Article contents
The Diffusion of Innovations in Early Modern Europe
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 June 2009
Extract
In recent years the study of the ‘Diffusion of Innovations’ has become a very fashionable subject. Everett M. Rogers stressed the fact that his book on the ‘Diffusion of Innovations’ was based on 506 diffusion studies published in the last decades. Of course quantity is not necessarily synonymous with quality and brilliant ideas are not a function of the number of titles printed. The first of the major conclusions reached by Rogers after perusing the 506 diffusion studies is that ‘innovativeness of individuals is related to a modern rather than a traditional orientation’. One may doubt whether such an extraordinary conclusion was worth the input of energy and goodwill that allegedly went into its production, but there is no doubt that innovations and their diffusion are a topic of major relevance in the study of social development. Innovations are to history what mutations are to biology. Actually, innovations show a remarkable tendency to cluster in time and space, and this incidentally suggests that attention should not be devoted exclusively to the eccentric individual genius of the innovators, but should also be extended to the anonymous forces of the environment.
- Type
- Eclecticism in Borrowing
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1972
References
1 Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of Innovations (New York-London, 1962) p. 311.Google Scholar
2 Cipolla, C. M., Guns and Sails (London, 1965) p. 131.Google Scholar
3 On the whole story cf. Chaloner, W. H., ‘Sir Thomas Lombe and the British Silk Industry’ in People and Industries (London, 1963).Google Scholar
4 Oakeshott, M., Political Education (Cambridge, 1951) p. 15.Google Scholar
5 Britten, F. J., Old Clocks and their Makers, 7th edition edited and revised by Baillie, G. H., Clutton, C. and Ilbert, C. A. (New York, 1956) p. 272.Google Scholar
6 Archivio di Stato, Milano, Commercio P.A. 264/fasc.2.
7 Casoni, G., ‘Note sull'artiglieria veneta’ in Venezia e le sue lagune (Venice, 1847) vol. I, part 2, pp. 177 and 180.Google Scholar
8 Cipolla, C. M., Guns and Sails, p. 54, n. 1.Google Scholar
9 Ullyett, K., British Clocks and Clockmakers (London, 1947) p. 18.Google Scholar
10 Amburger, E., Die Familie Marselis. Studien zur russischen Wirtschaftsgeschichte (Giessen, 1967).Google Scholar
11 Smith, J., Old Scottish Clockmakers (Edinburgh, 1921) p. 323.Google Scholar
12 Luzzatto, G., Studi di storia economica veneziana (Padova, 1954) p. 42.Google Scholar
13 Ibid. p. 43.
14 Fanfani, A., Storia del lavoro in Italia (Milano, 1943) pp. 144 ff.Google Scholar and ‘Aspetti demografici della politica economica nel ducato di Milano’ in Saggi di storia economica italiana (Milano, 1936) pp. 125–57.Google Scholar
15 Fanfani, A., Storia del lavoro in Italia, pp. 147–8.Google Scholar
16 Cipolla, C. M., ‘L'economia milanese alia meta del secolo XIV. I movimenti economici generali’ in Storia di Milano (Milano, 1957) vol. 8, p. 353.Google Scholar
17 Cipolla, C. M., Guns and Sails, p. 69, n. 2.Google Scholar
18 Svenskt Biografiskt Lexicon ad vocem De Besche.
19 Babinger, F., ‘Maometto II il Conquistatore e l'ltalia’ in Rivista Storica Italiana, 63 (1951) pp. 469–505.Google Scholar
20 Cf. Cipolla, C. M., Clocks and Culture (London, 1967) pp. 65 ff.;Google ScholarKenyon, G. H., The Glass Industry of the Weald (Leicester, 1968);Google ScholarCunningham, W., Alien Immigrants to England (London, 1897).Google Scholar
21 Frankel, S. H., The Economic Impact on Underdeveloped Societies (Oxford, 1953) pp. 22–4.Google Scholar
22 Barbour, V., ‘Dutch and English Merchant Shipping to the Seventeenth Century’ in The Economic History Review, 2 (1930) pp. 261–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31
- Cited by