Article contents
Modernization Theory and the Formation of Modern Social Theories in England and America
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 June 2009
Extract
‘Modernization theory’, Alexander Gerschenkron remarked recently, ‘obstructs rather than promotes the understanding of processes of econo- mic change’. Far from being a startling judgement, Gerschenkron's comment only signals that another distinguished scholar has joined the theory's detractors. The marked failure of modernization theory to predict how less developed countries would react to incentives for material advance explains the growing chorus of criticism. This indeterminate response from third world peoples has quite properly raised doubts about how well we understand what is involved in the reorientation of a society's habitual practices. The blight of disconfirming evidence, according to E. I. Eisenstadt, has now led to the abandonment of hope that breakdowns in modernization would be followed by resurgences towards modernity.
- Type
- Varieties of Modernization
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1978
References
I wish to thank Jonathan Dewald and Jeffrey Barnouw for their criticisms of this essay in an earlier form.
1 Gerschenkron, Alexander, ‘Europecentrism and Other Horrors: A Review Article’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 19, (1977), 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Eisenstadt, E. I., ‘Studies of Modernization and Sociological Theory’, History and Theory, 13 (1974), 235–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Smith, Anthony D., The Concept of Social Change: A Critique of the Functionalist Theory of Social Change (London, 1973), pp. 14–15, 68–77Google Scholar; and Tipps, Dean C., ‘Modernization Theory and the Comparative Study of Societies: A Critical Perspective’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15 (1973), 202–04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Smith, , Concept of Social Change, p. 66Google Scholar. See also Nisbet, Robert A., Social Change and History: Aspects of the Western Theory of Development (New York, 1969), pp. 240Google Scholar ff; and Wiener, Jonathan M.. ‘Modernization Theory and History; Achievement and Limitations’, paper delivered at the Social Science History Association Meeting, Madison, Wisconsin, April 23, 1976.Google Scholar
5 Durkheim, Emile, The Rules of Sociological Method, George Catlin, E. G., ed. (New York, 1964), pp. 1–13Google Scholar. See also Giddens, Anthony, ‘Classical Social Theory and the Origins of Modern Sociology’, American Journal of Sociology, 81 (1976). 703–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Brown, Richard D., ‘Modernization and the Modern Personality in Early America, 1600–1865: A Sketch of a Synthesis’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 2 (1972), 201–02CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Stout, Harry S., ‘Culture, Structure, and the “New” History: A Critique and an Agenda’, Computers and the Humanities, 9 (1975), 213–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Parsons, Talcott, The Structure of Social Action (New York, 1937), p. 768.Google Scholar
8 Geertz, Clifford, ‘Ideology as a Cultural System’ in Apter, David E., ed., Ideology and Discontent (Glencoe, 111., 1964), p. 64.Google Scholar
9 Ibid.; Lichtheim, George, The Concept of Ideology’, History and Theory, 4 (1964), 164–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Birnbaum, Norman, ‘The Sociological Study of Ideology’, Current Sociology, 9 (1960), 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Bailyn, Bernard, ‘The Central Themes of the American Revolution: An Interpretation’, in Kurtz, Stephen G. and Hutson, James H., eds., Essays on the American Revolution (Chapel Hill, 1973), p. 11.Google Scholar
12 The Commonwealth of Oceana in Pocock, J. G. A., ed., The Political Works of James Harrington (Cambridge, 1977), pp. 197–98Google Scholar. For a fine exploration of this development, see Fox-Genovese, Elizabeth, ‘Psychohistory versus Psychodeterminism: the Case of Rogin's Jackson’, Reviews in American History, 3 (1975), 407–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 [Powell, Robert], Depopulation arraigned (London, 1636), p. 111.Google Scholar
14 Supple, Barry, Commercial Crisis and Change in England, 1600–1642 (Cambridge, 1959), p. 235.Google Scholar
15 Cooper, J. P., ‘Social and Economic Policies under the Commonwealth’, in Aylmer, G. E., ed., The Interregnum (London, 1972), pp. 121–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Brenner, Robert, ‘The Social Basis of English Commercial Expansion, 1550–1650’, Journal of Economic History, 32 (1972), 361–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 On these developments see Wrigley, E. A., ‘A Simple Model of London's Importance in Changing English Society and Economy 1650–1750’, Past and Present, 37 (1967), 44–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and my Economic Thought in Seventeenth-Century England (Princeton, 1978), pp. 158–98.Google Scholar
18 Hoskins, W. G., ‘Harvest Fluctuations and English Economic History, 1620–1759’, Agricultural History Review, 16 (1968), 15–31, esp. 21.Google Scholar
19 Walter, John and Wrightson, Keith, ‘Dearth and the Social Order in Early Modern England’, Past and Present, 71 (1976), 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Thompson, F. M. L., ‘Landownership and Economic Growth in England in the Eighteenth Century’, in Jones, E. L. and Woolf, S. J., eds., Agrarian Change and Economic Development (London, 1969)Google Scholar; and Kerridge, Eric, Agrarian Problems in the Sixteenth Century and After (London, 1969) pp. 124–25.Google Scholar
21 Everitt, Alan, lsquo;Farm Labourers’, in Thirsk, Joan, ed.. The Agrarian History of England and Wales, 1500–1640 (Cambridge, 1967).Google Scholar
22 Cook, John, Unum necessarium (London, 1648), p. 7.Google Scholar
23 [SirNorth, Dudley], Discourses upon trade (London, 1691), p. viiiGoogle Scholar. Letwin, William, ‘The Authorship of Sir Dudley North's Discourses on Trade’, Economica, 18 (1951), 35–45, suggests that Roger North wrote the preface to his brother's essay.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 [Barbon, Nicholas], An apology for the builder (London, 1685), pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
25 Mun, Thomas, England's treasure by forraign trade (London, 1664), pp. 218–19.Google Scholar
26 Interest of money mistaken (London, 1668), pp. 21–23.Google Scholar
27 Coke, Roger, England's improvements (London, 1675), p. 57.Google Scholar
28 Davenant, Charles, ‘A Memorial Concerning the Coyn of England’ [1695], in Usher, Abbott Payson, ed., Two Manuscripts by Charles Davenant (Baltimore, 1942), pp. 20–21.Google Scholar
29 SirPetty, William, A treatise of taxes (London, 1662), p. 33.Google Scholar
30 [Locke, John], Some considerations of the consequences of the lowering of interest (London, 1692), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
31 Sir Thomas Colepepers Tracts concerning Usury Reprinted … with some animadversions on the writings of Dr. Lock (London [1709]).Google Scholar
32 [Houghton, John], A collection of letters for the improvement of husbandry and trade (London, 1681–83), p. 60.Google Scholar
33 Lee, Joseph, A vindication of a regulated enclosure (London, 1656), p. 9.Google Scholar
34 [North], Discourses upon trade, p. viii.Google Scholar
35 [Briscoe, John], A discourse of money (London, 1696), p. 22.Google Scholar
36 Discourse of the nature, use and advantages of trade (London, 1693), pp. 8–12.Google Scholar
37 [Barbon, ], An apology for the builder, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
38 [Martyn, Henry], Considerations upon the East-India trade (London, 1701), p. 67.Google Scholar
39 [North], Discourses upon trade, p. 14.Google Scholar
40 [SirThomas, Dalby], An historical account of the West-India Collonies (London, 1690), p. 6.Google Scholar
41 [Sheridan, Thomas], A discourse of the rise and power of Parliaments ([London] 1677), p. 225.Google Scholar
42 Adiscourse of the nature, use and advantages of trade, p. 15.Google Scholar
43 [North], Discourses upon trade, p. viii.Google Scholar
44 Thomas, P. J., Mercantilism and the East India Trade (London, 1963), pp. 30, 51.Google Scholar
45 A scheme of trade as it is at present carried on between England and France [London, 1674]Google Scholar. On this see Margaret Priestley, ‘Anglo-French Trade and the “Unfavourable Balance” Controversy, 1660–1685’ Economic History Review, second series, 4 (1951–1952).Google Scholar
46 The great necessity and advantage of preserving our own manufacturies (London, 1697)Google Scholar; The great loss and damage to England by the transportation of wooll to forreign parts (n.p., 1677); and Reasons humbly offered for the passing of a bill (London, 1697).Google Scholar
47 On these shifts of economic orientation see Clark, G. N., Guide to English Commercial Statistics (London, 1938), pp. xiii–xivGoogle Scholar; Davis, Ralph, ‘England's Foreign Trade, 1700–1774’, Economic History Review, second series, 15 (1962), 295–303Google Scholar; and Thomas, , Mercantilism and the East India Trade, pp. 172–73.Google Scholar
48 Price, Jacob, ‘Multilateralism and/or Bilateralism: the settlement of British Trade Balances with the North, c. 1700’, Economic History Review, second series, 14 (1961), 254–74Google Scholar; and Sperling, J., ‘The International Payments Mechanism in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries’, Economic History Review, second series, 14 (1961), 446–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49 Jones, D. W., ‘London Merchants and the Crisis of the 1690s’, in Clark, Peter and Slack, Paul, eds., Crisis and Order in English Towns 1500–1600 (London, 1972), pp. 333–38.Google Scholar
50 Dickson, P. G. M., The Financial Revolution in England (New York, 1967), pp. 6–17Google Scholar; and Davis, Ralph, ‘The Rise of Protection in England, 1689–1786’, Economic History Review, second series, 19 (1966), 306–17.Google Scholar
51 Dickson, Financial Revolution, pp. 8–22Google Scholar; and Laslett, Peter, ‘John Locke, the Great Recoinage, and the Origins of the Board of Trade’, William and Mary Quarterly, 14 (1957), 370–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52 Jones, , ‘London Merchants and the Crisis of the 1690s’, pp. 338–43Google Scholar; and Dickson, , Financial Revolution, pp. 257–59.Google Scholar
53 Davis, , ‘Rise of Protection’, 313–17.Google Scholar
54 Coleman, D. C., ‘Politics and Economics in the Age of Anne: the Case of the AngloFrench Trade Treaty of 1713’, in Coleman, and John, A. H., eds., Trade, Government and Economy in Preindustrial England: Essays Presented to F. J. Fisher (London, 1976).Google Scholar
55 Plumb, J. H., ‘The Growth of the Electorate in England from 1600 to 1712’, Past and Present, 45 (1969), 90–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56 Western, J. R., Monarchy and Revolution: the English State in the 1680s (London, 1972), p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57 [Locke, ], Some considerations, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
58 On this see Ashley, William James, ‘The Tory Origin of Free Trade Policy’, in Surveys, Historic and Economic (London, 1900), pp. 295–99.Google Scholar
59 Houghton, , A collection of letters, pp. 43–49.Google Scholar
60 Skinner, Quentin, ‘History and Ideology in the English Revolution’, Historical Journal, 8 (1965), 151–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61 Davis, , ‘England's Foreign Trade, 1700–1774.Google Scholar
62 Curtin, Philip, The Atlantic Slave Trade (Madison, 1969), pp. 140, 216.Google Scholar
63 Price, Jacob, ‘The Economic Growth of the Chesapeake and the European Market, 1695–1775’, Journal of Economic History, 24 (1964), 496–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64 Earle, Carville and Hoffman, Ronald, ‘Staple Crops and Urban Development in the Eighteenth-century South’, Perspectives in American History, 10 (1976), 34.Google Scholar
65 Paine, Thomas, Common Sense, The Works of Thomas Paine (London, 1796), p. 12.Google Scholar
66 Egnal, Marc, ‘The Economic Development of the Thirteen Continental Colonies, 1720 to 1775’, William and Mary Quarterly, 32 (1975), 191–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also McCusker, John J., ‘Sources of Investment Capital in the Colonial Philadelphia Shipping Industry’, Journal of Economic History 12 (1972), 146–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67 Harris, P. M. G., ‘The Social Origins of American Leaders: The Demographic Foundations’, Perspectives in American History, 3 (1969), 234–36.Google Scholar
