Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:57:12.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking the Violence of Pacification: State Formation and Bandits in Turkey, 1914–1937

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2012

Uğur Ümit Üngör
Uğur Ümit Üngör*
Affiliation:
History, Utrecht University
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses the changing relationship between Kurdish bandits and the Ottoman and Turkish states. Considerable research has been conducted on the impact of state formation on the establishment and maintenance of a monopoly of violence. But little is known about the state's use of outlaws for various security tasks. I address this hiatus and focus on the ebb and flow of Kurdish chieftains' relations to the state. Although these states followed consistent policies of disarmament and pacification, in periods of crisis, such as war, this changed as they tried to use the outlaws for their own purposes. I draw on previously untapped Ottoman and Western sources to portray the experience of one group of Kurdish tribal outlaws who found themselves at times diametrically opposed to the state, but in other times in accord with it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 746 - 769
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Whitman, James Q., “Aux Origines du ‘Monopole de la Violence,’” in Colliot-Thélène, Catherine and Kervégan, Jean-François, eds., De la société à la sociologie (Lyon: ENS Éditions, 2002), 71–91Google Scholar.

2 Goudsblom, Johan, “De Monopolisering van Georganiseerd Geweld,” Sociologische Gids 48, 4 (2001): 343–59Google Scholar.

3 Barkey, Karen, Empire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 67–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Weber, Max, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1922), 29Google Scholar.

5 Tibi, Bassam, “The Simultaneity of the Unsimultaneous: Old Tribes and Imposed Nation-States in the Modern Middle East,” in Khoury, Philip S. and Kostiner, Joseph, eds., Tribes and State Formation in the Middle East (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990), 127–52, at 132Google Scholar.

6 İnalcık, Halil, “Application of the Tanzimat and Its Social Effects,” Archivum Ottomanicum 5 (1973): 99–127Google Scholar.

7 Darity, William A. Jr., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (Detroit: Thomson Gale, 2008), vol. 8, 449–51Google Scholar.

8 Bruinessen, Martin van, Agha, Shaikh and State: The Social and Political Structures of Kurdistan (London: Zed, 1992), chs. 2, 3, and 4Google Scholar.

9 Hofmann, Tessa and Koutcharian, Gerayer, “The History of Armenian-Kurdish Relations in the Ottoman Empire,” Armenian Review, 39, 4–156 (1986): 1–45Google Scholar.

10 Klein, Janet, The Margins of Empire: Kurdish Militias in the Ottoman Tribal Zone (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 “Li Çiyaye Qîre, Delana Paşo, şerê Reşkotiyan û Etmankiyan: Şerê Filîtê Qûto û Mamê Elê Etmankî,” in Kevirbirî, Salihê, Filîtê Qûto: Serpêhatî, Dîrok, Sosyolojî (Istanbul: Pêrî, 2001), 59–75Google Scholar.

12 Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi, Ottoman Archives, Istanbul, hereafter cited as BOA, DH.MKT 1498/87, 3 May 1888.

13 BOA, DH.MKT 1488/73, 24 Jan. 1888, Ministry of Interior to governor of Bitlis.

14 BOA, DH.MKT 1555/84, 18 Oct. 1888.

15 BOA, DH.MUİ 23-2/16, 29 Jan. 1910.

16 “Şer û kilamak ji herêma Xerzan: Şerê Pencînaran û Elikan,” in Kevirbirî, Salihê, Filîtê Qûto: Serpêhatî, Dîrok, Sosyolojî (İstanbul: Pêrî, 2001), 11–18Google Scholar.

17 Beşikçi, İsmail, Doğu'da Değişim ve Yapısal Sorunlar (Göçebe Alikan Aşireti) (Ankara: Sevinç, 1969), 78–79Google Scholar.

18 BOA, DH.MKT 1589/66, 1 Mar. 1889.

19 Kevirbirî, Salihê, “Deng û Awaza Xerzan,” in Özgür Politika, 3 Jan. 2000Google Scholar. Some of these laments are performed in a documentary by Aktaş, Mehmet, Dengekî Zemanê Bere: Karapêtê Xaço: Voice from the Past (Belgium: Medya TV, 2000)Google Scholar.

20 Bozarslan, Hamit, “Remarques sur l'histoire des relations kurdo-arméniennes,” Journal of Kurdish Studies 1 (1995 [1996]): 55–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 BOA, DH.EUM.EMN 38/30, Vice-Governor of Bitlis Mehmed Kadri to Ministry of Justice, 6 Dec. 1913.

22 BOA, İ.HUS 25/1311/Z-061, 12 May 1894.

23 BOA, DH.MUİ 108/-1/34, 30 May 1910. Some of these assassinations were fictionalized in Avetis Aharonian, Sur le chemin de la liberte? (Marseille: Parente?ses, 2006).

24 BOA, DH.MUİ 120/3, 3 Sept. 1910.

25 BOA, DH.MUİ 4/-3/16, 19 Nov. 1909.

26 BOA, DH.EUM.EMN 66/15, docs. 1 and 5, governor of Bitlis to Ministry of Justice, 12 May 1914.

27 BOA, DH.EUM.EMN 89/5, 28 July 1914.

28 Beysanoğlu, Şevket, Anıtları ve Kitabeleri ile Diyarbakır Tarihi, vol. 2: Akkoyunlular'dan Cumhuriyete Kadar (Diyarbakır: Diyarbakır Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kültür ve Sanat Yayınları, 1996), 773, n. 17Google Scholar.

29 Aksakal, Mustafa, The Ottoman Road to War in 1914: The Ottoman Empire and the First World War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Türk Silahlı Kuvvetleri Tarihi (Ankara: Genelkurmay Basımevi, 1971), vol. 3, sec. 6, 1908–1920, 129–240Google Scholar.

31 BOA, DH.ŞFR 47/70, Talaat to provinces, 18 Nov. 1914.

32 Bloxham, Donald, “The Beginning of the Armenian Catastrophe: Comparative and Contextual Considerations,” in Kieser, Hans-Lukas and Schaller, Dominik J., eds., Der Völkermord an den Armeniern und die Shoah: The Armenian Genocide and the Shoah (Zürich: Chronos, 2002), 101–28Google Scholar.

33 The very few that by sheer chance escaped wrote compelling memoirs: Shamtanchian, Mikayel, The Fatal Night: An Eyewitness Account of the Extermination of Armenian Intellectuals in 1915 (Studio City, Calif.: H. and K. Majikian Publications, 2007)Google Scholar; Andonian, Aram, Exile, Trauma and Death: On the Road to Chankiri with Komitas Vartabed (London: Gomidas, 2010)Google Scholar; Odian, Yervant, Accursed Years: My Exile and Return from Der Zor, 1914–1919 (London: Gomidas, 2009)Google Scholar.

34 Kévorkian, Raymond, The Armenian Genocide: A Complete History (London: I. B. Tauris, 2010)Google Scholar.

35 Demirer, Hüseyin, Ha Wer Delal: Emînê Perîxanê'nin Hayatı (Istanbul: Avesta, 2008), 63–64Google Scholar.

36 “Ji birakujiya nava eşîran nimûneyeke sosret: Emînê Perîxanê—Evdilê Birahîm,” in Kevirbirî, Salihê, Filîtê Qûto: Serpêhatî, Dîrok, Sosyolojî (İstanbul: Pêrî, 2001), 49–58Google Scholar.

37 BOA, DH.İD 80/5, Interior Ministry report, 8 Aug. 1914.

38 Demirer, Ha Wer Delal, chs. 5 and 7.

39 Muggerditchian, Thomas, Dikranagerdee Nahankin Tcharteru yev Kurderou Kazanioutounneru (Cairo: Djihanian, 1919), 57–58Google Scholar. Yataghan were used in the Ottoman Empire until the early twentieth century.

40 Demirer, Ha Wer Delal, 75–89.

41 Ibid., 82–84. The massacre is corroborated in German, Syriac, Armenian, and Ottoman official sources. Politisches Archiv Auswärtiges Amt (German National Archives, Berlin), R14087, Friedrich Schuchardt to the German Foreign Office, 21 Aug. 1915, encl. 6; Muggerditchian, Dikranagerdee Nahankin Tcharteru. See also the memoirs of two Syriac chroniclers: Abed Mshiho Na'man Qarabashi, Dmo Zliho: Verhalen over de Gruweldaden jegens Christenen in Turkije en over het Leed dat hun in 1895 en in 1914–1918 is Aangedaan (Glanerbrug: Bar Hebraeus, 2002), 128Google Scholar; and Armalto, Ishaq, Al-Qousara fi Nakabat an-Nasara (Beirut: Al-Sharfe Monastery, 1970)Google Scholar; and Épisodes des Massacres Armèniens de Diarbekir: Faits et Documents (Constantinople: Kéchichian Fr., 1920), 28–30Google Scholar.

42 Politisches Archiv Auswärtiges Amt (German National Archives, Berlin), R14087, director of the Deutschen Hülfsbundes für christliches Liebeswerk im Orient (Frankfurt am Main) Friedrich Schuchardt to the Auswärtiges Amt, 21 Aug. 1915, encl. 6.

43 BOA, DH.EUM.MEM 67/31, 27 July 1915. Deputies Aziz Feyzi and Zülfü Bey, and militia Major Şevki were decorated with honorary medals for their “great achievements.” BOA, DH.KMS 43/10, 11 Jan. 1917. According to a British intelligence report, “Deputy Feyzi was received by the Kaiser and decorated with the Iron Cross.” National Archives (UK), FO 371/4172/24597, no. 63490, fol. 304 (undated).

44 Demirer, Ha Wer Delal, 87.

45 NAUK, FO 424/271, 28, no.10, clerk to Henderson, 11 July 1929, “Notes from a Journey from Angora to Aleppo, Diarbekr, Malatia, Sivas and the Black Sea Coast, June 9–29, 1929.”

46 Başbakanlık Cumhuriyet Arşivi (Republican Archives, Ankara) (henceforth BCA), 030.18.01.01/16.78.2, Prime Ministerial decree, 12 Dec. 1925.

47 BCA, 030.10/112.156.20, Foreign Ministry decree, 1 May 1925.

48 BCA, 030.10/127.914.24, Gendarmerie report, 15 June 1929.

49 BCA, 030.10/127.914.26, Gendarmerie report, 20 June 1929.

50 Kevirbirî, Salihê, Filîtê Qûto: Serpêhatî, Dîrok, Sosyolojî (Istanbul: Pêrî, 2001), 11–18, 59–75Google Scholar.

51 Genelkurmay Belgelerinde Kürt İsyanları, 197.

52 BCA, 030.18.01.01/14.48.5, Prime Ministerial decree, 29 July 1925.

53 Ergüven, Şükrü Kaya, 7–8.

54 Koçak, Umûmi Müfettişlikler, 100.

55 NAUK, FO 371/14578/E?, Drummond (Geneva) to Cadogan (London), 18 Nov. 1930, “Note sur un Entretien avec S.E. Tewfik Rouschdy Bey.”

56 Koçak, Umûmi Müfettişlikler, 79.

57 BCA, 030.10/35.359.8, Interior Minister Şükrü Kaya to Prime Minister İsmet İnönü, 24 Nov. 1931.

58 BCA, 030.10/54.359.5, Interior Minister Şükrü Kaya to Prime Minister İsmet İnönü, 30 Apr. 1932.

59 BCA, 030.10/54.359.5, Chief of Staff Fevzi Çakmak to Interior Minister Şükrü Kaya, 14 Apr. 1932.

60 BCA, 030.18.01.02/37.41.11, Cabinet decree, 13 May 1933.

61 BCA, 030.10/54.359.11, Inspector-General İbrahim Tali to Prime Minister İsmet İnönü, 20 Aug. 1932.

62 BCA, 030.10/54.359.14, Interior Ministry to Prime Ministry, 6 Sept. 1932.

63 BCA, 030.10/54.359.14, Inspector-General İbrahim Tali to Interior Minister Şükrü Kaya, 17 Sept. 1932.

64 BCA, 030.10/54.359.14, Inspector-General İbrahim Tali to Interior Minister Şükrü Kaya, 10 Sept. 1932.

65 BCA, 030.10/54.359.14, Interior Minister Şükrü Kaya to Prime Minister İsmet İnönü, 28 Sept. 1932; 4 Oct. 1932; 9 Oct. 1932; and 11 Oct. 1932.

66 BCA, 030.10/54.359.14, Interior Minister Şükrü Kaya to Prime Minister İsmet İnönü, 9 Oct. 1932.

67 BCA, 030.10/54.359.14, Prime Minister İsmet İnönü to Inspector-General İbrahim Tali, 13 Nov. 1932.

68 BCA, 030.10/54.359.14, Inspector-General İbrahim Tali to Prime Minister İsmet İnönü, 16 Nov. 1932.

69 BCA, 030.10/54.359.14, Interior Minister Şükrü Kaya to Prime Minister İsmet İnönü, 15 Nov. 1932.

70 BCA, 030.10/54.360.1, Interior Minister Şükrü Kaya to Prime Minister İsmet İnönü, 29 Dec. 1932.

71 The report is quoted in Koca, Hüseyin, Yakın Tarihten Günümüze Hükümetlerin Doğu-Güneydoğu Anadolu Politikaları: Umumi Müfettişliklerden Olağanüstü Hal Bölge Valiliğine (Konya: Mikro, 1998), 387–88Google Scholar.

72 BCA, 030.10/54.359.14, Inspector-General İbrahim Tali Öngören to Prime Minister İsmet İnönü, 29 Nov. 1932.

73 BCA, 030.10/69.454.36, Inspector-General İbrahim Tali Öngören to Prime Minister İsmet İnönü, 4 Jan. 1930.

74 BCA, 030.10/128.923.9, Interior Minister Şükrü Kaya to Prime Ministry, 15 Mar. 1937.

75 Ibid.; Koca, Yakın, 388 ff.

76 Mirzeler, Mustafa Kemal, “The Formation of Male Identity and the Roots of Violence against Women: The Case of Kurdish Songs, Stories and Storytellers,” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 20, 2 (2000): 261–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77 According to one expert, during wars, “The term is usually sought out by insurgents in search of legitimacy, and denied by incumbents who label their opponents ‘bad guys,’ bandits, criminals, subversives, or terrorists—and describe the war as banditry, terrorism, delinquent subversion, and other cognate terms.” Kalyvas, Stathis N., The Logic of Violence in Civil War (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The Nazis used similar language during their occupation of the Soviet Union: the term “partisan” was to be replaced by “bandit,” they argued, “for psychological reasons.” Accordingly, anti-partisan operations were to be called “anti-bandit warfare” and areas of suspected partisan presence were referred to as areas “contaminated with bandit groups.” Heer, Hannes, ‘The Logic of the War of Extermination: The Wehrmacht and the Anti-Partisan War,’ in Heer, Hannes and Naumann, Klaus, eds., War of Extermination: The German Military in World War II, 1941–1944 (New York: Berghahn Books, 2000), 92–126, at 113Google Scholar.

78 Ergüven, Şükrü Kaya, 111.

79 Ibid., 195–205.

80 See the family memoir written by a grandson of one of the Awina chieftains: Ergin, Ramazan, Awina ya da Kanın Gizli Tarihi: Reşo Kuri (Istanbul: Do, 2007)Google Scholar.

81 By the summer of 1937, the inspector-general reported progress in the pacification process: “In matters of public security there is a clear improvement compared to previous years; both the number of incidents and their severity have declined.” Such an account of the pacification campaign in the wake of the Karaköprü incident was either a knowing misrepresentation (common in Kemalist officials' correspondence to superiors they wanted to impress and satisfy) or a trivialization of the Karaköprü robbery. BCA, 030.10/70.461.1, Inspector-General Abidin Özmen to Prime Ministry, 24 Aug. 1937.

82 BCA, 030.10/128.923.9, Interior Minister Şükrü Kaya to Prime Ministry, 15 Mar. 1937.

83 BCA, 030.10/54.360.14, Chief of Staff Fevzi Çakmak to Prime Ministry, 3 Sep. 1938.

84 Interview conducted with Kenan Y. (from Mardin) in Berlin, 14 Jan. 2005.

85 Interview conducted with Amed Tîgrîs (from Lice) in Stockholm, 12 May 2005.

86 Interview conducted with Y. T. (from Diyarbakır) in Diyarbakır, 2 July 2005.

87 Schutz, Charles E., Political Humor: From Aristophanes to Sam Ervin (Rutherford, N.J.: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1977), 43–44Google Scholar, quoted in Thurston, Robert W., “Social Dimensions of Stalinist Rule: Humor and Terror in the USSR, 1935–1941,” Journal of Social History 24, 3 (1991): 541–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

88 For an overview of the literature, see Spruyt, Hendrik, “War, Trade, and State Formation,” in Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan C., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 211–35Google Scholar.

89 Hobsbawm, Eric, Bandits (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2000 [1969]), 20, 26Google Scholar.

90 Alvarez, Alex, “Militias and Genocide,” War Crimes, Genocide, and Crimes against Humanity 2 (2006): 1–33Google Scholar.

91 Barkey, Karen, Bandits and Bureaucrats: The Ottoman Route of State Centralization (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994), 230–31Google Scholar.

92 Kasaba, Reşat, A Moveable Empire: Ottoman Nomads, Migrants, and Refugees (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2009)Google Scholar.