Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:36:54.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Socialist Construction of Philately in the Early Soviet Era

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Jonathan Grant
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison

Extract

The term totalitarian has often been used by scholars to characterize the Soviet Union's system of government, and in many studies the emphasis has fallen on assessing the degree of effectiveness of the ruling apparatus in exercising its total control over society. Whatever the actual condition of public life in the Soviet Union (USSR), a desire to use the totalitarian system undeniably existed; and regardless of the degree to which people were able to retain an autonomous private sphere, their lives were shaped by this urge to total control. The best examples of this come not from the realm of high politics but of mundane personal practices such as the pursuit of hobbies. During the period from 1921 to 1939, the Soviet government redefined the hobby of stamp collecting, socially reconstructing it in terms of the regime's values. In the process, the Soviet regime demonstrated its totalitarian goal in ways that had ramifications in everyday life, as can be seen in the state's relations with the philatelists and in the realm of hobbies. The fact that the government strictly controlled and circumscribed something as seemingly innocuous and insignificant as stamp collecting reveals how strongly the state aspired to have total control of society. More important, this urge sprang not from the top of the Soviet apparatus but, rather, from mid-level officials.

Type
Communist Business
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 There is a vast literature on totalitarianism. Some of the more recent discussions of the subject can be found in Hosking, Geoffrey, The First Socialist Society: A History of the Soviet Union from Within (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985);Google ScholarDaniels, Robert V., ed., The Stalin Revolution: Foundations of the Totalitarian Era (Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company, 1990);Google ScholarSiegelbaum, Lewis H., “State and Society in the 1920s,” in Reform in Russia and the U.S.S.R.: Past and Prospects, Crummey, Robert O., ed. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1989), 126–43;Google ScholarGleason, Abbott, “‘Totalitarianism’ in 1984,” Russian Review, 43:2(1984), 145–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For an overview of the literature, see also Dallin, Alexander, ed., Between Totalitarianism and Pluralism, vol. 9 of Russian and Soviet History, 1500–1991 (New York,: Garland Publishing Inc., 1992).Google Scholar

2 Gelber, Steven M., “Free Market Metaphor: The Historical Dynamics of Stamp Collecting,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 34:4 (1992), 742–69. According to Gelber, the merchant model for collectors was followed when collectors sold or traded stamps to fill their own collections or make a modest profit; the investment model focused on an increase in value of the stamps over time rather than through trading activity; and the speculator model involved buying low and selling high in the hopes of striking it rich through stamp sales.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Chuchin, F. G., “Filatelija i deti,” Sovetskii Filatelist (cited hereafter as S.F.), 2 (1922), 1.Google Scholar

4 Zagranichnyi obmen,” S.F., 2 (1922), 11.Google Scholar

5 Filateliia i spekuliatsiia,” S.F., 2 (1922), 26.Google Scholar

6 Raevskii, B., “Novaia zagranichnaia fal'sh',” S.F., 7–8 (1923), 32.Google Scholar

7 Vladinets, N. l.. “Organizatsiia Upolnomochennogo po Filatelii i Bonam” in Bol'shoi fiiaielisiicheskii slovar' (Moskva: Izdatel'stvo “Radio i Sviaz',” 1988), 214;Google ScholarOffitsial'nyi otdel,” S.F., 2 (1922), 910.Google Scholar

8 Ustav Vserossiiskogo Obshchestva Filatelistov,” S.F., 3–4 (1923). 3032.Google Scholar

9 Kulakov, V., “Filateliia v Moskve: organizatsionnoe ukreplenie (1923–1924 gody),” Fi-latejija SSSR, 2 (1991), 5051.Google Scholar

10 Vladinets, , “Organizatsiia,” 295.Google Scholar

11 Stal'baum, Boris, “Lenin, deti, filateliia,” Sovetskii Kollektsioner (cited hereafter as S.K. ), 8 (1970), 69.Google Scholar

12 Sostav Vserossiiskogo Obshchestva Filatelistov,” S.F., 3–4 (1923), 33.Google Scholar

13 Chuchin, F. G., “Filateliia i monopoliia,” ?.F., 1 (1922), 6.Google Scholar

14 Kulakov, , “Filateliia v Moskve,” 52.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., 51.

16 Kulakov, V., “Filateliia v Moskve: organizatsionnoe ukreplenie (1923–1924 gody),” Filateliia SSSR, 5 (1991), 50.Google Scholar

