Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:52:19.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Manhood, Femaleness, and Power: A Cultural Analysis of Prehistoric Images of Reproduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Uli Linke
Uli Linke
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ideologies of reproduction are social facts, collective representations, of the dramatic ways in which human beings construct and appropriate gender for the imaging of social reality. Such symbolic universes are often centered on the body (Foucault 1980; Martin 1989; Turner 1984; Douglas 1973). As a template of cultural signification, the body becomes a model through which the social order can be apprehended. For instance, gender hierarchies are sometimes envisioned by means of an anatomical or physiological paradigm (Needham 1973; Hugh-Jones 1979; Theweleit 1987). However, the operation of societal power is generally focused on women's bodies and bodily processes. Women, according to a widespread (and controversial) paradigm, are grounded in nature by virtue of the dictates of their bodies: menstruation, pregnancy, birth (Lévi-Strauss 1966, 1969; Ortner 1974; Ardener 1975; Mac-Cormack and Strathern 1986).

Type
Gender, Generation, Sex
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , October 1992 , pp. 579 - 620
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ammerman, A.J.; and Cavalli-Sforza, L.L.. 1984. The Neolithic Transition and the Genetics of Population in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardener, Sheryl. 1975. Perceiving Women. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Arens, Wilhelm. 1943. “Der Baum als Symbol der Frau.” Volkswerk: Jahrbuch des staatlichen Museums für deutsche Volkskunde (Berlin), 3:259–66.Google Scholar
Arens, Wilhelm. 1948. “Baum und Frau im Glauben des deutschen Volkes.” Österreichische Zeitschrift des Vereins fur Volkskunde (Vienna), 51:70–80.Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston. 1968. The Psychoanalysis of Fire. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Bächtold-Staubli, Hans. 1929. Handwärterbuch des deutschen Aberglaubens. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Balys, J. 1942. “Baum und Mensch im litauischen Volksglauben.” Deutsche Volkskunde (Berlin), 13:171–7.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1972. Mythologies. New York: The Noonday Press.Google Scholar
Baum, P.F. 1922. “Judas's Red Hair.” Journal of English and German Philology, 21:1, 520–9.Google Scholar
Bauschatz, Paul C. 1982. The Well and the Tree: World and Time in Early Germanic Culture. Amherst, Mass.: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Ernest. 1973. The Denial of Death. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Beidelman, T.O. 1963. “The Blood Covenant and the Concept of Blood in Ukaguru.” Africa, 33:4, 321–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellows, Henry Adams. 1923. Edda Saemundar (The Poetic Edda, Icelandic), Bellows, H.A., trans., 2 vols. New York: The American–Scandinavian Foundation.Google Scholar
Bender, Barbara. 1987. “The Roots of Inequality,” in Domination and Resistance, Miller, D., Rowlands, M., and Tilley, C., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1934. “Un nom indoeuropéen de la ‘femme.’” Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 35:104–6.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1969. Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes, 2 vols. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1973. Indo-European Language and Society, Elizabeth, Palmer, trans. Coral Gables, Fla.: University of Miami Press, Miami Linguistics Series No. 12.Google Scholar
Bettelheim, Bruno. 1954. Symbolic Wounds: Puberty Rites and the Envious Male. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bettelheim, Bruno. 1962. Symbolic Wounds: Puberty Rites and the Envious Male, rev. ed. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe/Collier Books.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis. 1962. “Archaeology as Anthropology.” American Antiquity, 28:2, 217–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Maurice; and Jonathan, Parry, eds. 1984. Death and the Regeneration of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolte, Johannes; and Lutz, Mackensen. 1930. Handwörterbuch des deutschen Märchens. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Botticher, Gotthold. 1899. Hildenbrandlied und Waltharilied nebst den “Zaubersprüchen” und “Muspilli” als Beigaben. Halle a.S.: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. Outline of a Theory of Practice, Nice, R., trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J. 1971. “Preformation and Pre-Existence in the Seventeenth Century: A Brief Analysis.” Journal of the History of Biology, 4:221–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brain, James L. 1988. “Male Menstruation in History and Anthropology.” The Journal of Psychohistory, 15:3, 311–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Brandes, Stanley. 1980. Metaphors of Masculinity: Sex and Status in Andalusian Folklore (Publication of the American Folklore Society [New Series], Vol. 1). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling. 1949. A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. A Contribution to the History of Ideas. With the Co-Operation of Colleagues and Assistants. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Buckley, Thomas; and Gottlieb, Alma, eds. 1988. Blood Magic: The Anthropology of Menstruation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunker, Henry Alden; and Lewin, Bertram D.. 1951. “A Psychoanalytic Notation on the Root GN, KN, CN,” in Psychoanalysis and Culture; Essays in Honor of Géza Roheim, Wilbur, George B. and Warner, Muensterberger, eds., 363–67. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Buttenwieser, Moses. 1919. “Blood Revenge and Burial Rites in Ancient Israel.” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 39:303–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, E.A.S. 1970. The Tree at the Navel of the Earth. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casalis, Matthiew. 1976. “The Dry and the Wet: A Semiological Analysis of Creation and Flood Myths.” Semiotica, 17:35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassel, Paulus. 1882. Die Symbolik des Blutes. Berlin: A. Hoffmann and Comp.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1926. The Aryans: A Study of Indo-European Origins. London: Kegan Paul, Trench and TrubnerGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Abner. 1969. “Political Anthropology: The Analysis of the Symbolism of Power Relations.” Man, 4:215–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conkey, Margaret; and Janet, Spector. 1984. “Archaeology and the Study of Gender.” Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 7:1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, R. 1974. The Tree of Life: Symbol of the Center. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Dante, Alighieri. 1969. Divina commedia. Inferno (in Italian and English), Allan, Gilbert, trans. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Deetz, James. 1977. In Small Things Forgotten. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Delaney, Janice; Lupton, M.J.; and Toth, E.. 1988. The Curse: A Cultural History of Menstruation. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1889. Die indogermanischen Verwandtschaftsnamen: ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Alterthumskunde. Leipzig: Abhandlungen der königlichen sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, philologisch-historische Classe, 11:5, 380–606.Google Scholar
Dent, G.R., and Nyembezi, C.L.S.. 1969. Scholar's Zulu Dictionary. Pietermaritzburg: Shuter and Shooter.Google Scholar
Devereux, George. 1950. “The Psychology of Feminine Genital Bleeding.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 31:237–57.Google Scholar
De Vries, Jan. 1961. Altnordisches etymologisches Worterbuch. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
D'iakonov, I.M. 1985. “On the Original Home of the Speakers of Indo-European.” The Journal of Indo-European Studies, 13:1–2, 92–174.Google Scholar
Doke, C.M.; Malcolm, D. McK; and Sikakna, J.M.A., eds. 1958. English-Zulu Dictionary. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1973. Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Duhn, Friedrich von. 1906. “Rot und tot.” Archiv für Religionswissenschaft, 9:1–24.Google Scholar
Dumézil, Georges. 1958. L'Ideologie Tripartie des Indo-Européens. Brussels.Google Scholar
Dumézil, Georges. 1977. Les Dieux Souverains des Indo-Européens. Paris.Google Scholar
Dundes, Alan. 1976. “A Psychoanalytic Study of the Bullroar.” Man, 11: 220–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dundes, Alan. 1980. “Wet and Dry, The Evil Eye: An Essay in Indo-European and Semitic Worldview,” in his Interpreting Folklore, 93–133, 265–76. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dundes, Alan. 1983. “Couváde in Genesis,” in Studies in Aggadah and Jewish Folklore, (Folklore Research Center Studies, no. 7), Issachar, Ben-Ami and Joseph, Dan, eds., 35–53. Jerusalem: The Magnes Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1897. “La prohibition de l'inceste et ses origines.” L'Année sociologique, 1:1–70.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1963. Incest: The Nature and Origin of the Taboo, Edward, Sagarin, trans. New York: Lyle Stuart.Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. 1958a. Rites and Symbols of Initiation: The Mysteries of Birth and Rebirth. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. 1958b [1948]. Patterns in Comparative Religion, Rosemary, Sheed, trans. New York:Google Scholar
Sheed, and Ward, . Originally published as Traité d'histoire des religions (Paris: Payot).Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. 1961 [1952]. Images and Symbols: Studies in Religious Symbolism, Philip, Mairet trans. New York:Google Scholar
Sheed, and Ward, . Originally published as Images et symboles: essais sur le symbolisme magico-religieux (Paris: Librairies Gallimard).Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. 1964 [1951]. Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy, rev. and enl., Willard R., Trask, trans. (Bollingen series, no. 76). New York:Google Scholar
Bollinger, Foundation; distributed by Pantheon Books. Originally published as Le chamanisme et les techniques archaiques d l'extase (Paris: Payot).Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E.E. 1933. “Zande Blood-Brotherhoods.” Africa, 6:4, 369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. An Introduction, vol. 1 of The History of Sexuality, Robert, Hurley, trans. New York: Vintage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Roberta. 1978. Old Norse Court Poetry: The Drøttkvaet Stanza (Islandica 42). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Frazer, Sir James George. 1911. “Blood Tabooed,” in his Taboo and the Perils of the Soul, 239–51. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Frazer, Sir James George. 1955 [1936]. Aftermath: A Supplement to the Golden Bough. Reprint. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Freeman, Derek. 1968. “Thunder, Blood and the Nicknaming of God's Creatures.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 37:353–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freud, Sigmund. 1925 [1918]. “Contribution to the Psychology of Love: The Taboo of Virginity,” in Collected Papers, Joan, Riviere, trans., 216–35 (The International Psycho-Analytic Library, no. 10). London: Leonard and Virginia Woolf at the Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Johannes. 1952. Hethitisches Wörterbuch. Kurzgefasste kritische Sammlung der Deutungen hethitischer Wörter. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitatsverlag.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1970. Proto-Indo-European Trees: The Arboreal System of a Prehistoric People. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1978. The Meaning of Aphrodite. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1979. Language, Context, and the Imagination: Essays by Paul Friedrich, Dil, Anwar S., ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Frisk, Hjalmar. 1960. Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, vol. 1, A to Kα. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Frisk, Hjalmar. 1970. Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, vol. 2, Kp to Ω. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, T.V.; and Ivanov, V.V.. 1985a. “The Ancient Near East and the Indo-European Question: Temporal and Territorial Characteristics of Proto-Indo-European Based on Linguistic and Historico-Cultural Data.” The Journal of Indo-European Studies, 13:1–2, 3–48.Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, T.V.; and Ivanov, V.V.. 1985b. “The Migration of Tribes Speaking the Indo-European Dialects from Their Original Homeland in the Near East to Their Historical Habitations in Eurasia.” The Journal of Indo-European Studies, 13:1–2, 49–91.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Liv. 1987. “Identifying Gender Representation in the Archaeological Record: Contextual Study,” in The Archaeology of Contextual Meanings, Ian, Hodder, ed., 79–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilmore, David. 1990. Manhood in the Making. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gimbutas, Marija. 1963. “The Indo-Europeans: Archaeological Problems.” American Anthropologist, 65:825–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimbutas, Marija. 1970. “Proto-Indo-European Culture: The Kurgan Culture during the Fifth to the Third Millennia B.C.,” in Indo-European and Indo-Europeans, Cardona, G., Koenigswald, H.M., and Senn, A., eds., 155–98. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimbutas, Marija. 1973. “Old Europe c. 7000–3500 B.C., the Earliest European Cultures before the Infiltration of the Indo-European Peoples.” Journal of Indo-European Studies, 1:1–20.Google Scholar
