Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:57:20.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermal Response Variability of Random Polycrystalline Microstructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2015

Bin Wen ,
Zheng Li  and
Nicholas Zabaras
Bin Wen
Affiliation:
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory, Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801, USA
Zheng Li
Affiliation:
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory, Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801, USA State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Faculty of Vehicle Engineering and Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
Nicholas Zabaras*
Affiliation:
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory, Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801, USA
*
*Corresponding author.Email:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A data-driven model reduction strategy is presented for the representation of random polycrystal microstructures. Given a set of microstructure snapshots that satisfy certain statistical constraints such as given low-order moments of the grain size distribution, using a non-linear manifold learning approach, we identify the intrinsic low-dimensionality of the microstructure manifold. In addition to grain size, a linear dimensionality reduction technique (Karhunun-Loéve Expansion) is used to reduce the texture representation. The space of viable microstructures is mapped to a low-dimensional region thus facilitating the analysis and design of polycrystal microstructures. This methodology allows us to sample microstructure features in the reduced-order space thus making it a highly efficient, low-dimensional surrogate for representing microstructures (grain size and texture). We demonstrate the model reduction approach by computing the variability of homogenized thermal properties using sparse grid collocation in the reduced-order space that describes the grain size and orientation variability.

Keywords

52B1065D1868U0568U07Non-linear model reductionpolycrystalline microstructurehomogenizationmicrostructure reconstructionstochastic analysisKarhunun-Loéve Expansionmultiscale modelingheat conduction
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 607 - 634
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Sundararaghavan, V. and Zabaras, N., A statistical learning approach for the design of poly-crystalline materials, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining, 1 (2009), 306–321.Google Scholar
[2]Sundararaghavanand, V.Zabaras, N., Design of microstructure-sensitive properties in elasto-viscoplastic polycrystals using multi-scale homogenization, Int. J. Plast., 22 (2006), 1799–1824.Google Scholar
[3]Sankaran, S. and Zabaras, N., Computing property variability of polycrystals induced by grain size and orientation uncertainties, Acta. Mater., 55 (2007), 2279–2290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Zabaras, N. and Sankaran, S., An information-theoretic approach to stochastic materials modeling, IEEE Computing in Science and Engineering (CiSE) (special issue of “Stochastic Modeling of Complex Systems”, Tartakovsky, D. M., and Xiu, D., edts), Mar/Apr (2007), 50–59.Google Scholar
[5]Ganapathysubramanian, B. and Zabaras, N., Modelling diffusion in random heterogeneous media: data-driven models, stochastic collocation and the variational multi-scale method, J. Comput. Phys., 226 (2007), 326–353.Google Scholar
[6]Ganapathysubramanian, B. and Zabaras, N., A non-linear dimension reduction methodology for generating data-driven stochastic input models, J. Comput. Phys., 227 (2008), 6612–6637.Google Scholar
[7]Frank, R. C., Orientation mapping, Met. Trans. A., 19A (1988), 403–408.Google Scholar
[8]Acharjee, S. and Zabaras, N., A proper orthogonal decomposition approach to microstructure model reduction in Rodrigues space with applications to optimal control of microstructure-sensitive properties, Acta. Mater., 51 (2003), 5627–5646.Google Scholar
[9]Ganapathysubramanian, S. and Zabaras, N., Design across length scales: a reduced-order model of polycrystal plasticity for the control of microstructure-sensitive material properties, Comput. Meth. App. Mech. Eng., 193 (2004), 5017–5034.Google Scholar
[10]Kouchmeshky, B. and Zabaras, N., The effectof multiple sources of uncertainty on the convex hull of material properties of polycrystals, Comput. Mater. Sci., 47 (2009), 342–352.Google Scholar
[11]Ma, X. and Zabaras, N., An adaptive hierarchical sparse grid collocation algorithm for the solution of stochastic differential equations, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (2009), 3084–3113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Bowman, A.W. and Azzalini, A., Applied Smoothing Techniques for Data Analysis, Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
[13]Kent, J. T., Bibby, J. M., and Mardia, K. V., Multivariate Analysis, Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Elsevier, 2006.Google Scholar
[14]Roweis, S. T. and Saul, L.K., Nonlinear dimensionality reductionbylocally linear embedding, Sci., 290 (2000), 2323–2326.Google Scholar
[15]deSilva, V. and Tenenbaum, J. B., Global versus local methods in nonlinear dimensionality reduction, Adv. Neural. Inform. Pro. Syst., 15 (2003), 721–728.Google Scholar
[16]Tenenbaum, J., Silva, V. de, and Langford, J., A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimension reduction, Sci., 290 (2000), 2319–2323.Google Scholar
[17]A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction, freely downloadable software available at http://isomap.stanford.edu/.Google Scholar
[18]Krill, C. E. III and Chen, L.-Q., Computer simulation of 3-D grain growth using a phasefield model, Acta. Mater., 50 (2002), 3059–3075.Google Scholar
[19]Sankaran, S. and Zabaras, N., A maximum entropy approach for property prediction of random microstructures, Acta. Mater., 54 (2006), 2265–2276.Google Scholar
[20]Fan, D. and Chen, L.-Q., Computer simulation of grain growth using a continuum field model, Acta. Mater., 45 (1997), 611–622.Google Scholar
[21]Fan, D., Geng, C., and Chen, L.-Q., Computer simulation of topological evolution in 2-D grain growth using a continuum diffuse-interface field model, Acta. Mater., 45 (1997), 1115–1126.Google Scholar
[22]Vedantam, S. and Patnaik, B. S. V., Efficient numerical algorithm for multiphase field simulations, Phys. Rev. E., 73 (2006), 016703.Google Scholar
[23]Melnick, E. L. and Tenenbein, A., Misspecifications of the normal distribution, Am. Stat., 36(4) (1982), 372–373.Google Scholar
[24]Rosenblatt, M., Remarks on a multivariable transformation, Ann. Math. Stat., 23 (1952), 470–472.Google Scholar
[25]Yue, X. and W. E, , The local microscale problem in the multiscale modeling of strongly heterogeneous media: effects of boundary conditions and cell size, J. Comput. Phys., 222 (2007), 556–572.Google Scholar
[26]Kumar, S. and Singh, R. N., Thermal conductivity of polycrystalline materials, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 78(3) (1995), 728–736.Google Scholar