Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:19:05.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Importance of achieving rapid treatment response in major depressive disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2023

Gustavo Alva Open the ORCID record for Gustavo Alva [Opens in a new window]
Gustavo Alva*
Affiliation:
ATP Clinical Research, Costa Mesa, CA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Gustavo Alva Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading contributor to disability worldwide and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Current pharmacologic treatment options may be ineffective for some patients and can pose several limitations and challenges, including suboptimal response and slow onset of action. Many of these therapies can take 6 to 8 weeks for patients to achieve response and 12 weeks or longer to demonstrate full clinical benefit. Delays in depressive symptom resolution are associated with poor symptomatic and functional outcomes, decreased quality of life, and increased burden on the healthcare system. Achieving response and remission of symptoms soon after diagnosis and treatment is associated with lower rates of relapse and a greater likelihood of functional recovery. An unmet need exists for innovative treatments that offer rapid and sustained effects. This editorial discusses the benefits of rapid improvement in depressive symptoms with available and investigational agents for patients with MDD.

Keywords

Antidepressantsdepressionmajor depressive disorderrapid responsesustained response
Type
Editorial
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 28 , Issue 5 , October 2023 , pp. 521 - 525
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

For patients living with major depressive disorder (MDD), delays in treatment response can lead to nonadherence, multiple failed therapies, and negative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes.Reference IsHak, Mirocha and James 1 , Reference Rush, Trivedi and Wisniewski 2 Current guidelines recommend starting pharmacologic antidepressant therapy (ADT) or psychotherapy as an initial treatment option for patients with mild-to-moderate MDD and both pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for those with moderate-to-severe MDD.Reference Gelenberg, Freeman and Markowitz 3 , 4 Standard-of-care (SOC) ADTs (eg, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors) have several treatment-limiting side effects in some patients, including sexual dysfunction, weight gain, and disturbed sleep, which may contribute to nonadherence.Reference Wang, Han and Bahk 5 -Reference Samples and Mojtabai 8 Accordingly, guidelines recommend a “start low, go slow” approach to dosing ADTs when treating patients with MDD; since most SOC ADTs typically take several weeks to achieve maximal efficacy, patients are encouraged to continue these ADTs for 6 to 8 weeks before increasing the dose or switching to another agent.Reference Gelenberg, Freeman and Markowitz 3 , Reference Gautam, Jain, Gautam, Vahia and Grover 9 As many as ≥50% of patients may not respond (as measured by ≥50% reduction in 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAMD-17] total score, a tool often used in clinical trials to assess depressive symptoms) to their initial ADT and will need changes to therapy—leading to a longer time to achieve therapeutic benefit, and in some instances, chronic treatment for sustained benefit.Reference Rush, Trivedi and Wisniewski 2 Patients in the STAR*D study who required >1 treatment step were less likely to achieve remission (HAMD-17 total score ≤7) and more likely to relapse than those who responded to their first ADT.Reference Rush, Trivedi and Wisniewski 2 A rapid response to treatment is associated with long-term remission, whereas patients with delayed response were more likely to experience residual symptoms, including anxiety, sleep disturbances, pain, and decreased concentration.Reference Romera, Pérez and Ciudad 6 , Reference Nierenberg, Husain and Trivedi 7 To prevent relapse, close attention should be placed on patients who require a relatively long time to achieve remission.Reference Kubo, Sakurai, Tani, Watanabe, Mimura and Uchida 10 Together, protracted treatment with SOC ADTs, residual symptoms, and delayed remission can lead to negative impacts on HRQoL, with ≥50% of patients facing severely impaired HRQoL after trying multiple lines of therapy.Reference IsHak, Mirocha and James 1 , Reference Kelly, Posternak and Alpert 11 In contrast, patients who experience a shorter time to response or remission can experience fewer mental, physical, and financial hardships compared with those who experience a longer time to response or remission.Reference Romera, Pérez and Ciudad 6 , Reference Arnaud, Suthoff, Tavares, Zhang and Ravindranath 12 The negative impacts of a relatively long time-to-effect with SOC ADTs underscore the need for novel therapies that can provide patients with MDD (including those experiencing suicidal ideation or behavior) improvements in depressive symptoms that are rapid (ie, within 1 week) and sustained. 13

Currently available interventions with rapid and sustained improvement

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), which involves applying electrical stimulation to a patient’s brain to produce a seizure, is an FDA-approved nonpharmacologic intervention associated with rapid and sustained effects in patients with severe treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and clinical emergencies that require rapid improvements in depressive symptoms (Table 1).Reference Kellner, Greenberg, Murrough, Bryson, Briggs and Pasculli 14 , Reference Li, Yao and Sun 15 ECT is believed to treat depression by inducing neurogenesis and increasing neurotrophic signaling and is considered an effective treatment option for patients with MDD. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is another FDA-approved, rapid-acting nonpharmacologic therapy to treat adults with MDD for whom prior ADTs failed.Reference Cohen, Bikson, Badran and George 32 , Reference Croarkin and MacMaster 33 TMS noninvasively uses a strong pulsated magnetic field to stimulate a specific area of the cerebral cortex, leading to increased neural activity in the region.Reference Garnaat, Yuan, Wang, Philip and Carpenter 34 Although its precise mechanism of action is unclear, TMS is hypothesized to address inhibitory-excitatory imbalance between gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate neurotransmission. Another form of TMS, the Stanford accelerated intelligent neuromodulation therapy, also received FDA approval to treat MDD in adults for whom prior ADTs failed.Reference Cole, Phillips and Bentzley 18 Both ECT and TMS approaches provide rapid improvements in depressive symptoms within 1 week that may be sustained for several weeks.Reference Husain, Rush and Fink 16 -Reference Cole, Phillips and Bentzley 18 , Reference Yesavage, Fairchild and Mi 35 However, a limitation of these approaches is that they require administration by trained providers at specialized treatment locations, in some cases over multiple sessions.

Table 1. Currently available and investigational treatments with rapid and sustained response in patients with MDD

Abbreviations: 5-HT2A, 5-hydroxytryptamine type 2A; ADT, antidepressant therapy; ECT, electroconvulsive therapy; GABAAR, gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor; MDD, major depressive disorder; MDE, major depressive episode; NAS, neuroactive steroid; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; PAM, positive allosteric modulator; PPD, postpartum depression; SAINT, Stanford accelerated intelligent neuromodulation therapy; TMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation; TRD, treatment-resistant depression; XR, extended release.

Several pharmacotherapies with rapid and sustained effects are approved or used off-label as monotherapies or adjunct therapies for the treatment of MDD and other depressive disorders. Ketamine, esketamine, and dextromethorphan-bupropion are thought to act as N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists and elicit antidepressant effects through modulation of glutamate signaling (Table 1). These agents demonstrate rapid effects in as little as an hour, with improvements in depressive symptoms sustained up to 6 weeks.Reference Marwaha, Palmer, Suppes, Cons, Young and Upthegrove 21 -Reference Iosifescu, Jones and O’Gorman 23 However, ketamine and esketamine are limited by dissociative side effects and the potential for abuse, as well as the need for in-clinic visits to administer treatments.Reference Marwaha, Palmer, Suppes, Cons, Young and Upthegrove 21 Additionally, dextromethorphan is administered with bupropion, a potent cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor that increases the risk for drug-drug interactions and is associated with an increased risk of seizures. 36 The antidepressant activity of glutamatergic drugs supports the hypothesis that excitation-inhibition signaling in the brain is dysregulated in depression, suggesting that modulation of excitatory (glutamate) and inhibitory (GABA) signaling is a promising target for novel ADTs. Brexanolone, a neuroactive steroid and positive allosteric modulator (PAM) of GABAA receptors (GABAARs), is the only FDA-approved pharmacologic therapy for postpartum depression (PPD) and elicits rapid improvements in depressive symptoms in as early as 24 hours, but is limited by the need for a 60-hour intravenous infusion in a clinical setting.Reference Meltzer-Brody, Colquhoun and Riesenberg 20 , Reference Marwaha, Palmer, Suppes, Cons, Young and Upthegrove 21 , 37

