Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:52:22.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Threshold Probability for Long Cycles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2016

ROMAN GLEBOV
Affiliation:
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9190401, Israel (e-mail: [email protected])
HUMBERTO NAVES
Affiliation:
Institute for Mathematics and its Applications, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA (e-mail: [email protected])
BENNY SUDAKOV
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, ETH, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland (e-mail: [email protected])

Abstract

For a given graph G of minimum degree at least k, let Gp denote the random spanning subgraph of G obtained by retaining each edge independently with probability p = p(k). We prove that if p ⩾ (logk + loglogk + ωk(1))/k, where ωk(1) is any function tending to infinity with k, then Gp asymptotically almost surely contains a cycle of length at least k + 1. When we take G to be the complete graph on k + 1 vertices, our theorem coincides with the classic result on the threshold probability for the existence of a Hamilton cycle in the binomial random graph.

Type
Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Alon, N. and Spencer, J. (2008) The Probabilistic Method, Wiley.Google Scholar
[2] Ben-Shimon, S., Krivelevich, M. and Sudakov, B. (2011) On the resilience of Hamiltonicity and optimal packing of Hamilton cycles in random graphs. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 25 11761193.Google Scholar
[3] Bollobás, B. (1984) The evolution of sparse graphs. In Graph Theory and Combinatorics: Proc. Cambridge Combinatorial Conference in honor of Paul Erdős, Academic Press, pp. 3557.Google Scholar
[4] Bollobás, B. (2001) Random Graphs, second edition, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Diestel, R. (2010) Graph Theory, fourth edition, Vol. 173 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer.Google Scholar
[6] Erdős, P. and Rényi, A. (1960) On the evolution of random graphs. Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences 5 1761.Google Scholar
[7] Gilbert, E. (1959) Random graphs. Ann. Math. Statist. 30 11411144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Glebov, R. and Krivelevich, M. (2013) On the number of Hamilton cycles in sparse random graphs. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 27 2742.Google Scholar
[9] Hopcroft, J. and Tarjan, R. (1973) Algorithm 447: Efficient algorithms for graph manipulation. Comm. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 16 372378.Google Scholar
[10] Komlós, J. and Szemerédi, E. (1983) Limit distributions for the existence of Hamilton circuits in a random graph. Discrete Math. 43 5563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Korshunov, A. (1976) Solution of a problem of Erdős and Rényi on Hamiltonian cycles in non-oriented graphs. Soviet Math. Dokl. 17 760764.Google Scholar
[12] Krivelevich, M., Lee, C. and Sudakov, B. (2015) Long paths and cycles in random subgraphs of graphs with large minimum degree. Random Struct. Alg. 46 320345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Krivelevich, M. and Sudakov, B. (2013) The phase transition in random graphs: A simple proof. Random Struct. Alg. 43 131138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Menger, K. (1927) Zur allgemeinen Kurventheorie. Fund. Math. 10 96115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Pósa, L. (1976) Hamiltonian circuits in random graphs. Discrete Math. 14 359364.Google Scholar
[16] Riordan, O. (2014) Long cycles in random subgraphs of graphs with large minimum degree. Random Struct. Alg. 45 764767.Google Scholar
[17] West, D. (2007) Introduction to Graph Theory, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar