Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:29:13.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Importance of the Stokes-Brinkman Equations for Computing Effective Permeability in Karst Reservoirs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2015

Marcin Krotkiewski ,
Ingeborg S. Ligaarden ,
Knut-Andreas Lie  and
Daniel W. Schmid
Marcin Krotkiewski*
Affiliation:
Physics of Geological Processes, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048 Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
Ingeborg S. Ligaarden*
Affiliation:
SINTEF ICT, Department of Applied Mathematics, P.O. Box 124 Blindern, NO-0314 Oslo, Norway
Knut-Andreas Lie*
Affiliation:
SINTEF ICT, Department of Applied Mathematics, P.O. Box 124 Blindern, NO-0314 Oslo, Norway Center of Mathematics for Applications, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1053 Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
Daniel W. Schmid*
Affiliation:
Physics of Geological Processes, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048 Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
*
Corresponding author.Email:[email protected]
Email:[email protected]
Email:[email protected]
Email:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Cavities and fractures significantly affect the flow paths in carbonate reservoirs and should be accurately accounted for in numerical models. Herein, we consider the problem of computing the effective permeability of rock samples based on high-resolution 3D CT scans containing millions of voxels. We use the Stokes-Brinkman equations in the entire domain, covering regions of free flow governed by the Stokes equations, porous Darcy flow, and transitions between them. The presence of different length scales and large (ten orders of magnitude) contrasts in permeability leads to highly ill-conditioned linear systems of equations, which are difficult to solve. To obtain a problem that is computationally tractable, we first analyze the relative importance of the Stokes and Darcy terms for a set of idealized 2D models. We find that, in terms of effective permeability, the Stokes-Brinkman equations are only applicable for a special parameter set where the effective free-flow permeability is less than four orders of magnitude different from the matrix permeability. All other cases can be accurately modeled with either the Stokes or the Darcy end-member flows, depending on if there do or do not exist percolating free-flow regions. The insights obtained are used to perform a direct computation of the effective permeability of a rock sample model with more than 8 million cells.

Keywords

65N3068W1086-0286-08UpscalingStokes equationBrinkman equationporous media
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 10 , Issue 5 , November 2011 , pp. 1315 - 1332
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Arbogast, T. and Brunson, D. S., A computational method for approximating a Darcy-Stokes system governing a vuggy porous medium, Comput. Geosci., 11(3) (2007), 207–218.Google Scholar
[2]Arbogast, T. and Gomez, M. S. M., A discretization and multigrid solver for a Darcy-Stokes system of three dimensional vuggy porous media, Comput. Geosci., doi: 10.1007/s10596-008-9121-y, 2009.Google Scholar
[3]Arbogast, T. and Lehr, H. L., Homogenization of a Darcy-Stokes system modeling vuggy porous media, Comput. Geosci., 10(3) (2006), 291–302.Google Scholar
[4]Beavers, G. S. and Joseph, D. D., Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall, J. Fluid Mech., 30 (1967), 197–207.Google Scholar
[5]Brinkman, H. C., A calculation of the viscous force exerted by a flowing fluid on a dense swarm of particles, Appl. Sci. Res., 1(1) (1947), 27–34.Google Scholar
[6]Dabrowski, M., Krotkiewski, M. and Schmid, D. W., MILAMIN: MATLAB-based finite element method solver for large problems, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 9(1) (2008), 1–24.Google Scholar
[7]Davis, T. A. and Hager, W. W., Row modifications of a sparse Cholesky factorization, Siam J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 26(3) (2005), 621–639.Google Scholar
[8]Elman, H., Silvester, D. and Wathen, A., Finite Elements and Fast Iterative Solvers (with Applications in Incompressible Fluid Dynamics), Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation, Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
[9]Gulbransen, A. F., Hauge, V. L. and Lie, K.-A., A multiscale mixed finite element method for vuggy and naturally fractured reservoirs, SPE J., 15(12) (2010), 395–403.Google Scholar
[10]Henson, V. E. and Yang, U. M., Boomeramg: a parallel algebraic multigrid solver and precon-ditioner, Appl. Numer. Math., 41(1) (2002), 155–177.Google Scholar
[11]Jennings, J. W. and Lucia, F. J., Predicting permeability from well logs in carbonates with a link to geology for interwell permeability mapping, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng., 6(4) (2003), 215–225.Google Scholar
[12]Karper, T., Mardal, K.-A. and Winther, R., Unified finite element discretizations of coupled Darcy-Stokes flow, Numer. Meth. PDEs, 25(2) (2009), 311–326. Doi: 10.1002/num.20349.Google Scholar
[13]Krotkiewski, M. and Dabrowski, M., Parallel symmetric sparse matrix-vector product on scalar multi-core cpus, Parallel Comput., 36(4) (2010), 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Liu, S. and Masliyah, J. H., Dispersion in porous media, in Vafai, K., editor, Handbook of Porous Media, page 110, CRC Press, 2nd edition, 2005.Google Scholar
[15]Popov, P., Efendiev, Y. and Qin, G., Multiscale modeling and simulations of flows in naturally fractured karst reservoirs, Commun. Comput. Phys., 6 (2009), 162–184.Google Scholar
[16]Popov, P., Qin, G., Bi, L., Efendiev, Y., Kang, Z. and Li, J., Multiphysics and multiscale methods for modeling fluid flow through naturally fractured carbonate karst reservoirs, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng., 12(2) (2009), 218–231.Google Scholar
[17]Renard, P. and Marsily, G. de, Calculating equivalent permeability: a review, Adv. Water Res., 20(5-6) (1997), 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Shewchuk, J., Triangle Mesh Generator, 2007, http://www.cs.cmu.edu/∼quake/triangle.html.Google Scholar
[19]Willems, J., Numerical Upscaling for Multiscale Flow Problems, Ph.D Thesis, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, 2009.Google Scholar
[20]Zhang, L., Bryant, S. L., Jennings, J. W., Arbogast, T. J. and Paruchuri, R., Multiscale flow and transport in highly heterogeneous carbonates, in Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, September 2004, SPE 90336.Google Scholar