Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:39:32.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Packing Loose Hamilton Cycles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2017

Abstract

A subset C of edges in a k-uniform hypergraph H is a loose Hamilton cycle if C covers all the vertices of H and there exists a cyclic ordering of these vertices such that the edges in C are segments of that order and such that every two consecutive edges share exactly one vertex. The binomial random k-uniform hypergraph Hkn,p has vertex set [n] and an edge set E obtained by adding each k-tuple e ∈ ($\binom{[n]}{k}$) to E with probability p, independently at random.

Here we consider the problem of finding edge-disjoint loose Hamilton cycles covering all but o(|E|) edges, referred to as the packing problem. While it is known that the threshold probability of the appearance of a loose Hamilton cycle in Hkn,p is

$p=\Theta\biggl(\frac{\log n}{n^{k-1}}\biggr),$
the best known bounds for the packing problem are around p = polylog(n)/n. Here we make substantial progress and prove the following asymptotically (up to a polylog(n) factor) best possible result: for p ≥ logCn/nk−1, a random k-uniform hypergraph Hkn,p with high probability contains
$N:=(1-o(1))\frac{\binom{n}{k}p}{n/(k-1)}$
edge-disjoint loose Hamilton cycles.

Our proof utilizes and modifies the idea of ‘online sprinkling’ recently introduced by Vu and the first author.

Type
Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Dudek, A. and Frieze, A. (2011) Loose Hamilton cycles in random uniform hypergraphs. Electron. J. Combin. 18 P48.Google Scholar
[2] Dudek, A., Frieze, A., Loh, P.-S. and Speiss, S. (2012) Optimal divisibility conditions for loose Hamilton cycles in random hypergraphs. Electron. J. Combin. 19 P44.Google Scholar
[3] Ferber, A. (2015) Closing gaps in problems related to Hamilton cycles in random graphs and hypergraphs. Electron. J. Combin. 22 P1.61.Google Scholar
[4] Ferber, A., Kronenberg, G. and Long, E. (2015) Packing, Counting and Covering Hamilton cycles in random directed graphs. Electron. Notes Discrete Math. 49 813819.Google Scholar
[5] Ferber, A. and Vu, V. (2016) Packing perfect matchings in random hypergraphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.09492.Google Scholar
[6] Frieze, A. (2010) Loose Hamilton cycles in random 3-uniform hypergraphs. Electron. J. Combin. 17 N28.Google Scholar
[7] Frieze, A. and Krivelevich, M. (2005) On packing Hamilton cycles in ϵ-regular graphs. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 94 159172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Frieze, A. and Krivelevich, M. (2012) Packing Hamilton cycles in random and pseudo-random hypergraphs. Random Struct. Alg. 41 122.Google Scholar
[9] Knox, F., Kühn, D. and Osthus, D. (2015) Edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles in random graphs. Random Struct. Alg. 46 397445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Krivelevich, M. and Samotij, W. (2012) Optimal packings of Hamilton cycles in sparse random graphs. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 26 964982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] McDiarmid, C. (1998) Concentration. In Probabilistic Methods for Algorithmic Discrete Mathematics, Springer, pp. 195248.Google Scholar