Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:30:47.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Constrained Level Set Method for Simulating the Formation of Liquid Bridges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2015

Dongdong He  and
Huaxiong Huang
Dongdong He*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J1P3
Huaxiong Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J1P3
*
Email:[email protected]
Corresponding author.Email:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the dynamic process of liquid bridge formation between two parallel hydrophobic plates with hydrophilic patches, previously studied in [1]. We propose a dynamic Hele-Shaw model to take advantage of the small aspect ratio between the gap width and the plate size. A constrained level set method is applied to solve the model equations numerically, where a global constraint is imposed in the evolution [2] stage together with local constraints in the reinitialization [3] stage of level set function in order to limit numerical mass loss. In contrast to the finite element method used in [2], we use a finite difference method with a 5th order HJWENO scheme for spatial discretization. To illustrate the effectiveness of the constrained method, we have compared the results obtained by the standard level set method with those from the constrained version. Our results show that the constrained level set method produces physically reasonable results while that of the standard method is less reliable. Our numerical results also show that the dynamic nature of the flow plays an important role in the process of liquid bridge formation and criteria based on static energy minimization approach has limited applicability.

Keywords

76T9965M06Constrained level set methodHele-Shawliquid bridgesmass conservationmoving interface
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , August 2012 , pp. 577 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Silver, J., Mi, Z., Takamoto, K., Bungay, P., Brown, J. and Powell, A., Controlled formation of low-volume liquid pillars between plates with a lattice of wetting patches by use of a second immiscible fluid, J. Colloid. Interf. Sci., 219 (1999), 81–89.Google Scholar
[2]Laadhari, A., Saramito, P. and Misbah, C., Improving the mass conservation of the level set method in a finite element context, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I., 348 (2010), 535–540.Google Scholar
[3] M.Sussman and Fatemi, E., An efficient, interface-preservinglevel set redistancing algorithm and its application to interfacial incompressible fluid flow, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 20 (1999), 1165–1191.Google Scholar
[4]Sussman, M., Smereka, P., and Osher, S., A level set method approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow, J. Comput. Phys., 114 (1994), 146–159.Google Scholar
[5]He, D., Huang, H. and Tan, Y., Numerical simulation for a droplet fission process of elec-trowetting on dielectric device, Commun. Comput. Phys., 7 (2010), 1076–1094.Google Scholar
[6]Hou, T., Li, Z., Osher, S. and Zhao, H., A hybrid method for moving interface problems with application to the Hele-shaw flow, J. Comput. Phys., 134 (1997), 236–252.Google Scholar
[7]Jiang, G. and Peng, D., Weighted ENO schemes for Halmiton-Jacobi equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 21 (2000), 2126–2143.Google Scholar
[8]Zalesak, S., Fully multidimensional flux-corrected transport algorithms for fluids, J. Comput. Phys., 31 (1979), 335–362.Google Scholar
[9]Gómez, P., Hernández, J. and López, J., On the reinitialization procedure in a narrow-band locally refined level set method for interfacial flows, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 63 (2005), 1478–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar