Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:41:15.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Social Causation of the Courtly Love Complex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Herbert Moller
Herbert Moller
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

How to account for the courtly love complex of the troubadours and minnesingers has been an unsolved puzzle ever since the romanticists discovered it as a scholarly problem. For about three generations, in the 12th and 13th centuries, Provençal and German lyrical poetry was preoccupied with a strangely uneven love pattern. In the classic version of this poetry, the male lover presents himself as engrossed in a yearning desire for the love of an exceedingly beautiful and perfect woman whose strange emotional aloofness and high social status make her appear hopelessly distant. But the frustrated and sorrowful lover cannot overcome his fascination and renders faithful “love service” to this “high-minded” and exacting lady who reciprocates in a surprising manner: She does not grant him the amorous “reward” which he craves, but she gives him what immeasurably increases his “worth”: She rewards him with approval and reassurance. The great lady accepts him as being worthy of her attention, but only at the price of behavioral restraint and refinement of manners, that is, at the price of courtois behavior. As the contemporaries put it, courtoisie is the result of courtly love.

Type
Research Article
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , January 1959 , pp. 137 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lowie, Robert H., An Introduction to Cultural Anthropology (Enlarged, ed., New York, Rinehart, 1940), p. 374.Google Scholar

2 Jeanroy, Alfred, La poésie lyrique des troubadours (Toulouse, Privat, 1934), I, pp. 64–80Google Scholar; Parry, John J., “Introduction” to Andreas Capellanus, The Art of Courtly Love, ed. Parry, J. J. (New York, Columbia, 1941), pp. 4–8Google Scholar; Silverstein, Th., “Andreas, Plato, and the Arabs,” Mod. Philol., XLVII (1949), pp. 117–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nykl, A. R., Hispano-Arabic and Its Relations with the Old Provençal Troubadours (Baltimore (no publisher), 1946), pp. 382–93Google Scholar; Axhausen, K., Die Theorien über den Ursprung der provenzalischen Lyrik (Ph. D. diss., Marburg, 1937)Google Scholar; and Suchier, W.'s review in Deutsche Literatur Zeitung, LIX (1938), pp. 1680 ff.Google Scholar

3 Lévi-Provençal, E., Islam d’Occident (Paris, Librairie orientale et amer., 1948), pp. 292–97Google Scholar; Pérès, Henri, La poésie andalouse en arabe classique au Xle siècle (Paris, Librairie d’Amérique et d’Orient, 1937), pp. 397–431Google Scholar; Ecker, Lawrence, Arabischer, provenzalischer und deutscher Minnesang (Bern and Leipzig, Haupt, 1934)Google Scholar; Nykl, loc. cit., passim; Burdach, Konrad, Vorspiel (Halle, Niemeyer, 1925) I ,i , pp. 291–312.Google Scholar

4 Hazm, Ibn, A Book Containing the Risâla Known as The Dove's Neck-Ring about Love and Lovers, tr. Nykl, A. R. (Paris, Geuthner, 1931), pp. 13 and passim (Pétrof's pagination)Google Scholar; Denomy, A. J., “An Inquiry into the Origins of Courtly Love,” Mediaeval Studies, VI (1944), pp. 230–33.Google Scholar

5 Pérès, , Poésie andalouse, p. 425Google Scholar; Galpin, Stanley L., Cortois and Vilain (New Haven, Ryder's Printing House, 1905).Google Scholar For the horror of adultery, Hazm, Ibn, Dove Neck-Ring, pp. 127–31.Google Scholar

6 Whereas Andalusian poetry is replete with instances of desperate love, the less frequent occurrence of “pure” love of the courtly type becomes apparent from a comparison of comprehensive anthologies such as Nykl's Hispano-Arabic Poetry or Ibn Sa‘id, Moorish Poetry: A Translation of “The Pennants” of Ibn Sa‘id by Arberry, A. J. (London, 1953)Google Scholar, with the standard collection of German courtly poetry, Minnesang's Frühling, ed. Kraus, C. von (30th ed.,Zürich, Hirzel, 1950).Google Scholar Ecker, Minnesang, coordinated selected passages of nearly identical content from the Arabic, Provençal, and German culture areas, which seem to prove the unifoimity of their respective poetic productions, but the complete neglect of the difference in quantitative incidence is misleading.

7 Nykl, , Hispano-Arabic Poetry, pp. 10O–1, 380Google Scholar; Pérès, , Poésie andalouse, pp. 41–42, 408–11, 427–28.Google Scholar

8 Hazm, Ibn, Dove's Neck-Ring, pp. 99, 395–96, and passim.Google Scholar See also Ecker, , Minnesang, pp. 130–34.Google Scholar

9 Grunebaum, Gustave E. von, Medieval Islam (Chicago, University of Chicago, 1946), pp. 311–12, 316–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ecker, , Minnesang, pp. 2, 113Google Scholar; Smith, Margaret, Râbi‘a the Mystic and Her Fellow-Saints in Islâm (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1928), pp. 111 , 125–27.Google Scholar

10 Terrasse, Henri, Histoire du Maroc des origines à l’établissement du Protectorat français (Casablanca, Ed. Atlantides, , 1949), I, pp. 150–51Google Scholar; Lévi-Provençal, E., Historie de l’Espagne musulmane (Paris, Maisonneuve, 1953), III, pp. 167–72, 399–401Google Scholar; Pérès, , Poésie andalouse, pp. 253–54, 258–60, 283Google Scholar; Hitti, Philip K., History of the Arabs (3rd ed., London, Macmillan, 1943), p. 544.Google Scholar

11 Lévi-Provençal, E., L’Espagne musulmane au Xème siècle (Paris, Larose, 1932), pp. 23–28.Google Scholar

12 Defourneaux, M., Les français en Espagne aux XIe et XIIe siècles (Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 1949), p. 5Google Scholar; Verlinden, C., L’esclavage dans l’Europe médiévale, I: Péninsule Ibérique - France (Brugge, De Tempel, 1955), pp. 181–242Google Scholar; Pérès, , Poésie andalouse, pp. 261–62Google Scholar; Lévi-Provençal, , L’Espagne musulmane, pp. 28–31, 130–31Google Scholar; al-Himyarî, Ibn ‘Abd al-Mun‘im, Kitâb ar-Rawd al-Mi'târ Fî Habar al-Aktâr, ed. and trans. Lévi-Provençal, E. (Leiden, Brill, 1938), p. 33Google Scholar; Ecker, , Minnesang, pp. 229–31Google Scholar; Nykl, , Hispano-Arabic Poetry, pp. 6, 14 n. 6.Google Scholar

13 Verlinden, , L‘esclavage, I, pp. 227, 229Google Scholar; Brutails, J.-A., Etude sur la condition des populations rurales en Roussillon au moyen âge (Paris, Imprimerie nationale, 1901), pp. 34–35Google Scholar; Lévi-Provençal, , Histoire, III, p. 179.Google Scholar

14 Lévi-Provençal, , L’Espagne musulmane, pp. 136–38Google Scholar; idem, Histoire, III, pp. 80–85,167–87; Terrasse, , Maroc, I, pp. 159, 162, 189Google Scholar; Pérès, , Poésie andalouse, pp. 5–15Google Scholar; Hitti, , Arabs, p. 537Google Scholar; Nykl, , Hispano-Arabic Poetry, pp. 10–11, 181, 197, 201.Google Scholar

15 Terrasse, , Maroc, I, pp. 217–48, 301–60Google Scholar; Béraud-Villars, J., Les Touareg au pays du Cid (Paris, Plon, 1945), pp. 81–151Google Scholar; Brockelmann, C., History of the Islamic Peoples, trans. Carmichael, J. and Perlmann, M. (New York, Putnam, 1947), pp. 202–14.Google Scholar

16 Jeanroy, , Poésie, I, pp. 80–81.Google Scholar

17 Jeanroy, , Poésie, II, pp. 11–12Google Scholar; Richard, Alfred, Histoire des comtes de Poitou, 778–1204 (Paris, Picard, 1903). I, pp. 502–3Google Scholar; Appel, C., Bertran von Born (Halle, Niemeyer, 1931), p. 18Google Scholar; Nykl, , Hispano-Arabic Poetry, p. 378Google Scholar; Olschki, L., Die romanischen Literaturen des Mittelalters (Wildpark-Potsdam, Athenaion, 1928), pp. 193–94, 211–12.Google Scholar

18 Jones, W. Powell, “The Jongleur Troubadours of Provence,” PMLA, XLVI (1931), pp. 307–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brun, A., Parlers régionaux (Paris, Didier, 1946), pp. 49–50Google Scholar; Fürst, N., Versuch einer geografischen Literatureeschichte Frankreichs (Ph. D.-diss., Würzburg, 1934), p. 28Google Scholar; Richard, , Comtes de Poitou, I, pp. 502ff., II, pp. 53, 118, 168Google Scholar; Jeanroy, , Poésie, I, pp. 150–51, 168Google Scholar; his Liste par régions des troubadours dont le patrie est connue, ibid., pp. 319–25, is not helpful, as it does not classify the poets of the langue d‘oc according to type of productivity, and gives only the areas of origin but not of their major activities.

