Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:34:28.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

History, Anthropology, and the Study of Everyday Life. A Review Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Eve Rosenhaft
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Thin Line of Culture
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Judt, Tony, “A clown in regal purple: Social history and the historians,” History Workshop Journal 7 (Spring 1979), 6694CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eley, Geoff and Nield, Keith, “Why does social history ignore olitics?,” Social History 5 (1980), 249–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Most notably, Kater, Michael, “Begrifflichkeit und Historie” [review article], Archiv für Sozialgeschichte XXIII (1983), 688705Google Scholar. For a more persuasive critique, as part of a new “fin-desiècle” backlash against the 1960s' version of Enlightenment, see Kocka, Jürgen, “Zurück zur Erzählung? Plädoyer f7ür historische Argumentation,” Geschicte und Gesellschaft 10 (1954), 409–20Google Scholar.

3 Goddard, David, “Anthropology: the limits of functional ism,” in Ideology in Social Science, edited by Blackburn, Robin (Glasgow, 1972), 6175Google Scholar.

4 I am thinking here particularly of the work of the Birmingham Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies on working-class youth subcultures.