68 Nash, Gary B., ‘Slaves and Slaveowners in Colonial Philadelphia’, William and Mary Quarterly, 30 (1973), 227–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69 Earle, and Hoffman, , ‘Staple Crops and Urban Development’, p. 56Google Scholar; and Mitchell, Robert D., ‘The Shenandoah Valley Frontier’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 62 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70 Williams, David Allen, ‘The Small Farmer in Eighteenth-century Virginia Politics’, Agricultural History, 43 (1969), 93Google Scholar; and Lemon, James, The Best Poor Man's Country: A Geographical Study of Early Southeastern Pennsylvania (Baltimore, 1972), p. 94.Google Scholar
71 Lester, Richard A., ‘Currency Issues to Overcome Depressions in Pennsylvania, 1723 and 1729’, Journal of Political Economy, 45 (1938), 324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72 Nash, Gary, ‘The Transformation of Urban Politics, 1700–1765’, Journal of American History, 60 (1973), 605–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73 [Wise, John], ‘A Word of Comfort to a Melancholy Country’, and [Benjamin Franklin], ‘A Modest Enquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Paper Currency’, in Davis, A. M., ed., Colonial Currency Reprints, 1682–1751 (Boston, 1911), vol. 2, p. 186.Google Scholar
74 Cook, Edward M., Jr., ‘Social Behavior and Changing Values in Dedham, Massachusetts, 1700 to 1775’, William and Mary Quarterly, 27 (1970), 578CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bushman, Richard, From Puritan to Yankee: Character and the Social Order in Connecticut, 1690–1765 (New York, 1970), pp. 276–77Google Scholar; and McAnear, Beverly, ‘Mr. Robert R. Livingston's Reasons Against a Land Tax’, Journal of Political Economy, 48 (1940), 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
75 [Stevens, Thomas], ‘A Brief Account of the Causes that have Retarded the Progress of the Colony of Georgia in America’, in Collection of the Georgia Historical Society, 2 (1892).Google Scholar
76 Crowley, J. E., This Sheba, Self: The Conceptualization of Economic Life in Eighteenth-Century America (Baltimore, 1974), pp. 76–127.Google Scholar
77 Warden, G. B., ‘The Distribution of Property in Boston, 1692–1775’, Perspectives in American History, 10 (1976), 111.Google Scholar
78 Ibid., p. 97. See also Morgan, Edmund, ‘The Puritan Ethic and the American Revolution’, William and Mary Quarterly, 24 (1967), 3–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Woodward, C. Vann, ‘The Southern Ethic in a Puritan World’, William and Mary Quarterly, 25 (1968), 343–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
79 Chaffin, Robert J., ‘The Townshend Act of 1767’, William and Mary Quarterly, 27 (1970), 90 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and on this point see Rakove, Jack N.. ‘The Decision for American Independence: A Reconstruction’, Perspectives in American History, 10 (1976), 217 75, especially 274 75.Google Scholar
80 On this point see Upton, L. F. S., ‘The Dilemma of the Loyalists Pamphleteers’, Studies in Burke and His Time, 18 (1977)Google Scholar; and Dickinson, H. T., ‘The Eighteenth-Century Debate on the Sovereignty of Parliament’, Royal Historical Society Transactions, 5th series, 26 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
81 For a summary of his position, see Bailyn, , ‘Central Themes of the American Revolution.’ Pertinent here is Pauline Maier, ‘Why Revolution? Why Democracy?’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 6 (1976), 715.Google Scholar
82 Countryman, Edward, ‘Out of the Bounds of the Law: Northern Land Rioters in the Eighteenth Century’, in Young, Alfred, ed.. The American Revolution: Explorations in the History of American Radicalism (De Kalb, 1976), p. 48Google Scholar; and Boucher, Jonathan, A View of the Causes and Consequences of the American Revolution (1779).Google Scholar
83 [Briscoe, ], A discourse of money, p. 136.Google Scholar
84 Friedman, Bernard, ‘The Shaping of Radical Consciousness in Provincial New York’, Journal of American History, 56 (1970), 789, 792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
85 Pole, J. R., ‘Review of Merrill Jensen, The American Revolution Within America’, William and Mary Quarterly, 33 (1976), 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Foner, Eric, ‘Tom Paine's Republic: Radical Ideology and Social Change.’ in Young, ed., American Revolution, pp. 200 ff.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by