¹ Stilgoe, John R., “Moulding the Industrial Zone Aesthetic, 1880–1929,” American Studies, 16(1982), 4–24; at p. 8.Google Scholar

² Ibid., 19.

³ Konvitz, Josef, “Changing Concepts of the Sea, 1550–1950,” Terrae Incognitae, 11(1979), 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Idem., “An Introduction to Marjorie Nicolson's Memoir ‘Phattie Moms’”, Dalhousie Review, 57(Winter 1977–1978), 645–51Google Scholar. On maritime culture before industrialization, see the indispensable work by Corbin, Alain, Le territoire du vide; l'occident et le desire du rivage, 1750–1840 (Paris, 1988)Google Scholar; Pearson, M. N., “Littoral Society: The Case for the Coast,” The Great Circle, 7:1(04 1985), 1–8Google Scholar. Vigarié, André, Ports de commerce et vie littorale (Paris: Hachette, 1979), 86–119, informed my appreciation of the distinction between maritime and continental influences.Google Scholar

⁴ Hérubel, Marcel, En suivant les côtes de Dunkerque à Saint-Nazatre (Paris: Pierre Roger, 1912)Google Scholar. On Hérubel, see Manneville, Philippe, “Marcel Hérubel et les origines de l' économie maritime,” 7–11Google Scholar; and Vigarié, André;, “Le Havre et l' évolution de la pensée méthodologique en économie portuaire et maritime,” 13–22, both in Etudes normandes, 32:3(1984)Google Scholar. See also the works of his contemporaries, Rousiers, Paul de, Les grands ports de France: leur role économique (Paris: Armand Colin, 1909)Google Scholar; and Vallaux, Camille, Géographie sociale: la mer (Paris: Octave Doin, 1908).Google Scholar

⁵ A sampling of Tomlinson's, H. M.writings highlights London River (London: Knopf, 1921)Google Scholar, Under the Red Ensign, (London: Williams and Northgate, 1926)Google Scholar, and Below London Bridge (London: Harper and Brothers, 1935)Google Scholar. The first book on New York was written by McElwee, Roy S., Ports and Terminal FacilitiesGoogle Scholar: see also New York, New Jersey Port and Harbor Development Commission, Joint Report and Comprehensive Plan and Recommendations (Albany, 1920)Google Scholar. For London, see Jones, LI. Rodwin, Geography of London River (London: Dial Press, 1931)Google Scholar; and Howarth, E. G. and Wilson, M., West Ham (London, 1907)Google Scholar Material from the interwar period illustrates the neglect of port studies and, by implication, calls attention to shortcomings in earlier decades. Svendsen, A. Stromme, “A Note on Port Statistics,” Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geographie, 42 (12 1951), 349–59Google Scholar; Sargent, A. J., Seaports and Hinterlands (London: Adam and Charles Black, 1938)Google Scholar; Rambert, Gaston, Marseille, la fotoration d' une grande cite' moderne (Marseille: S. A. du Semaphore de Marseille, 1934)Google Scholar; Demangeon, Albert and Febvre, Lucien. Le Rhin: problèmes d'histoire et d'economic (Paris: Armand Cohn, 1935)Google Scholar; Ford, P., Work and Wealth in a Modern Port: An Economic Survey of Southampton (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1934)Google Scholar; and Jones, LI. Rodwin, The Geography of London River.Google Scholar

⁶ Bird, James, “Seaport Development: Some Questions of Scale,” 24–41Google Scholar, in Hoyle, B. S. and Hilling, D., eds., Seaport Systems and Spatial Change (Chichester, 1984)Google Scholar. Bird also observed that “the late development of such studies is also characteristic of the study of gateways.” On the concept of gateway cities, see Bird, “Seaports as a Subset of Gateways for Regions: A Research Survey,” Progress in Human Geography, 4(1980), 360–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Burghardt, A. F., “A Hypothesis about Gateway Cities,” Annals, (Association of American Geographers) 61(1971), 269–85.Google Scholar

⁷ Reeves, Peter, Broeze, Frank and McPherson, Kenneth, “Studying the Asia Port City,” 29, in Broeze, Frank, ed., Brides of the Sea: Port Cities of Asia from the 16th-20th Centuries (Honolulu and Kensington N.S.W.: University of Hawaii Press and University of New South Wales University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

⁸ Jackson, Gordon, “The Shipping Industry,” 253–83, in Transport in Victorian Britain, Freeman, Michael J. and Aldcroft, Derek H., eds., (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988), at 277Google Scholar. Dyos, H. J. and Aldcroft, D. A., British Transport: An Economic Survey from the Seventeenth Century to the Twentieth (Leicester, 1969), 243Google Scholar. See also Spratt, H. Philip, “The Marine Steam-Engine,” 141–56Google Scholar; and Robb, A., “Ship-Building,” 350–90 in The Late Nineteenth Century, c. 1850–1900, vol.5, A History of Technology, Singer, Charles, et al., eds. (Oxford, 1958).Google Scholar

