Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:19:16.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does India Have History? Does History Have India?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2012

Thomas R. Trautmann
Thomas R. Trautmann*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It was the unanimous opinion of the early Orientalists of British India that India had no history, at least in the sense of historical writings. Like every consensus, it contained many variations of detail, as we shall see, but as the view of experts it was widely influential for a long time. For example, R. C. Majumdar gave a thoughtful version of this view at the beginning of the multivolume History and Culture of the Indian People (Majumdar 1951) by Indian scholars, published shortly after independence. But the consensus was eroded by the rise of what we may call the “colonial knowledge” paradigm, which asserted a close connection between European rule and European knowledge of India. It tended to discredit the old consensus and to lighten the specific gravity of Orientalist knowledge, simplifying it as an object of historical explanation. This development has cleared an opening, in recent decades, for a rush of new studies tending to create an opposing consensus, that India did have history of a kind, it being the task of scholars to explicate what kind, exactly, that was (for example, Pathak 1966; Warder 1972; Thapar 1992; Wagoner 1993; Ali, ed. 1999; Narayana Rao, Shulman, and Subrahmanyam 2001; Guha 2004; Mantena 2007). This in itself has been very much to the good, by reopening questions that had been closed by the old consensus. The old consensus itself, by contrast, was dismissed without much examination, and was attributed to colonial interest, cultural misunderstanding, or insufficient grasp of Indian languages and literatures. The old consensus now is seen as a simple ideological projection, easily explained and dismissed, with little complexity or interest for historical investigation. But this simplifying action of the prevailing paradigm renders invisible some of the very real effects of the old consensus, effects whose explanation can be very valuable to us. In order to gain the benefit it holds we have to take it seriously, trying both to explain it historically and to decide whether or in what way it is true.

Type
Research Article
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 174 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ali, Daud, ed. 1999. Invoking the Past: The Uses of History in South Asia. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1944. Race-Thinking before Racism. Review of Politics 6, 1: 36–73.Google Scholar
Berossus, . 1978. The Babylonaiaca of Berossus. Burstein, Stanley Mayer, ed. and trans. Sources from the Ancient Near East, vol. 1, f. 5. Malibu: Undena Publications.Google Scholar
Droit, Roger-Pol. 1989. L'Oublie de l'Inde: une amnésie philosphique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1970. The ‘Village Community’ from Munro to Maine. In Religion/Politics and History in India: Collected Papers in Indian Sociology. Paris, The Hague: Mouton Publishers, 112–32. (Original version in Contributions to Indian Sociology 9 [1966]: 67–89).Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. 2005 [1949]. The Myth of the Eternal Return. Introduction by Jonathan, Z. Smith. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. 1884. Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigenthums und des Staats, in Anschluss an L. H. Morgan's Forschungen. Zurich: Hottingen.Google Scholar
Engels, Frederick [Friedrich]. 1972. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, in the Light of the Researches of Lewis H. Morgan. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Fustel de Coulanges, Numa Denis. 1864. La cité antique, étude sur le culte, le droit, les institutions de la Grèce et de Rome. Paris: Durand.Google Scholar
Fustel de Coulanges, Numa Denis. 1980. The Ancient City, a Study on the Religion, Laws, and Institutions of Greece and Rome. Small, Willard, trans. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
GobineauJoseph Arthur, Comte de Joseph Arthur, Comte de. 1853–1855. Essai sur l'inégalité des races humaines. 4 vols. Paris: Firmin Didot Freres.Google Scholar
GobineauJoseph Arthur, Comte de Joseph Arthur, Comte de. 1856. The Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races, with Particular Reference to Their Respective Influence in the Civil and Political History of Mankind. Hotz, H., ed., with appendices by J. C. Nott, M.D. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott. (Repr. New York and London: Garland, l984.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Jacob. 1819. Deutsche Grammatik. Göttingen: Dieterichsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Guha, Sumit. 2004. Speaking Historically: The Changing Voices of Historical Narration in Western India, 1400–1900. American Historical Review 109: 1084–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbfass, Wilhelm. 1988. India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. 1970. Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte, Werke 12. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. 1975. Introduction: Reason in History. In Lectures on the Philosophy of World History. Nisbet, H. B, trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. Ca. 1782. Notes on the State of Virginia. N.p.: n.p.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. 1755. A Dictionary of the English Language. (Repr. London: Times Books, 1983.)Google Scholar