19 Voretzsch, K., Einführung in das Studium der altfranzösischen Literatur (3rd ed., Halle, Niemeyer, 1925), p. 346Google Scholar; Kluckhohn, P., “Ministerialität und Ritterdichtung,” Zeitsch. f. deutsches Altertum u. dt. Literatur, LII (1910), pp. 139–40Google Scholar; Schneider, Hermann, Heldendichtung, Geistlichendichtung, Ritterdichtung (Heidelberg, Winter, 1943), pp. 439–40.Google Scholar For conclusive evidence regarding Proven?al and French inspiration of specific German Minnelieder, Frank, István, Trouvères et Minnesänger (Saarbrücken, West-Ost-Verlag, 1952).Google Scholar

20 Schneider, , Heldendichtung, p. 436Google Scholar; Nadler, J., Literaturgeschichte der deutschen Stämme und Landschaften (Regensburg, Habbel, 1923–1924), I, pp. 115–17.Google Scholar

21 Schmitt, Fritz and Fricke, G., Deutsche Literaturgeschichte in Tabellen (Bonn, Athenäum, 1949), I, p. 87Google Scholar; Lang, Margerete, Tannhäuser (Leipzig, Weber, 1936), pp. 101–3, 138, 141Google Scholar; Nadler, , Literaturgeschichte, I, pp. 141, 148.Google Scholar

22 Nadler, J., “Die Literaturkarte,” Euphorion, XXX (1929), pp. 9–10Google Scholar; Vogt, Friedrich, Geschichte der mittelhochdeutschen Literatur, I (Berlin and Leipzig, de Gruyter, 1922), pp. 142–43, 147, 170Google Scholar; Schmitt, and Fricke, , Literaturgesch., I, pp. 81–87, 94, 96Google Scholar; Schneider, , Heldendichtung, pp. 427, 499–505Google Scholar; Nadler, , Literaturgeschichte, I, pp. 115–17, 120Google Scholar; Weller, K., Geschichte des schwäbischen Stammes (München, Oldenburg, 1944), pp. 343, 413Google Scholar; Singer, S., Die mittelalterliche Literatur der deutschen Schweiz (Frauenfeld, Huber, 1930), pp. 142–60, 183–84Google Scholar; Switzerland is over-represented because it was there that the largest anthology was compiled. Thurnher, E., Wort und Wesen in Südtirol (Innsbruck, Oester. Verlagsanstalt 1947), pp. 94–105.Google Scholar

23 Nadler, , Literaturgeschichte, II, p. 58.Google Scholar The eastern areas which were settled by Germans during the 12th century produced no literature in this period except some religious verse. Veldeke was a conscious imitator of the new foreign poetry and used the courtly clichés with his tongue in his cheek; Schneider, , Heldendichtung, pp. 438–39Google Scholar; Korn, K., Studien über ‘Freude und Trûren’ bei mittelhochdeutschen Dichtern (Leipzig, Weber, 1932), pp. 28–29Google Scholar; Dam, J. v. in Deutsche Literatur des Mittelalters, Verfasserlexikon, ed. Stammler, W., II (Berlin and Leipzig, de Gruyter, 1936), p. 359.Google Scholar

24 Burdach, , Vorspiel, I, i, pp. 381–88.Google Scholar

25 Chrétien was pressed by Marie de Champagne to comply with the troubadour love pattern; his hesitations apparently prevented him from completing his Chevalier de la charette. Parry, “Introduction”, pp. 14–15; Painter, Sidney, French Chivalry (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins, 1940), chap. IVGoogle Scholar, also for his interesting interpretation of Andreas' Art of Courtly Love; Voretzsch, , Einführung, pp. 271–97Google Scholar; Jeanroy, , Poésie, I, p. 274Google Scholar; Misrahi, J. in Romance Philology, IV (1951), p. 352.Google Scholar

26 Jeanroy, , Poésie, I, pp. 250–52, 273Google Scholar; Wulff, August, Die frauenfeindlichen Dichtungen in den romanischen Literaturen des Mittelalters (Halle, Niemeyer, 1914).Google Scholar The third book of Andreas' Art of Courtly Love gives the antifeminist argumentation of his day. Kilgour, R. L., The Decline of Chivalry (Cambridge, Harvard, 1937), pp. 111–16.Google Scholar

