Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:12:12.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Material Culture Studies” and other Ways to Theorize Objects: A Primer to a Regional Debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2011

Haidy Geismar
Haidy Geismar*
Affiliation:
Anthropology and Museum Studies, New York University
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 210 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology, 16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2001. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Geismar, Haidy. n.d. Treasured Possessions: Culture, Property and Indigeneity in the Pacific. Duke University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred. 1992. The Enchantment of Technology and the Technology of Enchantment. In Coote, Jeremy and Shelton, Anthony, eds., Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics. Oxford: Clarendon, 40–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. New York and Oxford: Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebdige, Dick. 1988. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2003a. Semiotics and the Social Analysis of Material Things. Language & Communication 23, 3–4: 409–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2003b. Self-Interpretation, Agency, and the Objects of Anthropology: Reflections on a Genealogy. Comparative Studies in Society and History 45, 2: 222–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, Stuart. 2006. Reverse Anthropology: Indigenous Analysis of Social and Environmental Relations in New Guinea. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern (Nous n'avons jamais été modernes). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Layton, Robert. 2003. Art and Agency: A Reassessment. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9, 3: 447–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 2002 [1922]. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagos of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1992 [1925]. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel. 1987. Material Culture and Mass Consumption. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel. 2005. Materiality: An Introduction. In Miller, D., ed., Materiality. Durham: Duke University Press, 1–50.Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel. 2008. The Comfort of Things. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel and Tilley, Christopher. 1996. Editorial. Journal of Material Culture 1, 1: 5–14.Google Scholar
Morphy, Howard. 2009. Art as a Mode of Action: Some Problems with Gell's Art and Agency. Journal of Material Culture 14, 1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munn, Nancy D. 1986. The Fame of Gawa: A Symbolic Study of Value Transformation in a Massim (Papua New Guinea) Society. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, Fred. 2004. Ontologies of the Image and Economies of Exchange. American Ethnologist 31, 1: 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinney, Christopher and Thomas, Nicholas, eds. 2001. Beyond Aesthetics: Art and the Technologies of Enchantment. Oxford: Berg Publishing.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W., ed. 1985. Objects and Others: Essays on Museums and Material Culture. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1990. Artefacts of History: Events and the Interpretation of Images. In Siikala, Jukka, ed., Culture and History in the Pacific. Helsinki: Finnish Anthropological Society, 25–44.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. 2004. Exchanging Perspectives: The Transformation of Objects into Subjects in Amerindian Ontologies. Common Knowledge 10(3): 463–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Annette B. 1992. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping while Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar