Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:36:07.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Interface-Capturing Regularization Method for Solving the Equations for Two-Fluid Mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

Jian Du ,
Robert D. Guy ,
Aaron L. Fogelson ,
Grady B. Wright  and
James P. Keener
Jian Du*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Science, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA
Robert D. Guy*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Aaron L. Fogelson*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Grady B. Wright*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA
James P. Keener*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
*
Corresponding author.Email:[email protected]
Email:[email protected]
Email:[email protected]
Email:[email protected]
Email:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Many problems in biology involve gels which are mixtures composed of a polymer network permeated by a fluid solvent (water). The two-fluid model is a widely used approach to described gel mechanics, in which both network and solvent coexist at each point of space and their relative abundance is described by their volume fractions. Each phase is modeled as a continuum with its own velocity and constitutive law. In some biological applications, free boundaries separate regions of gel and regions of pure solvent, resulting in a degenerate network momentum equation where the network volume fraction vanishes. To overcome this difficulty, we develop a regularization method to solve the two-phase gel equations when the volume fraction of one phase goes to zero in part of the computational domain. A small and constant network volume fraction is temporarily added throughout the domain in setting up the discrete linear equations and the same set of equation is solved everywhere. These equations are very poorly conditioned for small values of the regularization parameter, but the multigrid-preconditioned GMRES method we use to solve them is efficient and produces an accurate solution of these equations for the full range of relevant regularization parameter values.

Keywords

76T9976D0776D2765F2276M2065M12Gel swellingpreconditionertwo-fluid model
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 14 , Issue 5 , November 2013 , pp. 1322 - 1346
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Walter, P., Molecular Biology of the Cell, Garland Science, New York, 2007.Google Scholar
[2]Fahy, J.V. and Dickey, B. R., Airway Mucus Function and Dysfunction, N. Engl. J. Med., 363(2010), 2233–47.Google Scholar
[3]Schreiber, Sören and Scheid, Peter, Gastric mucus of the guinea pig: Proton carrier and diffusion barrier, Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest, Liver Physiol., 272(1997), G63–G70.Google Scholar
[4]Verdugo, P., Deyrup-Olsen, I., Martin, A.W. and Luchtel, D. L., Polymer gel phase transition: The molecular mechanism of product release in mucin secretion, Mechanics of Swelling, Springer-Verlag, NATO ASI Series (1992), H64 671–681.Google Scholar
[5]Weisel, J.W., Fibrinogen and Fibrin, Adv. Protein Chem., 70 (2005), 247–299.Google Scholar
[6]Gersh, K.C., Edmondson, K.E. and Weisel, J. W., Flow rate and fibrin fiber alignment, J. Thromb. Haemost., 8(2010), 2826–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[7]Campbell, R.A., Aleman, M.M., Gray, L.D., Falvo, M.R. and Wolberg, A.S., Flow Profoundly Influences Fibrin Network Structure: Implications for Fibrin Formation and Clot Stability in Hemostasis, Thromb. Haemost., 104(2010), 1281–4.Google Scholar
[8]Neeves, K.B., Illing, D.A. and Diamond, S.L., Thrombin flux and wall shear rate regulate fibrin fiber deposition state during polymerization under flow, Biophys. J., 98(2010), 1344–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[9]Barocas, V. H. and Tranquillo, R. T., An anisotropic biphasic theory of tissue-equivalent mechanics: The interplay among cell traction, fibrillar network deformation, fiber alignment, and cell contact guidance, J. Biomech. Eng., 119 (1997), 137–145.Google Scholar
[10]Byrne, H. and Preziosi, L., Modelling solid tumour growth using the theory of mixtures, Math. Med. Biol., 20 (2003), 341–366.Google Scholar
[11]Cogan, N.G. and Guy, R.D., Multiphase flow models of biogels from crawling cells to bacterial biofilms, HFSP J., 4(2010), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[12]He, X. and Dembo, M., On the mechanics of the first cleavage division of the sea urchin egg, Exp. Cell. Res., 233 (1997), 252–273.Google Scholar
[13]Keener, J. P. and Sircar, S. and Fogelson, A. L., Kinetics of swelling gels, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 71 (2011), 854–875.Google Scholar
[14]Levine, A. J. and MacKintosh, F. C., The mechanics and fluctuation spectrum of active gels, J. Phys. Chem. B, 113 (2009), 3820–3830.Google Scholar
[15]Mow, V. C. and Holmes, M. H. and Lai, W. M., Fluid transport and mechanical properties of articular cartilage: A review, J. Biomech., 17 (1984), 377–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[16]Wolgemuth, C. W. and Mogilner, A. and Oster, G., The hyrdration dynamics of polyelectrolyte gels with applications to cell motility and drug delivery, Eur. Biophys. J., 33 (2004), 146–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[17]Doi, M. and See, H., Introductin to Polymer Physics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1996.Google Scholar
[18]Tanaka, T. and Fillmore, D. J., Kinetics of swelling in gels, J. Chem. Phys., 70 (1979), 1214–1218.Google Scholar
[19]Alt, W. and Dembo, M., Cytoplasm dynamics and cell motion: two-phase flow models. Math. Biosci., 156 (1999), 207–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[20]Wright, G.B., Guy, R.D. and Fogelson, A.L., An efficient and robust method for simulating two-phase gel dynamics, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 30(2008), 2535–2565.Google Scholar
[21]Wright, G.B., Guy, R.D., Du, J. and Fogelson, A.L., A high-resolution finite-difference method for simulating two-fluid, viscoelastic gel dynamics, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 166(2011), 1137–1157.Google Scholar
[22]Guy, R.D., Fogelson, A.L. and Keener, J. P., Modeling Fibrin Gel Formation in a Shear Flow, Mathematical Medicine and Biology, 24(2007), 111–130.Google Scholar
[23]Glimm, J., Grove, J.W., Li, X., Shyue, K.-M., Zeng, Y. and Zhang, Q., Three dimensional front tracking, SIAM J. Sci. Comp., 19(1998), 703–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Boettinger, W. J., Warren, J. A., Beckermann, C. and Karma, A., Phase-field simulation of solidification, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 32 (2002), 163–94.Google Scholar
[25]Osher, S. and Sethian, J., Front propagating with curvature dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations, J. Comput. Phys., 79(1988), 12–49.Google Scholar
[26]Colella, P., Multidimensional upwind methods for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 87(1990), 171–200.Google Scholar
[27]Leer, B. van, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme, V. A second order sequel to Godunov’s method, J. Comput. Phys., 32(1979), 101–136.Google Scholar
[28]Washio, T. and Oosterlee, C. W., Krylov subspace acceleration for nonlinear multigrid schemes, Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal., 6 (1997), 271–290.Google Scholar
[29]Oosterlee, C. W. and Washio, T., An evaluation of parallel multigrid as a solver and a precon-ditioner for singularly perturbed problems, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 19(1998), 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar