Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:32:43.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Degree Distribution of Competition-Induced Preferential Attachment Graphs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2005

N. BERGER
Affiliation:
Microsoft Research, One Microsoft Way, Redmond WA 98052, USA (e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
C. BORGS
Affiliation:
Microsoft Research, One Microsoft Way, Redmond WA 98052, USA (e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
J. T. CHAYES
Affiliation:
Microsoft Research, One Microsoft Way, Redmond WA 98052, USA (e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
R. M. D'SOUZA
Affiliation:
Microsoft Research, One Microsoft Way, Redmond WA 98052, USA (e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected])
R. D. KLEINBERG
Affiliation:
MIT CSAIL, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge MA 02139, USA (e-mail: [email protected])

Abstract

We introduce a family of one-dimensional geometric growth models, constructed iteratively by locally optimizing the trade-offs between two competing metrics, and show that this family is equivalent to a family of preferential attachment random graph models with upper cut-offs. This is the first explanation of how preferential attachment can arise from a more basic underlying mechanism of local competition. We rigorously determine the degree distribution for the family of random graph models, showing that it obeys a power law up to a finite threshold and decays exponentially above this threshold.

We also rigorously analyse a generalized version of our graph process, with two natural parameters, one corresponding to the cut-off and the other a ‘fertility’ parameter. We prove that the general model has a power-law degree distribution up to a cut-off, and establish monotonicity of the power as a function of the two parameters. Limiting cases of the general model include the standard preferential attachment model without cut-off and the uniform attachment model.

Type
Paper
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)