¹ For relevant discussion of bureaucratic polities see: Mosca, G., The Ruling Class (New York; McGraw-Hill, 1939), pp. 70–103Google Scholar; Friedrich, Carl J., Constitutional Government and Democracy (Boston, Ginn, 1950), chs. 2, 3.Google Scholar

² Eisenstadt, S. N., “Political Struggle in Bureaucratic Societies”, World Politics, IX (1956), pp. 15–36.Google Scholar

³ Weber, Max, From Max Weber – Essays in Sociology, eds. Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (Oxford University Press, 1946), pp. 224–8.Google Scholar

⁴ On monopolies in China: Gale, E. M., Discourses on Salt and Iron (Leyden, Brill, E. J., 1931)Google Scholar; Gale, E. M., “Public Administration of Salt in China”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, V (1930), pp. 150–152Google Scholar; Wilbur, C. M., “Industrial Slavery in China”, Journal of Economic History, III (1943), pp. 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar In Egypt: Kees, H., “Aegypten”, Kulturgeschichte des Alten Orients (Muenchen, C. H. Beck, 1933), pp. 126–137Google Scholar; Heichelheim, F. M., “Roemische Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte”, Historia Mundi, IV, (Bern, Francke, 1956), pp. 341, 457 if.Google Scholar

⁵ Ostrogorsky, G., “Quelques problèmes d'histoire de la paysannerie Byzantine”, Corpus Bruxelleuse Historiae Byzantinae (Bruxelles, Editions de Byzantion, 1956), chs. 1, 3.Google Scholar

⁶ Ostrogorsky, G., “Die lāndliche Steuergemeinde des byzantinischen Reiches im 10. Jahrhundert”, Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte, XX (1927), pp. 1–108Google Scholar; idem, History of the Byzantine State (Oxford University Press, 1956), pp. 83–98, 239–251.Google Scholar

⁷ Christensen, A. E., L'Iran sous les Sassanides (Copenhagen, Levin and Munksgaard, 1936), pp. 359–365.Google Scholar The parallelism between the Sassanid and Byzantine military colonies has been aanalyzed by Stein, E., “Ein Kapitel vom Persischen und vom Byzantinischen Staate”, Byzantinische- Neugriechische Jahrbucher, I (1920), pp. 50–67.Google Scholar

⁸ Balazs, E., “Beitrāge zur Wirtschaftsgeschichte der T'ang-Zeit”, Mitteilungen des Seminars fur Orientalische Sprachen, ed. Mittwoch, Eugen (Berlin, de Gruyter, 1931), pp. 1–92Google Scholar; des Rotours, Robert, Traité des Fonctionnaires et Traité de L'Armée (Leyden, E. J. Brill, 1947–1948)Google Scholar, Introduction; Pulleyblank, E., The Background of the Rebellion of An-Lu Shan (Oxford University Press, 1955), chs. 3, 5.Google Scholar

⁹ G. Ostrogorsky (cf. n. 6).

¹⁰ E. Balazs, op. cit.; Franke, W., “Zur Grundsteuer in China wahrend der Ming-Dynastie", Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft, 56 (1953), pp. 93–103.Google Scholar

¹¹ Ostrogorsky, G., “Das Steuersystem in Byzantinischen Altertum und Mittelalter", Byzantion, VI (1931), pp. 229–249Google Scholar; Bach, E., “Les lois agraires byzantines du Xle siècle”, Classica et Medievalia, V (1942), pp. 71–90.Google Scholar

¹² Balazs, E., “Le régime de la propriété en Chine du IVe au XlVe siècle, état de la question”, Cahiers d'histoire mondiale, I (1954), pp. 669–679Google Scholar; Maspero, H., “Les régimes frontiers en Chine, des origines aux temps modernes”, Mélanges posthumes sur les religions et I'histoire de la Chine, Etudes Historiques, III (Paris, Musée Guimet, 1950), pp. 141–192.Google Scholar

¹³ Haring, C. H., The Spanish Empire in America (New York, Oxford University Press, 1947), chs. 7, 12Google Scholar; Capdequi, J. M. Ots, El Estado Espanol en las Indias (Mexico, Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1946), pp. 9–25, chs. 3,4Google Scholar; idem, “Institutiones economicas de la America espanola durante el periode colonial”, Anuario de historia del derecho espanol, I (1932)Google Scholar; idem, “Algunas consideraciones en torno a la politica economica y fiscal del estado espanol en las Indias”, Revista de las Indias, series 2, II (1939), pp. 172–181Google Scholar; Zavala, S., New Viewpoints on the Spanish Colonization of America (Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1943), chs. 7, 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁴ See Hozelitz, B., Economic Stagnation in Agrarian Empires, prepared for Conference on Chinese Economy, Harvard University, Center of Far Eastern Studies, 1956 (mimeographed).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Luetge, F., “Das 14. und 15. Jahrhundert in der Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte”, Jahrbücher fuer Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 162 (1950), pp. 161–213.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Bratianu, G. I., Etudes Byzantines d'histoire économique (Paris, Paul Geuthner, 1938), II, chs. 1, 3Google Scholar; Boak, A. E. R., “The Book of the Prefect”, Journal of Economic and Business History, I (1928–1929), pp. 597–619.Google Scholar

¹⁷ H. Kees, op. tit. (cf. n. 4), pp. 36 ff., 102 ff.

¹⁸ E. M. Gale, Discourses on Salt and Iron (cf. n. 4); Blue, R. C., “The Argumentation of the Shih-huo-Chin”, Journal of Asian Studies, II (1948), pp. 90 ff.Google Scholar; E. Balazs, “Beitrage” (cf. n. 8); Balazs, E., Le traité économique du “Souei-Chou” (Leyden, E. J. Brill, 1953), esp. pp. 123–127.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Guthrie, Ch. L., “Colonial Economy, Trade, Industry and Labour in the 17th Century”, Revista de Historia de Americas, VII (1944), pp. 103–133Google Scholar; Lee, R. L., “Grain Legislation inColonial Mexico”, Hispanic American Historical Review, XXVII (1947), pp. 60–64.Google Scholar

²⁰ On Byzantium see: Diehl, Ch., Guilland, R. et al. , L'Europe Orientate de 1081 à 1453 (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1945)Google Scholar, and the discussion of Bréhier, L. in Journal des Savants (1945), esp. pp. 123 ffGoogle Scholar; Diehl, Ch., “The Government and Administration of the Byzantine Empire”, Cambridge Medieval History, IV (1923)Google Scholar; Bréhier, L., “Les Institutions de l'Empire Byzantin”, Le Monde Byzantin (Paris, A. Michel, 1949)Google Scholar, esp. ch. 1. On China see: des Rotours, R., “Traité des Examens”, Traduits de la Nouvelle histoire des T'ang (Paris, E. Leroux, 1932)Google Scholar, Introduction; des Rotours, R., “Traité des Fonctionnaires et Traité de T'Armée (Leyden, E. J. Brill, 1947)Google Scholar; Kracke, E. A., Jr., Civil Service in Sung China (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1953)Google Scholar, esp. chs. 3, 4; Stein, B., “Introduction à l'histoire et aux institutions byzantins”, Traditio, VII (1949–1951), esp. pp. 113–138.Google Scholar

²¹ Sagnac, P., La formation de la socété française moderne (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1945), I, pp. 50–147Google Scholar; Ford, F. L., Robe and Sword: The Regrouping of the French Aristocracy after Louis XIV (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1953)Google Scholar, esp. p. 2, ch. 5; Beloff, M., The Age of Absolutism (London, Hutchinson's University Library, 1954)Google Scholar.

²² See: Christensen, A. E., “Sassanid Persia”, Cambridge Ancient History, XII (Cambridge, 1939), pp. 114–18Google Scholar; Christensen, A. E., L'Iran sous les Sassanids (Copenhagen, Levin and Munksgaard, 1936), pp. 136–54Google Scholar; Ghirshman, R., Iran (London, Rankin, Pelican Books, 1954), p. 309Google Scholar; Mole, M., “L'orthodoxie zoroastrienne”, Annuaire de l'lnstitut dephilologie et d'histoireorientates, XII (1953), esp. p. 320Google Scholar where the problem of formalization is touched upon.

