Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T13:01:28.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effectiveness of Esketamine as a Treatment for Depression: A Real-World Survey of Disease Improvement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2025

Amanda Teeple
Affiliation:
1Janssen Scientific Affairs, Titusville, NJ
Kruti Joshi
Affiliation:
1Janssen Scientific Affairs, Titusville, NJ
Jason Shepherd
Affiliation:
2Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
Alexander Gillespie
Affiliation:
2Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
Nikisha Grant
Affiliation:
2Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
Ashley Mortimer
Affiliation:
2Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
Sophie Kirkman
Affiliation:
2Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
Manish Jha
Affiliation:
3Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care; UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the second leading cause of disability in the US, and increases the risk of poor health outcomes. This analysis assessed the real-world benefit and availability of esketamine for patients with difficult-to-treat MDD.

Methods

Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World Depression Disease Specific Programme XII (DSPTM), a cross-sectional retrospective survey of physicians and their patients in the United States in 2022. Physicians reported details for patients with MDD receiving esketamine regarding their prescribed medication (including access), daily functioning and disease improvement whilst receiving esketamine (reported by Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I)),)) change in depression severity (reported by Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale (CGI-S)) and physician satisfaction. CGI-I responses measured level of disease improvement since the initiation of current depression treatment regimen (‘Very much worse=1’ to ‘Very much improved=7’). CGI-S response options were converted to numerics to measure level of severity change (‘Normal, not at all ill=0’ to ‘Among the most extremely ill patients=6’) and compared at time of esketamine initiation and currently. Physician satisfaction with medication’s ability to achieve patient treatment goals was derived from a numeric scale (where ’Not at all satisfied=1’ to ’Very satisfied=5’).

Results

94 patients with MDD were currently receiving esketamine. Mean age was 44.3 (SD 13.26) and 47% were male. 26% of patients had been receiving esketamine for 0-3 months, 5% for 3-6 months, 15% for 6-12 months, 23% for 1-2 years and 30% for more than 2 years. CGI-I results showed physicians rated depression as improved in 98% of patients receiving esketamine >30 days. CGI-S results showed that patients receiving esketamine 1-30 days had a mean improvement of 1.2 while patients receiving esketamine for >30 days showed mean improvement of 0.9. 80% of physicians reported high satisfaction (score of 4 or 5) with esketamine’s ability to achieve patient treatment goals.

In patients receiving esketamine >30 days physicians reported that 62% could function better socially, 53% had a better quality of life, 41% had increased ability to work, 37% could better meet their own basic needs and 34% had an improvement in overall general health.

When prescribing esketamine, the treatment was only “available without restrictions” for 18% of patients, whilst 82% experienced at least some restrictions.

Conclusion

Physicians reported rapid and sustained clinical improvement among patients with MDD treated with esketamine in this real-world survey.

Funding

The analysis described here used data from Adelphi Real World Depression DSP. The DSP is a wholly owned Adelphi Real World product. Janssen is one of the multiple subscribers to the DSP.

Type
Abstracts
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press