Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:30:31.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Construction, Analysis and Application of Coupled Compact Difference Scheme in Computational Acoustics and Fluid Flow Problems

Part of: Incompressible viscous fluids Partial differential equations, boundary value problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2015

Jitenjaya Pradhan ,
Amit ,
Bikash Mahato ,
Satish D. Dhandole  and
Yogesh G. Bhumkar
Jitenjaya Pradhan
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, 751013
Amit
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, 751013
Bikash Mahato
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, 751013
Satish D. Dhandole
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, 751013
Yogesh G. Bhumkar*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, 751013
*
*Corresponding author. Email addresses: [email protected] (J. Pradhan), [email protected] (Amit), [email protected] (B. Mahato), [email protected] (S. D. Dhandole), [email protected] (Y. G. Bhumkar)
Get access

Abstract

In the present work, a new type of coupled compact difference scheme has been proposed for the solution of computational acoustics and flow problems. The proposed scheme evaluates the first, the second and the fourth derivative terms simultaneously. Derived compact difference scheme has a significant spectral resolution and a physical dispersion relation preserving (DRP) ability over a considerable wavenumber range when a fourth order four stage Runge-Kutta scheme is used for the time integration. Central stencil has been used for the present numerical scheme to evaluate spatial derivative terms. Derived scheme has the capability of adding numerical diffusion adaptively to attenuate spurious high wavenumber oscillations responsible for numerical instabilities. The DRP nature of the proposed scheme across a wider wavenumber range provides accurate results for the model wave equations as well as computational acoustic problems. In addition to the attractive feature of adaptive diffusion, present scheme also helps to control spurious reflections from the domain boundaries and is projected as an alternative to the perfectly matched layer (PML) technique.

Keywords

Coupled compact difference schemeDRP propertyadaptive numerical diffusioncomputational acousticPML technique

MSC classification

Secondary: 65N06: Finite difference methods 65N35: Spectral, collocation and related methods 76D05: Navier-Stokes equations 76D17: Viscous vortex flows
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , October 2015 , pp. 957 - 984
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Tam, C. K. W.. Computational Aeroacoustics a Wave Number Approach. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Colonius, T. and Lele, S. K.. Computational aeroacoustics: progress on nonlinear problems of sound generation. Prog. Aero. Sciences, 40:345–416, 2004.Google Scholar
[3]Fung, K. Y., Man, R. S. O., and Davis, S.. A compact solution to computational acoustics. ICASE/LaRC Workshop on Benchmark Problems in Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA), pages 59–72, 1995.Google Scholar
[4]Shah, P. L. and Hardin, J.. Second-order numerical solution of time-dependent, first-order hyperbolic equations. ICASE/LaRC Workshop on Benchmark Problems in Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA), pages 133–141, 1995.Google Scholar
[5]Sengupta, T. K., Sircar, S. K., and Dipankar, A.. High accuracy schemes for DNS and acoustics. J. Sci. Comput., 26:151–193, 2006.Google Scholar
[6]Kinsler, L. E., Frey, A. R., Coppens, A. B., and Sanders, J. V.. Fundamentals of Acoustics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.Google Scholar
[7]Sengupta, T. K., Rajpoot, M. K., Saurabh, S., and Vijay, V. V. S. N.. Analysis of anisotropy of numerical wave solutions by high accuracy finite difference methods. J. Comput. Phys., 230:27–60, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Bogey, C., Bailly, C., and Juvé, D.. Noise investigation of a high subsonic, moderate reynolds number jet using a compressible LES. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 16(4):273–297, 2003.Google Scholar
[9]Tam, C.K.W. and Dong, Z.. Radiation and outflow boundary conditions for direct computation of acoustic and flow disturbances in a nonuniform mean flow. J. Comput. Acoustics, 4 (2):175–201, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Vichnevetsky, R. and Bowles, J. B.. Fourier Analysis of Numerical Approximations of Hyperbolic Equations. SIAM Stud. Appl. Math., Philadelphia, 1982.Google Scholar
[11]Poinsot, T. and Veynante, D.. Theoretical and Numerical Combustion. R. T. Edwards Inc., 2005.Google Scholar
[12]Sengupta, T. K., Dipankar, A., and Sagaut, P.. Error dynamics: Beyond von Neumann analysis. J. Comput. Phys., 226:1211–1218, 2007.Google Scholar
[13]Sengupta, T. K., Bhumkar, Y. G., Rajpoot, M., Suman, V. K., and Saurabh, S.. Spurious waves in discrete computation of wave phenomena and flow problems. App. Math. Comput., 218:9035–9065, 2012.Google Scholar
[14]Sengupta, T. K.. High Accuracy Computing Methods: Fluid Flows and Wave Phenomena. Cambridge University Press., USA, 2013.Google Scholar
[15]Yu, C. H., Bhumkar, Y. G., and Sheu, T. W. H.. Dispersion relation preserving combined compact difference schemes for flow problems. J. Sci. Comput., 62(2):482–516, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Bhumkar, Y. G., Sheu, T. W. H., and Sengupta, T. K.. A dispersion relation preserving optimized upwind compact difference scheme for high accuracy flow simulations. J. Comput. Phys., 278:378–399, 2014.Google Scholar
[17]Sengupta, T. K., Ganeriwal, G., and De, S.. Analysis of central and upwind compact schemes. J. Comput. Phys., 192:677–694, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Visbal, M. R. and Gaitonde, D. V.. On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes. J. Comput. Phys., 181:155–185, 2002.Google Scholar
[19]Lele, S. K.. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys., 103:16–42, 1992.Google Scholar
[20]Gaitonde, D. V., Shang, J. S., and Young, J. L.. Practical aspects of higher-order numerical schemes for wave propagation phenomena. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 45(12):1849–1869, 1999.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Chiu, P. H. and Sheu, Tony W. H.. On the development of a dispersion-relation-preserving dual-compact upwind scheme for convection-diffusion equation. J. Comput. Phys., 228:3640–3655, 2009.Google Scholar
[22]Mahesh, K.. A family of high-order finite difference schemes with good spectral resolution. J. Comput. Phys., 145:332–358, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Sengupta, T. K., Bhaumik, S., and Bhumkar, Y. G.. Direct numerical simulation of two-dimensional wall-bounded turbulent flows from receptivity stage. Phys. Rev. E, 85(2):026308, 2012.Google Scholar
[24]Zhou, Q., Yao, Z., He, F., and Shen, M. Y.. A new family of high-order compact upwind difference schemes with good spectral resolution. J. Comput. Phys., 227:1306–1339, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Rajpoot, M. K., Sengupta, T. K., and Dutt, P. K.. Optimal time advancing dispersion relation preserving schemes. J. Comput. Phys., 229:3623–3651, 2010.Google Scholar
[26]Sengupta, T. K., Bhumkar, Y., and Lakshmanan, V.. Design and analysis of a new filter for LES and DES. Comput. Struct., 87:735–750, 2009.Google Scholar
[27]Sengupta, T. K. and Bhumkar, Y. G.. New explicit two-dimensional higher order filters. Comput. Fluids, 39:1848–1863, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28]Bhumkar, Y. G.. High Performance Computing of Bypass Transition. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, 2012.Google Scholar
[29]Bhumkar, Y. G. and Sengupta, T. K.. Adaptive multi-dimensional filters. Comput. Fluids, 49, 2011.Google Scholar
[30]Sengupta, T. K., Vijay, V. V. S. N., and Bhaumik, S.. Further improvement and analysis of CCD scheme: Dissipation discretization and de-aliasing properties. J. Comput. Phys., 228(17):6150–6168, 2009.Google Scholar
[31]Sandham, N.D., Li, Q., and Yee, H.C.. Entropy splitting for high-order numerical simulation of compressible turbulence. J. Comput. Phys., 178(2):307–322, 2002.Google Scholar
[32]Honein, A. E. and Moin, P.. Higher entropy conservation and numerical stability of compressible turbulence simulations. J. Comput. Phys., 201(2):531–545, 2004.Google Scholar
[33]Boersma, B. J.. A staggered compact finite difference formulation for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys., 208(2):675–690, 2005.Google Scholar
[34]Nagarajan, S., Lele, S. K., and Ferziger, J. H.. A robust high-order compact method for large eddy simulation. J. Comput. Phys., 191(2):392–419, 2003.Google Scholar
[35]Borue, V. and Orszag, S. A.. Local energy flux and subgrid-scale statistics in three-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 366:1–31, 1998.Google Scholar
[36]Haugen, N. and Brandenburg, A.. Inertial range scaling in numerical turbulence with hyper-viscosity. Phys. Rev. E, 70:026405, 2004.Google Scholar
[37]Lamorgese, A. G., Caughey, D. A., and Pope, S. B.. Direct numerical simulation of homogeneous turbulence with hyperviscosity. Phys. Fluids, 17, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[38]Tadmor, E.. Convergence of spectral methods for nonlinear conservation laws. SIAM J. Num. Analysis, 26(1):30–44, 1989.Google Scholar
[39]Karamanos, G-S. and Karniadakis, G.E.. A spectral vanishing viscosity method for large-eddy simulations. J. Comput. Phys., 163(1):22–50, 2000.Google Scholar
[40]Pasquetti, R.. Spectral vanishing viscosity method for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. J. Sci. Comput., 27:365–375, 2006.Google Scholar
[41]Lamballais, E., Fortun, V., and Laizet, S.. Straightforward high-order numerical dissipation via the viscous term for direct and large eddy simulation. J. Comput. Phys., 230(9):3270–3275, 2011.Google Scholar
[42]Chu, P. C. and Fan, C.. A three-point combined compact difference scheme. J. Comput. Phys., 140:370–399, 1998.Google Scholar
[43]Vorst, H.A.V. der. Bi-CGSTAB: A fast and smoothly converging variant of Bi-CG for the solution of non-symmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 13:631–644, 1992.Google Scholar
[44]Green, S. I.. Fluid Vortices: Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications. Springer, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar