Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:29:49.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Working with Language: The Linguistic Turn in French Labor History. A Review Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Lenard R. Berlanstein
Lenard R. Berlanstein
Affiliation:
The University of Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
CSSH Notes
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 1991 , pp. 426 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Scott, Joan Wallach, The Glassworkers of Carmaux. French Craftsmen and Political Action in a Nineteenth-Century City (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974),Google Scholar chs. 2, 4.

2 Ibid., chs. 4, 5.

3 Languages of Class: Studies In English Working Class History, 1832–1982 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

4 For a useful explication of Geertz's thought, see Biersack, Aletta, “Local Knowledge, Local History: Geertz and Beyond,” in The New Cultural History, Hunt, Lynn, ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989), 72–96.Google Scholar

5 The work has recently been translated as The Nights of Labor. The Workers' Dream in Nineteenth-Century France, Drury, John, trans. (Philadelphia: Temple University Press,1989).Google Scholar The new version begins with an excellent introduction by Donald Reid.

6 Especially subject to Ranciere's critique is Bernard Moss, The Origins of the French Labor Movement, 1830–1914. The Socialism of Skilled Workers (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976).Google Scholar

7 For a critical evaluation of Foucault as a historian of insanity, see Midelfort, H. C. Erik, “Madness and Civilization in Early Modern Europe: A Reappraisal of Michel Foucault,” in After the Reformation. Essays in Honor of J. H. Hexter, Malament, Barbara C., ed. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1980), 247–65.Google Scholar For an assessment of Foucault's approach to history, see Megill, Allan, “Foucault, Structuralism, and the Ends of History,” Journal of Modern History, 51 (1979), 451–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 The most thorough study of the creation of proletarian families is Michael Hanagan, Nascent Proletarians. Class Formation in Post-Revolutionary France (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989).Google Scholar

9 As Sociology Meets History (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985), 1.Google Scholar

10 See Palmer's comments, particularly on Derrida's article, in “Like the Sound of the Sea Deep Within a Shell: Paul de Man's War,” Critical Inquiry, 14 (Spring 1988), 590–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar