¹ Southall, Aidan, “Stateless Society,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Sills, D., ed. (New York: Macmillan, 1968), XV,Google Scholar 157ff. See also African Political Systems, Evans-Pritchard, E. E. and Fortes, Meyer, eds. (London: Oxford University Press, 1940).Google Scholar

² Easton, David, “Political Anthropology,”in Biennial Review of Anthropology 1959, Siegal, Bernard J., ed. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1959), 210–62.Google Scholar

³ Nettl, J. P., “The State as a Conceptual Variable,”World Politics, 20:4 (07 1968), 55992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴ Huntington, Samuel P., “Political Development and Political Decay,”World Politics, 17:3 (04 1965), 386–430;CrossRefGoogle ScholarNettl, J. P., Political Mobilization (New York: Basic Books, 1967).Google Scholar

⁵ Friedrich, C. J., Constitutional Government and Democracy: Theory and Practice in Europe and America, rev. ed., (Boston: Ginn, 1950).Google Scholar

⁶ E.g., Mills, C. Wright, Sociology and Pragmatism (New York: Paine-Whitman Publishers, 1964), 173Google Scholar et passim; Habermas, Jürgen, Knowledge and Human Interests, Shapiro, Jeremy J., trans. (Boston: Beacon Press, 1971), 91–112.Google Scholar

⁷ Bentley, Arthur F., The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1908).Google Scholar

⁸ Parsons, Talcott, The Structure of Social Action (New York: Free Press, 1949)Google Scholar. Lasswell, H. and Kaplan, A., Power and Society: A Framework for Political inquiry (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950):Google Scholar “Part One: The subject matter of political science is constituted by the conduct of persons with various perspectives of action, and organized into groups of varying complexity”(facing p. xxiv). Easton, David, “An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems,”World Politics, 9:3 (04 1957), 383–400;CrossRefGoogle ScholarDeutsch, Karl, The Nerves of Government Models of Political Communication and Control (London: Free Press of Glencoe, 1963);Google ScholarTruman, David B., The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion (New York: Knopf, 1971).Google Scholar

⁹ Greenstone, David, “Group Theories,”in Handbook of Political Science. Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W., eds. (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1975). II, 243–318;Google ScholarKress, Paul F., Social Science and the Idea of Process (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1970).Google Scholar

¹⁰ Rothman, Stanley, “Systematic Political Theory: Observations on the Group Approach,”American Political Science Review, 54:1 (03 1960), 15–33, esp. 23–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹¹ Mills, , Sociology and Pragmatism, 426ff; John Dewey, Freedom and Culture (New York: Capricorn Books, 1963).Google Scholar See also Apter, David, Choice and the Politics of Allocation: A Developmental Theory (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971). Much of the “feedback” literature (e.g., Easton, Deutsch) is based on this idea.Google Scholar

¹² Greenstone, , “Group Theories,” 260–62.Google Scholar

¹³ Ben Page, Who Gets What from Government (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).Google Scholar

¹⁴ Olson, Mancur, The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982);Google ScholarHudson, Michael, Arab Politics: The Search for Legititnacv (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977), 280ff.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971), 121–25.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Social Science Research Council Annual Report, 1953–1954 (New York: Social Science Research Council, 1954), 40, 57.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Almond, Gabriel A. and Coleman, James C., The Politics of the Developing Areas (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960), ch. 1.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Parsons, , Structure of Social Action, 751;Google ScholarParsons, T. and Shill, E., Toward a General Theory of Action (Glencoe: Free Press, 1950).Google Scholar

¹⁹ Habermas, Jürgen, Legitimation Crisis, McCarthy, Thomas, trans. (Boston: Beacon Press, 1975), 7, 89, 117ff.Google Scholar

²⁰ Kahin, G. McT., Pauker, G. J., Pye, L. W., “Comparative Politics of Non-Western Countries,” American Political Science Review, 49:4 (12 1955), 1022–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²¹ Lerner, Daniel, The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East (New York: Free Press, 1958).Google ScholarDeutsch, K., Nationalism and Social Communication (New York: Wiley & Technology Press, 1953).Google Scholar

²² Lerner, , Passing of Traditional Society, ch. 2, 43–75.Google Scholar

²³ Deutsch, Karl, “Toward an Inventory of Basic Trends and Patterns in Comparative and International Relations,” American Political Science Review, 54:1 (03 1960), 34–57;CrossRefGoogle Scholaridem,“Social Mobilization and Political Development,” American Political Science Review, 55:3 (09 1961), 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See Eisenstadt, S., “Modemization and Conditions of Sustained Growth,” World Politics, 16:4 (07 1964), 576–94,CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Coleman, J. S., “The Development Syndrome,” in L. Binder et al., Crises and Sequences in Political Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978), 73.Google Scholar

²⁴ Taylor, John, From Modernization to Modes of Production: A Critique of the Sociologies of Development and Underdevelopment (London: Macmillian, 1983).Google Scholar

²⁵ Ibid., 36.

²⁶ Ibid., 32.

²⁷ Parsons, Structure of Social Action, 722–25, 764.Google ScholarFoucault, Michel, The Archaeology of Knowledge, Smith, A. M. Sheridan, trans. (New York: Harper Colophon. 1972).Google Scholar

²⁸ Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar

²⁹ Taylor, , From Modernization, 29.Google Scholar

³⁰ Ibid., 36.

³¹ Ibid.

³² Huntington, Samuel P., Review Essay: Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968), 21, 25, 98, 341;Google ScholarHuntington, Samuel P. and Nelson, Joan M., No Easy Choice: Political Participation in Developing Countries (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Binder, L., “Review Essay: Political Participation and Political Development,” American Journal of Sociology, 83:3 (Autumn 1977), 751–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³³ Shits, Edward, Political Development in the New States (London: Mouton, 1965);Google ScholarBendix, Reinhard, Nation Building and Citizenship (New York: Wiley and Sons, 1964);Google ScholarRudolph, Lloyd and Rudolph, Suzanne, The Modernitv of Tradition: Political Development in India (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967);Google ScholarNisbet, Robert A., Social Change and History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

³⁴ Nettl, , Political Mobilization: Aristide Zolberg, Creating Political Order (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966);Google Scholar'LaPalombara, Joseph G. and Weiner, Myron, Political Parties and Political Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966);CrossRefGoogle ScholarJanowitz, M., Military Institutions and Coercion in the Developing Nations (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977);Google Scholar and LaPalombara, Joseph G., Bureaucracy and Political Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁵ Binder et al., Crises and Sequences; Kesselman, Mark, “Orderor Movement? The Literature of Political Development as Ideology,” World Politics, 26:1 (10 1973), 139–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁶ Tilly, Charles, ed., The Formation of National States in Western Europe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

³⁷ Almond, Gabriel A. and Powell, G. Bingham, Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co., 1966);Google ScholarAlmond, G. A. and Flanagan, Scott C. et al, Crises, Choice, and Change: Historical Studies of Political Development (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1973);Google ScholarHuntington, and Nelson, , No Easy Choice.Google Scholar

³⁸ Greenstone, , “Group Theories.”Google Scholar

³⁹ Proposal to the SSRC for a Research Planning Committee on States and Social Structures, submitted by Evans, P., Hirschman, A., Katzenstein, P., Katznelson, I., Krasner, S., Rueschemeyer, D., Skocpol, T., and Tilly, C., dated 04 1983; covering letter reporting approval of proposal signed by M. Gephar, dated August 1983.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Skocpol, Theda, “Bringing the State Back In,” Items (SSRC), 36:1/2 (06 1982), 1–8.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Ibid., 4.

⁴² Ibid., 7.

⁴³ The literature on these subjects is immense, but the following may provide a basis for further inquiry: Avineri, Shlomo, ed., Marx on Colonialism and Modernization (New York: Doubleday, 1969);Google ScholarWittfogel, Karl A., Oriental Despotism (New York: Vintage Books, 1981);Google ScholarBailey, Anne M. and Llobera, Joseph R., The Asiatic Mode of Production (Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981);Google ScholarRodinson, Maxime, Islam and Capitalism (Paris: Edition du Seuil, 1966), 61.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Frank, Andre Gunder, Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America(New York: Monthly Review Press, 1967).Google Scholar See also Amin, Samir, Accumulation on a World Scale: A Critique of the Theory of Underdevelopment, Pearce, Brian, trans. (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974);Google ScholarPrebisch, Raul, “The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems,”(New York: United Nations, 1950).Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Amin, , Accumulation; Arghiri Emmanuel, Unequal Exchange: A Stud of the Imperialism of Trade (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1972).Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Taylor, , From Modernization; Barry Hindess and Paul Hirst, Precapitalist Modes of Production (Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975):Google Scholaridem,Mode of Production and Social Formation: An Auto-critique of Precapilalist Modes of Production (London: Macmillan, 1977).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Shamir, Shimon, “The Marxists in Egypt,” in The USSR and the Middle East, Confino, Michael and Shamir, Shimon, eds. (Jerusalem: Israel Universities Press, 1973), 293ff.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Husain, Mahmoud [pseud.], Class Conflict in Egypt: 1945–1970 (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1973).Google Scholar See also Amin, Samir, The Arab Nation, Pallis, Michael, trans. (London: Zed Press, 1978).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Miliband, Ralph, The State in Capitalist Society (New York: Basic Books, 1969);Google ScholarMandel, Ernst, Late Capitalism, Bres, Joris de, trans. (London: New Left Books, 1975);Google ScholarHabermas, , Legitimation Crisis.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Kay, Geoffrey, Development and Underdevelopment (London: Macmillan, 1975).Google Scholar