17 Ibid., 51–52.

18 Raevskii, B., “Pochtovye marki RSFSR,” S.F., 2 (1922), 5.Google Scholar

19 Chuchin, F., “Otchet O'Dne Filatelii',” S.F., 2 (1922), 14;Google ScholarBukharov, O. N., Marki-svideteli istorii (Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Radio i Sviaz', 1982), 17.Google Scholar

20 As reported to the Central Committee, 310,287 of the 320,432 stamps were sold through the official monopoly office in Chuchin, Mannheim. F., “Balans oborotov,” S.F., 3–4 (1922), 23.Google Scholar

21 Chuchin, , “Balans oborotov,” 19.Google Scholar

22 Scott 1991 Standard Postage Stamp Catalogue, vol. 4 (Sidney, Ohio: Scott Publishing Co., 1990), 413–14.Google Scholar

23 Davies, R. W., ed., From Tsarism to the New Economic Policy: Continuity and Change in the Economy of the USSR (London: Macmillan Academic and Professional Ltd, 1990), 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 Bukharov, , Marki-svideteli istorii, 37.Google Scholar

25 Tsentral'nyi Gosudarstvennyi Arkhiv Narodnogo Khoziastva (TsGANKh), fond 3527 (NKPT), opis 26, delo 3, 1. 3.

26 Ibid., I. 7.

27 Stoetzer, Carlos, Postage Stamps as Propaganda (Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press, 1953), 2.Google Scholar

28 Katalog pochtovykh marok SSSR, 1918–1980, vol. 1 (Moskva: Tsentral'noe Filatelisticheskoe Agentshestvo “Soiuzpechat” Ministerstva Sviazi SSSR, 1984), 244.Google Scholar

29 Ibid., 244–47. See also Vladinets, , “Organizatsiia,” 176.Google Scholar

30 Stal'baum, , “Lenin,” 910;Google ScholarNovoe v dele gr. Banhovar,” S.F., 1–2 (1923), 40.Google Scholar

31 Stal'baum, , “Lenin,” 50.Google Scholar

32 Fisher, A. R., “Chto sobirat',” S.K., 1(1930), 19.Google Scholar

33 Slova i dela Borisa Babitsogo,” S.K., 2 (1930), 60.Google Scholar

35 For example, Pravda urged the population “not to throw away stamps,” and called on all citizens and children of the RSFSR to gather and send all canceled stamps, stamp collections, and anything they had on hand to be exchanged for chocolate and other products for starving children. “Ne brosaite marok,” Pravda, 9 March 1922, 3.Google Scholar

36 Raevskii, B., “K godovshchine sovetskoi filatelii,” S.F., 9–10 (1923), 10.Google Scholar

37 White, Stephen, The Bolshevik Poster (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988), 91.Google Scholar

38 Ibid., 92.

39 For a discussion of profiles of ruling heads of state on stamps, see Strauss, Harlan J., “Politics, Psychology, and the Postage Stamp,” in The Congress Book 1975: Fortv-First American Philatelic Congress, November 8–9, 1975 (Federalsburg: J. W. Stowell Printing Co., 1975), 176.Google Scholar

40 Bukharov, , Marki-svideteli istorii, 12.Google Scholar

41 Ibid., 13.

42 Ibid., 12–13.

43 Lenin, V. I., State and Revolution (New York,: International Publishers, 1988), 23.Google Scholar

44 Scott 1991, 290.Google Scholar

45 For a discussion of the images on Soviet stamps and their relation to gender construction, see Waters, Elizabeth, “The Female Form in Soviet Political Iconography, 1917–32,” in Barbara Evans Clements, Barbara Alpern Engel, and Christine Worobec, Russia's Women: Accommodation, Resistance, Transformation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991), 225–42.Google Scholar

46 Buckley, Mary, “Soviet Ideology and Female Roles,” in Ideology and Soviet Politics, White, Stephen, ed. (London: Macmillan Press, 1988), 161–62.Google Scholar

