Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:15:33.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Consensus Meeting on Effective Research Practice in PTSD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Abstract

The aim of this meeting was to obtain a consensus on what constitutes good research practice in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Objectives were to review relevant parameters of trials, such as the patients recruited, the means of assessing PTSD at baseline, and the change in symptomatology in response to treatment, and to reach a consensus on the most appropriate parameters to use in future research. The bases for the discussion were the 1995 National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the National Center for PTSD consensus on the assessment of PTSD, results of drug treatment trials, and information on the assessment scales used in PTSD research.

Type
PTSD Consensus
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.van der Kolk, BA, Dreyfuss, D, Michaels, M, et al.Fluoxetine in posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 1994;55:517522.Google Scholar
2.Davidson, JRT, Colket, JT.The eight-item treatment-outcome post-traumatic stress disorder scale: a brief measure to assess treatment outcome in post-traumatic stress disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997;12:4145.Google Scholar

ADDITIONAL REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.Google Scholar
Blake, D, Weathers, F, Nagy, L, et al.A clinical rating scale for assessing current and lifetime PTSD: the CAPS-1. Behavioral Therapy. 1990;13:187188.Google Scholar
Breslau, N, Davis, GC. Risk factors for PTSD related traumatic events: a prospective analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152:529535.Google ScholarPubMed
Breslau, N, Kessler, RC, Chilcoat, HD, et al.Trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in the community: the 1996 Detroit Area Survey of Trauma. Arch Gen Psychiatry. In press.Google Scholar
Davidson, JRT, Hughes, D, Blazer, DG. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the community: an epidemiological study. Psychol Med. 1991;21:713721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, JRT, Malik, MA, Travers, J. Structured interview for PTSD (SIP): psychometric validation for DSM-IV criteria. Depress Anxiety. 1997;5:127129.Google Scholar
Davidson, J, Book, S, Colket, J, et al. Assessment of a new self-rating scale for posttraumatic stress disorder. 1995. In press.Google Scholar
Davidson, JT, Colket, JT. The eight item treatment outcome posttraumatic stress disorder scale: a brief measure to assess treatment outcome in posttraumatic stress disorder. International Clinical Psychopharmacology. 1997;12:4145.Google Scholar
Dudley, B, Weathers, F, Nagy, L, et al.The development of a clinician administered PTSD scale. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 1995;8:7590.Google Scholar
Keane, TM, Fairbank, JA, Caddell, JM, et al.Clinical evaluation of a measure to assess combat exposure. Psychological Assessment. 1989;1:5355.Google Scholar
Kessler, RC, Sonnega, A, Bromet, E, et al.Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52:10481060.Google Scholar
McFarlane, AC, Atchison, M, Yehuda, R. Acute stress response following motor vehicle accidents and its relation to PTD. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1997;821:437441.Google Scholar
McFarlane, AC. The etiology of posttraumatic morbidity: predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating factors. Br J Psychiatry. 1989;154:221228.Google Scholar
Mellman, TA, Randolph, CA, Brawman Mintzer, O, et al.Phenomenology and course of psychiatric disorders associated with combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149:15681574.Google Scholar
Sheehan, D. Sheehan Disability scale. The Anxiety Disease. New York: Bantam Books Inc; 1986.Google Scholar
US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Revised. 1976.Google Scholar
Yehuda, R. Stress and glucocorticoid. Science. 1997;275:16621663.Google Scholar
Yehuda, R, McFarlane, AC. Conflict between current knowledge about posttraumatic stress disorder and its original conceptual basis. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152:17051713.Google Scholar