¹ See, for example, Szulc, Tad, Winds of Revolution: Latin America Today and Tomorrow (New York: Praeger, 1965)Google Scholar. A detailed analysis and critique of these views are found in Nelson, Joan M., Migrants, Urban Poverty, and Instability in Developing Nations (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1969)Google Scholar; also Goldrich, Daniel, ‘Toward the Comparative Study of Politicization in Latin America’ in Heath, Dwight B. and Adams, Richard N. (eds.), Contemporary Cultures and Societies in Latin America (New York: Random House, 1965), pp. 361–78.Google Scholar

² Lipset, Seymour Martin, Political Man (Garden City, N. Y.: Anchor Books, 1963)Google Scholar, chapter 4 3 Kornhauser, William, The Politics of Mass Society (New York: The Free Press, 1959).Google Scholar

⁴ See, for example, Schmitt, Karl and Burks, David, Evolution or Chaos: Dynamics of Latin American Government and Politics (New York: Praeger, 1963). Also Szulc, op. cit.Google Scholar

⁵ Lewis, Oscar, ‘The Culture of Poverty’, Scientific American, 215 (10 1966), pp. 19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Lewis, Oscar, Antropologia de la Pobreza (Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1962).Google Scholar

⁶ Rosenbluth, Guillermo, ‘Problemas Socio-economicos de la Marginalidad y la Integracion Urbana’, Revista Paraguaya de Sociologia, 11 (1968)Google Scholar. Also Hoffmann, R., Garcia, N., Mercado, O., and Uribe, F., ‘La Marginalidad Urbana’ in DESAL, Marginalidad en America Latina (Barcelona: Herder, 1969), chapter 2.Google Scholar

⁷ Weber, Max, The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, Henderson and Parsons, (trans.) (New York: The Free Press, 1965), p. 111.Google Scholar

⁸ Ibid., p. 115.

⁹ Clinard, Marshall B., ‘Urbanization, Urbanism, and Deviant Behavior in Puerto Rico’ in Social Change and Public Policy (San Juan: Social Science Research Center, University of Puerto Rico, 1968), p. 29.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Marris, Peter, ‘A Report on Urban Renewal in the United States’ in The Urban Condition (New York: Basic Books, 1963).Google Scholar

¹¹ Vekemans, Roger and Fuenzalida, I. S., ‘EI Concepto de Marginalidad’ in DESAL, op. cit., p. 50.Google Scholar

¹² Ibid., p. 59.

¹³ Ward, Barbara, ‘The Uses of Prosperity’, Saturday Review (August 29, 1964), pp. 191–2.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Hoffmann, et al. , op. cit., p. 302.Google Scholar

¹⁵ A. Cabala Darghan, ‘Estudio sobre Participación dentro de un Tipo de Asociación Voluntaria: Junta de Vecinos’, Consejeria Nacional de Promoción Popular, División de Estudios, Santiago (1968) (mimeograph).

¹⁶ See, for example, Hoffmann et al., op. cit. Also Wright, Charles and Hyman, Herbert, ‘Voluntary Associations' Membership of American Adults’, American Sociological Review, 23:3 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Freeman, H. E., Novak, E., and Reeder, L. G., ‘Correlates of Membership in Voluntary Associations’, American Sociological Review, 22:5 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁷ Goldrich, Daniel, Pratt, Raymond B., and Schuller, C. R., ‘The Political Integration of Lower-Class Urban Settlements in Chile and Peru’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 3:1 (1967–1967), p. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁸ Mangin, William, ‘Latin American Squatter Settlements: A Problem and a Solution’, Latin Research Review, 2:3 (Summer 1967), pp. 65–98.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Goldrich, et. al, op. cit.

²⁰ Vekemans, and Fuenzalida, , op. cit., pp. 57–8.Google Scholar

²¹ Abrams, Charles, ‘Squatter Settlements: The Problem and the Opportunity’, AID, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, D.C. (1965).Google Scholar

²² Others include studies in Rio de Janeiro, Caracas, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Lima, Guatemala City, Santo Domingo, and Santiago. They are excluded here for the sake of brevity. Results from these studies have been summarized and are available upon request from the author.

²³ Turner, John F. C., ‘Uncontrolled Urban Settlement: Problems and Policies’, International Social Development Review, 1 (1968), pp. 107–30.Google Scholar

²⁴ Ibid.

²⁵ Mattgin, , op. cit., p. 74.Google Scholar

²⁶ Goldrich, et al. ,, op. tit., p. 4.Google Scholar

²⁷ Cornelius, Wayne A., ‘Urbanization as an Agent ia Latin American Political Instabaity: The Case of Mexico’, American Political Science Review, 63 (09 1969), p. 855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁸ Germani, Gino, ‘Social and Political Consequences of Mobility’ in Smelser, Neil J. and Lipset, Seymour M. (eds.), Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development (Chicago: Aldine, 1966).Google Scholar

²⁹ Cardoso, Fernando H., ‘Le Proletariat brésilien’, Sociologie du Travail, 4 (1961), pp. 50–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Touraine, Alain, ‘Industrialisation et conscience ouvrière à São Paulo’, Sociologie du Travail, 4 (1961), pp. 389–407.Google Scholar

³⁰ Germani, Gino, ‘Inquiry into the Social Effects of Urbanization in a Working Class Sector of Greater Buenos Aires’, United Nations (1958)Google Scholar; Briones, Guillermo, ‘Movilidad Ocupacional y Mercado de Trabajo en el Peru’, America Latina, 6:3 (1963)Google Scholar; Flinn, William, ‘Rural-to-Urban Migration: A Colombian Case’, Land Tenure Center Research Publication no. 19, University of Wisconsin (1968)Google Scholar; Bonilla, Frank, ‘Rio’s Favelas, the Rural Slum within the City’, American University Field Staff Reports, 8:3 (1961)Google Scholar; Usandizaga, Elsa and Havens, A. Eugene, Tres Barrios de Invasion (Bogota: Tercer Mundo, 1966). In the writer's study of peripheral settlements in Santiago, 45 percent of respondents reported that their present occupations were better than before, while 18 percent judged them to be the same. When asked to compare their occupations with the ones to which they had aspired at the beginning of their adult lives, 44 percent found them to be better than or equal to their initial aspirations.Google Scholar

³¹ For a recent analysis of black ghetto demands, see Litt, Edgar, Ethnic Politics in America (Glenview, III.: Scott, Foresman, and Co., 1970).Google Scholar

³² Mangin, , op. cit., p. 85.Google Scholar