Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:56:37.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conquering the Past: Post-War Archaeology and Nationalism in the Borderlands of Chile and Peru, c. 1880–1920

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2009

Stefanie Gänger
Stefanie Gänger
Affiliation:
History, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1899, Chilean workers discovered the mummified body of a woman in a copper mine in Chuquicamata, in the Atacama Desert. Chile's most prominent archaeologists were called to examine the body and they estimated it had been in the mine for more than four centuries. What most astonished both the public and the scholarly community was that the body had been preserved virtually intact, apparently by nothing but the environmental conditions surrounding it. José Toribio Medina, a central figure in Chilean archaeology at the time, discussed this finding in 1901:

Natural causes account for the mummy of Chuquicamata. The body is that of a female. The depth of the soil where the corpse was found was no more than six to eight feet, and the miner was probably searching the mountain when a sudden collapse buried her. The miner, feeling that the mountain was breaking down, lifted her arms up to protect her head, the position in which her body is preserved. … In some parts of the body, especially the arms, the difference between the injured and the intact parts of the skin can even be distinguished, to the point where it seems almost that blood is flowing from the wounds. In her face, hidden between her arms, her contracted mouth is visible… .1

Type
Research Article
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 691 - 714
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Medina, José Toribio, “La Momia de Chuquicamata,” in Borchert, Juan, ed., Opúsculos varios de J. T. Medina (Santiago: El Globo, 1926 [1901]), 95Google Scholar.

2 Guillén, Sonia E., “Mummies, Cults, and Ancestors: The Chinchorro Mummies of the South Central Andes,” in Rakita, Gordon F. M., et al. , ed., Interacting with the Dead: Perspectives on Mortuary Archaeology for the New Millennium (Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 2005), 142–49Google Scholar.

3 In recent years, scholars have focused on the nationalist campaigns applied by both central states to the territories. Miranda, Sergio González, El dios cautivo: Las ligas patrióticas en la Chilenización compulsiva de Tarapacá (1910–1922) (Santiago: LOM Ediciones, 2004)Google Scholar. Skuban, William E., Lines in the Sand: Nationalism and Identity on the Peruvian-Chilean Frontier (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2007)Google Scholar.

4 This concept is often used in the context of the U.S.-American so-called “Spanish Borderlands.” Gould, Eliga H., “AHR Forum: Entangled Histories, Entangled Worlds: The English-Speaking Atlantic as a Spanish Periphery,” The American Historical Review 3, 112 (2007): 764–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a more general reflection on borders as political constructs, imagined projections of territorial power constantly challenged by human practices, see Baud, Michiel and van Schendel, Willem, “Toward a Comparative History of Borderlands,” Journal of World History 8, 2 (1997): 211–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 For a comprehensive overview of the field, see Díaz-Andreu, Margarita, A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology: Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past, Oxford Studies in the History of Archaeology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 4Google Scholar.

6 Kohl, Philip, “Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past,” Annual Review of Anthropology 27 (1998), 223–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Reid, Donald Malcolm, Whose Pharaohs? Archaeology, Museums, and Egyptian National Identity from Napoleon to World War I (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

7 My focus is on the interactions involving the former Peruvian territories, but I include also select examples from the former Bolivian area.

8 Canales, Pedro P., “Los cementerios indígenas en la costa del Pacífico,” in Congreso Internacional de Americanistas (Buenos Aires: Coni Hermanos, 1910), 273–97, 289Google Scholar.

9 Pinochet, Alejandro Cañas, Descripción jeneral del Departamento de Pisagua (Iquique: El Veintiuno de Mayo, 1884), 88Google Scholar. Román, Francisco San, Desierto y cordilleras de Atacama: Itinerario de las esploraciones, 2 vols. (Santiago de Chile: Imprenta Nacional, 1896), vol. 1, 29Google Scholar.

10 Andermann, Jens and Rowe, William, “Introduction. The Power of Images,” in Andermann, Jens and Rowe, William, eds., Images of Power: Iconography, Culture and the State in Latin America (New York: Berghahn Books, 2005), 3Google Scholar.

11 Philippi, Rudolph A., “Museo Nacional,” Anales de la Universidad de Chile 59 (1881): 320–24Google Scholar. See also the history of the Chilean National Museum by Patience A. Schell, In the Service of the Nation: Santiago's Museo Nacional (2002), www.bbk.ac.uk/ibamuseum (accessed 2008).

12 Parapsky, L., “Das Nationalmuseum in Santiago de Chile,” Verhandlungen des Deutschen Wissenschaftlichen Vereins zu Santiago (1886): 180–94, 192Google Scholar; Philippi, Rudolph A., “Museo Nacional,” Anales de la Universidad de Chile 62 (1882): 509–12, 509Google Scholar. See also Schell, In the Service of the Nation.

13 See, for instance, the parallels with twentieth-century Palestine. Glock, Albert, “Archaeology as Cultural Survival: The Future of the Palestinian Past,” Journal of Palestine Studies 23, 3 (1994): 70–84, 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Miranda, Sergio González, Chilenizando a Tunupa: La escuela pública en el Tarapacá Andino 1880–1990 (Santiago: DIBAM, 2002)Google Scholar.

15 All of Philippi's initiatives required the Ministry's explicit approval. Any expedition undertaken by the Museum was thus necessarily congruent with the Ministry's policy. Rudolph A. Philippi, “Letter to the Ministry of Education, Santiago, 30 May,” in National Archive, Section Ministry of Education, vol. 632 (1884).

16 Philippi, Federico, “Reise nach der Provinz Tarapacá von Friedrich Philippi: Professor an der Universität,” Verhandlungen des Deutschen Wissenschaftlichen Vereins zu Santiago (1886): 135–63Google Scholar.

17 Philippi, Federico, “Informe sobre la exploración de Tarapacá,” Anales de la Universidad de Chile 68 (1885): 126–27, 127Google Scholar; Philippi, Rudolph A., “Museo Nacional,” Anales de la Universidad de Chile 67 (1885): 1006–13, 1011Google Scholar. See also current debates on the return of war booty. Alfredo Pomareda, “10 mil libros peruanos están en Chile,” La República, 17 Sept. 2008.

18 See the references to donors in Latcham's synthesis of Atacama archaeology, and in Philippi's annual reports, and the example of Francisco San Román: Latcham, Ricardo E., Arqueología de la región Atacameña (Santiago: Prensas de la Universidad de Chile, 1938), 146Google Scholar; Philippi, “Museo Nacional” (1885), 1011; San Román, Desierto y cordilleras, 230.

19 Zapata, Leotardo Matus, “Las colecciones existentes en la Seccion de Antropolojía i Etnolojía del Museo Nacional,” Boletín del Museo Nacional de Chile 9 (1916): 134–40Google Scholar.

20 Cruz, Guillermo Feliu, Medina: Radiografía de un espíritu (Santiago: Nacimiento, 1952), 14Google Scholar.

21 Risopatrón, Francisco, Diccionario geográfico de las Provincias de Tacna y Tarapacá (Iquique: La Industria, 1890)Google Scholar.

22 Moore, Eduardo, “El Museo Nacional de Chile en 1910–1911,” Boletín del Museo Nacional de Chile 3, 1 (1911): 187–309Google Scholar.

23 Philippi, “Museo Nacional” (1882), 509. Huaca is a term used in the Andean countries to denote a pre-Hispanic site.

24 Hinsley, Curtis M., “Collecting Cultures and Cultures of Collecting: The Lure of the American Southwest, 1880–1915,” Museum Anthropology 16, 1 (1992): 12–20, 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Gusinde, Martin, “El Museo de Etnología y Antropología de Chile,” Revista Chilena de historia y geografía 19, 23 (1916): 30–47, 24Google Scholar. See also Ayala, Patricia, Políticas del pasado: Indígenas, arqueólogos y estado en Atacama (San Pedro de Atacama: Línea Editorial IIAM, 2008), 67Google Scholar.

26 Gusinde, “El Museo de Etnología,” 32.

27 Alegría, Luis, “Museo y Campo Cultural: Patrimonio indígena en el Museo de Etnología y Antropología de Chile,” Conserva 8 (2004): 57–70, 24Google Scholar.

28 Ibid.: 64.

29 Note the growing importance of “national” indigenous artifacts within the Museum by the 1880s, compared to their open neglect before that: Philippi, Rudolph A., “Historia del Museo Nacional de Chile,” Boletín del Museo Nacional de Chile 1 (1908): 3–30Google Scholar; Philippi, Rudolph A., “Museo Nacional,” Anales de la Universidad de Chile 28 (1866): 545–52Google Scholar. See also the complaints of the Archaeological Society in 1880 about the lack of state support for their project: de Santiago, Sociedad Arqueológica, “Sesión Preparatoria,” Revista de la Sociedad Arqueolójica 1, 1 (1880): 14–18, 14Google Scholar.

30 Alegría, “Museo y campo cultural,” 65.

31 Hinsley, “Collecting Cultures,” 15.

32 For the redefinition of Chilean national identity in the course of Chile's expansionist period see M. Consuelo Figueroa's doctoral thesis: “Representation of Chileaness: The Said and the Silenced in the Creation of the Chilean Nation,” in preparation, Stony Brook University.

33 González Miranda, El Dios Cautivo, 21.

34 Skuban, Lines in the Sand, 76, 62.

35 See, for instance, Maúrtua, Víctor M., La cuestión del Pacífico (Lima: Imprenta Americana, 1919)Google Scholar.

36 Uhle, Max, “Los Aborígenes de Arica,” Publicaciones del Museo de Etnología y Antropología de Chile 1, 4 (1917): 175–52Google Scholar.

37 Uhle, Max, “Los aborígenes de Arica,” Revista histórica: Órgano del Instituto Histórico del Perú 6 (1918): 5–24Google Scholar.

38 González Miranda, El Dios Cautivo, 19.

39 Toribio Mejía Xesspe, “Algunos datos históricos sobre la colección arqueológica de don Enrique Brüning y sobre el Museo Brüning de Lambayeque,” in Collection T. Mejía Xesspe, Archive of the Riva-Agüero Institute, doc. 504, Riva-Aguero Institute, Lima.

40 Cúneo-Vidal, Rómulo, “El cacicazgo de Tacna,” Revista histórica: Órgano del Instituto Histórico del Perú 6 (1919): 309–24, 310Google Scholar. See also his “History of Peruvian Civilization,” in which he includes the provinces of Tacna and Arica: Historia de la civilización Peruana contemplada en sus tres etapas clásicas de Tiahuanaco, Hattun Colla y el Cuzco precedida de un ensayo de determinación de “La Ley de Translación” de las civilizaciones americanas (Barcelona: Casa Editorial Maucci, 1924).

41 Skuban, Lines in the Sand, 6.

42 Castro, Luis, Regionalismo y desarrollo regional: Debate público, proyectos económicos y actores locales (Tarapacá 1880–1930) (Viña del Mar: CEIP Ediciones, 2005), 38Google Scholar.

43 This paper is based on an understanding of frontiers as socially charged places, where innovative cultural constructs are created and transformed: Lightfoot, Kent G. and Martinez, Antoinette, “Frontiers and Boundaries in Archaeological Perspective,” Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1995): 471–92, 472CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 González Miranda, El Dios Cautivo, 19–21.

45 See, for instance, F. Neolitzky's comments on the price and quality of Arica mummies: “Einige Beobachungen von der Westküste Americas,” Verhandlungen der Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte (1902). The City Council dealt in the period with numerous cases of “treasure hunters” carrying out excavations in the area: City Council Tarapacá, “Letter to Edmundo Moya, Eduardo Villa, Guillermo Clayton, et al., Iquique, 20 Feb. 1918,” vol. 5, fol. 79; Andrés Godoy, “Letter to City Council of Tarapacá,” n.d. 1914, vol. 9, fol. 11, both in Regional Archive of Tarapacá, Iquique.

