Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:29:36.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Closing Triangle: Critical Notes on a Model for Peasant Mobilization in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Peter Singelmann
Peter Singelmann
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, Kansas City
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Students of contemporary campesino movements in Latin America have their analyses generally focused on two problem-complexes. One of these entails the macro-structural changes of the larger society within which campesino movements develop. Such changes are represented by the gradual imposition of the nation-state over the more remote regions of the countries, the concomitant decline in the geographic, political, and economic isolation of these remote areas, the emergence of ‘multiple-power domains’ within which ascending groups challenge the political brokerage monopolies of the traditional large landholders over the campesinos within their domains, and the development of clientelistic political structures within which campesino followings become attractive power resources for politicians at the regional and national level.

Type
Latin America
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 1975 , pp. 389 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, Richard N. (1960) ‘Social change in Guatemala and U.S. policy’. Pp. 231–84 in Adams, R. et al. (eds.), Social Change in Latin America Today. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Adams, Richard N. (1964) ‘Rural labor’. Pp. 49–78 in Johnson, J.J. (ed.), Continuity and Change in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Richard N. (1967a) The Second Sowing: Power and Secondary Development in Latin America. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
Adams, Richard N. (1967b) ‘Political power and social structures’. Pp. 15–42 in Veliz, C. (ed.), The Politics of Conformity in Latin America. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adie, Robert F. (1970) ‘Cooperation, cooptation, and conflict in Mexican peasant organizations’. Inter-American Economic Affairs, 24 (Winter): 3–25.Google Scholar
Alberti, Giorgio (1970) ‘Los movimientos campesinos’. Pp. 164–213 in Keith, R.G. etal, La Hacienda, la Comunidad y el Campesino en el Perú. Lima: Moncloa Editores.Google Scholar
Anderson, Bo, and Cockroft, James D. (1966) ‘Control and cooptation in Mexican polities‘. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 7 (03): 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antezana, E. Luis (1960) La lucha entre Cliza y Ucweña. (Pamphlet) Cochabamba.Google Scholar
Baran, Paul A. (1970) ‘On the political economy of backwardness’. Pp. 285–301 in Rhodes, R.I. (ed.), Imperialism and Under development: A Reader. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bourque, Susan (1971) ‘El sistema politico peruano y las organizaciones campesinas: un modelo de integración’. Estudios Andinos, 2 (No. 1): 37–58.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Francois (1967) ‘The ejido and political stability in Mexico’. Pp. 158–91 in Veliz, C. (ed.), The Poitics of Conformity in Latin America. New York: Oxford. University Press.Google Scholar
Cotter, Julio (1969) ‘Actuates pautas de cambio en la sociedad rural del Perú’. Mar, En.J.Matos etal., Dominación y Cambio en el Perú Rural. Lima: Institute de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Cotter, Julio (1970a) ‘Traditional haciendas and communities in a context of political mobilization in Peru’. Pp. 533–58 in Stavenhagen, Rodolfo (ed.), Agrarian Problems and Peasant Movements in Latin America. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Cotter, Julio (1970b) ‘The mechanics of internal domination and social change in Peru’. Pp. 407–44 in Horowitz, I.L. (ed.), Masses in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cotter, Julio (1974) ‘Politische Krise und Militārpopulismus in Peru’. Pp. 159–98 in Mansilla, H.C.F. (ed.), Probleme des Dritten Weges. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Cotter, Julio, and Portocarrero, Felipe (1969) ‘Peru: peasant organizations’. Pp. 297–322 in Landsberger, H. (ed.), Latin American Peasant Movements. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Wesley W. Jr. (1969) ‘Peru: the peasant movement of La Convención’. Pp. 274–98 in Landsberger, H. (ed.), Latin American Peasant Movements. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dandier, Jorge (1969) El sindicalismo campesino en Bolivia: Los cambios estructwales en Ucweña. Mexico, D.F.: Institute Indigenista Interamericano (Serie Antropologia Social No. 11).Google Scholar
Dandier, Jorge (1971) Politics of Leadership, Brokerage and Patronage in the Campesino Movement of Cochabamba, Bolivia (1935–54). Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Dew, Edward (1969) Politics in the Altiplano: The Dynamics of Change in Rural Peru. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Di Telia, Torcuato (1965) ‘Populism and Reform in Latin America’. Pp. 47–74 in Veliz, C. (ed.), Obstacles to Change in Latin America. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feder, Ernest (1969) ‘Societal opposition to peasant movements and its effect on farm people in Latin America’. Pp. 399–450 in Landsberger, H. (ed.), Latin American Peasant Movements. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Feder, Ernest (1970) ‘Counterreform’. Pp. 173–223 in Stavenhagen, R. (ed.), Agrarian Problems and Peasant Movements in Latin America. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Foland, Frances M. (1968) ‘Northeast Brazil: A Strike in the Sugar Zone’. Newsletter No. 24 to the Institute of Current World Affairs, New York, 11 23,1968.Google Scholar
Forman, Shepard (1970) ‘Disunity and discontent: a study of peasant movements in Brazil’. Journal of Latin American Studies, v. 3 (03): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, George M. (1963) ‘The dyadic contract in Tzintzuntzan, II: patron-client relationship’. American Anthropologist, v. 65 (12): 1280–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galjart, Benno (1964) ‘Class and following in rural Brazil’. América Latina, v. 7 (07–09): 3–24.Google Scholar
Galjart, Benno (1965) ‘A further note on “followings”: reply to Huizer’. America Latina, v. 8 (07–09): 145–52.Google Scholar
Heath, Dwight B. (1969) ‘Bolivia: peasant syndicates among the Aymara of the Yungas-A view from the grass roots’. Pp. 170–209 in Landsberger, H. (ed.), Latin American Peasant Movements. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Cynthia N. (1969) ‘Brazil: the peasant movement of Pernambuco, 1961–1964’. Pp. 374–98 in Landsberger, H. (ed.), Latin American Peasant Movements. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Huizer, Gerrit (1965) ‘Some notes on community development and social research’. AméricaLatina, v. 8 (07–09): 128–44.Google Scholar
Huizer, Gerrit(1970a) ‘Emiliano Zapata and the peasant guerillas in the Mexican Revolution’.Pp. 376–406 in Stavenhagen, R. (ed.), Agrarian Problems and Peasant Movements in Latin America. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Huizer, Gerrit (1970b) ‘Peasant organization in agrarian reform in Mexico’. Pp. 445–502 in Horowitz, I.L. (ed.), Masses in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huizer, Gerrit (1972) The Revolutionary Potential of Peasants in Latin America. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Bertram (1966) ‘The patron-dependent relationship in Brazil’. Sociologia Ruralis, v. 6 (No. 1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsberger, Henry A. (1969) ‘Chile: a vineyard workers' strike-a case study of the relationship between church, intellectuals, and peasants’. Pp. 210–73 in Landsberger, H. (ed.), Latin American Peasant Movements. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Landsberger, Henry A. (1970) ‘Ten sources of weakness and cleavage in Latin American peasant movements’. Pp. 559–83 in Stavenhagen, R. (ed.), Agrarian Problems and Peasant Movements in Latin America. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Leeds, Anthony (1964) ‘Brazil and the myth of Francisco Juliāo’. Pp. 190–204 in Maier, J. and Weatherhead, R.W. (eds.), Politics of Change in Latin America. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg (1970) Geschichte und Klassenbewusstsein. Berlin: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Malloy, James M. (1970) Bolivia: The Uncompleted Revolution. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansilla, H.C.F. (1974) ‘Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des Dritten Weges’. Pp. 199–246 in Mansilla, H.C.F. (ed.), Probleme des Dritten Weges. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Matos Mar, Jose (1967) ‘Movimientos y organizations campesinas en el valle de Chancay’. Proyecto: ‘Los Movimientos Campesinas en el Peru desde Fines del siglo XVIII hasta nuestros dias’, No. 2. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Mayorga, René Antonio (1974) ‘Das Scheitern des populistischen Nationalismus in Bolivien‘. Pp. 69–124 in Mansilla, H.C.F. (ed.), Probleme des Dritten Weges. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Menges, Constantine C. (1968) ‘Peasant organizations and politics in Chile, 1958–1964’. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Moraes, Clodomir (1970) ‘Peasant leagues in Brazil’. Pp. 453–501 in Stavenhagen, R. (ed.), Agrarian Problems and Peasant Movements in Latin America. Garden City: Doubleday (Anchor).Google Scholar
Murphy, Brian (1970) ‘The stunted growth of campesino organizations’. Pp. 438–78 in Adams, R.N., Crucifixion by Power. Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Chile (1973) New York: North American Congress on Latin America.Google Scholar
Pearson, Neale J. (1969) ‘Guatemala: the peasant union movement, 1944–1954’. Pp. 323–73 in Landsberger, H. (ed.), Latin American Peasant Movements. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Petras, James, and Zemelman, Hugo (1972) Peasants in Revolt: A Chilean Case Study, 1965–1971. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Powell, John Duncan (1970) ‘Peasant society and clientelist polities’. The American Political Science Review, v. 64 (06): 411–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, John Duncan (1971) Political Mobilization of the Venezuelan Peasant. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Robert E. (1964) Rural unionization in Brazil. Madison: University of Wisconsin Land Tenure Center, Research Paper No. 14.Google Scholar
Reyna, José Luis (1974) ‘Control politico, estabilidad y desarrollo en México’. Paper presented at the First Congress of the Sociedad Mexicana de Sociologia in Pátzcuaro (Mich), January 1974.Google Scholar
Singelmann, Peter (1973) ‘Interés propio e interés de clase: Algunas funciones de los movimientos campesinos en América Latina’. Revista Mexicana de Sociologia, v. 35 (04–06): 383–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singelmann, Peter (1974) ‘Campesino movements and class conflict in Latin America: the functions of exchange and power.’ Journal of Inter-American Studies and World Affairs, v. 16 (02): 39–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skupch, Giinther (1974) ‘Das Entwicklungsdilemma Argentiniens’. Pp. 36–68 in Mansilla, H.C.F. (ed.), Probleme des Dritten Weges. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Stavenhagen, Rodolfo (1969) ‘Seven erroneous theses about Latin America’. Pp. 102–17 in Horowitz, I.L. et al. (eds.), New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Tripp, Giinter Matthias (1974) ‘Theorie und Realitat. Zur Konzeption des Dritten Weges am Beispiel Mexiko’. Pp. 11–36 in Mansilla, H.C.F. (ed.), Probleme de Dritten Weges. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Tullis, F.La Mond (1970) Lord and Peasant in Peru: A Paradigm of Political and Social Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagley, Charles (1964) ‘The peasant’. Pp. 21–48 in Johnson, J.J. (ed.), Continuity and Change in Latin America. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Whyte, William F. (1970) ‘El mito del campesino pasivo: La dinamica del cambio en el Perú rural’. Estudios Andinos, v. 1 (No. 1): 3–28.Google Scholar
Whyte, William F., and Williams, Lawrence K. (1968) Toward an Integrated Theory of Development. Ithaca: New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations (ILR Paperback No. 5).Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric (1955) ‘Types of Latin American peasantry: a preliminary discussion’. American Anthropologist, v. 57 (06): 452–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Eric (1966) ‘Kinship, friendship, and patron-client relations in complex societies’. Pp. 1–22 in Banton, M. (ed.), The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies. New York: PraegerGoogle Scholar