Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:14:05.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comments on “The Lebanese in West Africa”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Lloyd A. Fallers
Affiliation:
University of Chicago

Extract

Throughout the history of economics the stranger everywhere appears as the trader, or the trader as stranger. As long as the economy is essentially selfsufficient, or products are exchanged within a spatially narrow group, it needs no middleman: a trader is required only for products that originate outside the group. Insofar as members do not leave the circle to buy these necessities — in which case they are the “strange” merchants in that outside territory — the trader must be a stranger … This position of the stranger stands out more sharply if he settles down in the place of his activity, instead of leaving it again: in innumerable cases even this is possible only if he can live by intermediate trade… This position of the stranger stands out more sharply if he settles down in the place of his activity, instead of leaving it again: in innumerable cases even this is possible only if he can live by intermediate trade… The stranger is by nature no “owner of the soil“ — soil not only in the physical but also in the figurative sense of a life-substance which is fixed, if not in a point in space, at least at an ideal point of the social environment. Although in more intimate relations he may develop all kinds of charm and significance, as long as he is considered a stranger in the eyes of the other, he is not an “owner of soil”… Another expression of this constellation lies in the objectivity of the stranger. He is not radically committed to the unique ingredients and peculiar tendencies of the group, and therefore approaches them with the specific attitude of “objectivity”. But objectivity does not imply passivity and detachment; it is a particular structure composed of distance and nearness, indifference and involvement … The freedom, however, which allows the stranger to experience and treat even his close relationships as though from a birds-eye view, contains many dangerous possibilities. In uprisings of all sorts, the party attacked has claimed, from the beginning of things, that provocation has come from the outside, from emissaries and instigators.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Sociology of Georg Simmel, translated by Wolff, Kurt H. (Glencoe, 111., 1950), pp. 403405.Google Scholar

2 See, for example, Morris, Stephen, “Indians in East Africa: A Study in Plural Society”, British Journal of Sociology, VII, 2, 1956, pp. 194211CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kuper, Hilda, Indian People in Natal, (Durban, 1960)Google Scholar; T'ien, Ju K'ang, The Chinese of Sarawak (London, 1956). See also Maurice Freedman's review of some recent studies: “Jews, Chinese and Some Others”, British Journal of Sociology, X, 1, 1959, pp. 61–70.Google Scholar

3 Redfield, Robert, Peasant Society and culture(chicago, 1956).Google Scholar