Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:03:26.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Bounds for Edge-Cover by Random Walk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2014

AGELOS GEORGAKOPOULOS  and
PETER WINKLER
AGELOS GEORGAKOPOULOS
Affiliation:
Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, CV4 7AL, UK (e-mail: [email protected])
PETER WINKLER
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755-3551, USA (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We show that the expected time for a random walk on a (multi-)graph G to traverse all m edges of G, and return to its starting point, is at most 2m2; if each edge must be traversed in both directions, the bound is 3m2. Both bounds are tight and may be applied to graphs with arbitrary edge lengths. This has interesting implications for Brownian motion on certain metric spaces, including some fractals.

Keywords

Primary 05C81Secondary 60J65
Type
Paper
Information
Combinatorics, Probability and Computing , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , July 2014 , pp. 571 - 584
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Aldous, D. and Fill, J.Reversible Markov Chains and Random Walks on Graphs. Book in preparation. http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~aldous/RWG/book.htmlGoogle Scholar
[2]Aleliunas, R., Karp, R., Lipton, R., Lovász, L. and Rackoff, C. (1979) Random walks, universal traversal sequences, and the complexity of maze traversal. In Proc. 20th IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 218–233.Google Scholar
[3]Barlow, M. T., Pitman, J. W. and Yor, M. (1989) On Walsh's Brownian motions. Séminaire de Probabilités (Strasbourg) 23 275–293.Google Scholar
[4]Baxter, J. R. and Chacon, R. V. (1984) The equivalence of diffusions on networks to Brownian motion. Contemp. Math. 26 33–47.Google Scholar
[5]Brightwell, G. R. and Winkler, P. (1990) Extremal cover time for random walks on trees. J. Graph Theory 14 547–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Brightwell, G. R. and Winkler, P. (1990) Maximum hitting time for random walks on graphs. Random Struct. Alg. 1 263–276.Google Scholar
[7]Broder, A. (1990) Universal sequences and graph cover times: A short survey. In Sequences, Springer, pp. 109–122.Google Scholar
[8]Bussian, E. R. (1996) Bounding the edge cover time of random walks on graphs. PhD Thesis, Department of Mathematics, Georgia Institute of Technology. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA311706&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdfGoogle Scholar
[9]Chandra, A. K., Raghavan, P., Ruzzo, W. L., Smolensky, R. and Tiwari, P. (1989) The electrical resistance of a graph captures its commute and cover times. In Proc. 21st ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pp. 574–586.Google Scholar
[10]Dembo, A., Peres, Y., Rosen, J. and Zeitouni, O. (2004) Cover times for Brownian motion and random walks in two dimensions. Ann. of Math. 160 433–464.Google Scholar
[11]Ding, G., Lee, J. and Peres, Y. (2012) Cover times, blanket times, and majorizing measures. Ann. of Math. 175 1409–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Doyle, P. and Snell, J. L. (1984) Random Walks and Electrical Networks, Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
[13]Feige, U. (1995) A tight upper bound on the cover time for random walks on graphs. Random Struct. Alg. 6 51–54.Google Scholar
[14]Frank, H. F. and Durham, S. (1984) Random motion on binary trees. J. Appl. Probab. 21 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Georgakopoulos, A. (2010) Uniqueness of electrical currents in a network of finite total resistance. J. London Math. Soc. 82 256–272.Google Scholar
[16]Georgakopoulos, A. (2011) Graph topologies induced by edge lengths. In Infinite Graphs: Introductions, Connections, Surveys, special issue of Discrete Math. 311 1523–1542.Google Scholar
[17]Georgakopoulos, A. (2013) On graph-like continua of finite length. Preprint.Google Scholar
[18]Georgakopoulos, A. and Kolesko, K. (2013) Brownian motion on graph-like spaces. Preprint.Google Scholar
[19]Kahn, J. D., Linial, N., Nisan, N. and Saks, M. E. (1989) On the cover time of random walks on graphs. J. Theoret. Probab. 2 121–128.Google Scholar
[20]Karlin, A. and Raghavan, P. (1995) Random walks and undirected graph connectivity: A survey. In Discrete Probability and Algorithms, Vol. 72 of The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, Springer, pp. 95–101.Google Scholar
[21]Kigami, J. (2008) Analysis on Fractals, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[22]Lyons, R. with Peres, Y.Probability on Trees and Networks, Cambridge University Press, to appear.Google Scholar
[23]Mihail, M. and Papadimitriou, C. (1994) On the random walk method for protocol testing. In Computer Aided Verification, Vol. 818 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp. 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Mörters, P. and Peres, Y. (2010) Brownian Motion, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[25]Tetali, P. (1991) Random walks and the effective resistance of networks. J. Theoret. Probab. 4 101–109.Google Scholar
[26]Thomassen, C. and Vella, A. (2008) Graph-like continua, augmenting arcs, and Menger's theorem. Combinatorica 28 595–623.Google Scholar
[27]Varopoulos, N. T. (1985) Long range estimations for Markov chains. Bull. Sci. Math. 109 225–252.Google Scholar
[28]Wald, A. (1944) On cumulative sums of random variables. Ann. Math. Statist. 15 283–296.Google Scholar
[29]Walsh, J. (1978) A diffusion with discontinuous local time. Temps Locaux, Astérisque 52/5337–45.Google Scholar
[30]Winkler, P. and Zuckerman, D. (1996) Multiple cover time. Random Struct. Alg. 9 403–411.Google Scholar
[31]Zuckerman, D. (1989) Covering times of random walks on bounded-degree trees and other graphs. J. Theoret. Probab. 2 147–157.Google Scholar
[32]Zuckerman, D. (1991) On the time to traverse all edges of a graph. Inform. Process. Lett. 38 335–337.Google Scholar