47 Katalog, 84, 87, 146, 159, 265, 301.Google Scholar

48 Strauss, . “Politics, Psychology, and Postage,” 176.Google Scholar

49 Stoetzer, , Postage Stamps and Propaganda, 15–16.Google Scholar

50 Ibid., 9, 15.

51 L.Z., , “Filateliia i propaganda,” S.F., 3–4 (1922), 13.Google Scholar

52 For a summary of the common trend toward centralization and control of all social organizations by the Bolshevik leadership, see Kenez, Peter, The Birth of the Propaganda State: Soviet Methods of Mass Mobilization, 1917–1929 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 8694,CrossRefGoogle Scholar 186, 252–56. For discussion of the conventions of Soviet ideological discourse that promoted the fusion of state and social interests, see Schull, Joseph, “The Ideological Origins of ‘Stalinism’ in Soviet Literature,” Slavic Review, 51:3 (Fall 1992), 468–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53 Kenez, , Birth of Propaganda Stare, 153.Google Scholar

54 Eikhfus stated, “I stand on the side of the strict centralization af all philatelic affairs in the USSR.” Eikhfus, L., “O zadachakh filatelii v SSSR,” S.F., 1–2 (1923), 36.Google Scholar

55 Stal'baum, , “Lenin,” 21.Google Scholar

56 Chuchin, F., “Itogi i perspektivy,” S.F., 1–2 (1923), 5.Google Scholar

57 Chuchin, F., “Kollektsionirovanie i etika,” S.F., 3–4 (1923), 1.Google Scholar

58 Eikhfus, , “O zadachakh filatelii v SSSR,” 3536;Google ScholarKulakov, V., “Filateliia v Moskve,” Filateliia SSSR, 5 (1991), 51.Google Scholar

59 Sovnarkom charged the SFA with the duty of collecting and trading stamps for the benefit of the Lenin Fund for Homeless Children. The actual process of dissolving the OUFB and replacing it with the SFA occurred during 1924–26. The Lenin Fund was authorized by the Central Executive Committee in February 1925 and linked to philately in October 1926. In 1926 the Committee and Sovnarkom officially reformed the OUFB as the SFA. For details of this rather confusing bureaucratic reshuffling, see Stal'baum, , “Lenin,” 1520.Google Scholar

60 Stal'baum, , “Lenin,” 16.Google Scholar

61 Raevskii, , “K godovshchine sovetskoi filatelii,” 10.Google Scholar

62 The complete breakdown of membership at the end of 1924 was as follows: white collar, 84 percent; worker, 3 percent; military, 2 percent; unemployed. 9 percent; the age groups were: 1824, 24.7 percent; 25–45, 60.3 percent; 46–69, 15 percent. Kulakov, V., “Filateliia v Moskve,” Filateliia SSSR, 3 (1991), 19:Google ScholarIbid., 2 (1991), 50.

63 Raevskii, , “K godovshchine sovetskoi filatelii,” 78:Google ScholarChuchin, F., “Nasha godovshchina,” S.F., 9–10 (1923), 2.Google Scholar

64 Valeron, D. B., “Postavim na nogi,” S.K., 1 (1930). 3.Google Scholar

65 Ibid., 4.

66 Fitzpatrick, Sheila, “Cultural Revolution as Class War,” in idem, Cultural Revolution in Russia, 1928–1931 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978), 32.Google Scholar

68 “po otdelam V.O.F.,” S.K., 1 (1930), 3031.Google Scholar

69 Vilinbakhov, B., “Litso V.O.F.,” S.K., 3 (1930), 70.Google Scholar

70 Valeroii, D. B., “Kollektsionirovanie-v rabochie massy,” S.K., 7 (1930), 165.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., 166.

72 shiriiengefer, Erikh, “Za sektsiiu po mezhdunarodomy obmeny Pri Filinterne,” S.K., 2 (1930), 63.Google Scholar

74 Soiuzmov, M., “O filatelii v shkole,” S.K., 2 (1930), 55.Google Scholar

75 Ibid., 56.

76 Kolonii britanskoi imperii i ikh pochtobye marki,” S.K., 4–5 (1930), 112.Google Scholar

77 Kratkie svedeniia o deiatel'nosti vse soiuznogo obshchestva filarelistov (Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Sviazi, 1974), 3.Google Scholar

78 Gleizer, M. M., Isloriia filatelii v Pelerburge, Petrograde, Leningrade (Moskva: Radio i Sviaz', 1989), 48.Google Scholar