Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:54:22.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Aesthetics and Politics of Colonial Collecting: India at World Fairs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Carol A. Breckenridge
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania

Extract

In the second half of the nineteenth century, objects from India were repeatedly assembled for display at international exhibitions, known then and now as world fairs. Their transience and ephemerality set world fairs apart as extraordinary phenomena in the world of collecting. They are special because, despite the permanence they imply, they do not last; they come and they go. Their buildings are constructed, and then, by international charter, they are deconstructed. They are also special because they place objects in the service of commerce and in the service of the modern nation—state, with the inevitable imperial encounters that these two forces promote. In doing so, they yoke cultural material with aesthetics, politics and pragmatics.

Type
The World on Exhibition
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allwood, John. 1977. The Great Exhibitions. London: Studio Vista.Google Scholar
Altick, Richard D. 1978. The Shows Of London. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verson.Google Scholar
Benedict, Burton, ed. 1983. The Anthropology of World's Fairs: San Francisco's Panama Pacific International Exposition of 1915. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1968. Illuminations. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1978. Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Bhabba, Homi. 1986. “The Other Question: Difference, Discrimination and the Dis courses of Colonialism,” in Literature, Politics and Theory: Papers from The Essex Conference, Parker, Frances et al., eds. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Birdwood, George C. M. 1879. Paris Universal Exhibition of 1878. Handbook to the British Indian Section. Presentation Edition. London: Offices of the Royal Commission.Google Scholar
Birdwood, George C. M. 1880. The Industrial Arts of India. London: Chapman and Hall. 2 vols.Google Scholar
Birdwood, George C. M. 1908. Relics of the Honourable East Indian Company: To The Worshipful Memory of the Honourable East India Company (a series of fifty plates by William Griggs, with letterpress by Sir George Birdwood and William Foster). London: Queritche.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bunn, James. 1980. “The Aesthetics of British Mercantilism.” New Literary History, 11:2 (Winter, 1980), 303321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Bernard S. 1983. “Representing Authority in Victorian India,” in The Invention of Tradition, Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terene, eds., 165209.Google Scholar
Connadine, David. 1983. “The Context, Performance and Meaning of Ritual: The British Monarchy and the ‘Invention of Tradition,’ ca. 1820–1977,” in The Invention of Tradition, Hobsbawn, Eric, and Ranger, Terence, eds., 101164.Google Scholar
Cortinovis, Irene E. 1977. “China at the St. Louis World's Fair,” Missouri Historical Review, 72:1, 5966.Google Scholar
Curti, Merle. 1955. “America at the World Fairs, 1851–1893,” Probing Our Past. New York: Harper & Brothers, 246277.Google Scholar
Debord, Guy. 1977. Society of the Spectacle. Detroit: Black and Red Press.Google Scholar
Desmond, Ray. 1982. The India Museum, 1801–1879. London: India Office Library and Records.Google Scholar
Haltern, Utz. 1971. Die Londoner weltaursstellung von 1851: eine beitrag zur geschichte der burgerlich-industriellen gesellschaft im 19. jahrhundert. Munster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Harris, Neil. 1975. “All the World a Melting Pot? Japan at American Fairs, 1894–1904” in Mutual Images: American-Japanese Relations, Iriye, Akira, ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Neil. 1979. “Museums, Merchandising, and Popular Taste: The Struggle for Influence,” in Material Culture and the Study of American Life, Quimby, Ian M. G., ed. New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Havell, E. B. n.d. Essays on Indian Art, Industry and Education. Madras: Natesan Company.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric, AND Ranger, Terence. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth. 1983. The Triumph of Art for the Public, 1785–1848. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Impey, Oliver. 1977. Chinoiserie: The Impact of Oriental Styles on Western Art and Decoration. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Lanny, Richard. 1971. The Speaking Tree: A Study of Indian Culture and Society. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lipking, Lawrence. 1970. The Ordering of the Arts in Eighteenth-Century England. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moor, Edward. 1807. The Hindu Pantheon. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
Mullaney, Steven. 1983. “Strange Things, Gross Terms, Curious Customs: The Rehearsal of Cultures in the Late Renaissance.” Representations, 3 (Summer), 4167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plum, Werner. 1977. World Fairs in the 19th Century: Pageants of Social and Cultural Change. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Rivett-Carnac, J. H. 1900. “A Lesser Hindu Pantheon. Being An Illustrated Catalogue of Metal Objects Used in Hindu Ritual.” The Journal of Indian Art and Industry, IX (72), (10), 1321 (plus 12 plates).Google Scholar
Rivett-Carnac, Marion. 1900. “Ancient Indian Beads.” The Journal of Indian Art and Industry, IX (71), (07), 512 (plus 11 plates).Google Scholar
Rydell, Robert. 1984. All the World's a Fair: Visions of Empire at American International Expositions, 1876–1916. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, Debora. 1977. “The 1889 Exhibition: The Crisis of Bourgeois Individualism,” in City and Ideology: Paris under the Academy, Vidler, Anthony, ed., special issue of Oppositions, A Journal for Ideas and Criticism in Architecture, 8(Spring), 7191.Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan. 1970. “Posters: Advertisement, Art, Political Artifact, Commodity,” in The Art of Revolution: Castro's Cuba 1959–1970, Stermer, Dugald, comp. New York: McGraw-Hill, vii–xxiii.Google Scholar
Sparling, Tobin. 1982. The Great Exhibition: A Question of Taste. New Haven: Yale Center for British Art.Google Scholar
Stewart, Susan. 1984. On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, The Gigantic, The Souvenir and The Collection. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wornum, Ralph N. 1851. “The Exhibition as a Lesson in Taste.” The Art Journal Illustrated Catalogue, London: Virtue, i–xxii.Google Scholar
Wyatt, M. Digby. 1851. The Industrial Arts of the Nineteenth Century: A Series of Illustrations of the Choicest Specimens Produced by Every Nation at the Great Exhibition of Works of Industry. London: Day & Company (1851–53). 2 vols.Google Scholar