUS Press in association with Kyoto University Press.Google Scholar
Studwell, Joe. 2013. How Asia Works: Success and Failure in the World's Most Dynamic Region. N.p.: Gove Press.Google Scholar
Bureau, Tax. 1893. Shuzeikyoku Tōkei Nensho [Annual statistical report of the Tax Bureau]. Tokyo: Tax Bureau, Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar
Thompson, Virginia. 1947. Labor Problems in Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thongchai, Winichakul. 1994. Siam Mapped: A History of Geo-Body of a Nation. Honolulu: University of Hawaìi Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 990–1990. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wales, H.G.Q. 1934. Ancient Siamese Government and Administration. London: Bernard Quaritch, Ltd.Google Scholar
Yoshiki, Fumio. 1979. How Japan's Metal Mining Industry Modernized. Tokyo: United Nations University.Google Scholar