Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:14:07.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pre-competitive levels of arousal and self-confidence among elite and non-elite equestrian riders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

Inga A Wolframm  and
Dominic Micklewright
Inga A Wolframm*
Affiliation:
University of Applied Sciences, Van Hall Larenstein (Wageningen UR), Postbus411 6700 AKWageningen, The Netherlands University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, ColchesterCO4 3SQ, UK
Dominic Micklewright
Affiliation:
University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, ColchesterCO4 3SQ, UK
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Research into other sports has shown that excessive levels of anxiety can undermine motor function during performance. This study aims to investigate the effects of anxiety and self-confidence on equestrian performance. Forty riders (12 male, 28 female; 15 elite, 25 non-elite; 12 dressage, 17 showjumping, 11 eventing) completed the Revised Competitive Sport Anxiety Inventory 2 (CSAI-2R), which measures the levels of somatic and cognitive anxiety (arousal) as well as levels of self-confidence. Two-way between-subjects MANOVA tests were used to examine competence-by-discipline interactions and gender-by-discipline interactions in CSAI-2R scores. Post hoc analysis was conducted using one-way univariate ANOVA tests. Spearman's rank correlation tests were conducted between each of the CSAI-2R subscales according to competence, discipline and gender. Most important findings include lower somatic arousal and higher self-confidence in elite compared with non-elite riders, with 15.2 ± 4.4 vs. 19.0 ± 5.0, F1,34 = 5.8, P < 0.05; 31.5 ± 4.8 vs. 25.1 ± 7.4, P < 0.01, respectively. Negative correlations between cognitive arousal and self-confidence were found among elite riders, non-elite riders, showjumpers and female riders (r = − 0.69, P < 0.005; r = − 0.41, P < 0.05; r = − 0.52, P < 0.05; r = − 0.33, P < 0.05). Greater riding-specific skills in the elite rider may result in increased self-confidence. Lower levels of somatic anxiety may further increase fine motor skills in elite riders. Practical implications are that non-elite riders would benefit from sport psychological interventions increasing levels of self-confidence and reducing symptoms of somatic arousal to improve performance.

Keywords

arousalself-confidenceequestriansport psychology
Type
Research Paper
Information
Comparative Exercise Physiology , Volume 5 , Issue 3-4 , November 2008 , pp. 153 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1McGreevy, PD (2002). Development and resolution of behavioural problems in the ridden horse. Havemeyer Workshop on Horse Behaviour and Welfare, Holar, Iceland, June 13–15, pp. 110–115.Google Scholar
2McGreevy, PD (2007). The advent of equitation science. The Veterinary Journal 174(3): 492–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Visser, K, Van Reenen, CG, Zetterqvist-Blokhuis, M, Morgan, EKM, Hassnén, P and Rundgren, RMM (2008). Does horse temperament influence horse–rider cooperation? Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 11(3): 267–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4van Dierendonck, M and Goodwin, D (2005). Social contact in horses: implications for human–horse interactions. In: de Jonge, FH and van den Bos, R (eds) The Human–Animal Relationship: Forever and a Day. Assen: Royal van Gorcum, pp. 65–81.Google Scholar
5Brandt, KA (2004). A language of their own: an interactionist approach to human–horse communication. Society and Animals 12(4): 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Trotter, MA and Endler, NS (1999). An empirical test of the interaction model of anxiety in a competitive equestrian setting. Personality and Individual Differences 27: 861–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Meyers, MC, Bourgeois, AE, LeUnes, A and Murray, NG (1999). Mood and psychological skills of elite and sub-elite equestrian athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior 22(3): 399–409.Google Scholar
8Beauchamp, MR and Whinton, LC (2005). Self-efficacy and other-efficacy in dyadic performance: riding as one in equestrian eventing. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 27: 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Lazarus, RS and Folkman, S (1984). Stress Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company, pp. 141–178.Google Scholar
10Endler, NS, Edwards, JM and Vitelli, R (1991). Multidimensional Anxiety Scales (EMAS): Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
11Hardy, L (1990). A catastrophe model of anxiety and performance. In: Jones, JG and Hardy, L (eds) Stress and Performance in Sport. Chichester, UK: Wiley, pp. 81–106.Google Scholar
12Cox, RH, Martens, MP and Russell, WD (2003). Measuring anxiety in athletics: the revised competitive state anxiety inventory-2. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 25: 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Oxendine, JB (1970). Emotional arousal and motor performance. Quest 13: 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Murphy, M and Arkins, S (2007). Equine learning behaviour. Behavioural Processes 76: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Jones, JG (1991). Recent developments and current issues in competitive state anxiety research. The Psychologist 4: 152–155.Google Scholar
16Jones, G and Swain, ABJ (1992). Intensity and direction dimensions of competitive anxiety and relationships with competitiveness. Perceptual and Motor Skills 74: 467–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Jones, JG, Swain, ABJ and Hardy, L (1993). Intensity and direction dimensions of competitive state anxiety and relationships with performance. Journal of Sports Sciences 11: 525–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Martens, R, Burton, D, Vealey, RS, Bump, LA and Smith, DE (1990). Development and validation of the competitive state anxiety inventory-2. In: Martens, RS, Vealey, RS and Burton, D (eds) Competitive Anxiety in Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp. 117–190.Google Scholar
19Hardy, L (1996). A test of catastrophe models of anxiety and sports performance against multidimensional theory models using the method of dynamic differences. Anxiety, Stress and Coping: an International Journal 9: 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Bandura, A (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
21Burton, D (1988). Do anxious swimmers swim slower? Reexamining the elusive anxiety-performance. Journal of Sport Psychology 10: 45–61.Google Scholar
22Woodman, T and Hardy, L (2003). The relative impact of cognitive anxiety and self-confidence upon sport performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences 21: 443–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Jones, G, Swain, A and Cale, A (1991). Gender differences in precompetition temporal patterning and antecedents of anxiety and self-confidence. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 13(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Williams, J and Perry, J (1998). Relationship of intensity and direction of competitive trait anxiety to skill level and gender in tennis. The Sport Psychologist 12: 169–179.Google Scholar
25Eysenck, MW and Calvo, MG (1992). Anxiety and performance: the processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion 6: 409–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar