Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:19:01.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theory in Anthropology: Center and Periphery1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Arjun Appadurai
Arjun Appadurai
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sherry Ortner's account of the development of anthropological theory is admirable both because of the complexity of her argument and because it opens up a series of interesting possibilities for theoretical self-criticism among anthropologists. In this essay, I consider a theme which is not directly addressed in Ortner's piece, but which might usefully be considered in relation to it. The theme involves the significance of place in the construction of anthropological theory in the period since World War II.

Type
CSSH Discussion
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 356 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, Noam. 1968. Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Lawrence A.; Atran, Scott; and Yengoyan, Aram A. 1982. “Theories of Knowledge and Culture.” Social Science Information, 21:161–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar