Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-xc2pj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-31T04:53:26.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correlation analysis of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children aged 6–14: based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2025

Xianhua Li
Affiliation:
Paediatrician, Longyan First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Longyan, Fujian, China
Yan Luo
Affiliation:
Paediatrician, Longyan First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Longyan, Fujian, China
Xiaodan Zeng
Affiliation:
Paediatrician, Longyan First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Longyan, Fujian, China
Xuewen Qiu
Affiliation:
Paediatrician, Longyan First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Longyan, Fujian, China
Yang Hua
Affiliation:
Paediatrician, Longyan First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Longyan, Fujian, China
Lingling Zhan*
Affiliation:
Paediatrician, Longyan First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Longyan, Fujian, China
*
Corresponding author: Lingling Zhan; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to elucidate the association between the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and the risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children aged 6–14 based on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data.

Method

We utilized data from NHANES 2013–2014 for analysis, with PLR as the independent variable and ADHD as the dependent variable. Weighted logistic regression was used to construct the relationship model. The subgroup analysis with stratification and adjustment for confounding factors was conducted to explore the association between PLR and ADHD risk in children aged 6–14. Finally, the restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was carried out to explore the non-linear relationship between PLR and ADHD.

Results

The study included 1455 samples with 91 ADHD cases. A significant positive association (OR > 1, P < 0.05) was observed between PLR and ADHD risk in the multivariate weighted logistic regression model. Race and asthma status remarkably influenced the relationship between PLR and ADHD (P for interaction<0.05). The positive association between PLR and ADHD risk was particularly significant (P < 0.05) in boys, children born to mothers aged 20–29, and children with asthma. The RCS curve indicated a non-linear association between PLR and ADHD risk (P-non-linear = 0.0040), with OR > 1 when PLR ≥ 106.40.

Conclusion

Increased PLR elevated the risk of ADHD, especially in males, children born to mothers aged 20–29, and children with asthma, with 106.40 possibly being an effective threshold for PLR’s impact on ADHD risk.

Type
Original Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurodevelopmental disorder diagnosed in childhood, characterized by symptoms such as inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity, which deviate from typical developmental patterns.Reference Magnus, Nazir, Anilkumar and Shaban 1 The global prevalence of ADHD in children ranges from 2% to 7%.Reference Sayal, Prasad, Daley, Ford and Coghill 2 Although it has long been considered a childhood disorder, in most cases it persists into adulthood.Reference Pagan, Huizar, Short, Gotcher and Schmidt 3 Children with ADHD face many challenges, including poor cognitive and learning abilities,Reference McDougal, Gracie, Oldridge, Stewart, Booth and Rhodes 4 as well as higher rates of mental disorders and more healthcare service requirements.Reference Danielson, Visser, Chronis-Tuscano and DuPaul 5 , Reference Song 6 ADHD is a costly disease for society, with an estimated 6.1–16.3% of children and adolescents in the United States affected by ADHD.Reference Danielson, Holbrook and Bitsko 7 The annual social excess cost associated with ADHD is as high as $33.2 billion.Reference Schein, Adler and Childress 8 Therefore, identifying potential factors related to ADHD is of significant importance for preventing and reducing the burden of the disease.

However, merely identifying and intervening based on symptoms is insufficient to effectively reduce the incidence and economic costs of the disease. In recent years, research has begun to focus on the potential role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of ADHD. Inflammation is a biological response characterized by elevated levels of acute-phase proteins and cytokines in circulation and increased infiltration of immune cells.Reference Roe 9 Inflammation is tightly linked with developmental changes in the brain, and cytokines produced during inflammatory events can enter the brain barrier through various pathways and affect the central nervous system structure.Reference Suss, Hoffmann and Rothe 10 There is increasing evidence proving that the inflammatory process is one of the main pathophysiological mechanisms of ADHD.Reference Leffa, Torres and Rohde 11 Therefore, exploring the association between inflammatory markers and ADHD is particularly important.

The platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) has attracted attention as a low-cost, simple, and applicable test for predicting clinical outcomes of chronic low-grade inflammation and neuroimmune diseases.Reference Erre, Paliogiannis and Castagna 12 Reference Mazza, Lucchi, Rossetti and Clerici 14 Previous studies have demonstrated that PLR plays an essential role in the pathophysiology of ADHD in children, and it may be a potential inflammatory marker for childhood ADHD.Reference Akinci and Uzun 15 , Reference Avcil 16 These studies have mostly focused on ADHD children and adolescents aged 6–17,Reference Fabio, Orsino, Lecciso, Levante and Suriano 17 lacking specific research on children aged 6–14. However, the age range of 6–14 years is a crucial period for children’s neurodevelopment.Reference Tapia-Serrano, Esteban-Cornejo, Rodriguez-Ayllon, Vaquero-Solis, Sanchez-Oliva and Sanchez-Miguel 18 , Reference Gilboa and Helmer 19 Relevant studies indicate that ADHD is most common among children aged 6–12 years,Reference Stuhec and Locatelli 20 with an increasing prevalence in the 10–14 age group.Reference Sayal, Prasad, Daley, Ford and Coghill 2 This suggests that children in this age range may face a higher risk of ADHD, and the inflammatory processes occurring during this developmental stage may play a crucial role in the onset and progression of the disease. Additionally, about 1/3 of mental disorders begin before the age of 14Reference Solmi, Radua and Olivola 21; identifying and understanding inflammatory markers during this age range may also provide a key opportunity for early intervention and prevention. Therefore, focusing on this age group is crucial for developing targeted strategies for the prevention and treatment of ADHD.

Building on this, this study utilized the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database to investigate the association between PLR and ADHD in children aged 6–14. The aim was to uncover potential factors influencing this association and explore the potential role of PLR in the pathogenesis of ADHD. We hypothesized that an elevated PLR may be associated with an increased risk of developing ADHD.

2. Methods

2.1. Data source and study population

The NHANES database is a stratified, multi-stage study conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) of the United States (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm). This database is freely accessible and its main feature is to assess the health and nutritional status of the US population through a combination of interviews, physical examinations, and laboratory tests. The NHANES data obtained the approval of the NCHS Institutional Review Board and informed consent from participants.

The initial sample of this study included 10 175 respondents from the 2013–2014 cycle. To ensure the representativeness of the sample and the integrity of the data, we established the following inclusion and exclusion criteria:

Inclusion Criteria: (1) Children aged 6–14 years; (2) Complete data on platelet count and lymphocyte count; (3) Detailed ADHD history information and data on the use of ADHD-related prescription medications provided in the NHANES survey.

Exclusion Criteria: (1) Respondents whose age did not meet the requirements, with a total of 8243 excluded; (2) Respondents with missing data on platelet count, lymphocyte count, or ADHD prescription medication status, with a total of 116 excluded; (3) Respondents with missing covariate data, with a total of 361 excluded. After this screening process, a total of 1455 eligible respondents were included in the study sample. The detailed screening process for this study is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1. The flowchart of sample selection in NHANES 2013–2014.

2.2. PLR

The PLR data collection was based on the Beckman Coulter DxH800 instrument in the NHANES Mobile Examination Center (MEC) for complete blood cell counts of all participants. The whole blood count analysis of platelet count and lymphocyte count was performed using the five-part classification. PLR was calculated using the formula of platelet count and lymphocyte count. PLR = platelet count/lymphocyte count.Reference Chen, Sun, Jin, Zhou and Li 22

2.3. ADHD

The ADHD data collection was based on detailed information about medical history and prescription drugs obtained from participants in the NHANES questionnaire. Participants were clustered into two groups based on ICD-10-CM codes, one group being the ADHD patients with ADHD medication treatment, and the other group being the non-ADHD population (control group). The code of ICD-10-CM is F90 (F90: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders) 23.

2.4. Variables

In this project, gender, race, poverty-to-income ratio (PIR), age, dietary inflammatory index (DII), maternal age at childbirth, smoking during pregnancy, health insurance status, asthma, monocyte count, eosinophil count, segmented neutrophil count, and basophil count were identified as potential confounding factors. The age of children selected for this experiment was limited to 6–14 years old. Race was classified as Mexican, other Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and other races. The classification criteria for PIR were ≤ 1.3 (low income), 1.3–3.5 (low to medium income), and > 3.5 (high income).Reference Stebbins, Noppert, Aiello, Cordoba, Ward and Feinstein 24 The maternal age at childbirth and smoking status during pregnancy were based on personal interview data of children aged ≤15 years: (1) maternal age at childbirth: How old was your biological mother when you were born? (2) smoking status during pregnancy: Did your biological mother smoke during pregnancy? Asthma was defined as whether a doctor or other health professional had ever told you that you had asthma. If participants answered yes, they were considered asthma patients.Reference Wen, Wang, Giri and Guo 25 Health insurance status was defined as whether the participant had health insurance or other types of healthcare plans, with answers “yes” or “no.” Blood samples from participants were obtained using the Beckman Coulter DxH 800 instrument in the MEC to obtain complete blood count (CBC) and blood cell distribution.Reference Liu, Wang, Li, Li and Zhang 26 The collected CBC information included monocyte count, segmented neutrophil count, eosinophil count, and basophil count.Reference Klasson, Sadhir and Pontzer 27