²³ Simpson, L. B., The Encomienda in New Spain (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1950), pp. 123–144Google Scholar; C. H. Haring, The Spanish Empire in America, chs. 7, 8; Gongora, M., El Estado en el Derecho Indiana (Santiago, Universidad de Chile, 1951)Google Scholar; Zavala, S., La Encomienda Indiana (Madrid, Imprenta Helenica, 1953)Google Scholar; Konetzkie, R., “Die Entstehung des Adels in Hispano-America wāhrund der Kolonialzeit”, Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte, XXXIX (1952), pp. 215–250Google Scholar; Wolf, Eric R., “Aspects of Group Relations in a Complex Society”, American Anthropoligist, XL (1956), pp. 1065–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁴ On the general trends see: Alfoeldi, A., “Roömische Kaiserzeit”, Historia Mundi, IV (1956), esp. pp. 216–219, 223–229Google Scholar; on the policies of particular emperors: Momigliano, A., Claudius - The Emperor and his Achievement (Oxford, The Clarendon Press, 1934)Google Scholar, esp. ch. 3; on the social composition and political functions of the equestrian order see Stein, Arthur, Der Romische Ritterstand (Mnchen, C. H. Beck, 1927), sep. pp. 54–106, 419–459Google Scholar; Pflaum, H. G., Les Procurateurs Equestres sous le Haut-Empire Romain (Paris, A.–Maisonneuve, 1950).Google Scholar

²⁵ C. H. Haring (cf. n. 23), ch. 9; Pierson, W. W., Jr., “Some Reflections on the Cabildo as an Institution”, The Hispanic American Historical Review, V (1932), pp. 513–596Google Scholar; Moore, J. P., The cabildo in Peru under the Hapsburgs - a study on the origins and powers of the town council in the Viceroyalty of Peru, 1530–1700 (Durham, North Carolina, Duke University Press, 1954).Google Scholar

²⁶ Gibson, C., “The Transformation of the Indian Community in New Spain”, Journal of World History, II (1955), pp. 581–607Google Scholar; M. Gongora, El Estado (cf. n. 23): Chevalier, L., “Les municipality indiennes en Nouvelle Espagne, 1520–1620”, Annuario de historia del derecho espanol, XV (1944), pp. 352–386.Google Scholar

²⁷ G. Ostrogorsky, “Die landliche Steuergemeinde.” (cf. n. 6); “Das Steuersystem.” (cf. n. 11); History (cf. n. 6); R. des Rotours, Traité des Fonctionnaires (cf. n. 8), Intioduction; E. Pulleyblank (cf. n. 8), ch. 5; Charanis, P., “On the Social Structure of the later Roman Empire”, Byzantion, XVII (1944–1945), pp. 39–58.Google Scholar

²⁸ Bréliier, L., “Les institutions de l'empire byzantin” (cf. n. 20), pp. 218–248Google Scholar; Ostrogorsky, G., History, pp. 207–231Google Scholar; C. Haring (cf. n. 13), chs. 6, 7; M. Gongora, op. cit., pp. 233–200; Buenger, K., Quellen zur Rechtgeschichte der T'ang Zeit (Monumenta Serica, IX, Leipzig, 1946)Google Scholar; idem, “Die Rechtsidee in der chinesischen Geschichte”, Saeculum, III (1952), pp. 192–217Google Scholar; Christensen, A. E., L'Iran sous les Sassanids (cf. n. 22), pp. 300 ff.Google Scholar, ch. 7.

²⁹ Pringsheim, F., “Justininian's Prohibition of Commentaries to the Digest”, Revue Internationale des droits de l'antiquité, V (1950), pp. 383–416.Google Scholar

³⁰ Ruiz, A., “Das Römische Recht” (cf. n. 24), pp. 489–515Google Scholar; Schiller, A. A., “Bureaucracy and the Roman Law”, Seminar, VII (1949), pp. 26–48Google Scholar; idem, “Factors in the Development of the late Classical Law”, Seminar, XI (1953), pp. 1–11Google Scholar; idem, “The Jurists and the Prefects of Rome”, Revue Internationale des droits de l'antiquité, II (1949), pp. 319–359Google Scholar; Schulz, F., History of Roman Legal Science (London, Oxford University Press, 1946), pp. 262–99.Google Scholar

³¹ A. E. Christensen, L'Iran sous les Sassanides (cf. n. 7).

³² See, for a good recent discussion: Joueon des Longrais, Frederic, “Le droit criminel anglais au moyen age”, Revue historique du droit franfais et étranger, IV (1956), pp. 39 ff.Google Scholar; Chenon, E., Histoire générate du droit français (Paris, Société Anonyme du Recueil Sirey, 1929), II, pp. 452 ff.Google Scholar

³³ Jones, A. H. M., “Imperial and Senatorial Jurisdiction in the Early Principate”, Historia, III (1954), pp. 464–488.Google Scholar