Gimbutas, Marija. 1980. “The Kurgan Wave Migration (3400–3200 B.C.) into Europe and the Following Transformation of Culture.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 8:273–315.Google Scholar
Gimbutas, Marija. 1982. The Goddesses and Gods of Old Europe: 6500–3500 B.C. Myths and Cult Images. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gonda, Jan. 1980. Vedic Ritual: The Non-Solemn Rites, vol. 4, pt. 1 of Handbuch der Orientalistic. Zweite Abteilung: Indien. Leiden: E.J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, Jack. 1983. The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Jacob. 1868. Geschichte der deutschen Sprache, 2 vols., 3rd ed. Leipzig: S. Hirzel Verlag.Google Scholar
Hall, Thomas, S. 1975. “Euripus; or the Ebb and Flow of the Blood.” Journal of the History of Biology, 8:2, 321–50.Google Scholar
Herdt, Gilbert H. 1981. Guardians of the Flutes: Idioms of Masculinity. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Herdt, Gilbert H. 1982. Rituals of Manhood: Male Initiation in Papua New Guinea. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, Michael. 1985. The Poetics of Manhood: Contest and Identity in a Cretan Mountain Village. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettrich, Heinrich. 1985. “Indo-European Kinship Terminology in Linguistics and Anthropology.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hiatt, L.R. 1971. “Secret Pseudo-Procreation Rites among the Australian Aborigines,” in Anthropology in Oceania, Hiatt, L.R. and Jaywardene, C., eds., 77–88. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian, ed. 1982. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, Ian. 1984. “Burials, Houses, Women and Men in the European Neolithic,” in Ideology, Power and Prehistory, Miller, D. and Tilley, C., eds., 51–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Uno. 1922–1923. Der Baum des Lebens (Annales academiae scientiarum fennicae, series B, vol. 16, no. 3). Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
Hugh-Jones, Christine. 1979. From the Milk River: Spatial and Temporal Processes in Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, K.H. 1955. “The Pictish Language,” in The Problem of the Picts, Wainwright, F.T., ed., 126–66. Edinburgh: Nelson.Google Scholar
Jay, Nancy. 1985. “Sacrifice as Remedy for Having Been Born of Woman,” in Immaculate and Powerful, Atkinson, C.W., Buckanan, C.H., and Miles, M.R., eds., 283–309. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Kammeyer, Hans F. 1941. “Lebensbaum und Baumkult der Völker.” Mitteilungen der deutschen dendrologischen Gesellschaft, 54 (Jahrbuch), 73–87.Google Scholar
Kirk, G.S.; and Raven, J.E.. 1957. The Presocratic Philosophers. A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Ernst. 1967. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language, 2 vols. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Krahe, Hans. 1936. Ligurisch und indogermanisch (Festschrift für H. Hirt), 2:241–55. Heidelberg: von H. Hirt and Streitberg.Google Scholar
Krahe, Hans 1958. Einleitung undLautlehr.voX. 1 of Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft (Sammlung Goschen Vol. 59). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
La Barre, Weston. 1984. Muelos: A Stone Age Superstition about Sexuality. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Latte, Kurt. 1960. Römische Religionsgeschichte (Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft, 5:4. Munich: C. H. Becksche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Latynin, B.A. 1933. “The Cosmic Tree and the Tree of Life in the Folklore and Art of Eastern Europe.” Izvetsia Akadamie ist mat Kultur, no. 69.Google Scholar
Lauffer, Otto. 1937. “Schicksalsbaum und Lebensbaum im deutschen Glauben und Brauch.” Zeitschrift für Volkskunde (Berlin), n.s., 7:3, 215–30.Google Scholar
