Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:01:35.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development as History. A Review Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Folke Dovring
Folke Dovring
Affiliation:
University of Illionis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Agricultural Labor and Capitalism
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , October 1979 , pp. 567 - 571
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, among others, Thrupp, Sylvia L., “Tradition and Development: A Choice of Views”, Comparative Studies in Society and History 6:1 (10 1963), 84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar (review article). Cf. also Hirashima, , p. 33,Google Scholar quoting a British commission of 1928 affirming the competence of traditional peasant farmers: further increases in yields would have to await scientific progress.

2 O'Brien, P. K., Heath, D. and Keyder, C., “Agricultural efficiency in Britain and France, 1815–1914”, The Journal of European Economic History, 6:2 (Fall 1977), 339–91;Google Scholar and Ruttan, Vernon W., “Structural retardation and the modernization of French agriculture: A skeptical view,” The Journal of Economic History, 38:3 (09 1978), 714–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Cf. Dovring, Folke, “Eighteenth-century changes in European agriculture: A comment,” Agricultural History, 43:1 (01 1969), 181–86.Google Scholar