46 Korff, Gottfried, “Culturbilder aus der Provinz. Notizen zur präsentationsabsicht und -ästhetik des heimatmuseums um 1900,” in Eberspächer, Martina, König, Gudrun Marlene, and Tschofen, Bernhard, eds., Museumsdinge. Deponieren—Exponieren (Köln: Böhlau Verlag, 2002), 49–57Google Scholar; Levine, Philippa, The Amateur and the Professional: Antiquarians, Historians and Archaeologists in Victorian England, 1838–1886 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)Google Scholar.

47 See Oyarzún's, Aureliano references to private collectors: “Las Calabazas pirograbadas de Calama,” Revista Chilena de historia y geografía (1929): 3–25, 3Google Scholar.

48 Sergio Chacon Caceres, “Homenaje al médico cirurjano y escritor Vicente Dagnino Oliveri por su obra y aporte a la cultura nacional en Tacna y Arica” (Arica: Universidad de Chile Sede Arica, 1976), 4.

49 Canales, “Los cementerios indígenas,” 286.

50 Dagnino, Vicente, El correjimiento de Arica. 1535–1784 (Arica: La Epoca, 1909)Google Scholar.

51 On the multiplicity of identities in borderlands, see van Schendel's, Willem work on the borderlands between India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Burma: The Bengal Borderland: Beyond State and Nation in South Asia (London: Anthem Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

52 de Tacna, Museo, Museo de Tacna fundado por Vicente Dagnino i obsequiado a la ciudad: Catálago (Tacna: Carlos García Dávila, 1911), IIIGoogle Scholar.

53 Johnson, Benjamin, “Engendering Nation and Race in the Borderlands,” Latin American Research Review 37, 1 (2002): 259–71Google Scholar.

54 González Miranda, El Dios Cautivo, 27.

55 Ibid., 19.

56 de Bezé, Francisco, Tarapacá en sus aspectos físico, social y económico (Santiago: Imprenta y Litografía Universo, 1920), 131Google Scholar.

57 For a survey of the institutionalization process in Chile, see Rodríguez, Mario Orellana, Historia de la arqueología en Chile (1842–1990) (Santiago de Chile: Bravo y Allende Editores, 1996), 86Google Scholar. For an overview of the development in Peru, see Doig, Federico Kauffmann, “Pasado y presente de la arqueología Peruana,” in Gesellschaft, Deutsch-peruanische, ed., Archäologie in Peru—Archäometrie (Stuttgart: Theiss, 1987), 9–21Google Scholar.

58 See, for instance, Latcham, Ricardo E., “Costumbres mortuorias de los Indios de Chile y otras partes de América,” Anales de la Universidad de Chile 127–130 (1915–1916): 443–93, 1–32, 77–524, 819–80, 85–144, 273–326Google Scholar.

59 It is now commonly assumed that the majority of Peruvian mummies are a product of dryness, cold, or the absence of air, or of the intentional exploitation of these natural processes: Vreeland, James, “Mummies of Peru,” in Cockburn, Aidan, Cockburn, Eve, and Reyman, Theodore A., eds., Mummies, Disease and Ancient Cultures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 154–89, 154–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Ramos, Gabriela, Death and Conversion in the Andes: Lima and Cuzco, 1532–1670, History, Languages, and Peoples of the Spanish and Portuguese Worlds, MacCormack, Sabine, series ed. (South Bend, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press, 2009), ch. 1Google Scholar.

61 Canales, “Los cementerios indígenas,” 196.

62 Medina, “La Momia de Chuquicamata,” 98. Medina was wrong in estimating that the mummy had lived shortly before the conquest. A carbon-14 analysis dated the clothes and body at a.d.550 Scientists have also found that the miner's braids misled nineteenth-century scholars: the mummy was a young man. Fuller, David, “The Production of Copper in 6th-Century Chile's Chuquicamata Mine,” Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society 56, 11 (2004): 62–66, 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Philippi, Rudolph A., “La Momia de Chuquicamata: Diversas teorías y opiniones,” El Mercurio, 18 Apr. 1901, 1Google Scholar.

64 Philippi, Rudolph A., “Algo sobre las momias Peruanas,” Revista Chilena 1 (1875): 135–48Google Scholar.

65 Rivero, Francisco criticized Barrera for his claim that pre-Hispanic mummies were the result of a procedure similar to that applied to Egyptian rulers, in “Antigüedades Peruanas: Memoria sobre los sepulcros o Huacas de los antiguos peruanos,” Memorial de ciencias naturales, y de industria nacional y extranjera; redactado por M. de Rivero y de N. de Piérola 3 (1828): 101–10Google Scholar.

66 Philippi, “Algo sobre las momias Peruanas.”

67 A focus on institutionalized and state-based forms of scholarship has induced historians of Peruvian archaeology to claim that interest in the pre-Hispanic past faded after the years around independence and reemerged only around 1900: Earle, Rebecca, “Monumentos y museos: La nacionalización del pasado precolombino durante el siglo XIX,” in Gónzalez-Stephan, Beatriz and Andermann, Jens, eds., Galerías del Progreso: Museos, exposiciones y cultura visual en América Latina, Estudios Culturales (Rosario: Beatriz Viterbo, 2006), 27–64, 32Google Scholar.

68 See, in particular, the second part of Antigüedades Peruanas, on the prehistory of Peru's southern area: de Rivero y Ustariz, Mariano Eduardo and De Tschudi, J. J., Antigüedades Peruanas (Viena: Imprenta Imperial de la Corte y del Estado, 1851)Google Scholar.

69 Franch, José Alcina, Arqueólogos o anticuarios: Historia antigua de la arqueología en la América Espanola (Barcelona: Ediciones de Serbal, 1995)Google Scholar. An example of a nineteenth-century traveler is Bollaert, W., “Observations on the History of the Incas of Peru, on the Indians of South Peru, and on some Indian Remains in the Province of Tarapacá,” Journal of the Ethnological Society of London (1848–1856) 3 (1854): 132–64, 164CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The Peruvian scholar José Mariano Macedo also collected and studied artifacts from the area around Arica. See Eisleb, Dieter, Altperuanische Kulturen, Völkerkunde, Museum für, ed., 4 vols., vol. 1, Neue Folge 31 (Berlin: Museum für Völkerkunde, 1975), 115Google Scholar.

70 The classical works are Galindo, Alberto Flores, Buscando un Inca: Identidad y utopía en los Andes, 3d ed. (Lima: Editorial Horizonte, 1988)Google Scholar; Rowe, John Howland, “Movimiento nacional Inca,” Revista Universitaria de Cuzco 107, 2 (1955): 17–47Google Scholar.

71 Rivero was among the promoters of regionalist policies countering Lima hegemony: see Espinoza, Javier Flores, “La añoranza del pasado: Justo Sahuaraura Inca y sus recuerdos de la monarquía Peruana,” in Recuerdos de la monarquía Peruana o Bosquejo de la historia de los Incas (Lima: Ediciones de Umbral, 2001), 13–46, 29Google Scholar.

72 Majluf, Natalia, “De la rebelión al museo: Genealogías y retratos de los Incas, 1781–1900,” in Majluf, N. et al. , eds., Los Incas, reyes del Perú (Lima: Artes y tesoros del Perú, 2005)Google Scholar; Herrera, José Tamayo, Historia del indigenismo cuzqueño, siglos XVI–XX (Lima: Instituto Nacional de Cultura, 1980)Google Scholar.

73 Little is known about these scholars. García, Elvira García y, “Ana María Zenteno,” in La mujer Peruana a través de los siglos (Lima: Imprenta Americana, 1924)Google Scholar; Gil, Armando Guevara, “La contribución de José Lucas Caparó Muñiz a la formación del Museo Arqueológico de la Universidad del Cuzco,” Boletín del Instituto Riva-Agüero 24 (1997): 167–226Google Scholar. Few authors of histories of archaeology mention their role on the margins, in their function as collectors. Díaz-Andreu, World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology, 183.

74 See, for instance, the almost complete absence of prehistory in the Chilean representation at the Universal Exposition of 1873, or the Congress of the Americanists in 1881. Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, Lista de los objetos que comprende la Exposición Americanista (Madrid: M. Romero, 1881)Google Scholar; Welt-Ausstellung, , Officieller General-Catalog (Vienna: Verlag der General-Direction, 1873)Google Scholar.

75 The identification with the indigenous culture, representing the conquered, provided legitimation for independence from the conqueror Spain. Díaz-Andreu, World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology, 89.

76 The Mapuche, or “Araucanos,” did at times play a crucial part in the formation of the national imagery. The archaeological remains left by this ethnic group, however, became interesting only gradually, in conjunction with both the advent of evolutionist archaeology and the gradual conquest of Mapuche territories concluded in 1883. For a survey of the relations between Mapuches and the Chilean central state, see Casanueva, Fernando, “Indios malos en tierras buenas: Visión y concepción del Mapuche según las elites chilenas,” in Boccara, Guillaume, ed., Colonización, resistencia y mestizaje en las Américas (siglos XVI–XX) (Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala, 2002), 291–327Google Scholar.

77 See, for instance, Latcham, “Costumbres mortuorias,” 444.

78 Méndez, Cecilia, “Incas Sí, Indios No: Apuntes para el estudio del nacionalismo criollo en el Perú,” Journal of Latin American Studies 1, 28 (1996): 197–225Google Scholar.

79 Ayala, Patricia, “Relaciones entre atacameños, arqueólogos y Estado en Atacama (Norte de Chile),” Estudios Atacameños: Arqueología y antropología surandinas 33 (2007): 133–57, 137Google Scholar. The work of Ayala as well as of Gundermann also shed light on the relations between scholars, Chilean elites, and local indigenous communities. Gundermann, Hans, “Sociedades indígenas y conocimiento antropológico: Aymaras y atacameños de los siglos XIX y XX,” Chungará special issue (2007)Google Scholar.

80 Zintzen, Christiane, Von Pompeji nach Troja: Archäologie, Literatur, und Öffentlichkeit im 19. Jahrhundert, Comentarii 6 (Wien: WUV Universitätsverlag, 1998), 140–41Google Scholar.

81 Uhle, Max, “Letter to the Ministry of Education, Arica, 1 July 1916,” Publicaciones del Museo de Etnología y Antropología de Chile (1916): 49Google Scholar.

82 See for instance Wallace, Alfred Russel, “The Origin of Human Races and the Antiquity of Men Deduced from the Theory of Natural Selection,” Anthropological Review 2 (1864): 158–87, 49Google Scholar.

83 See, for instance, Swarthout, Kelley R., Assimilating the Primitive: Parallel Dialogues on Racial Miscegenation in Revolutionary Mexico, Latin America Interdisciplinary Studies (New York: Peter Lang, 2004)Google Scholar.

84 Hernández, C., “Chile a fines del siglo XIX: Exposiciones, museos, y la construcción del arte nacional,” in Andermann, Jens and Gónzalez-Stephan, Beatriz, eds., Galerías del progreso: Museos, exposiciones y cultura visual an América Latina, estudios culturales (Rosario: Beatriz Viterbo Editora, 2006), 261–94Google Scholar.

85 Schell, In the Service of the Nation.

86 For the Chilean debates on evolutionism, see Nogues, Alfonso Francisco, “Descendencia del hombre i Darwinismo: De dónde desciende el hombre?” Anales de la Universidad de Chile 84 (1893–1894): 1255–82, 145–79, 697–713Google Scholar.

87 See, for instance, the following studies published on the occasion of international congresses or in European journals: Latcham, Ricardo E., “Notes on Chilian Anthropology,” Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 33 (1903): 167–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Oyarzún, Aureliano, “Contribución al estudio de la influencia de la civilización peruana sobre los aborígenes de Chile,” in Congreso Internacional de Americanistas (Buenos Aires: Coni Hermanos, 1910), 354–98Google Scholar.

88 Bayly, Christopher A., The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914: Global Connections and Comparisons (Oxford: and Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2004), 203Google Scholar.

89 Breckenridge, Carol A., “The Aesthetics and Politics of Colonial Collecting: India at World Fairs,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 31, 2 (1989): 195–216, 196CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90 Ibid.

91 Müller-Scheessel, Nils, “Fair Prehistory: Archaeological Exhibits at French Expositions Universelles,” Antiquity 75, 288 (2001): 391–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

92 Chile at the Pan-American Exposition: Brief Notes on Chile and General Catalogue of Chile Exhibits (Buffalo: Pan-American Exposition, 1901).

93 Ross, James, “Dr. John Miller Was One of the Examiners Yesterday of the Mummy in the Chilean Building,” Buffalo Evening News, 24 Sept. 1901Google Scholar; “The Only Petrified Human Body in Existence on Exhibition in the Chile Building in the Pan-American Exposition,” (no author), Buffalo Evening News, 19 Aug. 1901.

94 N.R.Z., “A Buffalo debidamente: O quedarse en Santiago,” El Mercurio, 17 Dec. 1900: 2.

95 For a detailed study of the early phase in the Congresses of the Americanists, see Rebok, Sandra, “La constitución de la investigación antropológica alemana a finales del siglo XIX: Actores y lugares del saber Americanista,” in López-Ocón, Leoncio and Chaumeil, Jean-Pierre, eds., Los Americanistas del siglo XIX: La construcción de una comunidad científica internacional (Frankfurt/M.: Iberoamericana, 2005)Google Scholar.

96 Canales, “Los cementerios indígenas,” 282.

97 For studies on Max Uhle, see Gänger, Stefanie, “La mirada imperialista? Los alemanes y la arqueología Peruana,” Revista histórica 3, 2 (2006): 69–90Google Scholar; Kaulicke, Peter, ed., Max Uhle y el Perú Antiguo (Lima: PUCP Fondo Editorial, 1998)Google Scholar.

98 Fagan, Brian and Meltzer, David J., “Antiquity of Humankind,” in Fagan, Brian, ed., Oxford Reference Online (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar (non-public website, accessed 1 June 2009).

99 See the debates between Latcham, Uhle, and Capdeville about the finding of presumed paleoliths. See Latcham, Ricardo E., “Letter to Augusto Capdeville,” in Mostny, Grete, ed., Epistolario de Augusto Capdeville con Max Uhle y otros arqueólogos e historiadores (Santiago: Fondo Histórico y Bibliográfico José Toribio Medina, 1915)Google Scholar.

100 Evans, Oswald H., for instance, acknowledged that due to the conditions of preservation in the Atacama Desert the artifacts found in Taltal potentially represented a “survival of the Stone Age of culture,” in “Notes on the Stone Age in Northern Chile, with Special Reference to Taltal,” Man 11 (1906): 19–24, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Other scholars opposed Uhle's argument on findings antedating the Neolithic Age: Breton, A. C., “Review: Archaeology in Chile. Los aborígenes de Arica, by Max Uhle,” Man 74 (1919): 140–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

101 A number of authors have published on the interrelation of science and empire in regards colonialism in Latin America. See, for instance, MacLeod, Roy, “Introduction,” Osiris 15 (2000): 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

102 Ballantyne, Toni, “Introduction,” in Ballantyne, T., ed., Science, Empire, and the European Exploration of the Pacific (Aldershot: Ashgate Variorum, 2004)Google Scholar.

103 Chatterjee, Kumkum, “The King of Controversy: History and Nation-Making in Late Colonial India,” American Historical Review 110, 5 (2005): 35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

104 Penny, Glenn H., Objects of Culture: Ethnology and Ethnographic Museums in Imperial Germany (Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

105 Smith, Hilary A., “Using the Past to Serve the Peasant: Chinese Archaeology and the Making of a Historical Science,” in Kuklick, Henrika, ed., A New History of Anthropology (Malden, Mass. and Oxford: Blackwell, 2009), 207–22Google Scholar.