Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:03:26.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comments on the Grays' Four Hundred Year Cycle in Human Ability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

A. L. Kroeber
Affiliation:
University of California

Extract

In the Journal of Cycle Research (7:43–48, April, 1958) S.W. and N.E. Gray published “Evidence for a 400-Year Cycle in Human Ability”, which might have been more accurately called “Human Achievement” since ability refers to potential, but the 25,000 lives they reviewed were finished and realized. They took the names of historic personages listed in the 1935 edition of the Columbia Encyclopedia and classified them, without rating or ranking, each as an equivalent unit, according to their occurrence in time; or, more exactly, counting how many individuals, eminent enough to have won inclusion in this encyclopedia, were alive in each decade between 500 B.C. and A.D. 1800. The authors recognize that essentially their data do not cover “human history”, but “the western world and its Mediterranean fringes”.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In terms of the cultures involved, the data would relate overwhelmingly to the Classic, Islamic, and Western civilizations. They would include both military-political and aestheticintellectual achievements (though in an unknown proportion), but practically exclude economic and technological attainments and events.

1 If Pirenne's view of the West as undergoing recession from about 700 on as the result of Muslim expansion is correct, the Grays’ trough at 710 might represent the Arab land and sea closure as well as the end of Merovingian decadence. But the Grays’ curve seems to validate the Carolingian Renaissance as an advance by its definite rise from 710 to 850. Medievalists have perhaps by now decided how far Pirenne was essentially right or how far his cause and effect stand in disproportionate relation. Their reaction to the problem would be extremely helpful.