Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:34:15.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Class and Patriarchy as Competing Paradigms for the Study of Middle Eastern Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Mervat Hatem
Mervat Hatem
Affiliation:
Howard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the last nine years, while Western feminists were directing critical attention to what they described as “the curious courtship,” the “unhappy marriage,” and the “uneasy hyphen between marxism-feminism,” Western students of Middle Eastern women were pushing the field toward a serious consideration and adoption of Marxian social and economic theories. In two very important articles, Nikki Keddie and Judith Tucker argued that the field can expand its understanding of the different worlds of women by studying their roles in production and social reproduction. This new materialist approach promised to overcome what both said was a serious idealist bias in the literature that derived the status of Middle Eastern women from the major Muslim religious and legal texts and/or relied on the culturally biased Western/Orientalist conceptions of these women.

Type
CSSH Discussion
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , October 1987 , pp. 811 - 818
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Weinbaum, Batya, The Curious Courtship of Women's Liberation and Socialism (Boston: South End Press, 1978)Google Scholar.

2 Hartmann, Heidi, “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union,” in Women and Revolution, Sargeant, Lydia, ed. (Boston: South End Press, 1983), 1–43Google Scholar.

3 Petchesky, Rosalind, “Dissolving the Hyphen: A Report on Marxist-Feminist Groups 1–5,” in Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism, Eisenstein, Zillah, ed. (New York: Monthly Review, 1979), 373–91Google Scholar.

4 Keddie, Nikki, “Problems in the Study of Middle Eastern Women,” International Journal of Middle East Studies, 10:2 (05 1979), 226–27Google Scholar.

5 Tucker, Judith, “Problems in the Historiography of Women in the Middle East: The Case of Nineteenth-Century Egypt,” International Journal of Middle East Studies, 15:3 (08 1983). 329–30Google Scholar.

6 Keddie, , “Problems,” 225–29Google Scholar; Tucker, , “Problems in Historiography,” 321Google Scholar.

7 Tucker, , “Problems in Historiography,” 323Google Scholar.

8 Gran, Judith, “Impact of the World Market on Egyptian Women,” Merip Reports, 58 (06 1977), 3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Beck, Lois and Keddie, Nikki, eds., Women in the Muslim World (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Women and Work in the Middle East,” Merip Reports, 95 (03-04 1981)Google Scholar; “Women and Labor Migration,” Merip Reports, 124 (06 1984)Google Scholar; Fernea, Elizabeth, ed., Women and the Family in the Middle East (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

9 Ibid.

10 Balbus, Isaac, Marxism and Domination (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982), 76–79Google Scholar; Hartmann, “Unhappy Marriage,” 13–19; Mackinon, Catherine, “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory,” in Feminist Theory: A Critique of Ideology, Keohane, Nannerl, Rosaldo, Michelle, and Gelpi, Barbara, eds. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), 3–4Google Scholar.

11 Tucker, , “Problems in Historiography,” 333Google Scholar; Baffoun, Alya, “Women and Social Change in the Muslim Arab World,” Women's Studies’ International Forum, 5:2 (1982), 228Google Scholar.

12 Gran, , “Impact,” 4–6Google Scholar; Hammam, Mona, “Labor Migration and the Sexual Division of Labor,” Merip Reports, 95 (03-04 1982), 5–8Google Scholar; Layne, Linda, “Women in Jordan's Work Force,” Merip Reports, 95 (03-04 1981), 19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Hammam, “Labor Migration.”

14 Ibid.

15 Hammam, , “Labor Migration,” 5Google Scholar; Tucker, , “Problems in Historiography,” 329–30Google Scholar.

16 Keddie, , “Problems,” 232Google Scholar; Tucker, “Problems in Historiography,” 330–31Google Scholar; Gran, , “Impact,” 4–6Google Scholar.

17 Hatem, Mervat, “The Politics of Sexuality and Gender in Segregated Patriarchal Systems: The Case of Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Egypt,” Feminist Studies (Summer 1986), 251–74Google Scholar.

18 Hammam, “Labor Migration”; Tucker, “Problems in Historiography.”

19 Hatem, “Politics of Sexuality and Gender.”

20 Hatem, Mervat, “The Enduring Alliance of Nationalism and Patriarchy in Muslim Personal Status Laws: The Case of Modern Egypt,” Feminist Issues, 6:1 (Spring 1986), 19–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 El-Saadawi, Nawal, The Hidden Face of Eve (London: Zed Press, 1980)Google Scholar, preface and introduction.

22 Ibid., 1.

23 El-Saadawi, Nawal, “Women and Islam,” Women's Studies’ International Forum, 5:2 (1982), 206Google Scholar.

24 Eisenstein, , ed., Capitalist PatriarchyGoogle Scholar.

25 Mernissi, Fatima, “The Patriarch in the Moroccan Family: Myth or Reality?” Women's Status and Fertility, in the Muslim World, Allman, James, ed. (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1978), 312–32Google Scholar; idem, “Virginity and Patriarchy,” Women's Studies’ International Forum, 5:2 (1982), 183–91; idem, “Women and the Impact of Capitalist Development in Morocco: Part I, ” Feminist Issues, 2:2 (Fall 1982), 70, 75–76.

26 Mernissi, Fatima, Beyond the Veil (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1975)Google Scholar; idem, “Virginity and Patriarchy.”

27 Keddie, , “Problems,” 227–28Google Scholar.

28 Mernissi, , Beyond the Veil, ix–x, xxGoogle Scholar; idem, “Women,” 79; idem, “Virginity and Patriarchy,” 184–85, 187.

29 Mernissi, , Beyond the Veil, 15Google Scholar.

30 Mernissi, , “Women,” 71Google Scholar.

31 Ibid., 78.

32 Mernissi, , Beyond the Veil, 6–14Google Scholar.

33 Mernissi, , “Women,” 78Google Scholar.

34 Ibid., 81–82.

35 (New York: Pergamon Press, 1984).

36 Hatem, “Politics of Sexuality and Gender;” idem, “Enduring Alliance.”