Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:56:25.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uncertainty and Practical Reasoning in Clinical Psychiatry and Neuropsychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Andrew A. Nierenberg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 14 , Issue 6 , June 2009 , pp. 284 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

References

REFERENCES

1.Kahneman, D, Slovic, P, Tversky, A. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1982.Google Scholar
2.Tversky, A, Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185:1124–1131.Google Scholar
3.Rush, AJ. Strategies and tactics in the management of maintenance treatment for depressed patients. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60(Suppl 14):21–26, 31–35.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Rush, AJ, Prien, RF. From scientific knowledge to the clinical practice of psychopharmacology: Can the gap be bridged? Psychopharmacology Bull. 1995;31:7–20.Google Scholar
5.Schäfer, M. Nomothetic and Idiographic Methodology in Psychiatry–A historical-philosophical analysis. Med Health Care Philos. 1999;2:265–274.Google Scholar
6.Zwarenstein, M, Treweek, S. What kind of randomized trials do we need? J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:461–463.Google Scholar
7.Feinstein, AR, Horwitz, RI. Problems in the “Evidence” of “Evidence Based Medicine”. Am J Med 1997;103:529–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Smoller, JW, Nierenberg, AA. Small numbers, big impact. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 1999;7:109–113.Google Scholar
9.Klein, GA. Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998.Google Scholar
10.Slovic, P, Finucane, ML, Peters, E, MacGregor, DG. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal. 2004;24:311–322.Google Scholar
11.Nierenberg, AA, Smoller, JW, Eidelman, P, Wu, YP, Tilley, CA. Critical thinking about adverse drug effects: lessons from the psychology of risk and medical decision-making for clinical psychopharmacology. Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77:201–208.Google Scholar
12.Nierenberg, AA, Ostacher, MJ, Borrelli, DJ, et al.The integration of measurement and management for the treatment of bipolar disorder: A STEP-BD model of collaborative care in psychiatry. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(Suppl 11):3–7.Google Scholar
13.Trivedi, MH, Rush, AJ, Wisniewski, SR, et al.Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: Implications for clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:28–40.Google Scholar
14.Weiss, AP, Guidi, J, Fava, M. Closing the efficacy-effectiveness gap: translating both the what and the how from randomized controlled trials to clinical practice. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70:446–449.Google Scholar
15.Schwartz, D, Lellouch, J. Explanatory and Pragmatic Attitudes in Therapeutical Trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:499–505.Google Scholar
16.Montgomery, K. How Doctors Think: Clinical Judgment and the Practice of Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006.Google Scholar