³⁴ On the general characteristics and development of Chinese law see Cheng, F. T., “Sketch of the History, Philosophy and Reform in Chinese Law”, Studies in the Law of the Far East and Southeast Asia (Washington D.C., The Washington Foreign Law Society in cooperation with the George Washington University Law School, 1956)Google Scholar; K. Bueeger, “Die Rechtsidee═” (cf. n. 28); Escarra, J., Le droit chinois (Paris, Librairie du Recueil Sirey, 1936)Google Scholar; Hulsewe, A. F. P., Remnants of Han Law (Leyden, E. J. Brill, 1955)Google Scholar; K. Buenger, Quellen zur Rechtheschichte… (cf. n. 28); see also review of this book in Zeitschrift der deutschen Morgenlāndischen Gesellschaft, 100 (1950), pp. 385–9; van der Sprenkel, S., A Sociological Analysis of Chinese Legal Institutions with Special Reference to the Ching Period (Thesis, University of London, 1956).Google Scholar E. A. Kracke, Jr., comments: “The lack of development in Chinese ‘civil’ law was to an important degree explainable by the Confucian prejudice against coercion, and preference for regulating all relationships, so far as possible, by the code of ‘ritual’ (li) or social propriety.”

³⁵ A good description of the communications and propaganda machines in the Empire of T'ang can be found in Reischauer, E. O., Ennin's Travels in T'ang China (New York, Ronald Press Co., 1955), ch. 5.Google Scholar

³⁶ Goodrich, L. C., The Literary Inquisition of Ch'ien Lung (Baltimore, Maryland, The Waverly Press, 1953)Google Scholar; Hucker, C., The “Eastern Forest" Movement in the late Ming Period (Second Conference on Chinese Thought, Laconia, N.H., 1954) (mimeographed)Google Scholar; Busch, H., “The Tung-Lin Academy and its political and philosophical significance” (Momunenta Serica, XIV, 1955), pp. 1–163Google Scholar; Gait, H. S., History of Chinese Educational Institutions (London, A. Probsthain, 1951)Google Scholar, passim.

³⁷ Hussey, J. M., Church and Learning in the Byzantine Empire, 867–1185 (London, Oxford University Press, H. Milford, 1937), pp. 39–67, 105 ff.Google Scholar

³⁸ Rideout, J. K., “The Rise of Eunuchs during the T'ang Dynasty”, Asia Major, N. S., I (1949), pp. 53–72Google Scholar; Guilland, R., “Les eunuchs dans l'empire byzantine”, Etudes byzantines, I (1943), pp. 197–238, II, pp. 185–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁹ See Boak, A. E. R., “The Master of the Offices in the Later Roman and Byzantine Empires”, XIV The University of Michigan Studies, University Studies (New York, The Macmillan Co., 1919)Google Scholar; J. E. Dunlap, “The OflSce of the Grand Chamberlain in the later Roman and Byzantine Empires”, ibid., XIV (1924), for a very acute analysis of this problem as it applies to two positions; Guilland, R., “Etudes d'histoire administrative”, Byzantina - Metabyzantina, I (1946), esp. pp. 168–179Google Scholar; Hsieh, P., The Government of China (Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1927), chs. 2–4.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Ostrogorsky, G., History (cf. n. 6), p p. 239–251Google Scholar, chs. 5, 6; Diehl, Ch., Les grands probèmes de l'histoire byzantine (Paris, A. Colin, 1943), chs. 9, 10.Google Scholar

⁴¹ A cautious formulation of this thesis can be found in van der Sprenkel, B., “High Officials of the Ming”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 14(1952), p. 113Google Scholar; D. C. Twitchett, “Review of Sudo Yoshiyuki - Studies in t h e History of Chinese Land-Tenure”, ibid., XVIII (1956), pp. 388–9; E. Pulleyblank, The Background of the Rebellion … (cf. n. 8); Eberhard, W., Conquerors and Rulers (Leyden, E. J. Brill, 1952)Google Scholar, chs. 1, 3; E. Balazs, “Le régime de la propriété(; en Chine … ”(cf. n. 12).

⁴² F. L. Ford, Robe and Sword (cf. n. 21); Barber, Elinor G., The Bourgeoisie in 18th Century France (Princeton, The Princeton University Press, 1955), pp. 120–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Drioton, E. and Vandier, Jacques, L'Egypte (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1938)Google Scholar, ch. 6; M. Beloff, The Age of Absolutism (cf. n. 21).