Jones, William. 1788. The Third Anniversary Discourse, Delivered 2 February, 1786, by the President. (On the Hindus). Asiatic Researches 1: 415–31.Google Scholar
Lassen, Christan. 1847–1858. Indische Alterthumskunde. 4 vols. Bonn: H. B. Keonig; Leipzig: L. A. Kittler.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. 1871. Village-Communities in the East and West. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. 1875. Lectures in the Early History of Institutions. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. 1883. Dissertations on Early Law and Custom. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. 1970 [1861]. Ancient Law, Its Connection with the Early History of Society and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. 10th ed., with introduction and notes by Pollock, Frederick. Gloster, Mass.: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Majumdar, R. C. 1951. History and Culture of the Indian People, vol. 1. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Mantena, Rama. The Question of History in Precolonial India. 2007. History and Theory 46: 396–408.Google Scholar
Manu, . 2005. Manu's Code of Law: A Critical Edition and Translation of the Manava-Dharmasastra. Olivelle, Patrick, ed. and trans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maurice, Thomas. 1793–1800. Indian Antiquities: Or, Dissertations, Relative to the Ancient Geographical Divisions, the Pure System of Primeval Theology, the Grand Code of Civil Laws, the Original Form of Government, and the Various and Profound Literature of Hindostan. 7 vols. London: the author.Google Scholar
Maurice, Thomas. 1822. Memoirs of the Author of Indian Antiquities. Part III. London: the author.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. H. 1851. League of the Ho-dé-no-sau-nee, or Iroquois. Rochester: Sage and Brother.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. H. 1871. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, vol. 17. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Narayana Rao, V., Shulman, David, and Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. 2001. Textures of Time: Writing History in South India 1600–1800. Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Pallas, P. S. 1780–1789. Linguarum Totius Orbis Vocabularia Comparativa. 2 vols. St. Petersberg: Carl Schnoor.Google Scholar
Pargiter, F. E. 1962. The Purana Text of the Dynasties of the Kali Age. 2d ed.Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.Google Scholar
Pathak, V. S. 1966. Ancient Historians of India: A Study in Historical Biographies. London: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Pingree, David. 1963. Astronomy and Astrology in India and Iran. Isis 54: 229–46.Google Scholar
Pingree, David. 1978. History of Mathematical Astronomy in India. In Gillispie, Charles Coulston, ed., Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. 15, suppl. 1, 533–633.Google Scholar
Rocher, Ludo and Rocher, Rosane. 1994–1995. The Puranarthaprakasa: Jones's Primary Source on Indian Chronology. Bulletin of the Deccan College Post-Graduate & Research Institute 54–55: 47–71. (Romanized Sanskrit text of the work.)Google Scholar
Thapar, Romila 1992. Interpreting Early India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R. 1992a. The Revolution in Ethnological Time. Man n.s. 27: 379–97.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R. 1992b. Indian Time, European Time. In Hughes, Diane Owen and Trautmann, Thomas R., eds., Time: Histories and Ethnologies. Ann Arbor: Comparative Studies in Society and History Book Series, University of Michigan Press, 167–97.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R. 1997. Aryans and British India. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R. 2006. Languages and Nations: The Dravidian Proof in Colonial Madras. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R. 2008. Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship. New ed. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R. 2009. Riot over Ryotwar. In Trautmann, Thomas, ed., The Madras School of Orientalism: Producing Knowledge in Colonial South India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 310–32.Google Scholar
Verbrugghe, Gerald P. and Wickersham, John M.. 1996. Berossos and Manetho, Introduced and Translated: Native Traditions in Ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Wagoner, Phillip B. 1993. Tidings of the King: A Translation and Ethnohistorical Analysis of the Rayavacakamu. Honolulu: University of Hawaìi Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warder, A. K. 1972. An Introduction to Indian Historiography. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.Google Scholar
Whitman, Walt. 1871. Passage to India. Washington, D.C.: J. C. Redford, for the author.Google Scholar
Whitman, Walt. 1982. Walt Whitman: Complete Poetry and Collected Prose. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. H. 1854 [1st ed. 1831]. An Introduction to Universal History, for the Use of Schools. 5th ed.Calcutta: Calcutta School Book Society.Google Scholar