Lechler, George. 1937. “The Tree of Life in Indo–European and Islamic Cultures.” Ars Islamica: The Research Seminary in Islamic Art, 4:369–421.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1966. The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Raw and the Cooked. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Lévy-Bruhl, Lucien. 1935. “Blood and Its Magic Virtues,” and “Blood and Its Sinister Virtues,” in his Primitives and the Supernatural, Clare, Lilian A., trans., 323–432. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Lidz, R.W.; and Lidz, Theodore. 1977. “Male Menstruation: A Ritual Alternative to the Oedipal Transition.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 58:1, 17–37.Google Scholar
Linke, Uli. 1985. “Blood as Metaphor in Proto-Indo-European.” The Journal of Indo-European Studies, 13:3–4, 333–76.Google Scholar
Linke, Uli. 1986. Where Blood Flows, A Tree Grows: A Study of Root Metaphor in German Culture. Ph.D. Disser., Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Linke, Uli. 1989. “Women, Androgynes, and Models of Creation in Norse Mythology.” The Journal of Psychohistory, 16:3, 231–62.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. 1964. “The Hot and the Cold, the Dry and the Wet in Greek Philosophy.” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 84:92–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, E.M. 1923. The Blood Sacrifice Complex (American Anthropological Association Memoir, no. 30). Menasha, Wis.: The Collegiate Press.Google Scholar
Mallory, J.O. 1989. In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology and Myth. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Mannhardt, Wilhelm. 1904. Der Baumkultus der Germanen und ihrer Nachbarstämme. Mythologische Untersuchungen, 2nd ed., vol. 1 of Wald- und Feldkulte. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger Verlag.Google Scholar
Maringer, Johannes. 1976. “Das Blut im Kult und Glauben der vorgeschichtlichen Menschen.” Anthropos: Internationale Zeitschrift für Völker- und Sprachkunde, 71:1–2, 226–53.Google Scholar
Marshall, Yvonne. 1985. “Who Made the Lapita Pots? A Case Study in Gender Archaeology.” Journal of Polynesian Society, 94:205–33.Google Scholar
Martin, Emily. 1989. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Marzell, Heinrich. 1925–1935. “Die deutschen Bäume in der Volkskunde: Esche; Eberesche; Erie; Tanne; Lärche; Wacholder; Rotbuche; Birke; Linde.” Mitteilungen der deutschen dendrologischen Gesellschaft, 35:75–86, 37:71–78, 38:76–82, 41:78–87, 42:180–6, 43:270–80, 45:144–54, 46:121–31, 47:196–204.Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1952. “Gibt es ein indogermanisches ٭sor-‘Frau’?” Studien zur indogermanischen Grundsprache, 4:32–39.Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1956. Kurzgefasstes etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindischen, vol. 1 of Indogermanische Bibliothek, zweite Reihe. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitatsverlag.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Dennis J. 1969. “The Symbolism of Blood and Sacrifice.” Journal of Biblical Literature, 88:2, 166–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Dennis J. 1973. “Further Notes on the Symbolism of Blood and Sacrifice.” Journal of Biblical Literature, 92:2, 205–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormack, Carol P.; and Strathern, Marilyn, eds. 1986. Nature, Culture, Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGhee, Robert. 1977. “Ivory for the Sea Woman: The Symbolic Attributes of a Prehistoric Technology.” Canadian Journal of Archaeology, 1:141–49.Google Scholar
McGraw-Hill, Editors. 1963. Pinyin Romanization in Alphabetical Sequence, vol. 3 of Modern Chinese-English Technical and General Dictionary. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret. 1947. Male and Female. New York: William Morrow and C.Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret. 1977. “End Linkage: A Tool for Cross-Cultural Analysis,” in About Bateson: Essays on Gregory Bateson, Mary Catherine Bateson et al. ,John, Brockman, ed., 170–231. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. 1920. “Les noms du ‘feu’ et de 1' ‘eau’ et la question du genre.” Memoires de la Sociéte de Linguistique de Paris, 21:249–56.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. 1964. Introduction a I'étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel; and Tilley, Christopher, eds. 1984. Ideology, Power and Prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montagu, M.F. Ashley. 1937–1938. “The Origin of Sub-Incision in Australia.” Oceania, 8:193–207.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Rita E. 1974. “A Cross-Cultural Study of Menstruation, Menstrual Taboos and Related Social Variables.” Ethos, 2:137–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Henrietta, ed. 1990. Space, Text and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Needham, Rodney. 1967. “Blood, Thunder and the Mockery of Animals,” in Myth and Cosmos. Readings in Mythology and Symbolism, John, Middleton, ed., 271–85. Garden City, N.Y.: The Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Needham, Rodney, ed. 1973. Right and Left: Essays on Dual Symbolic Classification. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, Hugo. 1953. “Der heilige Baum bei Nauders.” Tiroler Heimat, 17:119–32.Google Scholar
O'Flaherty, Wendy Doninger. 1980. Women, Androgynes, and Other Mythical Beasts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Onians, Richard Broxton. 1973 [1951]. The Origins of European Thought about the Body, the Mind, the Soul, the World, Time and Fate. New York: Amo Press. Reprint. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry B. 1974. “Is Female to Male as Nature Is to Culture?,” in Women, Culture and Society, Rosaldo, M.Z. and Lamphere, L., eds., 67–88. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry B.; and Harriet, Whitehead, eds. 1981. Sexual Meanings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
OvidOvidius Naso, Publius Ovidius Naso, Publius. 1925–1926 [1916]. Metamorphoses, 2 vols., Frank Justus, Miller, trans. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons. Reprint.Google Scholar
Parkington, John. 1989. “Interpreting Paintings without a Commentary: Meaning and Motive, Content and Composition in the Rock Art of the Western Cape, South Africa.” Antiquity, 63:13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisani, Vittore. 1951. “Vxor: Richerche di Morfologia Indoeuropa,” in Filologia Orientate Glottologia, vol. 3 of Miscellanea G. Galbiati, 1–38. Milano: Ultico Hoepl Editore.Google Scholar
Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, vol. 1. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Puhvel, J. 1978. “Victimal Hierarchies in Indo-European Animal Sacrifice.” American Journal of Philology, 99:354–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puhvel, J. 1984. Hittite Etymological Dictionary. New York: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
Pulgram, E. 1958. The Tongues of Italy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, Ernest. 1943. “The Tree of Life: A Psychoanalytic Investigation of the Origins of Mankind.” Psychoanalytic Review, 30:263–72.Google Scholar
Raum, Johannes. 1907. “Blut und Speichelbiinde bei den Wadchagga.” Archiv für Religionswissenschaft, 10:269–94.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 1988. Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin 1989. “They Ride Horses Don't They? Mallory on the Indo-Europeans.” Antiquity, 63:843–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinsohn, Jacob. 1896. “Das Blut,” in his Die Psychologie der Naturvölker, 18–32. Leipzig: Wilhelm Friedrich Verlag.Google Scholar
Roheim, Géza. 1945. War, Crime, and the Covenant (Journal of Clinical Psychopathology Monograph Series, no. 1). Monticello, N.Y.: Medical Journal Press.Google Scholar
Roheim, Géza. 1949. “The Symbolism of Subincision.” American Imago, 6:321–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Rüsche, Franz. 1930. Blut, Leben und Seek: ihr Verhältnis nach Auffassung der griechischen und hellenistischen Antike, der Bibel und der alten alexandrinischen Theologen; eine Vorarbeit zur Religionsgeschichte des Opfers (Studien zur Geschichte des Altertums, supp. vol. 5). Paderborn: Ferdinand Schoningh Verlag.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Meredith. 1954. A Dictionary of the Yao language. Zamba, Nyasaland: The Government Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, David W. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Schoner, E. 1964. Das Viererschema in der antiken Humoralpathologie (Sudhoffs Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin und der Naturwissenschaften, supp. vol. 4) Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Schrader, O. 1904. “Über Bezeichnungen för die Heiratsverwandtschaft bei den indogermanischen Völkern.” Indogermanische Forschungen: Zeitschrift für indo-germanische Sprach-und Altertumskunde, 17:1–2, 11–36.Google Scholar
Schroder, Franz Rolf. 1931. “Germanische Schöpfungsmythen.” Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift, 19:1–26.Google Scholar
Schultz-Lorentzen, A. 1927. Dictionary of the West Greenland Eskimo Language (Meddelelser Om Gronland), vol. 69 Kobenhavn: C.A. Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Martin. 1982. “Blood in Sogdian and Old Iranian.” Monumentum Georg Morgenstierne II, vol. 8, 189–96, of Hommages et Opera Minora. Leiden: E.J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Warren. 1988. “Ritual Kinship, Ritual Incorporation and the Denial of Death.” Man (N.S.), 23:275–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Warren. 1989. “The Theoretical Importance of Pseudo-Procreative Symbolism.” The Psychoanalytic Study of Society, 14:71–88.Google Scholar
Sherratt, Andrew; and Susan, Sherratt. 1988. “The Archaeology of Indo-European: An Alternative View.” Antiquity, 62:584–95.Google Scholar
Siegel, Rudolph. 1968. Galen's System of Physiology and Medicine: An Analysis of His Doctrine and Observations on Bloodflow, Respiration, Humors and Internal Diseases. New York: S. Karger.Google Scholar
Skomal, Nacev; and Polomé, Edgar C., eds. 1987. Proto-Indo-European: The Archae-ology of a Linguistic Problem (Studies in Honor of Marija Gimbutas). Washington, D.C.: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Sonny, A. 1906. “Rote Farbe im Totenkult.” Archiv für Religionswissenschaft (Leipzig), 9:525–9.Google Scholar
Steinmueller, John E. 1959. “Sacrificial Blood in the Bible.” Biblica, 40:2, 556–67.Google Scholar
StrackHerman, J. Herman, J. 1892. Das Blut im Glauben und Aberglauben der Menschheit. Berlin.Google Scholar
Szemerenyi, Oswald. 1977. “Studies in the Kinship Terminology of the Indo-European Languages, with Special Reference to Indian, Iranian, Greek and Latin.” Ada Iranica (Textes et Memoires 7, Varia 1977), 16:1–231.Google Scholar
Taylor, John Walter. 1979. “Tree Worship.” Mankind Quarterly, 20:79–141.Google Scholar
Tegnaeus, Harry. 1952. Blood Brothers: An Ethno-Sociological Study of the Institutions of Blood-Brotherhood with Special Reference to Africa. Stockholm: The Ethnographical Museum of Sweden, New Series Publication No. 10.Google Scholar
Theweleit, Klaus. 1987. Male Fantasies, 2 vols. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Timm, Klaus. 1964. “Blut und die rote Farbe im Totenkult.” Ethnographisch-Archäologische Zeitschrift, 5:39–55.Google Scholar
Toporov, V.N. 1973. “L'albero universale: saggio d'interpretazione semiotica,” in Ricerche Semiotiche: Nuove Tendenze delle Scienze Umane nell Urss, Lofman, Jurij M. and Uspenskij, Boris A., eds.; Clara Strada, Janovic, trans. (Italian edition, vol. 43:148–201). Torino: Nuova Biblioteca Scientifica.Google Scholar
Trumbull, Henry Clay. 1885. The Blood Covenant: A Primitive Rite and Its Bearings on Scripture. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Trumbull, Henry Clay. 1896. The Threshold Covenant or The Beginning of Religious Rites. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S. 1984. The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor W. 1965. “Colour Classification in Ndembu Ritual: A Problem in Primitive Classification,” in Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion (A.S.A. Monograph No. 3), Banton, M., ed., 47–84. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor W. 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vasmer, Max. 1953. Russisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Vergil Vergilius Maro, Publius. 1960. Virgil. Aeneid, 2 vols., Fairclough, H. Rushton, trans. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, Karl Alfred. 1892. “Das Blut im Glauben der alten Aegypter.” Am Ur-Quell: Monatschrift für Volkskunde, 3:4, 113–6.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, Karl Alfred. 1923–1924. “Der Blutglaube im alten Ägypten.” Archiv für Religionswissenschaft, 22:58–86.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Eva. 1925. Die Bedeutung der roten Farbe im Kultus der Griechen und Römer. Erläutert mit Berücksichtigung entsprechender Bräuche bei anderen Völkern (Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten, vol. 20). Giessen: Alfred Töpelmann Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiinsche, August. 1905. “Die Sagen vom Lebensbaum und Lebenswasser: Altorientalische Mythen.” Ex Oriente Lux, 1:2–3. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zvelebil, Marek; and Zvelebil, Kamil V.. 1988. “Agricultural Transition and Indo-European Dispersals.” Antiquity, 62:574–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar