Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:29:23.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agrarianism: A Critique of Colonial Modernity in Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2000

Gi-Wook Shin
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles

Abstract

In Rescuing History from the Nation, Prasenjit Duara challenges the repressive power of the nation-state to frame historical narratives in modern China and India. According to Duara, dominant narratives in both countries have been based on a linear, evolutionary, Enlightenment model of history that stresses national progress toward modernity, whether through idealist evolutionism, anti-imperialism, or even Marxism. As a result, he argues, such narratives have excluded other important discourses on political community that rejected the modernist mode of thought. In order to provide a “multiplicity of historical representations of political community,” he examines a series of alternate narratives like federalism, which promoted goals other than the nation-state, or which expressed critiques of modernity through the promotion of “Asian values.” With this, he attempts to “rescue” historical narratives from the dominant, repressive power of the nation-state, by writing “histories that resist being pressed into the service of the national subject in its progress toward modernity.”Prasenjit Duara, Rescuing History from the Nation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Society for Comparative Study of Society and History

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Earlier versions of this paper were presented at a conference on “Colonialism, Nationalism, and Modernity in East Asia” held at the University of California, Santa Cruz, October 11–12, 1996; at a colloquium sponsored by the Korea Institute of Harvard University in October 1997; and at the 4th Pacific and Asia Conference on Korean Studies held at the University of British Columbia, May 11–12, 1998. I am very grateful to Gale Herschatter, David McCann, and Yun-Shik Chang for their invitation to contribute, to Carter Eckert, Chai-Sik Chung and other participants in the events for their stimulating comments and discussions, and to Cho Soùng Yun in Korea for his assistance in locating materials. I also thank anonymous reviewers of CSSH for their valuable comments and suggestions. Direct all correspondence to Gi-Wook Shin, UCLA, Department of Sociology, Box 951551, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1551. Email: [email protected]