⁴³ H. Kees, “Aegypten” (cf. n. 4), pp. 201–207; Stock, H., Die Erste Zwischenzeit Aegyptens (Rome, Pontificium Institutum Biblicum, 1949)Google Scholar; Edgerton, W., “The Question of Feudal Institution in Ancient Egypt”, Feudalism in History, ed. Coulborn, R. (Princeton University Press, 1956), pp. 120–132Google Scholar; Drioton, E. and Vandier, J., L'Egypte (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1938), ch. 6.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ A. E. Christensen, L'lran sous les Sassanids (cf. n. 22), ch. 10; R. Ghirshman, Iran (cf. n. 22).

⁴⁵ Miranda, J., “La function economica del encomiendero en les origines del regimen colonial de Noeva Espana, 1525–1531”, Andes del Instituto NacionaldeAnthropologiaeHistoria.il (1947), pp. 421–462Google Scholar; Chevalier, F., “La formation des grands domaines aux Mexique, terre et société au XVIe –XVIIe siècles”, Travaux et Memoires de l'lnstitut d'Ethnologie, LVI (Paris, 1952), pp. 31–40.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ H. Kees, “Aegypten” (cf. n. 4), p p. 227–263; Wilson, J. A., The Burden of Egypt (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1951), chs. 10, 11Google Scholar; E. Drioton and J. Vandier, op. cit. (n. 43).

⁴⁷ A. E. Christensen, L'Iran … (cf. n. 22), esp. ch. 6.

⁴⁸ C. Hucker, The “Eastern Forest” Movement… (cf. n. 36).

⁴⁹ Charlesworth, M. P., “The Flavian Dynasty”, The Cambridge Ancient History, XI (Cambridge 1936), pp. 4–12Google Scholar; also see papers by Kraemer, C. J. and Westerman, W. L. in The Age of Diocletian-A Symposium (New York, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1953).Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Charanis, P., “On the Social Structure and Economic Organization of the Byzantine Empire in the 13th Century”, Byzantinoslavica XII (1951), pp. 94–154Google Scholar; Guilland, R., Lapolitique sociale des empereurs byzantins de 867 à 1087, (Paris, Centre de documentation universitaire, 1955).Google Scholar

⁵¹ G. Kolias, “Aemter- und Wurdenkauf im früh- und mittelbyzantinischen Reich” (Athens, Verlag der Byzantinisch-neugriechischen Jahrbücher, 1939); Cheng, C., The Chinese Gentry (Seattle, University of Washington Press, 1955), pp. 8–32, 188–197Google Scholar; K. W. Swart, Sale of Offices in the 17th Century (The Hague, Nijhoff, 1949) (this book contains a very lucid exposition of the spread of the system in the 17th century; see review by Goubert, P., Annales, VIII [1953], pp. 210–214)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Parry, J. H., The Sale of Public Offices in the Spanish Indies under the Hapsburgs (Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1955).Google Scholar

⁵² Pagès, G., “La vénalité des offices dans l'ancienne France”, Revue Historique, 169 (Paris, 1932), pp. 476–495).Google Scholar

⁵³ H. Kees, Aegypten (cf. n. 4); pp. 201 ff.; H. Stock, Die erste Zwischenzeit (cf. n. 43); H. Kees (cf. n. 4), pp. 282 ff.; Drioton and Vandier, op. cit., ch. 12.

⁵⁴ G. Ostrogorsky, History (cf. n. 6); L. Bréhier (cf. n. 20).

⁵⁵ R. Ghirshman, Iran (cf. n. 22); Christensen, A. E., “Die Iranier”, Handbuch der Altertumswssenschaft, ed. Otto, Walter (München, C. H. Beck, 1933)Google Scholar, Abt. 3, Teil 1, m, pp. 271 ff.

⁵⁶ Eberhard, W., Conquerors and Rulers (cf. n. 41); idem, A History of China (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1950)Google Scholar; Stange, H., “Geschichte China, vom Urbeginn bis auf die Gegenwart”, Geschichte Asiens (München, F. Bruckmann, 1950), pp. 431–496Google Scholar; Balazs, E., “Les aspects significatifs de la société chinoise”, Asiatische Studien, VI (1952), pp. 80 ff.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Kracke, E. A., Jr., “Sung Society, Change Within Tradition”, Far Eastern Quarterly, XTY (08 1955), pp. 479–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁸ E. Balazs, (cf. n. 56), p. 82; Bodde, D., “Feudalism in China”, Feudalism in History, ed. Coulborn, R. (Princeton, 1956), pp. 49–92.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Lewis, B., The Arabs in History (London, Hutchinson's University Library, 1950), chs. 5,6.Google Scholar