Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:13:32.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neo-transcendentalism in the New Left Counter-culture: A Vision of the Future Looking Back

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Martin Schiff
Affiliation:
John Jay College

Extract

The student movement of the 1960s has been characterized as the dawn of a new national consciousness and a new counter-culture, ‘the passionate revolution of creative intelligence’, and ‘the saving vision our endangered civilization required’. The New Left spokesmen for the movement have proclaimed themselves the vanguard of a unique cultural and political rebellion against what they consider the evils of capitalist-pluralist America. They present their arguments in Hegelian terms as a new and profound synthesis of the progressive elements embodied in America's political and intellectual history. Yet a more probing analysis of American history indicates that the values inherent in the New Left counter-culture are not very new at all. In fact, apart from their rhetoric, the New Left cultural and political attitudes bear a striking similarity to certain nineteenth-century Utopian outlooks. The most direct antecedent of the modern counter-culture appears to be the New England transcendental- ist movement which emerged in the 1840s. This relationship between a New Left counter-culture, credited by its supporters with messianic characteristics for national salvation, and a nineteenth-century utopianism that made no significant impact on the unfolding of history raises many questions about the credibility and future of the counter-culture.

Type
Counter-Culture
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Reich, Charles A., The Greening of America (New York: Random House, 1970).Google Scholar

2 Keniston, Kenneth, ‘You Have to Grow Up in Scarsdale to Know How Bad Things Really Are’, The New York Times Magazine, 04 27, 1969, p. 128.Google Scholar

3 Roszak, Theodore, The Making of a Counter Culture (Garden City: Doubleday, 1968), p. 1.Google Scholar

4 For a sympathetic, coherent statement of New Left goals, see Keniston, , op. cit., pp. 27–9 and pp. 122–30.Google Scholar

5 Black Power groups may be considered part of the New Left in tactics, but their socio-economic roots and objectives preclude their classification as part of the counter-culture. In their striving for upward social mobility, black Leftists are motivated by the deprivation of the economic and political opportunities to which white Leftists have long been accustomed. The socio-economic roots of the counter-culture are examined in detail later in the analysis.

6 Keniston, Kenneth, Young Radicals (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968), p. 93.Google Scholar

7 Brzezinski, Zbigniew, ‘Revolution and Counterrevolution’, The New Republic, 07 1, 1968, pp. 23–5 at p. 25.Google Scholar

8 Keniston, , ‘You Have to Grow Up in Scarsdale to know How Bad Things Really Are’, p. 122.Google Scholar

9 Roszak, , op. cit., pp. 205–38.Google Scholar