The DII data were based on two 24-hour dietary recalls conducted face-to-face in NHANES, followed by a telephone interview 3–10 days later to assess dietary intake. The 24-hour dietary recall questionnaire collected information on food types and portion sizes, while the food frequency questionnaire asked about food consumption frequency. The average intake of food was estimated as the average of two dietary recalls for each participant in the survey period. In this study, 28 food parameters were included to calculate the DII, including carbohydrates, proteins, alcohol, fiber, total fats, cholesterol, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), saturated fats, monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), n-3 fatty acids, niacin, vitamin A, n-6 fatty acids, thiamine (vitamin B1), riboflavin (vitamin B2), vitamin B12, vitamin B6, vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, selenium, iron, magnesium, folate, beta-carotene, caffeine, zinc, and energy. Calculation steps: Z-score = (daily intake of a certain dietary component or nutrient - global mean daily intake) / standard deviation of the global mean daily intake of that dietary component or nutrient. To minimize the impact of right-skewness, the Z-score was converted to a percentile (minimizing the impact of outliers/right-skewness), and then the value was doubled and subtracted by 1 to achieve a symmetric distribution with 0 as the center. Finally, we multiplied the total inflammation score for each dietary component to calculate the inflammation index for each dietary component or nutrient to obtain the individual DII. Then, we added up the DII scores for the 28 foods to obtain the participants’ final DII scores. The DII scores ranged from negative to positive, with lower DII negative scores indicating anti-inflammatory effects and higher DII positive scores indicating pro-inflammatory effects.Reference Zhang, Jia and Lai 28 , Reference Shivappa, Steck, Hurley, Hussey and Hebert 29 n-3 fatty acids included eicosatetraenoic acid (20:5), linolenic acid (18:3), clupanodonic acid (22:5), stearidonic acid (18:4), and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6). n-6 fatty acids included arachidonic acid (20:4) and linoleic acid (18:2).Reference Chen, Sun and Zhang 30

2.5. Statistical analysis

We employed the Tableone package to generate baseline tables. Based on the general population characteristics and whether they have ADHD, we grouped the respondents and drew baseline tables. Categorical variables were represented by n(%), while continuous variables were represented by mean(sd) (n: sample size without weight adjustment; n(%): proportion with weight adjustment; mean: mean value with weight adjustment; sd: standard deviation with weight adjustment). The survey package was utilized to construct a weighted logistic regression model of PLR and ADHD. The stratified analysis was carried out on the categorical variables in the model without adjusting for confounding factors. A likelihood ratio test was applied to the interaction term P-values of the stratified logistics regression model with all confounders adjusted. P < 0.05 indicates a significant difference. PLR was stratified by using weighted tertiles. The survey package was employed to construct a weighted logistic regression model of PLR and ADHD with adjusted confounding factors. We performed subgroup analysis on confounding factors and gender factors for interaction terms with P < 0.10 in the weighted logistic regression model of PLR and ADHD. In the weighted logistic regression model after adjusting for all confounding factors, restricted cubic splines (RCS) were utilized to investigate the association between PLR and ADHD. The models in this study included the Crude model without adjustment. Model I adjusted gender, age, race, PIR, maternal age at childbirth, smoking during pregnancy, asthma, and health insurance status. Model II adjusted gender, age, race, PIR, maternal age at childbirth, smoking during pregnancy, asthma, health insurance status, DII, monocyte count, segmented neutrophil count, eosinophil count, and basophil count. All statistical analyses were carried out by using R (V4.2.2) software.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline characteristics of the participants

A total of 1455 eligible participants were included in this project. The overall distribution of characteristics is shown in Table 1. There were 91 ADHD patients, with a mean age of 9.81 ± 2.34 years. The proportion of male patients was considerably higher (82.82% vs 54.10%, P = 0.004), and more patients had mothers who smoked during pregnancy (31.82% vs 13.28%, P = 0.002). The PLR value of children with ADHD (122.95 ± 36.64) was considerably higher than that of the non-ADHD population (106.86 ± 36.84, P = 0.002).

Table 1. Characteristics of NHANES participants between 2013–2014

DII, dietary inflammatory index; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio.

Note: Categorical and continuous variables are expressed as n (%) and mean (sd), respectively. n: unweighted; n (%), mean and sd: weighted.

3.2. Stratified analysis

As shown in Table 2, stratified analysis of gender, race, maternal age at childbirth, smoking during pregnancy, PIR, asthma, and health insurance status indicated a positive correlation between PLR and the risk of ADHD in the population of boys, the population with PIR > 3.5, children born to mothers aged 20–39 at delivery, children born to non-smoking mothers during pregnancy, and children with asthma (OR > 1, P < 0.05). The interaction test between confounding factors and PLR suggested a significant interaction effect of race and asthma status on the correlation between PLR and ADHD (P for interaction<0.05).

Table 2. Relationship between PLR and ADHD medications in categorical variables

Interaction P value adjusting for gender, age, race, PIR, maternal age at childbirth, smoking during pregnancy, asthma, health insurance status, DII, monocyte count, segmented neutrophil count, eosinophil count, and basophil count.

3.3. Subgroup analysis

As shown in Table 3, in the unstratified population, the constructed Crude model (OR: 1.01, 95%CI: 1.00–1.02, P < 0.001), Model I (OR: 1.01, 95%CI: 1.00–1.01, P < 0.001), and Model II (OR: 1.01, 95%CI: 1.00–1.01, P < 0.01) explored the association between serum PLR and the risk of ADHD, uncovering a significant positive correlation between PLR and the risk of ADHD in all three models. Furthermore, we investigated the impact of PLR on ADHD, finding that compared to the first quartile (Q1) of PLR, the second and third quartiles (Q2, Q3) considerably increased the risk of ADHD in all three models (P < 0.01), indicating that the risk of ADHD coincided with the increase of PLR.

Table 3. Associations between PLR and OR (95% CI) for ADHD medications, NHANES 2013–2014

Note: Crude model (unadjusted). Model I adjusted gender, age, race, PIR, maternal age at childbirth, smoking during pregnancy, asthma, and health insurance status. Model II adjusted gender, age, race, PIR, maternal age at childbirth, smoking during pregnancy, asthma, health insurance status, DII, monocyte count, segmented neutrophil count, eosinophil count, and basophil count.

* P-value <0.05, ** P-value <0.01, *** P-value <0.001.

Subgroup analysis (Table 4) based on gender, maternal age at childbirth, and asthma demonstrated that in boys, children born to mothers aged 20–29 years at delivery, and individuals with asthma, PLR was positively linked with the risk of ADHD. This association remained significant in all models after adjusting for confounding factors (OR > 1, P < 0.05).

Table 4. Relationship between PLR and ADHD medications by gender, maternal age at childbirth, asthma (95% CI), NHANES, 2013–2014

Note: Crude model (unadjusted). Model I adjusted gender, age, race, PIR, maternal age at childbirth, smoking during pregnancy, asthma, and health insurance status. Model II adjusted gender, age, race, PIR, maternal age at childbirth, smoking during pregnancy, asthma, health insurance status, DII, monocyte count, segmented neutrophil count, eosinophil count, and basophil count.

* P-value <0.05, ** P-value <0.01, *** P-value <0.001.

3.4. Nonlinear association between PLR and ADHD risk

Figure 2 illustrates the nonlinear association between PLR and ADHD risk. The RCS curve indicated a significant overall trend between PLR and ADHD risk (P < 0.001), and a nonlinear association was detected in models adjusting for all confounding factors (P-non-linear = 0.0040). As PLR increased, the risk of ADHD also increased. The RCS curve revealed that when PLR ≥ 106.40, OR > 1, a risk factor was indicated; when PLR < 106.40, OR < 1, a protective factor was indicated.

Figure 2. RCS graph showing the association between PLR and ADHD risk.

Note: RCS lines are based on gender, age, race, PIR, maternal age at childbirth, smoking during pregnancy, asthma, health insurance status, DII, monocyte count, segmented neutrophil count, eosinophil count, and basophil count.

OR is represented by orange lines, and the shaded area represents the 95% CI. OR: Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval; PLR: Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio; ADHD: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

4. Discussion

In this project, we recruited a total of 1455 participants and recorded the measurement values of PLR in patients to explore the association between PLR and ADHD risk in the NHANES from 2013 to 2014. The results unearthed that high PLR values were linked with an increased risk of ADHD compared to the population without ADHD. Considering the potential contribution of different lifestyle factors for each participant, such as maternal smoking and drinking status during pregnancy, which may promote excessive production of inflammatory factors and affect the development of child ADHD, we also analyzed the correlation of demographic and lifestyle factors (covariate) with PLR and ADHD. Subgroup analysis demonstrated statistically significant linkages between PLR and ADHD risk in boys, children born to mothers aged 20–29 at delivery, and individuals with asthma (OR > 1, P < 0.05). The RCS demonstrated a nonlinear positive correlation between PLR and ADHD when PLR ≥ 106.40.

Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in serum have been observed to interfere with the development of brain regions and neurotransmitter systems involved in executive attention, motivation, planning behavior, and decision-making.Reference Andersen 31 These changes in the maturation of specific brain circuits may lead to persistent neurological or neuroendocrine changes, increasing the risk of ADHD in children. Furthermore, there is evidence that inflammatory cytokines can trigger the regulation of neuroimmune mechanisms involved in behavior and emotion through the blood–brain barrier.Reference Doney, Cadoret, Dion-Albert, Lebel and Menard 32 Animal experiments have proven that allergen exposure or allergic reactions can stimulate the peripheral brain regions, as well as produce avoidance behavior, increased anxiety, and decreased social behavior.Reference Florsheim, Bachtel and Cullen 33 , Reference Yang, Wu and Zhang 34 The symptoms of ADHD are similar to cognitive impairments caused by functional and structural changes in these two brain circuits.

Platelets are an important component of innate and adaptive immunity and are a major source of cytokines and pro-inflammatory molecules.Reference Rolla, Puricelli and Bertoni 35 Platelets are similar to neurons in that they participate in the uptake and release of serotonin, which is both a central neurotransmitter and a peripheral neuromodulator,Reference Canobbio 36 thus making platelets a diagnostic tool and an interesting research model for various psychiatric disorders. Furthermore, lymphocytes play a central role in adaptive immunity, representing the regulatory or protective components of the immune system.Reference Annunziato, Romagnani and Romagnani 37 Since PLR reflects two pathways and may be less influenced by confounding factors, it may provide more stable information than other widely used single leukocyte parameters. PLR has previously been studied in neurobehavioral disorders such as mood disorders, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer’s disease in adult patients, serving as a predictor for disease progression.Reference Inaltekin and Yagci 38 Reference Bulut, Yorguner and Carkaxhiu Bulut 40 Several previous studies pointed out that children with ADHD have higher PLR values compared to healthy controls,Reference Akinci and Uzun 15 , Reference Avcil 16 which is consistent with our results. In addition, our results indicated that when PLR ≥ 106.40 and OR > 1, the risk of ADHD in children was significantly increased. However, this result was not definitive, awaiting a large number of experiments for validation.

The impact of attention deficit disorders on children varies by gender, with boys being more common.Reference Ayano, Yohannes and Abraha 41 This is in line with the trend observed in a previous prospective study on the relationship between maternal social psychological stress and the diagnosis of ADHD in children, where boys had a higher risk of ADHD compared to girls with their mothers under the same social stress during pregnancy.Reference Okano, Ji, Riley and Wang 42 We speculated that this may be related to hormonal differences between the sexes. In the past few decades, estrogen and testosterone have been recognized to play a pivotal part in brain development as well as the occurrence and development of neurodevelopmental disorders.Reference Varshney and Nalvarte 43 Reference Collignon, Dion-Albert, Ménard and Coelho-Santos 45 Estrogen is considered a key protective factor for females in dopamine-related brain disorders such as Parkinson’s disease or ADHD.Reference Rao, Li and Lapin 46 , Reference Sahin, Altun, Kurutas and Findikli 47 High levels of estrogen can effectively maintain the activity of neuroprotective proteins in the brain mitochondria, reducing the incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders in females.Reference Burstein, Kim and Fels 48 However, after menopause, the decrease in estrogen levels considerably reduces this advantage and increases the likelihood of women developing neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease.Reference Ali, Sohail and Jaffer 49 The role of androgens, however, seems to be opposite. Excessive prenatal exposure to androgens, especially testosterone, can have a tissue effect on ADHD through its impact on the dopaminergic neural circuitry, which is linked with neurodevelopmental disorders.Reference Maleki, Bashirian, Soltanian, Jenabi and Farhadinasab 50 , Reference Zhang, Lu and Guo 51 A systematic analysis study on the relationship between an inflammation-related index and sex hormones revealed a positive correlation between testosterone levels and PLR,Reference Wei, Zhang and Chen 52 indicating that as testosterone levels increase, the PLR levels in children also increase, thereby increasing the risk of boys developing ADHD.

In this study, we uncovered that compared to other age groups, the risk of children developing ADHD seemed to be more elevated when their mothers aged 20–29 years old at delivery. People aged 20–29 are in the early stages of their careers and personal life and may face more pressure and challenges. According to a previous report from the American Psychological Association, individuals aged 20–29 in the United States have the highest levels of stress, 53 which is tightly linked to neuroimmune. Moderate stress can activate psychological and behavioral processes. However, excessive or prolonged stressors and the resulting chronic dysregulation of the stress system can lead to a wide range of chronic pathological conditions.Reference Dolotov, Inozemtseva, Myasoedov and Grivennikov 54 The impact of stress events on the immune system is an important factor in modulating the body’s ability to resist diseases.Reference Bekhbat and Neigh 55 Pressure-induced stress can cause various physiological and endocrine changes, functional parameter disorders, and biochemical index changes.Reference Takahashi, Flanigan, McEwen and Russo 56 Persistent or recurrent stress can activate and increase the production of inflammatory cells in peripheral blood or body tissues. In addition, stress-induced changes in multiple systems in the body can also lead to disorders of various stress-related biomarkers and factors, such as abnormal elevation of inflammatory marker levels such as interleukin-1β, C-reactive protein, and tumor necrosis factor.Reference Ghezzi, Floridi and Boraschi 57 Previous research has demonstrated that if mothers experience major stress events during pregnancy or report perceiving high levels of stress, the likelihood of children being diagnosed with ADHD increases by 1.45 to 3.03 times.Reference Okano, Ji, Riley and Wang 42 Inflammation is currently considered an effective mediator between maternal psychosocial stress and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in offspring.Reference Hantsoo, Kornfield, Anguera and Epperson 58

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease with various phenotypes and endotypes. Inflammation plays a pivotal role in the development of asthma.Reference Miller, Grayson and Strothman 59 Multiple cells and cellular components are implicated in asthma attacks. During an asthma attack, various inflammatory cells can promote the occurrence of inflammation by releasing various pro-inflammatory mediators and inflammatory molecules, thus exacerbating asthma.Reference Chen, Yu, Zhong, Hua and Huang 60 , Reference Huang, Li, Wang and Tian 61 Various inflammatory biomarkers associated with asthma, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, PLR, and systemic immune inflammation index, are tightly linked with the incidence and mortality of asthma patients.Reference Ke, Qiu, Fan and Wei 62 Previous research has unearthed that children with asthma may be more prone to experiencing mental health problems.Reference Zhou, Chen, Zhao, Liu and Cui 63 The severity of asthma is associated with an increased risk of mental health disorders, which is more elevated in children with severe asthma.Reference Zhou, Chen, Zhao, Liu and Cui 63 Being consistent with our findings, a large Swedish twin cohort study revealed that children with asthma have twice the risk of developing ADHD compared to those without asthma,Reference Brew, Lundholm, Viktorin, Lichtenstein, Larsson and Almqvist 64 indicating that increasing attention to children with asthma may be crucial in reducing the incidence of ADHD in the future.

The analysis of NHANES 2013–2014 data in this investigation indicated that higher PLR values were associated with an increased risk of ADHD. However, this study also has limitations. Firstly, since genetic factors have a great impact on the risk of ADHD, even if we considered race as a covariate with adjustment and further analysis, we still cannot eliminate the bias of genetic factors. Secondly, we were unable to obtain information about the mother’s lifestyle during pregnancy and their related disease reports, such as gestational diabetes and pregnancy-induced hypertension, which could potentially affect the results. Lastly, a portion of the data in this project was based on self-reported information, leading to potential subjective bias. Future research should be designed as large-scale prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trials to confirm our findings, attempting to study intervention measures from the perspective of inflammatory mechanisms.

5. Conclusion

This study, based on data from the 2013–2014 NHANES, explored the association between PLR and ADHD in children aged 6–14 years. The results indicate that high PLR values are significantly associated with an increased risk of ADHD, particularly in boys, children whose mothers gave birth at ages 20–29, and those with asthma. Additionally, a non-linear positive correlation between PLR and ADHD risk was observed when PLR ≥ 106.40. These findings further support the potential role of inflammation in the onset and development of ADHD, providing preliminary evidence for PLR as a potential biomarker for ADHD and suggesting its possible use in identifying high-risk populations. However, considering the limitations of this study, future research should be designed as larger-scale, prospective, multi-center randomized controlled trials to validate these findings and further explore the relationship between inflammatory mechanisms and ADHD. Meanwhile, the clinical application potential of PLR warrants further investigation, as it may aid in the early identification of high-risk children and could inform future intervention strategies to improve the prognosis of children with ADHD.

Data availability statement

The data and materials in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author contribution

Conceptualization: Xianhua Li; Data curation: Yan Luo; Formal Analysis: Xianhua Li; Investigation: Yan Luo; Methodology: Xiaodan Zeng; Project administration: Lingling Zhan; Resources: Xuewen Qiu; Software: Xuewen Qiu; Supervision: Lingling Zhan; Validation: Hua Yang; Visualization: Hua Yang; Writing – original draft: Xianhua Li; Writing – review & editing: Xiaodan Zeng.

Funding

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Before data from this study were included in the NHANES public database, all participants signed informed consent forms, adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, and were reviewed and approved by the NCHS Ethical Review Board.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Footnotes

X.L. and Y.L. authors contributed equally.

References

Magnus, W, Nazir, S, Anilkumar, AC, Shaban, K. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls; 2024.Google Scholar
Sayal, K, Prasad, V, Daley, D, Ford, T, Coghill, D. ADHD in children and young people: prevalence, care pathways, and service provision. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5:175186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagan, AF, Huizar, YP, Short, TR, Gotcher, Z, Schmidt, AT. Adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a narrative review of biological mechanisms, treatments, and outcomes. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023;23:451460.Google ScholarPubMed
McDougal, E, Gracie, H, Oldridge, J, Stewart, TM, Booth, JN, Rhodes, SM. Relationships between cognition and literacy in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dev Psychol. 2022;40:130–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danielson, ML, Visser, SN, Chronis-Tuscano, A, DuPaul, GJ. A National description of treatment among united states children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Pediatr. 2018;192:240246 e1.Google ScholarPubMed
Song, J. Patterns of adverse childhood experiences and psychiatric disorders among adolescents with ADHD: a latent class analysis. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 PMID: 38110757. DOI: 10.1007/s10578-023-01645-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danielson, ML, Holbrook, JR, Bitsko, RH, et al. State-level estimates of the prevalence of parent-reported ADHD diagnosis and treatment among U.S. children and adolescents, 2016 to 2019. J Atten Disord. 2022;26:16851697.Google ScholarPubMed
Schein, J, Adler, LA, Childress, A, et al. Economic burden of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among children and adolescents in the United States: a societal perspective. J Med Econ. 2022;25:193205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roe, K. An inflammation classification system using cytokine parameters. Scand J Immunol. 2021;93:e12970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suss, P, Hoffmann, A, Rothe, T, et al. Chronic peripheral inflammation causes a region-specific myeloid response in the central nervous system. Cell Rep. 2020;30:408295 e6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leffa, DT, Torres, ILS, Rohde, LA. A review on the role of inflammation in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2018;25:328333.Google Scholar
Erre, GL, Paliogiannis, P, Castagna, F, et al. Meta-analysis of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Clin Invest. 2019;49:e13037.Google ScholarPubMed
Su, M, Ouyang, X, Song, Y. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte to lymphocyte ratio in depression: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2022;308:375–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Mazza, MG, Lucchi, S, Rossetti, A, Clerici, M. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in non-affective psychosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2020;21:326338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akinci, MA, Uzun, N. Evaluation of hematological inflammatory markers in children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2021;122:256262.Google ScholarPubMed
Avcil, S. Evaluation of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, and mean platelet volume as inflammatory markers in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018;72:522530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fabio, RA, Orsino, C, Lecciso, F, Levante, A, Suriano, R. Atypical sensory processing in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a comparative study. Res Dev Disabil. 2024;146:104674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tapia-Serrano, MA, Esteban-Cornejo, I, Rodriguez-Ayllon, M, Vaquero-Solis, M, Sanchez-Oliva, D, Sanchez-Miguel, PA. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and academic performance in adolescents: Does BMI status moderate this association? Clin Nutr. 2021; 40:44654472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilboa, Y, Helmer, A. Self-management intervention for attention and executive functions using equine-assisted occupational therapy among children aged 6-14 diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Altern Complement Med. 2020;26:239246.Google ScholarPubMed
Stuhec, M, Locatelli, I. Age-related pharmacotherapy of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Slovenia in children and adolescents: A population-based study. Eur Psychiatry. 2017;42:129133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solmi, M, Radua, J, Olivola, M, et al. Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27:281295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, S, Sun, X, Jin, J, Zhou, G, Li, Z. Association between inflammatory markers and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2007–2010. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18:305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: 2013–2014 Data Documentation, Codebook, and Frequencies . 2016.Google Scholar
Stebbins, RC, Noppert, GA, Aiello, AE, Cordoba, E, Ward, JB, Feinstein, L. Persistent socioeconomic and racial and ethnic disparities in pathogen burden in the United States, 1999–2014. Epidemiol Infect. 2019;147:e301.Google ScholarPubMed
Wen, J, Wang, C, Giri, M, Guo, S. Association between serum folate levels and blood eosinophil counts in American adults with asthma: Results from NHANES 2011-2018. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1134621.Google ScholarPubMed
Liu, B, Wang, J, Li, YY, Li, KP, Zhang, Q. The association between systemic immune-inflammation index and rheumatoid arthritis: evidence from NHANES 1999-2018. Arthritis Res Ther. 2023;25:34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klasson, CL, Sadhir, S, Pontzer, H. Daily physical activity is negatively associated with thyroid hormone levels, inflammation, and immune system markers among men and women in the NHANES dataset. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0270221.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, J, Jia, J, Lai, R, et al. Association between dietary inflammatory index and atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease in U.S. adults. Front Nutr. 2022;9:1044329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shivappa, N, Steck, SE, Hurley, TG, Hussey, JR, Hebert, JR. Designing and developing a literature-derived, population-based dietary inflammatory index. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17:16891696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J, Sun, B, Zhang, D. Association of dietary n3 and n6 fatty acids intake with hypertension: NHANES 2007–2014. Nutrients. 2019;11:1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, SL. Neuroinflammation, early-life adversity, and brain development. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2022;30:2439.Google ScholarPubMed
Doney, E, Cadoret, A, Dion-Albert, L, Lebel, M, Menard, C. Inflammation-driven brain and gut barrier dysfunction in stress and mood disorders. Eur J Neurosci. 2022; 55:28512894.Google ScholarPubMed
Florsheim, EB, Bachtel, ND, Cullen, JL, et al. Immune sensing of food allergens promotes avoidance behaviour. Nature. 2023;620:643650.Google ScholarPubMed
Yang, S, Wu, J, Zhang, Q, et al. Allergic rhinitis in rats is associated with an inflammatory response of the hippocampus. Behav Neurol. 2018;2018:8750464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolla, R, Puricelli, C, Bertoni, A, et al. Platelets ":multiple choice” effectors in the immune response and their implication in COVID-19 thromboinflammatory process. Int J Lab Hematol. 2021;43:895906.Google ScholarPubMed
Canobbio, I. Blood platelets: circulating mirrors of neurons? Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2019;3:564565.Google ScholarPubMed
Annunziato, F, Romagnani, C, Romagnani, S. The 3 major types of innate and adaptive cell-mediated effector immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135:626635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inaltekin, A, Yagci, I. Evaluation of simple markers of inflammation and systemic immune inflammation index in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder patients and healthy controls. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2023;34:1115.Google Scholar
Dong, X, Nao, J, Shi, J, Zheng, D. Predictive value of routine peripheral blood biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulut, NS, Yorguner, N, Carkaxhiu Bulut, G. The severity of inflammation in major neuropsychiatric disorders: comparison of neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios between schizophrenia, bipolar mania, bipolar depression, major depressive disorder, and obsessive compulsive disorder. Nord J Psychiatry. 2021;75:624632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayano, G, Yohannes, K, Abraha, M. Epidemiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2020;19:21.Google Scholar
Okano, L, Ji, Y, Riley, AW, Wang, X. Maternal psychosocial stress and children’s ADHD diagnosis: a prospective birth cohort study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;40:217225.Google ScholarPubMed
Varshney, M, Nalvarte, I. Genes, gender, environment, and novel functions of estrogen receptor beta in the susceptibility to neurodevelopmental disorders. Brain Sci. 2017;7.Google ScholarPubMed
Quartier, A, Chatrousse, L, Redin, C, et al. Genes and pathways regulated by androgens in human neural cells, potential candidates for the male excess in autism spectrum disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2018;84:239252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collignon, A, Dion-Albert, L, Ménard, C, Coelho-Santos, V. Sex, hormones and cerebrovascular function: from development to disorder. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2024;21:2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, SC, Li, Y, Lapin, B, et al. Association of women-specific health factors in the severity of Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2023;9:86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahin, N, Altun, H, Kurutas, EB, Findikli, E. Evaluation of estrogen and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER) levels in drug-naive patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2018;18:126131.Google Scholar
Burstein, SR, Kim, HJ, Fels, JA, et al. Estrogen receptor beta modulates permeability transition in brain mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2018;1859:423433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ali, N, Sohail, R, Jaffer, SR, et al. The role of estrogen therapy as a protective factor for alzheimer’s disease and dementia in postmenopausal women: a comprehensive review of the literature. Cureus. 2023;15:e43053.Google ScholarPubMed
Maleki, A, Bashirian, S, Soltanian, AR, Jenabi, E, Farhadinasab, A. Association between polycystic ovary syndrome and risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in offspring: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2022;65:8589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y, Lu, D, Guo, VY, et al. Association between maternal polycystic ovary syndrome and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in offspring aged 3-6 years: A Chinese population-based study. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1032315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, C, Zhang, W, Chen, J, et al. Systematic analysis between inflammation-related index and sex hormones in American adults: cross-sectional research based NHANES 2013-2016. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1175764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stress in America™ 2020: A National Mental Health Crisis. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2020/report-october.Google Scholar
Dolotov, OV, Inozemtseva, LS, Myasoedov, NF, Grivennikov, IA. Stress-induced depression and alzheimer’s disease: focus on astrocytes. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23.Google ScholarPubMed
Bekhbat, M, Neigh, GN. Sex differences in the neuro-immune consequences of stress: focus on depression and anxiety. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;67:112.Google ScholarPubMed
Takahashi, A, Flanigan, ME, McEwen, BS, Russo, SJ. Aggression, social stress, and the immune system in humans and animal models. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018;12:56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghezzi, P, Floridi, L, Boraschi, D, et al. Oxidative stress and inflammation induced by environmental and psychological stressors: a biomarker perspective. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018;28:852872.Google ScholarPubMed
Hantsoo, L, Kornfield, S, Anguera, MC, Epperson, CN. Inflammation: a proposed intermediary between maternal stress and offspring neuropsychiatric risk. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;85:97106.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, RL, Grayson, MH, Strothman, K. Advances in asthma: new understandings of asthma’s natural history, risk factors, underlying mechanisms, and clinical management. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148:14301441.Google ScholarPubMed
Chen, F, Yu, M, Zhong, Y, Hua, W, Huang, H. The role of neutrophils in asthma. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021;50:123130.Google Scholar
Huang, C, Li, F, Wang, J, Tian, Z. Innate-like lymphocytes and innate lymphoid cells in asthma. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2020;59:359370.Google ScholarPubMed
Ke, J, Qiu, F, Fan, W, Wei, S. Associations of complete blood cell count-derived inflammatory biomarkers with asthma and mortality in adults: a population-based study. Front Immunol 2023;14:1205687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, H, Chen, Z, Zhao, W, Liu, Y, Cui, Y. Evaluation of neuropsychiatric comorbidities and their clinical characteristics in Chinese children with asthma using the MINI kid tool. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19:454.Google ScholarPubMed
Brew, BK, Lundholm, C, Viktorin, A, Lichtenstein, P, Larsson, H, Almqvist, C. Longitudinal depression or anxiety in mothers and offspring asthma: a Swedish population-based study. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47:166174.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. The flowchart of sample selection in NHANES 2013–2014.

Figure 1

Table 1. Characteristics of NHANES participants between 2013–2014

Figure 2

Table 2. Relationship between PLR and ADHD medications in categorical variables

Figure 3

Table 3. Associations between PLR and OR (95% CI) for ADHD medications, NHANES 2013–2014

Figure 4

Table 4. Relationship between PLR and ADHD medications by gender, maternal age at childbirth, asthma (95% CI), NHANES, 2013–2014

Figure 5

Figure 2. RCS graph showing the association between PLR and ADHD risk.Note: RCS lines are based on gender, age, race, PIR, maternal age at childbirth, smoking during pregnancy, asthma, health insurance status, DII, monocyte count, segmented neutrophil count, eosinophil count, and basophil count.OR is represented by orange lines, and the shaded area represents the 95% CI. OR: Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval; PLR: Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio; ADHD: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.