27 Bloch, Marc, La société féodale, 2 vols. (Paris, Michel, 1939–1940), I, pp. 35–44.Google Scholar On the diffusion of courtoisie, Braun, G., “Der Einfluss des südfranzösischen Minnesangs und Ritterwesens auf die nordfranzösische Sprache,” Romanische Forschungen, XLIII (1929), pp. 1–160Google Scholar; Brunot, F., Histoire de la langue française des origines à 1900 (Paris, Colin (n.d.)), I, pp. 389–91Google Scholar; Painter, , French Chivalry, pp. 133, 137–39Google Scholar; Olschki, , Roman. Literaturen, pp. 101, 213, 220–22Google Scholar; Huizinga, J., The Waning of the Middle Ages (London, St. Martin's Press, 1924), chaps. VIII and IXGoogle Scholar, where he comments: “The same circles who showed so much shamelessness in sexual relations professed to venerate the ideal of courtly love.”

28 Bloch, Société, passim; Bosl, K., Die Reichsministerialität der Salier und Staufer, 2 vols. (Stuttgart, Hiersemann, 1950–1951)Google Scholar; Molitor, E., Der Stand der Mirdsterialen (Breslau, Marcus, 1912)Google Scholar; Ganshof, F.-L., Etude sur les ministeriales en Flandre et en Lotharingie (Bruxelles, Lamertin, 1926)Google Scholar; Kluckhohn, Paul, Die Ministerialität in Südostdeutschland vom 10. bis zum Ende des 13. Jahrhunderts (Weimar, Böhlau, 1910)Google Scholar; Dollinger, P., L’évolution des classes rurales en Bavière depuis la fin de l’époque carolingienne jusqu’au milieu du XIIIe siècle (Paris, Belles Lettres, 1949)Google Scholar; Otto, E., “Von der Abschliessung des Ritterstandes,” Hist. Zeitsch., CLXII (1940), pp. 19–40Google Scholar; Schmitthenner, P., “Lehnskriegswesen und Söldnertum im abendländischen Imperium des Mittelalters,” Hist. Zeitsch., CL (1934), pp. 229–67Google Scholar; Guilhiermoz, P., Essai sur l’origine de la noblesse en France au moyen âge (Paris, A. Picard, 1902), pp. 460–61Google Scholar, quotes several documented cases of fugitive serfs who succeeded in being dubbed knights. Bühler, J., Die Kultur des Mittelalters (Leipzig, Kröner, 1931), p. 102Google Scholar, estimates that there were finally about a hundred ministeriales for one old aristocratic family.

29 Geographical statistics on the differential distribution of ministeriales are not available. The distribution of imperial ministeriales, exclusively, has been recorded by Bosl, Reichsministerialität, in seven valuable maps. For Alsace, ibid., I, pp. 190,214.

30 Nitzsch, K. W., Ministerialität und Bürgertum im 11. und 12. Jahrhundert (Leipzig, Teubner, 1859), pp. 356–57Google Scholar; Schneider, Fedor, Mittelalter (Leipzig and Wien, Deuticke, 1929), pp. 366–67.Google Scholar

31 Rörig, F., Die europäische Stadt und die Kultur des Bürgertums im Mittelalter (Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1955), pp. 16–22Google Scholar; Postan, M., “The Trade of Medieval Europe: The North,” Cambridge Economic History of Europe, II, ed. Postan, M. and Rich, E. E. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1952), pp. 160,184–90Google Scholar; R. S. Lopez, “The Trade of Medieval Europe: The South,” ibid., pp. 292, 319, 349. On the slow development of towns in southeast Germany also Dollinger, , Classes rurales, pp. 491–92Google Scholar; Kluckhohn, , Ministerialität, p. 97Google Scholar; Teske, H., Thomasin von Zerclaere (Heidelberg, Winter, 1933), p. 4Google Scholar; Seeger, H.-J., Westfalens Handel und Gewerbe vom 9. bis zum Beginn des 14. Jahrhunderts (Berlin, Curtius, 1926), pp. 95–130.Google Scholar

32 Deibel, G., “Die finanzielle Bedeutung Reichs-Italiens für die staufischen Herrscher des 12. Jahrhunderts,” Zeitsch. d. Savigny-Stiftung f. Rechtsgesch., Germ. Abt., LIV (1934), pp. 134–77.Google Scholar

33 Bosl, , Reichsministerialität, I, p. 140Google Scholar; II, pp. 493–94, 600–1.

34 Hotz, W., Staufische Reichsburgen am Mittehhein (Berlin, Stilke, 1937), pp. 5–6Google Scholar; Weller, , Geschichte, pp. 262–63, 267, 333, 401Google Scholar; Nadler, , Literaturgeschichte, I, pp. 120–21, 128Google Scholar; Nitzsch, , Ministerialität, p. 324Google Scholar; Schmitthenner, P., Das freie Söldnertum im abendländischen Imperium des Mittelalters (München, Oldenbourg, 1934), pp. 5–7, 27, 77–78, 80–81, 88.Google Scholar

