Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:42:13.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regulation Theory, Post-Marxism, and the New Social Movements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

George Steinmetz
George Steinmetz
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
CSSH Discussion
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 176 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1994

References

Aglietta, Michel. 1987. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation. The US Experience. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1970. Reading Capital. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1971. “Freud and Lacan,” in Lenin and Philosophy, 189–219. New York: Monthly Review.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1977. “Contradiction and Overdetermination,” in Louis Althusser, For Marx, 87–128. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Arrighi, Giovanni; Hopkins, Terence; and Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1989. Anti-systemic Movements. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bagguley, Paul. 1992. “Social Change, the Middle Class and the Emergence of ‘New Social Movements’: A Critical Analysis.” The Sociological Review, 40:1, 26–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balibar, Etienne. 1991. “Is There a ‘Neo-Racism’?,” in Etienne Balibar and Immanuel Wallerstein, Race, Nation, Class, 17–28. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bark, Dennis L., and Gress, David R.. 1989. From Shadow to Substance 1945–1963, vol. 1 of A History of West Germany. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1989. “Risikogesellschaft.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 36 (Sept. 1), 31–3.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, ed. 1991. Politik in der Risikogesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Benton, Sarah. 1989. “The Party is Over.” Marxism Today, 33:3 (03), 32–37.Google Scholar
Berman, Russell. 1981. “Opposition to Rearmament and West German Culture.” Telos, 14:4 (no. 51), 141–58.Google Scholar
Badie, Bertrand, and Birnbaum, Pierre. 1983. The Sociology of the State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. 1978. A Realist Theory of Science. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Badie, Bertrand. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Badie, Bertrand. 1986. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Blackbourn, David, and Eley, Geoff. 1985. The Peculiarities of German History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonefeld, Werner, and Holloway, John, eds. 1991. Post-Fordism and Social Form. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Praxis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital,” in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Richardson, J. C., ed., 241–58. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert. 1986. Democracy and Capitalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert. 1990. The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Boye, Robert, and Mistral, J.. 1982. Accumulation, Inflation, Crises. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Brand, Karl-Werner. 1982. Neue soziale Bewegungen. Entstehung, Funktion und Perspektive neuer Protestpotentiale. Eine Zwischenbilanz. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Brand, Karl-Werner; Büsser, Detlef; and Rucht, Dieter. 1986. Aufbruch in eine andere Gesellschaft. Neue Soziale Bewegungen in der Bundesrepublik. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Brenner, Robert, and Mark Glick. 1991. “The Regulation Approach: Theory and History.” New Left Review, 188 (07-08), 45–119.Google Scholar
Butterwegge, Christoph, and Isola, Horst, eds. 1991. Rechtsextremismus im vereinten Deutschland. Randerscheinung oder Gefahr für die Demokratie? Berlin: Links.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 1977. The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 1978. City, Class and Power. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chopra, Ingrid, and Scheller, Gitta. 1992. “Die neue Unbeständigkeit.' Ehe und Familie in der spätmodernen Gesellschaft.” Soziale Welt, 43:1, 3:48–69.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean. 1985. “Strategy or Identity: New Theoretical Paradigms and Contempo rary Social Movements.” Social Research, 52:4, 663–717.Google Scholar
Cotgrove, Stephen, and Duff, Andrew. 1980. “Environmentalism, Middle-Class Radicalism and Politics.” Sociological Review, 28:2, 333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delale, Alain, and Ragache, Gilles. 1978. La France de 68. Paris: éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
d'Entrèves, Alexander. 1967. The Notion of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eder, Klaus. 1985. “The ‘New Social Movements’: Moral Crusades, Political Pressure Groups, or Social Movements?” Social Research, 52:4, 869–90.Google Scholar
Elsaesser, Thomas. 1989. New German Cinema: A History. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Barbara. 1990. “Rethinking Social Movement Theory.” Socialist Review, 20:35–65.Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo, and Alvarez, Sonia E., eds. 1992. The Making of Social Movements in Latin America: Identity, Strategy, and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Wolfram. 1987. “Wirtschafts- und sozialgeschichtliche Anmerkungen zum ‘deutschen Sonderweg’.” Tel Aviver Jahrbuch für deutsche Geschichte, 16:96–116.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. New York: Vintage House.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge, Gordon, Colin, ed. New York: Panthenon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1989. “Sécurité, territoire et population,” in Résumé des cours. 1970–1982, 99–106. Paris: Juillard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1991. “Governmentality,” in The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality, Burchell, Graham, ed., 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1987. “Women, Welfare and the Politics of Need Interpretation.” Hy patia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 2:103–21.Google Scholar
Gorz, André. 1980. Adieux au prolétariat. Au-delà du socialisme. Paris: éditions Galilée.Google Scholar
Gorz, André. 1982. “The Reconquest of Time.” Telos, 16:1 (no. 55), 212–7.Google Scholar
Graham, Julie. 1991. “Fordism/Post-Fordism, Marxism/Post-Marxism: The Second Cultural Divide.” Rethinking Marxism, 41: 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971 [1929–1935]. “Americanism and Fordism,” in Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 277–320. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1978. Cahiers de prison. Cahiers 10,11,12,13 (translation of Quaderni del Carcere). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Grebing, Helga. 1986. Der ‘deutsche Sandet-weg’ in Europa 1806–1945. Eine Kritik. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1983. “The Problem of Ideology: Marxism Without Guarantees,” in Marx 100 Years On, Matthews, B., ed., 56–85. London.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1988. “The Toad in the Garden: Thatcherism among the Theorists,” in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence eds., 35–73. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. n.d. “Social Protection: The Ambiguity of Decentralization, Privatization, and Empowerment.” Manuscript, Law School, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hartford, Barbara, and Hopkins, Sarah. 1984. Greenham Common: Women at the Wire. London: The Women's Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Heide. 1981. “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union,” in Women and Revolution, Sargent, Lydia, ed., 1–42. Boston: South End press.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Herf, Jeffrey. 1991. War by Other Means. Soviet Power, West German Resistance, and the Battle of the Euromissiles. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Joachim. 1980. Der Sicherheitsstaat. Frankfurt/Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Joachim. 1981. “The New Leviathan and the Struggle for Democratic Rights.” Telos, 14:2 (no. 48), 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Joachim. 1983. “The Fordist Security State and New Social Movements.” Kapitallistate, nos. 10/11:75–88.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Joachim. 1988. “The Crisis of Fordism, Transformations of the ‘Keynesian’ Security State, and New Social Movements,” in Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, vol. 10, Kriesberg, Louis and Bronislaw, Misztal, eds., 43–55.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Joachim. 1990. Kapitalismus ohne Alternative? Materialistische Gesellschaftstheorie und Möglichkeiten einer sozialistischen Politik heute. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Joachim. 1991. “From the Fordist to the Post-Fordist State,” in The Politics of Flex ibility. Restructuring State and Industry in Britain, Germany, and Scandinavia, Jessop, Bob, ed., 67–81. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Joachim, and Roth, Roland. 1986. Das Neue Gesicht des Kapitalismus. Vom Fordismus zum Post-Fordismus. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Joachim. 1987. “Immer so weiter? Oder: Der Konservatismus der Linken,” and “Der Kapitalismus ist enorm anpassungsfáhig” (discussion). Sozialismus, 5 (05-06), 36–46.Google Scholar
Hoffmann-Axthelm, Dieter; Kallscheuer, Otto; Knödler-Bunte, Eberhard; and Wortmann, Brigitte. 1978. Zwei Kulturen? TUNIX, Mescalero und die Folgen. Berlin: Verlag Ästhetik und Kommunikation.Google Scholar
Hollander, Paul. 1992. Anti-Americanism: Critiques at Home and Abroad. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hubert, Eva. 1983. “Politiker fragen—Bürger antworten nicht! Die Boykottbewegung gegen die Volkszählung,” in Die Volkszählung, Taeger, Jurgen, ed. Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Einhorn.Google Scholar
Hubner, Kurt. 1987. “Neue Gesichtszüge?” Sozialismus, 4 (04-05), 39–44.Google Scholar
Hülsberg, Werner. 1988. The German Greens. A Social and Political Profile. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Illich, Ivan Irving; Zola, Kenneth; McKnight, John; Caplan, Jonathan; Shaiken, Harley. 1977. Disabling Professions. London: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 1992. “Actually Existing Marxism.” Unpublished paper,Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1983. “Accumulation, State, and Hegemonic Projects.” Kapitalistate, nos. 10/11:89–112.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1988. “Post-Fordismus. Zur Rezeption der Regulationstheo?e bei Joachim Hirsch.” Das Argument 34:3 (no. 193), 380–90.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1989. “Conservative Regimes and the Transition to Post-Fordism: The Cases of Great Britain and West Germany” in Capitalist Development and Crisis Theory: Accumulation, Regulation and Spatial Restructuring, Gottdiener, M. and Komninos, Nicos eds. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1990a. State Theory. Putting States in Their Place. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1990b. “Regulation Theories in Retrospect and Prospect.” Economy and Society, 19:2, 153–216.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1991. “Thatcherism and Flexibility: The White Heat of a Post-Fordist Revolution,” in The Politics of Flexibility. Restructuring State and Industry in Britain, Germany and Scandinavia, Jessop, Bob, ed., 135–61. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Katsiaficas, George. 1987. The Imagination of the New Left. A Global Analysis of the 1960s. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 1981. City Trenches: Urban Politics and the Patterning of Class in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1985. “New Social Movements in West Germany and the United States,” in Political Power and Social Theory, vol. 5, Zeitlin, Maurice, ed., 5. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structure and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science, 16:1, 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivisto, Peter. 1986. “What's New about the ‘New Social Movements’?: Continuities and Discontinuities with the Socialist Project.” Mid-American Review of Sociology, 11:2, 29–43.Google Scholar
Klandermans, Bert, and Tarrow, Sidney. 1988. “Mobilization into Social Movements: Synthesizing European and American Approaches.” International Social Movement Research, 1:1–38.Google Scholar
Kocka, Jürgen. 1990. “Revolution und Nation 1989. Zur historischen Einordnung der gegenwärtigen Ereignisse.” Tel Aviver Jahrbuch für deutsche Geschichte, no. 19:479–99.Google Scholar
Kramer, Jane. 1988. “Letter from Europe.” The New Yorker (November 28), 67–100.Google Scholar
Stephen, Krasner, ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1989a. “Local Mobilization for the People's Petition of the Dutch Peace Movement.” International Social Movement Research, 1:41–81.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1989b. “New Social Movements and the New Class in the Netherlands.” American Journal of Sociology, 95:1078–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lasch, Christopher. 1978. The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lash, Scott, and Urry, John. 1987. The End of Organized Capitalism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lau, Christoph. 1991. “Neue Risiken und gesellschaftliche Konflikte,” in Politik in der Risikogesellschaft, Beck, Ulrich, ed., 248–65. Frankfurt am Main; Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Lecorte, Tomas. 1992. Wir tanzen bis zum Ende: die Geschichte eines Autonomen. Hamburg: Galgenberg.Google Scholar
Liddington, Jill. 1991. The Road to Greenham Common. Feminism and Anti Militarism in Britain since 1820. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Link, Jurgen. 1992. “Normalismus und Neorassismus.” Das Argument, 34:5 (no. 195), 714–22.Google Scholar
Lipietz, Alain. 1987. Mirages and Miracles. The Crises of Global Fordism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Maase, Kaspar. 1992. BRAVO Amerika: Erkundungen zur Jugendkultur der Bundesrepublik in den fünfziger Jahren. Hamburg: Junius.Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne. 1991. “From ‘Bringing’ to ‘Putting’: The State in Late Twentieth Century Social Theory.” Canadian Journal of Sociology, 16:2, 119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Charles S. 1987. “Society as Factory,” in In Search of Stability. Explorations in Historical Political Economy, 19–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maier, Hans. 1980. Die Ältere Deutsche Staats- und Verwaltungslehre, 2nd ed.Munchen: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Mandel, Ernest. 1978. Late Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Martin, William C. 1988. “From Class Challenge to Comfortable Collaboration? Understanding Recent Fluctuations in the Politics of the Educated Middle Class.” Ph.D. Disser., Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Mattausch, John. 1989. A Commitment to Campaign: A Sociological Study of the CND. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, Margit. 1988. “The Changing Conditions for Local Politics in the Transition to Post-Fordism.” Paper prepared for the International Conference on Regulation Theory,Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Mayer, Margit. 1991. “Politics in the Post-Fordist City.” Socialist Review, 21:1, 105–24.Google Scholar
Melucci, Alberto. 1980. “The New Social Movements: A Theoretical Approach.” Social Science Information, 19:2, 201–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melucci, Alberto. 1981. “Ten Hypotheses for the Analysis of New Movements,” in Contemporary Italian Sociology, Pinto, Diana, ed., 173–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Melucci, Alberto. 1984. “An End to Social Movements? Introductory Paper to the Sessions on ‘New Social Movements’ and Change in Organizational Forms.” Social Science Information, 23:4, 819–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melucci, Alberto. 1989. Nomads of the Present. Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Mohr, Reinhard. 1992. Zaungäste. Die Generation, die nach der Revolte kam. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.Google Scholar
Mooser, Joseph. 1983. “Abschied von der ‘Proletarität.’ Sozialstruktur und Lage der Arbeiterschaft in der Bundesrepublik in historischer Perspektive,” in Sozialgeshichte der Bundesrepublik, Conze, Werner and Lepsius, M. Rainer, eds., 143–186. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 1981. “Radical Democracy: Modern or Postmodern,” in Universal Abandon? The Politics of Postmodernism, Ross, Andrew, ed., 31–45. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy, and Pollak, Michael. 1981. The Atom Besieged: Extraparliamentary Dissent in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Niethammer, Lutz. 1979. “Rekonstruktion und Desintegration: Zum Verständnis der deutschen Arbeiterbewegung zwischeu Krieg und Kaltem Krieg.” Geschichte und Gesellschaft, Sonderheft 5.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1980. “Konkurrenzpartei und kollektive politische Indentität,” in Parlementarisches Ritual und politische Alternativen, Roth, Roland, ed., 26–42. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1984. “Work: The Key Sociological Category?,” in Contradictions of the Welfare State, 129–50. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1987. “Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics: Social Movements since the 1960s,” in Changing Boundaries of the Political, Maier, Charles S., ed., 63–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panitch, Leo. 1986. “Theories of Corporatism: Reflections on a Growth Industry,” in Working Class Politics in Crisis, 160–86. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Pasquale. 1991. “Theatrum Politicum: The Genealogy of Capital—Police and the State of Prosperity,” in The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality, Burchell, Graham, ed. 105–18. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Perrow, Charles. 1979. “The Sixties Observed,” in The Dynamics of Social Move ments, Zald, Mayer and McCarthy, John D., eds. Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop.Google Scholar
Pohrt, Wolfgang. 1982. Endstation: Uber die Wiedergeburt der Nation. Berlin: Rotbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Postone, Moishe. 1993. Time, Labor and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx's Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos. 1978. Political Power and Social Classes. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos. 1980. State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Raschke, Joachim. 1985. Soziale Bewegungen. Ein historisch-systematischer Grundrβ. New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Rochon, Thomas R. 1988. Mobilizing for Peace: The Antinuclear Movements in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, John. 1988. “Who Practices Hegemony? Class Division and the Subject of Politics.” Cultural Critique (Spring), 25–52.Google Scholar
Roth, Roland. 1989. “Fordism and New Social Movements.” Unpublished Manu script. Free University of Berlin, Zentralinstitut für wissenschaftliche Forschung. Ruccio, David F. 1992. “After Communism.” Rethinking Marxism, 5:2, 7–22.Google Scholar
Rucht, Dieter. 1982. “Neue soziale Bewegungen oder: Die Grenzen bürokratischer Modernisierung.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 13:272–92.Google Scholar
Schemer, Christoph. 1989. “Das Fordismus-Theorem der französischen Regula tionsschule.” Manuscript, Otto-Suhr-Institut, Free University of Berlin.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 1990. Die Friedensbewegung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Ursachen und Bedingungen der Mobilisierung einer neuen sozialen Bewegung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Phillipe, and Lehmbruch, Gerhard eds. 1979. Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Schneider, Michael. 1981. “Väter und Söhne, posthum. Das beschädigte Verhältnis zweier Generationen,” in Den Kopf verkehrt aufgesetzt oder Die melancholische Linke. Aspekte des Kulturverfalls in den siebziger Jahren, 8–64. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Schönhuber, Franz. 1992. “Mord von Rechts: Wer stoppt die Gewalt?” (Interview in television documentary film). German ZDF Network, 11 25.Google Scholar