⁹ Sturmey, S. G., British Shipping and World Competition (London, 1962).Google Scholar

¹⁰ Pollard, Sidney and Robertson, Paul, The British Shipbuilding Industry, 1870–1914 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Studies in Business History, no. 30, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹¹ Jackson, Gordon, “The Ports,” 218–52, in Transport in Victorian Britain; Pudney, John, Docks, London's (London: Thames and Hudson, 1975)Google Scholar; Kenwood, A. G., “Port Investment in England and Wales, 1851–1913,” Yorkshire Bulletin of Economic and Social Research, 17(1965), 156–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Greeves, Ivan S., London Docks 1800–1980: A Civil Engineering History (London: Thomas Telford, 1980).Google Scholar

¹² Riddell, John F., Clyde Navigation: A History of the Development and Deepening of the River Clyde (Edinburgh: John Donald, 1979)Google Scholar; Slaven, Anthony, The Development of the West of Scotland 1750–1960 (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1965), 236–45Google Scholar; Butt, John, “Working Class Housing in Glasgow, 1900–1939,” 143–69, in MacDougall, Ian, ed., Essays in Scottish Labour History: A Tribute to Marwick, W. H. (Edinburgh, 1979)Google Scholar; Cunnison, J. and Gilfillian, J. B. S., The Third Statistical Account of Scotland: Glasgow (London, 1958), 464–71Google Scholar. See also Slaven, A., “A Shipyard in Depression: John Brown's of Clydebank, 1919–1938,” Business History, 19(1977), 192–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹³ Jones, LI. Rodwell, The Geography of London River.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Vigarié, Andre, Les grands ports de commerce de la Seine au Rhin: leur évolution devant l'industrialisation des arrières pays (Paris: SABRI, 1964).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Konvitz, Josef W., “William J. Wilgus and Engineering Projects to Improve the Port of New York, 1900–1930,” Technology and Culture, 30(04 1989), 398–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The freight rail plan was made public by Wilgus in a published pamphlet, “Proposed New Railway System for the Transportation and Distribution of Freight by Improved Methods in the City and Port of New York” (New York: Amsterdam Press, 1908)Google Scholar. See also “Freight Distribution by Subway,” Scientific American, 99(1908), 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Francis W. Lane, “Proposed Freight Subway Belt Line for Lower New York City,” 403–5, and an editorial. “A Plan for Subway Freight Distribution in New York City,” 419–20, both in Engineering News, 60(10 15, 1908).Google Scholar For more background on the commercial structure of New York's maritime trade, see Hefter, Jean, Le port de New York et le commerce extérieur américain (Paris, 1986)Google Scholar; Pred, Allen R., The Spatial Dynamics of U. S. Urban-Industrial Growth, 1800–1914: Interpretive and Theoretical Essays (Cambridge, Mass., 1966)Google Scholar; Gottmann, Jean, Megalopolis (New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1961)Google Scholar, and Tobier, Emmanuel, “Manhattan's Business District in the Industrial Age,” 77–105, in Mollenkopf, John Hall, ed., Power, Culture and Place: Essays on New York City (New York, 1988)Google Scholar; and McElwee, Roy S., Port Development (New York, 1918Google Scholar; rev. ed., New York: McGraw Hill, 1926), and Idem., Ports and Terminal Facilities (New York, 1926).Google Scholar

¹⁶ Condit, Carl W., A History of the Rail and Terminal System from the Grand Central Electrification to the Present, vol. 2, of The Port of New York (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981), p. 109.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Ibid., 101.

¹⁸ Miller, R. C., “The Dockworker Subculture and Some Problems in Cross-Cultural and Cross-Time Generalities,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 11:3(1969), 302–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁹ Barnes, Charles B., The Longshoremen (New York: Survey Associates, 1915), viii.Google Scholar

²⁰ Castelain, Jean-Pierre, Manières de vivre, manières de boire: alcool et sociabilité sur le port (Paris: Editions Imago, 1989).Google Scholar

²¹ Pred, Allan, Modernity and the Language of Everyday Life in Late Nineteenth-Century Stockholm (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

²² Broeze, Frank. “Militancy and Pragmatism: An International Perspective on Maritime Labour, 1870–1914,” International Review of Social History, 36(1991), 165–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 170. In addition to the many works cited by Broeze, see also Kimeldorf, Howard, Reds or Rackets? The Making of Radical and Conservative Unions on the Waterfront (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Rosenberg, Daniel, New Orleans Dockworkers: Race, Labor and Unionism, 1892–1923 (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Lartigue-Vecchié, Mireille, “Les grèves des dockers à Marseille de 1890 à 1903,” Provence historique (1960), 146–79.Google Scholar

²³ Ibid., 173.

²⁴ McCarthy, Terry, The Great Dock Strike (London, 1988)Google Scholar; Lovell, John, “Sail, Steam and Emergent Dockers' Unionism in Britain, 1850–1914,” International Review of Social History, 32(1987), 230–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Idem., Stevedores and Dockers: A Study of Trade Unionism in the Port of London, 1870–1914 (London, 1969)Google Scholar; Phillips, Gordon and Whiteside, Noel, Casual Labour: The Unemployment Question in the Port Transport Industry 1880–1970 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985)Google Scholar; Taplin, Eric, The Docker's Union: A Study of the National Union of Dock Labourers, 1889–1922 (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1985), 6–22 and 108–17.Google Scholar

²⁵ Avner Offer, The First World War: An Agrarian Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar

²⁶ Evans, Richard J., Death in Hamburg: Society and Politics in the Cholera Years, 1830–1910 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar. For an interesting comparison, see Snowden, Frank M., “Cholera in Barletta 1910,” Past and Present, no. 132 (1991), 67–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁷ Evans, Death in Hamburg, 304.Google Scholar

²⁸ Ibid., 517–23.

²⁹ See also Rath, Juergen, Arbeit in Hamburger Hafen: eine historische Untersuchung (Hamburg: Hamburger Studien zur Geschichte der Arbeit, no. 1, 1988).Google Scholar

³⁰ Broeze, Frank, “Militancy and Pragmatism,” 183–85; see also 175–78.Google Scholar

³¹ Ibid., 175; see also, 178.

³² Rosen, Christine Meisner, The Limits of Power: Great Fires and the Process of City Growth in America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³³ Doughty, Martin, Merchant Shipping and War: A Study in Defence Planning in Twentieth-Century Britain (London: Royal Historical Society; Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1982), 37–38.Google Scholar

³⁴ Offer, The First World War, 244, 293–99, 309–10.Google Scholar

³⁵ French, David, British Economic and Strategic Planning, 1905–1914 (London: Allen and Unwin, 1982), 65.Google Scholar

³⁶ Dyos, H. J. and Aldcroft, D. H., British Transport: An Economic Survey from the Seventeenth Century to the Twentieth (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1969), 277–97Google Scholar; Fayle, C. Ernest, The War and the Shipping Industry (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1927)Google Scholar; Henniker, A. M., Transportation on the Western Front, 1914–1918 (London: His Majesty's Stationary Office, 1937)Google Scholar; Wilgus, William J., Transporting the AEF in Western Europe, 1917–1919 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1931)Google Scholar; Crowell, Benedict and Wilson, Robert Forrest, The Road to France: The Transportation of Troops and Military Supplies, 2 vols. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1921).Google Scholar

³⁷ Phillipsá and Whiteside, Casual Labour, 116–44Google Scholar; Jonathan Schneer, “The War, the State and the Workplace: British Dockers During 1914–1918,” 96–112, in Cronin, James E. and Schneer, Jonathan, eds., Social Conflict and the Political Order in Modern Britain (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

³⁸ Hauser, Henri, Le problème du régionalisme (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, Histoire economique et sociale de la guerre mondiale, serie francaise, 1924)Google Scholar; Claveille, Albert, Nos ports (Paris: Plon, 1921)Google Scholar; Blache, Pierre Vidal de la, “Régions françaises,” Revue de Paris (1910), 821–49.Google Scholar

³⁹ Isard, Walter, “A Neglected Cycle: The Transport-Building Cycle,” Review of Economic Statistics, 24(1942), 149–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barsness, Richard W., “Maritime Activity and Port Development in the United States since 1900: A Survey,” Journal of Transport History (n.s.), 2(1974), 167–84Google Scholar; Pounds, N. J. G., “Port and Outport in North-West Europe,” Geographical Journal, 109 (1947), 216–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bird, James, “Seaports and the European Economic Community,” Geographical Journal, 133(1967), 202–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Idem,“Of Central Places, Cities and Seaports,” Geography, 58(1973), 105–18Google Scholar; Robinson, Ross, “Modelling the Port as an Operational System: A Perspective for Research,” Economic Geography, 52(1976), 71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Vigarié, André, Ports de commerce et vie littorale (Paris: Hachette, 1979)Google Scholar; Hoyle, B. S. and Pinder, D. A., eds., Cityport Industrialization and Regional Development: Spatial Analysis and Planning Strategies (Oxford: Pergamon, 1981)Google Scholar; Hoyle, B. S. and Hilling, D., eds., Seaport Systems and Spatial Change (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1984)Google Scholar; Hoyle, B. S., Pinder, D. A. and Husain, M. S., Revitalising the Waterfront: International Dimensions of Dockland Redevelopment (London: Belhaven Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Mills, H., “The San Francisco Waterfront: The Social Consequences of Industrial Modernization,” Urban Life, 5(1976), 221–51, and 6 (1977), 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar