Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T05:49:15.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equality of the Bond Percolation Critical Exponents for Two Pairs of Dual Lattices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2008

John C. Wierman
John C. Wierman
Affiliation:
Mathematical Sciences Department, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The substitution method is used to show that the percolative behaviour of the triangular and hexagonal lattices bond percolation models are similar near their critical probabilities. As a consequence, if the limits defining the critical exponents β and γ exist, these lattices have the same values of β and γ. Similarly, the method also shows equality of the β and γ values for bond percolation models on the bowtie lattice and its dual.

Type
Research Article
Information
Combinatorics, Probability and Computing , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 95 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Aizenman, M. and Barsky, D. J.. Sharpness of the phase transition in percolation models. Communications in Mathematical Physics 108, 489–526 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Chayes, J. T. and Chayes, L.. The mean field bound for the order parameter of Bernoulli percolation. Percolation Theory and Ergodic theory of Infinite Particle Systems (ed. Kesten, H.), pp. 49–71. Springer, Berlin (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Durrett, R.. Some general results concerning the critical exponents of percolation processes. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete 69, 421–437 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Grimmett, G.. Percolation. Springer, Berlin (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Kesten, H.. Percolation Theory for Mathematicians. Birkhäuser, Boston (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Kesten, H.. Scaling relations for 2D-percolation. Communications in Mathematical Physics 109, 109–156 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Kesten, H. and Zhang, Y.. Strict inequalities for some critical exponents in 2D-percolation. Journal of Statistical Physics 46, 1031–1055 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Menshikov, M. V.. Coincidence of critical points in percolation problems. Soviet Mathematics Doklady 33, 856–859 (1986).Google Scholar
[9] Newman, C. M.. Another critical exponent inequality for percolation: β≽2/δ. Journal of Statistical Physics 47, 695–699 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Nguyen, B. G.. Gap exponents for percolation processes with triangle condition. Journal of Statistical Physics 49, 235–243 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Nguyen, B. G.. Correlation length and its critical exponent for percolation processes. Journal of Statistical Physics 46, 517–523 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Preston, C. J.. A generalization of the FKG inequalities. Communications in Mathematical Physics 36, 233–241 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Stauffer, D.. Introduction to Percolation theory. Taylor and Francis, London (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Wierman, J. C.. Bond percolation critical probability bounds for the Kagomé lattice by a substitution method. Disorder in Physical Systems (ed. Grimmett, G. and Welsh, D. J. A.). Oxford University Press (1990).Google Scholar
[15] Wierman, J. C.. Bond percolation on honeycomb and triangular lattices. Advances in Applied Probability 13, 293–313 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Wierman, J. C.. A bond percolation critical probability determination based on the star-triangle transformation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 17, 1525–1530 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Yonezawa, F., Sakamoto, S. and Hori, M.. Percolation in two-dimensional lattices. II. The extent of universality. Physical Review B 40, 650–660 (1989).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed