Article contents
The Evolution of Muslim Urban Society
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 June 2009
Extract
Islamic society is ever intriguing. Across broad territories and over millenia of time, it maintains a constant identity; yet it is always elusive, varied, and changing. The study of Islamic urbanism, like so many Islamic topics, oscillates between attempts to define what is fundamental and universal in Islamic city life, and what is ineffably individual about each locality; the contradictory perspectives seem equally valid. While topography, culture, and history have given each locality a unique identity, by the middle ages, Middle Eastern towns between the Nile and the Jaxartes—the core area of Islamic society—shared common features of social organization. Small communities, such as families, neighborhood quarters, and fraternities were the fundamental units of society. Town populations were gathered into loosely organized religious bodies, such as schools of law, Shirite sects, and Sufi brotherhoods, who were dominated by ethnically alien elites organized into slave armies and slave-maintained governments, and who garrisoned and extracted revenues from the towns while remaining separate from local community life. Characteristically, then, Middle Eastern Muslim cities operated on three levels-parochial groups, religious communities, and imperial regimes. Organized urban life depended on the relationships between person and groups within this three-tiered institutional pattern.
- Type
- Cities
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1973
References
1 Lapidus, M., Muslim Cities in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1967),Google Scholar and ‘Muslim Cities and Islamic Societies’, Middle Eastern Cities, edited by the author (Berkeley, 1969), pp. 47–74.Google Scholar A brief résumé of previous work, including this paper, appears under the title ‘Traditional Muslim Cities: Structure and Change’, in Brown, L. C., From Medina to Metropolis (Princeton, 1972).Google Scholar
2 For general works on ancient cities see Adams, R. M., The Evolution of Urban Society (Chicago, 1968),Google Scholar and Land Behind Baghdad (Chicago, 1966);Google Scholar Jones, A. H. M., The Greek City from Alexander to Justinian (Oxford, 1940);Google Scholar Pigulevskaya, N. V., Les villes de l'État Iranien (Paris, 1963).Google Scholar
3 The most important general work on the Arab conquests and settlement is al-Balādhurl, , Futūḥ al-Buldān (Leiden, 1866),Google Scholar translated by Hitti, P. K. and Murgotten, E. C., The Origins of the Islamic State (New York, 1916–1924).Google Scholar Al-Tabarl, , Ta'rikh al-rusūl wal-mulūk is the most comprehensive chronicle.Google Scholar General secondary works include Caetani, L., Annali dell' Islam, 8 vols. (Milan, 1905–1918);Google Scholar Wellhausen, J., The Arab Kingdom and its Fall (Calcutta, 1927);Google Scholar and Reitemeyer, E. Die Städtgriindungen der Araber im Islam (Munich, 1912).Google Scholar
Later geographers also contain valuable information on the early settlement of Arab-Muslim towns. See in particular Hawkal, Ibn, Kitāb Sūral al-Ard, 2 vols. (Leiden, 1938–1999);Google Scholar IṣtakhrĪ, , al-Masālik wal-mamālik (Cairo, 1961);Google Scholar al-MuqaddasĪ, Aḥsan al-taqāsim fĪ al-Aqālim (Leiden, 1906);Google Scholar al-MustawfĪ, , Nuzhat al-Qulūb (London, 1919);Google Scholar al-, Kitāb al-Buldān (Leiden, 1906),Google Scholar translated by Wiet, G., Les Pays (Cairo, 1937);Google Scholar and Yāqūt, al-Buldan, 10 vols. (Cairo, 1906–1907).Google Scholar Valuable summaries are found in Strange, G. Le, The Lands of the Eastern Caliphate (Cambridge, 1905),Google Scholar and Palestine under the Moslems (London, 1890);Google Scholar and Schwartz, P., Iran im Mittelalter (Leipzig, 1896–1936).Google Scholar
Various works on particular provincial situations are available. For Syria see O. Grabar, ‘Umayyad “Palace” and the Abbāsid “Revolution”‘, Studia Islamica, 18 (1963), pp. 5–18Google Scholar; Tchalenko, G., Villages antiques de la Syrie du Nord, 3 vols. (Paris, 1953–1958).Google Scholar For Iraq see Massignon, L., ‘Explication du Plan de Basra’, Westostliche Abhandlung R. Tschudi (1954), pp. 154–74,Google Scholar and ‘Explication du Plan de Kufa’, Mélanges Maspéro, 3 (1940), pp. 337–60Google Scholar; Pellat, C., Le milieu Basrien et la formation de Gāhiz (Paris, 1953)Google Scholar; Sālih al-AlĪ, Al-Tanzimat al- wal-iqfiṣādiyya fĪl Basra (Baghdad, 1965).Google Scholar For eastern Iran see Gibb, H. A. R., The Arab Conquests of Central Asia (London, 1923);Google Scholar Barthold, W., Turkestan Down to the Mongol Invasion (London, 1968);Google Scholar Sālih al-AlĪ, ‘IstĪṭan al-Arab fi Khurāsān’.
4 For the development of Baghdad and its quarters see Strange, G. Le, Baghdad during the Abbasid Caliphate (Oxford, 1924);Google Scholar Salmon, G., L'Introduction topographique à l'histoire de Baghdad (Paris 1904);Google Scholar Streck, M., Die alte Landschaft Babylonien nach den arabischen Geographen (Leiden, 1900);Google Scholar Lassner, J., ‘Massignon and Baghdad: The Complexities of Growth in an Imperial City’, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 9 (1966), pp. 1–27Google Scholar; al-YaqūbĪ, Kitāb al-Buldān, pp. 233–54.Google Scholar
5 For the events of 816 and 846 (200–201 and 231 A. H.) see al-TabarĪ, , Ta'rikh (Cairo), Husayniyya, ed., 10, pp. 238–45, 248–9, 252–4;Google Scholar 11, pp. 15-18, 46-7; al-Uyūn al- fĪ akhbār al- and Miskawayh, , Tajārib al-Umum, ed. de Goeje, M. J. and de Jong, P. (Leiden, 1869), pp. 352–7, 429–35, 440–1, 446, 529–32;Google Scholar Ibn al-AthĪr, al-Kāmil fĪl-Ta'rikh (Beirut, 1965–7), 6, pp. 315–16, 324–27, 341–42; 7, pp. 20–33, 65Google Scholar; KathĪr, Ibn, al-Bidāya-wal-Nihāya (Cairo, 1932), 10, pp. 246–8, 303–6, 316.Google Scholar
For the policies of al-Mamūn see Sourdel, D., ‘La politique religieuse du Calife 'Abbaside al-Ma'mūn’, Rivue des Etudes Islamiques, 30 (1962), pp. 27–48;Google Scholar W. M. Watt, ‘The Political Attitudes of the Mutazila’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1963), pp. 38–57.Google Scholar
For Hanbalism see the Encyclopaedia of Islam, new edition, Aḥmad ibn Hanbal, al-BarbahārĪ, Hanābila;Laoust, H., ‘Le Hanbalisme sous le caliphat de Baghdad’, Révue des Etudes Islamiques, 27 (1959), pp. 67–128.Google Scholar Among the chronicles see KathĪr, Ibo, al-Bidāya wal-Nihāya,Google Scholar and al-ṢQlĪ, , Akhbār al-RāḍĪ wal-MuttaqĪ (London, 1935), passim.Google Scholar
6 No comprehensive history of military organization has been written, but the following articles may be consulted. O. S. A. Ismail ‘Mutaṣim and the Turks’, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 29 (1966), pp. 12–24;Google Scholar Bosworth, C. E., ‘Ghaznevid Military Organization’, Der Islam, 26 (1960), pp. 37–77;Google Scholar Ayalon, D., L'esclavage du Mamelouk (Jerusalem, 1951).Google Scholar
7 The histories of the schools can be traced through the biographical dictionaries. A good introduction to the school tabaqāt may be found in G. Makdisi, lbn Aqil et la résurgence de l'Islam ttaditionaliste (Damascus, 1965);Google Scholar Al-Subkl, Tabaqat al-shāffi yya, 6 vols. (Cairo, 1905–6), and lbn Abl Yalā, Tabaqāt al-hanābila, 2 vols. (Cairo, 1952)Google Scholar are noteworthy. For the judicial aspects of school organization see al-WakĪ, Akhbār al-qudā, 3 vols. (Cairo, 1947–1950);Google Scholar Tyan, E., Histoire de l'organisation judiciaire en pays d'Islam (Leiden 1960);Google Scholar Schacht, J., Introduction to Islamic Law (Oxford, 1964).Google Scholar On the development of judicial organization and the schools in Egypt particularly important materials are to be found in al-Kindl, , Kitāb al-Wulāt wa-Kitāb al-quḍāt (Leiden, 1912);Google Scholar and al-SuyūṭĪ, , Huṣn al-Maḥāḍara, 2 vols. (Cairo, 1904).Google Scholar
Studies of the schools of law in individual cities are few. See in particular Bosworth, C. E., The Ghaznavids (Edinburgh, 1963);Google Scholar Bulliet, R., Nishapur, Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, 1968;Google Scholar Lapidus, I. M., Muslim Cities.Google Scholar Histories or studies of particular cities are important for understanding the general structure of society. Among the most important are Abū Nuaym al-IṣfahānĪ, Kitāb Akhbār Iṣfahān, 2 vols. (Leiden, 1931–1934);Google Scholar Narshakhl, , The History of Bukhara, translated by Frye, R. N. (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1954);Google Scholar Sauvaget, J., Alep (Paris, 1941),Google Scholar and ‘Esquisses d'une histoire de la ville de Damas’, Revue des Etudes Islamiques, 8 (1934), pp. 421–80;Google Scholar Cahen, C., Mouvements Populaires et Autonomisme Urbain (Leiden, 1959).Google Scholar
8 Other theories about Islamic cities are set forth in Brunschvig, R., ‘Urbanisme medieval et Droit musulman’, REI (1947), pp. 127–55;Google Scholar von Grunebaum, G. E., ‘The Sacred Character of Islamic Cities’, Mélanges Taha Husain (Cairo, 1962), pp. 25–37,Google Scholar and ‘The Structure of the Muslim Town’, Islam: Essays on the Nature and Growth of a Cultural Tradition, second edition (London, 1961), pp. 141–58;Google Scholar Marçais, G., ‘Considérations sur les Villes Musulmanes et notamment sur le Rôle du Mohtasib’, La Ville, vol. 6 (Brussels: Société Jean Bodin, 1955), pp. 248–62,Google Scholar and ‘La Conception des Villes dans l'lslam’, Revue d'Alger, 2 (1945), pp. 517–33;Google Scholar Marçais, W., ‘L'Islamisme et la Vie urbaine’, Comptes Rendus, Academie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres (1928), pp. 86–100;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Pauty, E., ‘Villes spontanees et Villes créés en Islam’, AIEO, 9 (1951), pp. 52–75;Google Scholar de Planhol, X., Le Monde Islamique (Paris, 1957).Google Scholar
- 14
- Cited by