Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:46:20.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Post Peasants: The Character of Contemporary Sardinian Society1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Alex Weingrod
Affiliation:
Brandeis University

Extract

Considerable attention has recently been given to depicting the present-day conditions of rural life in developing and industrializing states. Anthropologists have begun to doubt whether the familiar term ‘peasant society’ adequately represents those rural groups that are increasingly linked with an urban-based industrial economy and society. A number of alternate terms and constructs have lately been suggested. For example, in a recent article Erasmus (1967) explores what he calls the ‘upper limits of peasantry’ in portions of Bolivia, Venezuela and Mexico. By ‘upper limits of peasantry’ Erasmus refers to those segments of the rural population that are within a market economy and national polity and yet are only partially integrated within an emergent industrial society. To cite another recent example, Lopreato's study of a Calabrian village (1967) details how emigration and the subsequent remittances altered the social and economic structure of a long-impoverished South Italian community. Interestingly, Lopreato entitles his study Peasants No More; like Erasmus he too wishes to indicate the changed character of rural life in industrializing states.

Type
Peasantry
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Compendio Statistica Delia Regione Sarda 1964–65, no date, Rome.Google Scholar
Erasmus, C. (1967), ‘Upper Limits of Peasantry and Agrarian Reform: Bolivia, Venezuela, and Mexico Compared’, Ethnology, VI, 349–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C. (1962), ‘Studies in Peasant Life: Community and Society’, Biennial Review of Anthropology, Siegel, B., ed., pp. 142. Stanford.Google Scholar
Le Lannou, Maurice (1941), Patres e Paysans de la Sardaigne. Tours.Google Scholar
Lopreato, J. (1967), Peasants No More. San Francisco.Google Scholar
Pinna, P. (1966), ‘L'Emigrazione in Sardegna’, Rassegna Parlamentare.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, A. (1966), Amoral Familism and Historical Marginality. International Review of Community Development 15, 1314.Google Scholar
Relazione Sulla Situazione Economica Delia Sardegna (1968), Cagliari.Google Scholar
Weingrod, A. (1962), ‘Administered Communities’, Economic Development and Cultural Change XI: 6984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingrod, A. (1968), ‘Patrons, Patronage and Political Parties’. Comparative Studies in Society and History, X, 377–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, E. (1966), Peasants. Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar