Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:15:59.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constrained Interpolation Profile Conservative Semi-Lagrangian Scheme Based on Third-Order Polynomial Functions and Essentially Non-Oscillatory (CIP-CSL3ENO) Scheme

Part of: Two-phase and multiphase flows Hyperbolic equations and systems Partial differential equations, initial value and time-dependent initial-boundary value problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2017

Qijie Li ,
Syazana Omar ,
Xi Deng  and
Kensuke Yokoi
Qijie Li*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK
Syazana Omar*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK
Xi Deng*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK Department of Energy Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, 226-8502, Japan
Kensuke Yokoi*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:[email protected] (K. Yokoi), [email protected] (Q. Li), [email protected] (S. Omar), [email protected] (X. Deng)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:[email protected] (K. Yokoi), [email protected] (Q. Li), [email protected] (S. Omar), [email protected] (X. Deng)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:[email protected] (K. Yokoi), [email protected] (Q. Li), [email protected] (S. Omar), [email protected] (X. Deng)
*Corresponding author. Email addresses:[email protected] (K. Yokoi), [email protected] (Q. Li), [email protected] (S. Omar), [email protected] (X. Deng)
Get access

Abstract

We propose a fully conservative and less oscillatory multi-moment scheme for the approximation of hyperbolic conservation laws. The proposed scheme (CIP-CSL3ENO) is based on two CIP-CSL3 schemes and the essentially non-oscillatory (ENO) scheme. In this paper, we also propose an ENO indicator for the multimoment framework, which intentionally selects non-smooth stencil but can efficiently minimize numerical oscillations. The proposed scheme is validated through various benchmark problems and a comparison with an experiment of two droplets collision/separation. The CIP-CSL3ENO scheme shows approximately fourth-order accuracy for smooth solution, and captures discontinuities and smooth solutions simultaneously without numerical oscillations for solutions which include discontinuities. The numerical results of two droplets collision/separation (3D free surface flow simulation) show that the CIP-CSL3ENO scheme can be applied to various types of fluid problems not only compressible flow problems but also incompressible and 3D free surface flow problems.

Keywords

CIP-CSL schemeENO schemeconservation lawsfree surface flows

MSC classification

Secondary: 35L65: Conservation laws 65M06: Finite difference methods 65M08: Finite volume methods 76T10: Liquid-gas two-phase flows, bubbly flows
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 765 - 788
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Ashgriz, N., and Poo, J. Y. Coalescence and separation in binary collisions of liquid drops. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 221 (12 1990), 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Colella, P., and Woodward, P. R. The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 54, 1 (1984), 174–201.Google Scholar
[3] Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S., and Chakravarthy, S. R. Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III. Journal of Computational Physics 71, 2 (1987), 231–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Hu, G., Li, R., and Tang, T. A robust WENO type finite volume solver for steady euler equations on unstructured grids. Communications in Computational Physics 9, 3 (2011), 627–648.Google Scholar
[5] Huang, C.-S., Xiao, F., and Arbogast, T. Fifth order multi-moment weno schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Scientific Computing 64, 2 (2015), 477–507.Google Scholar
[6] Hyman, J. M. Accurate monotonicity preserving cubic interpolation. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 4, 4 (1983), 645–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Ii, S., and Xiao, F. CIP/multi-moment finite volume method for euler equations: A semi-lagrangian characteristic formulation. Journal of Computational Physics 222, 2 (2007), 849–871.Google Scholar
[8] Ii, S., and Xiao, F. High order multi-moment constrained finite volume method. part i: Basic formulation. Journal of Computational Physics 228, 10 (2009), 3669–3707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Imai, Y., and Aoki, T. Accuracy study of the IDO scheme by fourier analysis. Journal of Computational Physics 217, 2 (2006), 453–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Jiang, G.-S., and Shu, C.-W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 126, 1 (1996), 202–228.Google Scholar
[11] Liu, X.-D., Osher, S., and Chan, T. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 115, 1 (1994), 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Onodera, N., Aoki, T., and Yokoi, K. A fully conservative high-order upwind multi-moment method using moments in both upwind and downwind cells. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids (2016). fld.4228.Google Scholar
[13] Qiu, J.-M., and Shu, C.-W. Conservative high order semi-lagrangian finite difference WENO methods for advection in incompressible flow. Journal of Computational Physics 230, 4 (2011), 863–889.Google Scholar
[14] Serna, S., and Marquina, A. Power ENO methods: a fifth-order accurate weighted power ENO method. Journal of Computational Physics 194, 2 (2004), 632–658.Google Scholar
[15] Shu, C.-W. Total-variation-diminishing time discretizations. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 9, 6 (1988), 1073–1084.Google Scholar
[16] Shu, C.-W. Advanced Numerical Approximation of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations: Lectures given at the 2nd Session of the Centro Internazionale Matematico Estivo (C.I.M.E.) held in Cetraro, Italy, June 23–28, 1997. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998, ch. Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, pp. 325–432.Google Scholar
[17] Shu, C.-W., and Osher, S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 77, 2 (1988), 439–471.Google Scholar
[18] Shu, C.-W., and Osher, S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, II. Journal of Computational Physics 83, 1 (1989), 32–78.Google Scholar
[19] Sod, G. A. A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 27, 1 (1978), 1–31.Google Scholar
[20] Sun, Z., Teng, H., and Xiao, F. A slope constrained 4th order multi-moment finite volume method with weno limiter. Communications in Computational Physics 18 (2015), 901–930.Google Scholar
[21] Tanaka, R., Nakamura, T., and Yabe, T. Constructing exactly conservative scheme in a non-conservative form. Computer Physics Communications 126, 3 (2000), 232–243.Google Scholar
[22] Xiao, F. Unified formulation for compressible and incompressible flows by using multi-integrated moments I: one-dimensional inviscid compressible flow. Journal of Computational Physics 195, 2 (2004), 629–654.Google Scholar
[23] Xiao, F., Akoh, R., and Ii, S. Unified formulation for compressible and incompressible flows by using multi-integrated moments II: Multi-dimensional version for compressible and incompressible flows. Journal of Computational Physics 213, 1 (2006), 31–56.Google Scholar
[24] Xiao, F., Ikebata, A., and Hasegawa, T. Numerical simulations of free-interface fluids by a multi-integrated moment method. Computers and Structures 83, 67 (2005), 409–423. Frontier of Multi-Phase Flow Analysis and Fluid-Structure Frontier of Multi-Phase Flow Analysis and Fluid-Structure.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25] Xiao, F., and Yabe, T. Completely conservative and oscillationless semi-Lagrangian schemes for advection transportation. Journal of Computational Physics 170, 2 (2001), 498–522.Google Scholar
[26] Xiao, F., Yabe, T., Peng, X., and Kobayashi, H. Conservative and oscillation-less atmospheric transport schemes based on rational functions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 107, D22 (2002), ACL 2–1–ACL 2–11. 4609.Google Scholar
[27] Yabe, T., Tanaka, R., Nakamura, T., and Xiao, F. An exactly conservative semi-Lagrangian scheme (CIP-CSL) in one dimension. Monthly Weather Review 129, 2 (2001), 332–344.Google Scholar
[28] Yokoi, K. A numerical method for free-surface flows and its application to droplet impact on a thin liquid layer. Journal of Scientific Computing 35, 2 (2008), 372–396.Google Scholar
[29] Yokoi, K. A practical numerical framework for free surface flows based on CLSVOF method, multi-moment methods and density-scaled CSF model: Numerical simulations of droplet splashing. Journal of Computational Physics 232, 1 (2013), 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30] Yokoi, K. A density-scaled continuum surface force model within a balanced force formulation. Journal of Computational Physics 278 (2014), 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31] Yokoi, K., Onishi, R., Deng, X.-L., and Sussman, M. Density-scaled balanced continuum surface force model with a level set based curvature interpolation technique. International Journal of ComputationalMethods 13, 04 (2016), 1641004.Google Scholar