Dopamine and serotonin partial agonist antipsychotics, aripiprazole and brexpiprazole, also provide rapid and sustained benefits, but their use is limited by the potential for psychomotor side effects such as akathisia.Reference Berman, Marcus and Swanink 24 , Reference Thase, Youakim and Skuban 25 Quetiapine is a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor antipsychotic used as an adjunct to SOC ADTs that also demonstrates rapid and sustained benefits, but is associated with side effects (eg, weight gain) that may be treatment limiting.Reference Bauer, Pretorius, Constant, Earley, Szamosi and Brecher 26 , Reference El-Khalili, Joyce and Atkinson 27 While there are available therapies that, alone or in combination with SOC ADTs, may help to achieve rapid relief from depressive symptoms, their limitations, both practical and therapeutic, indicate a need for newer therapies.

Investigational pharmacologic interventions with the potential for rapid and sustained improvement

Psychedelics have emerged as a promising class of investigational therapies with the potential for rapid and sustained improvements in depressive symptoms for patients with MDD (Table 1). Psilocybin, a 5-hydroxy-tryptamine type 2A receptor agonist, is a psychedelic compound that can improve depressive symptoms in conjunction with psychotherapy, with studies demonstrating effects 1 week postdose that were sustained through 8 weeks without maintenance dosing.Reference Marwaha, Palmer, Suppes, Cons, Young and Upthegrove 21 , Reference Davis, Barrett and May 28 However, some patients treated with psilocybin have experienced emotional effects, including anxiousness, fear, and other emotional distress during treatment sessions, and use of psilocybin is limited by the need to receive treatment in a clinical setting and remain under supervision for several hours.Reference Marwaha, Palmer, Suppes, Cons, Young and Upthegrove 21 , Reference Davis, Barrett and May 28 , Reference Carhart-Harris, Giribaldi and Watts 38 Esmethadone, a novel NMDA receptor antagonist, can provide improvements in as little as 4 days of treatment in patients for whom up to 3 ADTs failed, but its long-term efficacy is unknown.Reference Marwaha, Palmer, Suppes, Cons, Young and Upthegrove 21

Modulation of GABAergic signaling is an evolving approach to treat MDD among investigational therapies (Table 1). Zuranolone is a GABAAR PAM and neuroactive steroid that is thought to upregulate GABAAR expression and enhance GABAergic signaling via synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAARs; zuranolone is currently in clinical development as an oral, once-daily, 14-day treatment course for MDD and PPD in adults.Reference Gunduz-Bruce, Silber and Kaul 29 , Reference Clayton, Deligiannidis and Lasster 30 , Reference Althaus, Ackley and Belfort 39 -Reference Hoffmann, Nomikos and Kaul 41 Targeting both synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAARs distinguishes zuranolone from other GABAergic drugs, such as benzodiazepines, which only target synaptic receptors.Reference Althaus, Ackley and Belfort 39 Across several clinical trials, patients with MDD or PPD treated with zuranolone experienced rapid improvements in depressive symptoms that were sustained for several weeks beyond the 14-day treatment course; the most common side effects included headache, dizziness, somnolence, and sedation, which were mostly mild or moderate in severity.Reference Gunduz-Bruce, Silber and Kaul 29 , Reference Deligiannidis, Meltzer-Brody and Gunduz-Bruce 31 , Reference Clayton, Lasser and Brown 42 Interim results from an ongoing, open-label, longitudinal study of zuranolone showed that most patients who responded at day 15 received ≤2 treatment courses during ≤1 year of follow-up, suggesting that response to treatment is rapid and sustained.Reference Cutler, Aaronson and Mattingly 43 , Reference Cutler, Aaronson and Mattingly 44