Schröer, Burkhard. 1992. Rechte Kerle. Skinheads, Faschos, Hooligans. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Schroeren, Michael. 1990. Die Grünen: 10 bewegte Jahre. Wien: Ueberreuter.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan Wallach. 1988. “The Sears Case,” in Gender and the Politics of History, 167–77. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anne, Showstack-Sassoon, ed. 1982. Approaches to Gramsci. London: Writers and Readers.Google Scholar
Snow, David A.; JrRohford, E. Burke, Worden, Steven K. and Benford, Robert D.. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review, 51:4, 464–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, David A., and Benford, Robert D.. 1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research, no. 1:197–217.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George. 1990. “The Myth and the Reality of an Autonomous State: Indus t?alists, Junkers, and Social Policy in Impe?al Germany.” Comparative Social Research, no. 12:239–93.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George. 1994. “Fordism and the ‘Immoral Economy’ of Right-Wing Violence in Contemporary Germany,” in Research on Democracy and Society, vol. 2. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Taeger, Jürgen, ed. 1983. Die Volkszählung. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Einhorn.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1988. “Old Movements in New Cycles of Protest: The Career of an Italian Religious Community.” International Social Movement Research, no. 1:281–304.Google Scholar
Tergeist, Peter. 1984. “Berlin (West): Die USA als Besatzer.” Dollars und Träume. Studien zur Politik, Ökonomie, Kultur der USA, 10:30–41.Google Scholar
Therborn, Göran. 1992. “The Life and Times of Socialism.” New Left Review, 194 (07/08), 17–32.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1986. The Contentious French. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touraine, Alain. 1977. The Self-Production of Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, Kenneth H. 1991. “How New are the New Social Movements?” Theory, Culture and Society, 8:1, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vester, Michael. 1983. “Die ‘Neuen Plebjer.’ Thesen zur Klassen- und Schichtenstruktu? und zu den. Entwicklungsperspektiven der neuen sozialen Bewegungen,” in Gesellschaftliche Probleme als Anstoβ und Folge von Politik, Hart-wich, Hans-Hermann, ed., 215–6. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Vieten, Gunter C. 1983. “Holland—ein Land löβt sich nicht zählen,” in Die Volkszählung, Taegar, Jurgen, ed. Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Einhorn.Google Scholar
Vollmer, Antje. 1992. “Die SPD nach dem Tod Willi Brandts.” tageszeitung (October 17), p. 10.Google Scholar
Wagner, Hilde, and Stahn, Peter. 1987. “Das neue Gesicht des Kapitalismus. Debatte des neuen Theorieentwurfs von Joachim Hirsch and Roland Roth.” Sozialismus, 4 (04-05), 29–38.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immauuel. 1991. “The Construction of Peoplehood: Racism, Nationalism, Ethnicity,” in Etienne Ballbar and Immanuel Wallerstein, Race, Nation, Class, 71–85. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immauuel. 1983. Historical Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Weakliem, David. 1991. “The Two Lefts? Occupation and Party Choice in France, Italy, and the Netherlands.” American Journal of Sociology, 96:1327–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1947 [1921–1922]. “Class, Status, Power,” in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, eds., 180–95. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. 1985. The German Empire 1871–1918. Leamington Spa: Berg.Google Scholar
Weir, Margaret, and Skocpol, Theda. 1985. “State Structures and the Possibilities of ‘Keynesian’ Responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain and the United States,” in Bringing the State Back In, Evans, Peter B., Rueschmayer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilde, Lawrence. 1990. “Class Analysis and the Politics of New Social Movements.” Capital and Class, 42 (Winter), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, Norbert. 1970. “America's Unique Class Politics,” in The Logic of Social Hierarchies, Laumann, Edward, Siegel, Paul, and Hodge, Robert, eds. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Winkler, Heinrich August. 1990. “Mit Skepsis zur Einigung.” Die Zeit, Nr. 40 (09 28), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence S. 1988. “The Transnational Movement against Nuclear Weapons, 1945–1986: A Preliminary Survey,” in Peace Movements and Political Cultures, Chatfield, Charles and Dungen, Peter van den, eds., 265–94. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin, 1978. Class, Crisis, and the State. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin. 1985. Classes. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin. 1987. “Towards a Post-Marxist Radical Social Theory.” Contemporary Sociology, 16:5, 748–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin; Becker, Uwe; Brenner, Johanna; Burawoy, Michael; Burns, Val; Carchedi, Guglielmo; Marshall, Gordon; Meiksins, Peter F.; Rose, David; Stinchcombe, Arthur; Paris, Philip Van. 1989. The Debate on Classes. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar