Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:54:10.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Separatism and Ethnicity: A Response to Sloan's ‘Ethnicity or Imperialism?’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Michael Hechter
Affiliation:
University of Washington

Extract

The geographical distribution of separatist movements in the world today is, and always has been, highly skewed. At any point in history such movements arise only in particular states, and—within these states—only in particular regions. One task of a general theory of separatism is to account for this skewed geographical distribution. Mr. Sloan seems to think that the answer to this problem is ‘imperialism’, tout court. He apparently believes that any region subject to dependent development is likely to spawn separatist movements (hence his discussion of Vermont). According to Mr. Sloan ethnicity has no causal status in a theory of separatism. Thus, to pay it heed is to mistake an effect for a cause.

Type
Regionalism: A Debate on Hechter's Internal Colonialism
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hechter, Michael, ‘Group Formation and the Cultural Division of Labor,’ American Journal of Sociology 84:2 (09 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Hechter, Michael and Levi, Margaret, ‘ A Comparative Study of Ethnoregionalism in Brittany and Wales,’ mimeo. (March 1978).Google Scholar