Conclusions

The therapeutic landscape for MDD is shifting to better address the delay in relief of symptoms experienced with current SOC ADTs. Patients with MDD with delayed response to treatment often experience worse clinical outcomes and lower HRQoL compared with those with rapid response. Some of the available treatments for patients with MDD demonstrate rapid improvement in depressive symptoms (eg, ECT, TMS, and esketamine) but are targeted for those with severe depression or TRD and require treatment at a specialized site with direct supervision by healthcare professionals, which may be particularly challenging for patients who are unable to find time to visit a treatment center or for patients in rural areas. Novel investigational therapeutic options offer the potential to achieve therapeutic efficacy within 1 week of treatment and demonstrate positive benefits, including a shorter time to remission, fewer residual symptoms, and greater HRQoL. Furthermore, several of the investigational agents are not associated with some of the treatment-limiting side effects commonly observed with SOC ADTs, such as sexual dysfunction, weight gain, and disturbed sleep. For some patients, these investigational therapies demonstrate favorable benefit-to-risk profiles relative to SOC ADTs. As more pharmacologic options with rapid and sustained effects enter clinical development and become available, it will be necessary to assess the accessibility of these treatment options and to adjust treatment expectations of patients and physicians. As such, a re-evaluation of the current “start low, go slow” clinical approach to pharmacotherapy for depression is critical, and will likely shift to one that targets individualized therapy that rapidly improves depressive symptoms without a significant side effect burden and need for chronic treatment.

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Matthew Brown, PhD, and Jay Parekh, PharmD, of Symbiotix, LLC, and Ryan Coleman, PhD, of AlphaBioCom, LLC, for providing medical writing assistance and editorial support, which were funded by Sage Therapeutics, Inc., and Biogen Inc.

Financial support

This work was funded by Sage Therapeutics, Inc., and Biogen Inc. During the development process, Sage Therapeutics, Inc., and Biogen Inc., had the opportunity to review and comment on the manuscript, and the author retained full editorial control and provided final approval on all content. Medical writing assistance and editorial support were provided by Symbiotix, LLC, and AlphaBioCom, LLC, and funded by Sage Therapeutics, Inc., and Biogen Inc. The author has received research funding from Sage Therapeutics, Inc., AbbVie, Acadia, Alector, Athira, Avanir, Eisai, Lilly, LivaNova, and Teva.

Author contribution

Conceptualization: G.A.; Writing—original draft: G.A.; Writing—review and editing: G.A.

Disclosure

The author has served as a consultant for Sage Therapeutics, Inc., Biogen Inc., AbbVie, Acadia, Alfa Sigma, Alkermes, Avanir, Axsome, Janssen, Lundbeck, Myriad, Otsuka, Sunovion, Takeda, Teva, and Vanda; and served as a speaker for Sage Therapeutics, Inc., Biogen Inc., AbbVie, Acadia, Alfa Sigma, Alkermes, Avanir, Axsome, Intracellular, Janssen, Lundbeck, LivaNova, Myriad, Neurocrine, Otsuka, Sunovion, Takeda, and Teva.

References

IsHak, WW, Mirocha, J, James, D, et al. Quality of life in major depressive disorder before/after multiple steps of treatment and one-year follow-up. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015;131(1):51–60. doi:10.1111/acps.12301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rush, AJ, Trivedi, MH, Wisniewski, SR, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(11):1905–1917. doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelenberg, AJ, Freeman, MP, Markowitz, JC. American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(suppl):1–152.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Depression Across Three Age Cohorts. https://www.apa.org/depression-guideline. Accessed January 16, 2023.Google Scholar
Wang, S-M, Han, C, Bahk, W-M, et al. Addressing the side effects of contemporary antidepressant drugs: a comprehensive review. Chonnam Med J. 2018;54(2):101–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romera, I, Pérez, V, Ciudad, A, et al. Residual symptoms and functioning in depression, does the type of residual symptom matter? A post-hoc analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13(1):51. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-13-51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nierenberg, AA, Husain, MM, Trivedi, MH, et al. Residual symptoms after remission of major depressive disorder with citalopram and risk of relapse: a STAR*D report. Psychol Med. 2010;40(1):41–50. doi:10.1017/s0033291709006011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samples, H, Mojtabai, R. Antidepressant self-discontinuation: results from the collaborative psychiatric epidemiology surveys. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(5):455–462. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201400021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gautam, S, Jain, A, Gautam, M, Vahia, VN, Grover, S. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of depression. Indian J Psychiatry. 2017;59(suppl 1):S34–S50. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.196973.Google ScholarPubMed
Kubo, K, Sakurai, H, Tani, H, Watanabe, K, Mimura, M, Uchida, H. Predicting relapse from the time to remission during the acute treatment of depression: a re-analysis of the STAR*D data. J Affect Disord. 2023;320:710–715. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, K, Posternak, M, Alpert, JE. Toward achieving optimal response: understanding and managing antidepressant side effects. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2008;10(4):409–418. doi:10.31887/DCNS.2008.10.4/kkelly.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnaud, A, Suthoff, E, Tavares, RM, Zhang, X, Ravindranath, AJ. The increasing economic burden with additional steps of pharmacotherapy in major depressive disorder. Pharmacoeconomics. 2021;39(6):691–706. doi:10.1007/s40273-021-01021-w.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Major depressive disorder: developing drugs for treatment (June 2018). https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/major-depressive-disorder-developing-drugs-treatment. Accessed January 30, 2023.Google Scholar
Kellner, CH, Greenberg, RM, Murrough, JW, Bryson, EO, Briggs, MC, Pasculli, RM. ECT in treatment-resistant depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169(12):1238–1244. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12050648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, M, Yao, X, Sun, L, et al. Effects of electroconvulsive therapy on depression and its potential mechanism. Front Psychol. 2020;11:80 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husain, MM, Rush, AJ, Fink, M, et al. Speed of response and remission in major depressive disorder with acute electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): a consortium for research in ECT (CORE) report. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65(4):485–491. doi:10.4088/jcp.v65n0406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y-M, Li, N, Yang, L-L, et al. Randomized controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with paroxetine for the treatment of patients with first-episode major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2017;254:18–23. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, EJ, Phillips, AL, Bentzley, BS, et al. Stanford neuromodulation therapy (SNT): a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2022;179(2):132–141. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20101429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanes, S, Colquhoun, H, Gunduz-Bruce, H, et al. Brexanolone (SAGE-547 injection) in post-partum depression: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10093):480–489. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31264-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzer-Brody, S, Colquhoun, H, Riesenberg, R, et al. Brexanolone injection in post-partum depression: two multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2018;392(10152):1058–1070. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31551-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marwaha, S, Palmer, E, Suppes, T, Cons, E, Young, AH, Upthegrove, R. Novel and emerging treatments for major depression. Lancet. 2023;401(10371):141–153. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02080-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murrough, JW, Iosifescu, DV, Chang, LC, et al. Antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: a two-site randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170(10):1134–1142. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13030392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iosifescu, DV, Jones, A, O’Gorman, C, et al. Efficacy and safety of AXS-05 (dextromethorphan-bupropion) in patients with major depressive disorder: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial (GEMINI). J Clin Psychiatry. 2022;83(4):21m14345. doi:10.4088/JCP.21m14345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berman, RM, Marcus, RN, Swanink, R, et al. The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68(6):843–853. doi:10.4088/jcp.v68n0604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thase, ME, Youakim, JM, Skuban, A, et al. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive brexpiprazole 2 mg in major depressive disorder: a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with inadequate response to antidepressants. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76(9):1224–1231. doi:10.4088/JCP.14m09688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauer, M, Pretorius, HW, Constant, EL, Earley, WR, Szamosi, J, Brecher, M. Extended-release quetiapine as adjunct to an antidepressant in patients with major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(4):540–549. doi:10.4088/jcp.08m04629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Khalili, N, Joyce, M, Atkinson, S, et al. Extended-release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder (MDD) in patients with an inadequate response to ongoing antidepressant treatment: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;13(7):917–932. doi:10.1017/s1461145710000015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, AK, Barrett, FS, May, DG, et al. Effects of psilocybin-assisted therapy on major depressive disorder: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(5):481–489. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunduz-Bruce, H, Silber, C, Kaul, I, et al. Trial of SAGE-217 in patients with major depressive disorder. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(10):903–911. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1815981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayton, AH, Deligiannidis, KM, Lasster, R, et al. Sustained benefits of zuranolone in patients with major depressive disorder: results from the LANDSCAPE clinical development program. Paper presented at: Psych Congress; September 17-20, 2022; New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Deligiannidis, KM, Meltzer-Brody, S, Gunduz-Bruce, H, et al. Effect of zuranolone vs placebo in postpartum depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(9):951–959. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.1559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, SL, Bikson, M, Badran, BW, George, MS. A visual and narrative timeline of US FDA milestones for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) devices. Brain Stimul. 2022;15(1):73–75. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2021.11.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croarkin, PE, MacMaster, FP. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for adolescent depression. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2019;28(1):33–43. doi:10.1016/j.chc.2018.07.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnaat, SL, Yuan, S, Wang, H, Philip, NS, Carpenter, LL. Updates on transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2018;41(3):419–431. doi:10.1016/j.psc.2018.04.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yesavage, JA, Fairchild, JK, Mi, Z, et al. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on treatment-resistant major depression in US veterans: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(9):884–893. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auvelity. Prescribing Information. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.; October 2022. https://www.axsome.com/auvelity-prescribing-information.pdf. Accessed January 16, 2023.Google Scholar
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves first treatment for post-partum depression. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-treatment-post-partum-depression. Accessed January 30, 2023.Google Scholar
Carhart-Harris, R, Giribaldi, B, Watts, R, et al. Trial of psilocybin versus escitalopram for depression. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(15):1402–1411. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2032994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Althaus, AL, Ackley, MA, Belfort, GM, et al. Preclinical characterization of zuranolone (SAGE-217), a selective neuroactive steroid GABA(A) receptor positive allosteric modulator. Neuropharmacology. 2020;181:108333. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez Botella, G, Salituro, FG, Harrison, BL, et al. Neuroactive steroids. 2. 3α-hydroxy-3β-methyl-21-(4-cyano-1H-pyrazol-1′-yl)-19-nor-5β-pregnan-20-one (SAGE-217): a clinical next generation neuroactive steroid positive allosteric modulator of the (γ-aminobutyric acid) A receptor. J Med Chem. 2017;60(18):7810–7819. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, E, Nomikos, GG, Kaul, I, et al. SAGE-217, a novel GABA(A) receptor positive allosteric modulator: clinical pharmacology and tolerability in randomized phase I dose-finding studies. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020;59(1):111–120. doi:10.1007/s40262-019-00801-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayton, AH, Lasser, R, Brown, C, et al. Zuranolone in major depressive disorder: results from the phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, WATERFALL study. Paper presented at: Psych Congress; October 29-November 1, 2021, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Cutler, AJ, Aaronson, ST, Mattingly, GW, et al. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of zuranolone repeat treatment courses in adult patients with major depressive disorder—an analysis of the open-label, phase 3 SHORELINE study. Poster presented at: Psych Congress; 2022, New Orleans, LA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, AJ, Aaronson, ST, Mattingly, GW, et al. Safety and efficacy of zuranolone 50 mg and need for repeat treatment courses in the open-label, phase 3 SHORELINE study of adult patients with major depressive disorder. Poster presented at: Psych Congress; 2022, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Currently available and investigational treatments with rapid and sustained response in patients with MDD