⁵¹ For example, Amin, , Arab Nation, 111ff.;Google ScholarHussein, Adel, Al-Igtisad al Misrivva, min alIstiglal ila al-Taba'iyya, 2 vols. (Cairo: Dar al-Mustagbal al-'Arabi, 1982);Google Scholar'Laroui, Abdullah, L'ideologie arabe contemporaine (Paris: F. Maspero, 1967), 139ff.Google Scholar

⁵² Warren, Bill, Imperialism: Pioneer of Capitalism (London: New Shelf Books, 1981).Google Scholar

⁵³ Cardoso, F. H. and Faletto, Enzo, Dependency and Development in Latin America, Urquidi, Marjory Mattingly, trans. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979);Google ScholarO'Donnell, Guillermo, Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism (Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California, 1973);Google ScholarSkocpol, Theda, States and Social Revolutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979);CrossRefGoogle ScholarWallerstein, Immanuel, The Origins of the Modern World System (New York: Academic Press, 1974).Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Packenham, Robert A., “Plus ça Change … The English Edition of Cardoso and Falletto's Dependencia r Desarollo en America Latina,” Latin American Research Review, 17:1 (1982), 131–51, esp. 143–45.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Taylor, , From Modernization, 164.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Ibid., 71ff.

⁵⁷ Ibid., 266, 274, 275.

⁵⁸ Ibid., 240.

⁵⁹ Ibid., 276, n. 12, on the matter of forms of theoretical discourse.

⁶⁰ Evans, Peter, Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

⁶¹ Packenham, , “Plus Ça Change,” 142–46.Google ScholarCardoso, and Faletto, , Dependency and Development, was originally published in 1973.Google Scholar

⁶² O'Donnell, , Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism; The New Authoritarianism in Latin America, Collier, David, ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

⁶³ O'Donnell, Guillermo, “Tensions in the Bureaucratic-Authoritarian State and the Question of Democracy,” in New Authoritarianism, Collier, , ed., 285–318; see 313ff.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Collier, David, “The Bureaucratic-Authoritarian Model: Synthesis and Priorities for Future Research,” in New Authoritarianism, Collier, , ed., 386–87.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Ibid., 395.,

⁶⁶ Ibid., 369.,

⁶⁷ Ibid., 387.

⁶⁸ Review (a quarterly journal of the Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of Economics, Historical Systems, and Civilizations, published by Research Foundation of the State University of New York) publishes articles which conform to a perspective described by the editors as one “which recognizes the primacy of analyses of economics over long historical time and large space, the holism of the social-historical process, and the transitory (heuristic) nature of theories” Review, 3:2 (Fall 1979). The first issue was printed in the summer of 1977.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World System I (New York: Academic Press. 1974), 348.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Goldstone, J. A., “The Comparative and Historical Study of Revolutions,” Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 8, Turner, Ralph H. and Short, James F., Jr., eds. (Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Review Press, 1982).Google Scholar

⁷¹ Ibid., 194; Moore, Barrington, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966).Google Scholar

⁷² Goldstone, , “Comparative and Historical Study,” 193–94.Google Scholar

⁷³ Brinton, Crane, The Anatomy of Revolution (New York: Vintage Books, 1965);Google ScholarGoldstone, , “Comparative and Historical Study,” 189–92.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Moore, , Social Origins, 468ff.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Skocpol, Theda, “A Critical Review of Barrington Moore's Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy,” Politics and Society, 4:1 (Fall 1973), 1–34; see 28–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷⁶ Skocpol, , States and Social Revolution, 116, 154.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Ibid., 285–86.

⁷⁸ Rosenberg, Hans, Bureaucracy, , Aristocracy, and Autocracy: The Prussian Experience, 1660–1815 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958).Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Abrahamian, Ervand, Iran between Two Revolutions (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982), 441;Google ScholarSkocpol, Theda, “Rentier State and Shia Islam in the Iranian Revolution,” Theory and Society, 11 (1982), 265–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁸⁰ Binder et al., Crises and Sequences; Habermas, , Legitimation Crisis; O'Donnell, Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism; Collier, New Authoritarianism.Google Scholar