35 Kluckhohn, , Ministerialität, pp. 95–97, 112–16, 146–237, 247Google Scholar; Dollinger, , Classes rurales, p. 303Google Scholar; Thurnher, , Südtirol, p. 71Google Scholar; Leeper, A. W. A., A History of Medieval Austria (New York, Oxford, 1941), pp. 258–59, 271–72, 311–12.Google Scholar

36 Keyser, E., Bevölkerungsgeschichte Deutschlands (Leipzig, Hirzel, 1938). p. 166Google Scholar; Kötzschke, R. and Ebert, W., Geschichte der ostdeutschen Kolonisation (Leipzig, Bibliograph. Institut, 1937), p. 56Google Scholar; Teske, , Thomasin, pp. 5–7,9,11, and n. 25.Google Scholar

37 Molitor, , Ministerialen, pp. 37, 196–98Google Scholar; Zallinger, O. von, Die Schöffenbarfreien des Sachsenspiegels (Innsbruck, Wagner, 1887), pp. 259–65Google Scholar; Bosl, , Reichsministerialität, II, p. 579Google Scholar; Ficker, J., Vom Heerschilde (Innsbruck, Wagner, 1862), pp. 167,169–70.Google Scholar

38 Schulte, Aloys, “Die Standesverhältnisse der Minnesänger,” Zeitsch.f. deutsches Altertum u. dt. Literatur, XXXIX (1895), pp. 192–93Google Scholar; Ahrens, Jakob, Die Ministerialität in Köln und am Niederrhein (Leipzig, Quelle und Meyer, 1908), pp. 38–40, 88.Google Scholar

39 Dollinger, , Classes rurales, pp. 390–91Google Scholar; Kluckhohn, , Ministerialität, pp. 139–45.Google Scholar

40 Postan, “Trade,” pp. 181–84; Petit-Dutaillis, Ch., The Feudal Monarchy in France and England from the Tenth to the Thirteenth Century (London, Kegan Paul, 1936), passimGoogle Scholar; Mitteis, H., Der Staat des Hohen Mittelalters, 3rd ed. (Weimar, Böhlau, 1948), pp. 240–42, 339, 342.Google Scholar

41 Petit-Dutaillis, , Feudal Monarchy, p. 235Google Scholar; Ganshof, , Ministeriales, pp. 69, 338Google Scholar; Thibault, F., “La condition des personnes en France,” Rev. hist, de droit, 4e sér., XII (1933), p. 699Google Scholar; Bloch, Marc, “Un problème d’histoire comparée: La ministérialité en France et en Allemagne,” Rev. hist, de droit, 4e sér., VII (1928), p. 50Google Scholar.

42 Guilhiermoz, , Essai, pp. 462–63Google Scholar; Ganshof, , Ministeriales, pp. 75–78, 376–77Google Scholar; Duby, G., La société aux XIe et XIIe siècles dans la région mâconnaise (Paris, Colin, 1953), p. 390 n.l.Google Scholar, Kluckhohn, , Ministerialität, p. 137Google Scholar; Dollinger, Ph. in Annales, E.S.C., IV (1949), p. 335Google Scholar.

43 Ganshof, , Ministeriales, pp. 343–51, 374–76Google Scholar. The nobility of southern Belgium also became a closed class early in the 11th century; Genicot, L., “La ‘noblesse’ au Xle siècle dans la région de Gembloux,” Vierteljahrschr. f. Sozial– und Wirtsch.gesch., XLIV (1957), pp. 97–104Google Scholar.

44 This dichotomy is, of course, a simplification. As Ganshof, , Ministeriales, pp. 81–161, 203, 229, 251, 304–34, 377Google Scholar, points out, there were regions which presented an intermediate picture, namely Brabant, Liège, Namur, and Hainault. Economically retarded Burgundy, to mention another area, could neither be centralized by its dukes before the end of the 12th century, nor could the nobility improve their political and economic situation. Cf. Richard, Jean, Les dues de Bourgogne et la formation du duché du Xle au XlVe siècle (Dijon, Bernigaud et Privat, 1954), pp. 132–35, 260–66, 517, 520Google Scholar. Duby, , Société, pp. 241–43 , 381–96, 411–21, 636, 642Google Scholar, has shown for southern Burgundy that, from the lOth to the 12th century, the nobility and the knighthood shrank to almost half of their original numbers.

45 Boussard, J., Le gouvernement d’Henri II Plantagenêt (Paris, D’Argences, 1956), pp. 113– 55Google Scholar; Petit-Dutaillis, , Feudal Monarchy, pp. 169–73Google Scholar; Tenant de la Tour, G., L’homme et la terre de Charlemagne à Saint Louis (Paris, Desclée de Brouwer, 1943), pp. 282, 586–95Google Scholar; Feuchère, P., “Essai sur 1’évolution territoriale des principautés françaises (X-XIIIe siècles),” Moyen Age, LVIII (1952), pp. 95–96Google Scholar; Lodge, E. C., Gascony under English Rule (London, Methuen, 1926), pp. 12–13Google Scholar; Brutails, , Etude, pp. 286–87Google Scholar; Mundy, J. H., Liberty and Political Power in Toulouse 1050–1230 (New York, Columbia, 1954), pp. 21–23Google Scholar.

46 Ourliac, P., “Les villages de la région toulousaine au Xlle siècle,” Annales, E.S.C., IV (1949), pp. 272, 275, 277Google Scholar; Deffontaines, P., Les hommes et leurs travaux dans les pays de la moyenne Garonne (Lille, S.I.L.I.C., 1932), p. 159Google Scholar; Lodge, , Gascony, p. 11Google Scholar; Ballot, Marc, “Histoire du Limousin,” Visages du Limousin et de la Marche, ed. Perpillon, A. et al. . (Paris, Ed. Horizons de France, 1950), p. 60Google Scholar; Painter, S., “Castellans of the Plain of Poitou in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries,” Speculum, XXXI (1956), pp. 243–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Appel, , Bertran von Born, p. 77Google Scholar; de Bornelh, Giraut, Sämtliche Lieder, ed. Kolsen, A. (Halle, Niemeyer, 1910), I, no. 5: 76–87Google Scholar.

47 Boussard, , Henri II, pp. 189–92Google Scholar; Boutruche, R., Une société provinciale en lutte contre le régime féodale (Rodez, Carrère, 1947), p. 64Google Scholar. For Toulouse, Mundy, J. H., Liberty and Political Power in Toulouse 1050–1230 (New York, Columbia, 1954), pp. 5–8Google Scholar, claims earlier growth, but has to admit that there is virtually no material on it.

48 de Saint-Blanquat, Odon, “Comment se sont créées les bastides du sud-ouest de la France,” Annales, E.S.C., IV (1949), pp. 279–84Google Scholar; Boutruche, R., “Les courants de peuplement dans l’Entre-Deux-Mers,” Annales d’hist. éc. et soc., VII (1935), pp. 18–19Google Scholar; Higounet, Ch., “Bastides vet frontières,” Moyen Age, LIV (1948), p. 115Google Scholar; Escande, J.-J., Histoire du Périgord, I (Cahors, Coueslant, 1934), pp. 123–26, 140–45Google Scholar.

49 Bloch, , Société, II, pp. 63–64Google Scholar; Boutruche, R., La crise d’une société: Seigneurs et paysans du Bordelais pendant la Guerre de Cent Ans (Paris, Belles Lettres, 1947), p. 82Google Scholar; Berenger-Feraud, L.-J.-B., Les Provençaux à travers les âges (Paris, Leroux, 1900), pp. 265–72Google Scholar; de la Tour, Tenant, L’homme, pp. 291–94, 399–408, 462, 474–75, 516–35, 653–54Google Scholar; Brutails, , Roussillon, p. 198Google Scholar; Lodge, , Gascony, pp. 193, 204–5Google Scholar.

50 Delbriick, H., Geschichte der Kriegskunst, III: Das Mittelalter, 2nd ed. (Berlin, Stilke, 1923), pp. 192–94Google Scholar; Runciman, S., A History of the Crusades, I (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1951), pp. 114–65, 337–41Google Scholar; de Moreau, E., Histoire de l’Eglise en Belgique (Bruxelles, L’Edition universelle, (n.d.)), III , pp. 632–35Google Scholar; Duby, , Société, pp. 432–33, 435Google Scholar; Lodge, , Gascony, p. 22Google Scholar; de la Tour, Tenant, L’homme, p. 574Google Scholar; Richard, Jean, Le comté de Tripoli sous la dynastie toulousaine (Paris, Geuthner, 1945), pp. 89–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Defourneaux, , Français en Espagne; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, La reconquista española y la repoblación del pais (Zaragoza, Instituto de Estudios Pirenaicos, 1951)Google Scholar; Richard, , Comtes de Poitou, I. p. 289Google Scholar; Castro, Américo, The Structure of Spanish History (Princeton, University Press, 1954), pp. 161–73Google Scholar.

52 Fellinger, F., Das Kind in der altfranzösischen Literatur (Göttingen, Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1908), pp. 18–19Google Scholar; Guilhiermoz, , Essai, pp. 170, 245–46 n. 8, 250Google Scholar. Occasionally there were married “bachelors”.

53 On English rivals of native nobles in Aquitaine, Boutruche, , Crise d’une société, pp. 358–59Google Scholar. Several troubadours are known to have moved southward from the Plateau Central. Kluckhohn, , Ministerialität, p. 81Google Scholar.

54 Bosl, , Reichsministerialität, I, p. 108Google Scholar, and von Minnigerode, Heinrich Freiherr, Ebenburt und Echtheit: Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der adeligen Heiratsebenburt vor dem 13. Jahrhundert (Heidelberg, Winter, 1912), pp. 44, 45, 53, 58Google Scholar; both with evidence predominantly from southern Germany.

55 Ganshof, , Ministeriales, pp. 343–51Google Scholar.

56 The Lai du Fresne by Marie de France, the Roman des Sept Sages, Ruodlieb, Kudrun, Wolfdietrich, the Renner by Hugo von Trimberg, all condemn marriage to a partner of lower rank. Schulte, Aloys, Der Adel und die deutsche Kirche im Mittelalter (Stuttgart, Encke, 1910), pp. 314–30Google Scholar; Boutruche, Crise d'une société, p. 357.

57 Bosl, , Reichsministerialität, I, pp. 108–10Google Scholar; von Fürth, August Freiherr, Die Ministerialen (Köln, Bachem, 1836), pp. 303–5, 342Google Scholar; Kluckhohn, Ministerialität, p. 138.

58 Ganshof, Ministeriales, pp. 172, 243; Bloch, “Ministerialité,” pp. 81–83; Waitz, G., Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte, V, 2nd ed. (Berlin 1893), p. 356Google Scholar; Fürth, Ministerialen, p. 150; Lodge, E. C., “Serfdom in the Bordelais,” Eng. Hist. Rev., XVIII (1903), p. 429CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 Schwabenspiegel, ed. von Lassberg, F. L. A. Frhr. (Tübingen, Fues, 1840), p. 141, § 319Google Scholar.

60 Boutruche, Crise d’une société, pp. 287, 356; Aubenas, R., “La famille dans l‘ancienne Provence,” Annales d’hist. éc. et soc, VIII (1936), pp. 523–24Google Scholar; Brinkmann, H., Entstehungsgeschichte des Minnesangs (Halle, Niemeyer, 1926), p. 35Google Scholar. In Poitou, Richard Lionheart had such a marriage divorced; Richard, , Comtes de Poitou II, p. 254Google Scholar.

61 Giraut de Bornelh, no. 40: 24–40; for comment, ibid., II, p. 79.

62 de Peguilhan, Aimeric, The Poems, ed. and trans. Shepard, William F. and Chambers, Frank M. (Evanston, I11., Northwestern University Press, 1950), no. 29: 22–28, pp. 158–59Google Scholar. Wechssler, E., Das Kulturproblem des Minnesangs (Halle, Niemeyer, 1909), I, p. 154Google Scholar.

63 Bosl, . Reichsministerialität, I, pp. 67–70, 77–78, 80, 86, 138–39; II, pp. 604–7Google Scholar; Schulte, , “Standesverhältnisse,” pp. 198–203Google Scholar; idem, , Adel, pp. 23–27, 296, 326Google Scholar; Kluckhohn, , Ministerialität, pp. 83–84Google Scholar, quotes four cases of ministeriales marrying daughters of princes and counts, and the marriage of the divorced wife of emperor Frederick Barbarossa to a ministerialis, i.e., legally a serf-knight. Fürth, , Ministerialen, pp. 296–98Google Scholar.

64 Reinmar in Minnesangs Frühling, 171: 11–12. See also de Ventadour, Bernard, Seine Lieder, ed. Appel, C. (Halle, Niemeyer, 1915), no. 43: 25–32Google Scholar; Giraut de Bomelh, no. 25: 92–95; no. 51: 16–30; no. 52: 45–55.

65 de Marseille, Folquet, Le troubadour Folquet de Marseille, ed. Stronski, S. (Cracow. Académie des Sciences, 1910), no. 11Google Scholar. See also Giraut de Bornelh, no. 47: 96–114, and passim; Naumann, Hans, Deutsche Kultur im Zeitalter des Rittertums (Potsdam, Athenaion, 1938), p. 141Google Scholar.

66 Marcabru, , Poésies complètes du troubadour Marcabru, ed. Dejeanne, J.–M.–L. (Toulouse, Privat, 1909), no. 4: 45–46; no. 6: 45–58Google Scholar; von Ouwe, Hartman in Minnesangs Frühling, 214: 12–15; 216: 29–217:13Google Scholar; see also 207: 23–24; Wulff, , Frauenfeindliche Dichtungen, pp. 167–68Google Scholar.

67 Peirol, , Peirol: A Troubadour of Auvergne, ed. Aston, S. C. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1953), no. 23: 1–6; no. 25: 69–72Google Scholar; and “Introduction,” p. 21. Rejection of “unrewarded” love service increased in the course of the 13th century; it appeared in a very outspoken form in Tannhäuser's poetry; Lang, , Tannhäuser, pp. 101–2Google Scholar; Singer, , Mittelalterliche Literatur, p. 145Google Scholar; Korn, , Studien, pp. 34, 79–81Google Scholar; Appel, , Bertran von Born, pp. lxiv–lxvi, lxxviii–lxxixGoogle Scholar; Capellanus, Andieas, Courtly Love, p. 185: “Rules of Love,” no. 11Google Scholar.

68 E.g., Giraut de Bornelh, no. 48: 55–60, and passim.

69 von der Vogelweide, Walther, Lieder und Sprüche, ed. Wilmanns, W. and Michels, V., 4th ed. (Halle, Waisenhaus, 1924), 28: 31Google Scholar. On the growing number of unenfeoffed ministeriales and knights, Schmitthenner, , “Lehnskriegswesen,” p. 254Google Scholar; Wilmanns, W. and Michels, V., Leben und Dichten Walthers von der Vogelweide, 2nd ed. (Halle, Waisenhaus, 1916), pp. 7, 391 n.s 15–17Google Scholar. On the increasing subdivision of noble property and especially the small size of the average fief of ministeriales in Bavaria, Dollinger, , Classes rurales, pp. 90–92Google Scholar.

70 Giraut de Bornelh, no. 75: 19–20; d’Auvergne, Peire, Die Lieder Peires von Auvergne, ed. Zenker, R. (Erlangen, Junge, 1900), no. 12: 19–24Google Scholar; Wilmanns, and Michels, , Leben, p. 293Google Scholar. On mutual jealousies and frictions, ibid., p. 188; Kluckhohn, , Ministerialität, pp. 102, 132–38Google Scholar; Wechssler, , Kulturproblem, I, p. 94Google Scholar.

71 Jones, , “Jongleur Troubadours,” pp. 307ffGoogle Scholar.; Jeanroy, , Poésie, I, pp. 92–94, 133–34Google Scholar. By contrast, in northern France all the trouvères belonged to the nobility with the sole exception of Chrétien de Troyes; ibid., I, p. 273.

72 Bernard de Ventadour, no. 21: 9–11; Giraut de Bornelh, no. 59:17–24; 33–40; no. 25: 30–35.

73 Capellanus, Andreas, Courtly Love, pp. 53–54, 93, 120Google Scholar. In the same vein, von Zirclaria, Thomasin, Der Wälsche Gast, ed. Rückert, H., lines 1593–1606Google Scholar; and Freidank, 54:6, “He who is virtuous is wellborn”. On morum probitas and the nobility of the heart, Wechssler, , Kulturproblem, I, pp. 52–54Google Scholar. The dependence of true nobility on behavior was denied again when the noble class considered itself closed; it was debated anew in the 15th and 16th centuries, e.g. by Castiglione.

74 Les chansons de Jaufré Rudel, ed. Jeanroy, A., 2nd ed. (Paris, 1924), no. 4: 12–21Google Scholar, as trans, and interpreted by Denomy, A. J., “Fin’ Amors: The Pure Love of the Troubadours, Its Amorality and Possible Source,” Mediaeval Studies, VII (1945), pp. 161–63Google Scholar.

75 Giuraut de Bornelh, no. 37: 1–9; also no. 58: 36–37; no. 76: 41–48, the poet as a moral guide.

76 E.g., a poem by Giraut de Bornelh, no. 47: 58–76. Huizinga, Waning, chap. V.

77 Williamson, Robert W., Essays in Polynesian Ethnology, ed. Piddington, R. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1939), pp. 183–85,193–98Google Scholar; Mühlmann, Wilhelm E., Die geheime Gesellschaft der Arioi: Eine Studie über polynesische Geheimbünde (Leiden, Brill, 1932), pp. 59, 68–74Google Scholar.